Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Genomics
Volume 2016, Article ID 5613862, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5613862
Research Article

The Use of Genomics in Conservation Management of the Endangered Visayan Warty Pig (Sus cebifrons)

1Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre (ABGC), Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
2Department of Animal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), 6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
3Veterinary Services, Rotterdam Zoo, 3041 JG Rotterdam, Netherlands
4San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, Escondido, CA 92027, USA

Received 24 December 2015; Accepted 7 February 2016

Academic Editor: Cino Pertoldi

Copyright © 2016 Rascha J. M. Nuijten et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. IUCN 2013, “The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species,” Version 2013.1., http://www.iucnredlist.org.
  2. R. Frankham, “Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 325–333, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. S. L. Rodrigues, J. D. Pilgrim, J. F. Lamoreux, M. Hoffmann, and T. M. Brooks, “The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 71–76, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. W. Oliver, “Sus cebifrons,” in IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2013.1., 2008, http://www.iucnredlist.org/. View at Google Scholar
  5. D. A. Conde, N. Flesness, F. Colchero, O. R. Jones, and A. Scheuerlein, “An emerging role of zoos to conserve biodiversity,” Science, vol. 331, no. 6023, pp. 1390–1391, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. A. Rudnick and R. C. Lacy, “The impact of assumptions about founder relationships on the effectiveness of captive breeding strategies,” Conservation Genetics, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1439–1450, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. F. Keller and D. M. Waller, “Inbreeding effects in wild populations,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 230–241, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. D. Beuzen, M. J. Stear, and K. C. Chang, “Molecular markers and their use in animal breeding,” The Veterinary Journal, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 42–52, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. J. Hayes, P. J. Bownan, A. J. Chamberlain, and M. E. Goddard, “Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 433–443, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. J. E. Pool, I. Hellmann, J. D. Jensen, and R. Nielsen, “Population genetic inference from genomic sequence variation,” Genome Research, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 291–300, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. F. W. Allendorf, P. A. Hohenlohe, and G. Luikart, “Genomics and the future of conservation genetics,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 697–709, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. H. Kohn, W. J. Murphy, E. A. Ostrander, and R. K. Wayne, “Genomics and conservation genetics,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 629–637, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. J. Ouborg, C. Pertoldi, V. Loeschcke, R. K. Bijlsma, and P. W. Hedrick, “Conservation genetics in transition to conservation genomics,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 177–187, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. J. Ouborg, F. Angeloni, and P. Vergeer, “An essay on the necessity and feasibility of conservation genomics,” Conservation Genetics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 643–653, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. Angeloni, N. Wagemaker, P. Vergeer, and J. Ouborg, “Genomic toolboxes for conservation biologists,” Evolutionary Applications, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 130–143, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. O. A. Ryder, “Conservation genomics: applying whole genome studies to species conservation efforts,” Cytogenetic and Genome Research, vol. 108, no. 1–3, pp. 6–15, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. C. Steiner, A. S. Putnam, P. E. A. Hoeck, and O. A. Ryder, “Conservation genomics of threatened animal species,” Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, vol. 1, pp. 261–281, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. A. Blouch, “Conservation and research priorities for threatened suids of south and southeast Asia,” IBEX Journal of Mountain Ecology, vol. 3, pp. 21–25, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  19. J. D. Ballou, R. C. Lacy, and J. P. Pollak, PMx: Software for Demographic and Genetic Analysis and Management of Pedigreed Populations, Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, Ill, USA, 2010.
  20. M. Bosse, H.-J. Megens, O. Madsen et al., “Regions of homozygosity in the porcine genome: consequence of demography and the recombination landscape,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e1003100, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Bosse, H. Megens, O. Madsen et al., “Using genome-wide measures of coancestry to maintain diversity and fitness in endangered and domestic pig populations,” Genome Research, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 970–981, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. M. A. Groenen, A. L. Archibald, H. Uenishi et al., “Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution,” Nature, vol. 491, no. 7424, pp. 393–398, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. W. P. Lee, M. P. Stromberg, A. Ward, C. Stewart, E. P. Garrison, and G. B. Marth, “MOSAIK: a harsh-based algorithm for accurate next-generation sequencing short read mapping,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID e90581, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  24. H. Li, B. Handsaker, A. Wysoker et al., “The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools,” Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 16, pp. 2078–2079, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. P. Danecek, A. Auton, G. Abecasis et al., “The variant call format and VCFtools,” Bioinformatics, vol. 27, no. 15, Article ID btr330, pp. 2156–2158, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. S. Korneliussen, A. Albrechtsen, and R. Nielsen, “ANGSD: analysis of next generation sequencing data,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 15, no. 1, article 356, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. S. Purcell, B. Neale, K. Todd-Brown et al., “PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 559–575, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. C. Chang, C. C. Chow, L. C. Tellier, S. Vattikuti, S. M. Purcell, and J. J. Lee, “Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets,” GigaScience, vol. 4, article 7, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. Phylip, 2013, http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html.
  30. D. H. Alexander, J. Novembre, and K. Lange, “Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals,” Genome Research, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1655–1664, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H. Li and R. Durbin, “Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences,” Nature, vol. 475, no. 7357, pp. 493–496, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. I. Curik, M. Ferenčaković, and J. Sölkner, “Inbreeding and runs of homozygosity: a possible solution to an old problem,” Livestock Science, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 26–34, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. W. McLaren, B. Pritchard, D. Rios, Y. Chen, P. Flicek, and F. Cunningham, “Deriving the consequences of genomic variants with the Ensembl API and SNP Effect Predictor,” Bioinformatics, vol. 26, no. 16, pp. 2069–2070, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. P. C. Ng and S. Henikoff, “SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 31, no. 13, pp. 3812–3814, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. A. F. Frantz, J. G. Schraiber, O. Madsen et al., “Genome sequencing reveals fine scale diversification and reticulation history during speciation in Sus,” Genome Biology, vol. 14, no. 9, article R107, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. Glémin, “How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating,” Evolution, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 2678–2687, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. Simberloff, “Hybridization between native and introduced wildlife species: importance for conservation,” Wildlife Biology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 143–150, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. W. Miller, S. J. Wright, Y. Zhang, S. C. Schuster, and V. M. Hayes, “Optimization methods for selecting founder individuals for captive breeding or reintroduction of endangered species,” in Proceedings of the 15th Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB '10), pp. 43–53, January 2010. View at Scopus
  39. S. Fritz, A. Capitan, A. Djari et al., “Detection of haplotypes associated with prenatal death in dairy cattle and identification of deleterious mutations in GART, SHBG and SLC37A2,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 6, Article ID e65550, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  40. R. C. Lacy and J. P. Pollak, Vortex: A Stochastic Simulation of the Extinction Process. Version 10.0, Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, Ill, USA, 2013.
  41. R. Frankham, “Where are we in conservation genetics and where do we need to go?” Conservation Genetics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 661–663, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. E. S. Fienieg and P. Galbusera, “The use and integration of molecular DNA information in conservation breeding programmes: a review,” Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 44–51, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  43. M. T. Olsen, L. W. Andersen, R. Dietz, J. Teilmann, T. Härkönen, and H. R. Siegismund, “Integrating genetic data and population viability analyses for the identification of harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) populations and management units,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 815–831, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. Á. R. De Cara, B. Villanueva, M. Á. Toro, and J. Fernández, “Using genomic tools to maintain diversity and fitness in conservation programmes,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 22, no. 24, pp. 6091–6099, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. B. A. Shafer, J. B. W. Wolf, P. C. Alves et al., “Genomics and the challenging translation into conservation practice,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 78–87, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. N. Romanov, E. M. Tuttle, M. L. Houck et al. et al., “The value of avian genomics to the conservation of wildlife,” BMC Genomics, vol. 10, supplement 2, p. S10, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. K. Ralls, J. D. Ballou, B. A. Rideout, and R. Frankham, “Genetic management of chondrodystrophy in California condors,” Animal Conservation, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 145–153, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. K. Ralls and J. D. Ballou, “Genetic status and management of California condors,” The Condor, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 215–228, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. N. D. Halbert, T. J. Ward, R. D. Schnabel, J. F. Taylor, and J. N. Derr, “Conservation genomics: disequilibrium mapping of domestic cattle chromosomal segments in North American bison populations,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 2343–2362, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus