Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Genomics
Volume 2017, Article ID 1676874, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1676874
Research Article

Case Study of Somaclonal Variation in Resistance Genes Mlo and Pme3 in Flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) Induced by Nanoparticles

1Department of Biotechnology, Daugavpils University, Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Laboratory of Genomics and Biotechnology, Parades Street 1A, Daugavpils LV-5401, Latvia
2Department of Technology, Daugavpils University, Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, G. Liberts’ Center of Innovative Microscopy, Parades street 1A, Daugavpils LV-5401, Latvia

Correspondence should be addressed to Ilona Mickeviča; vl.ud@acivekcim.anoli

Received 19 December 2016; Revised 31 January 2017; Accepted 7 February 2017; Published 23 February 2017

Academic Editor: Ferenc Olasz

Copyright © 2017 Inese Kokina et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. Ngezahayo, Y. Dong, and B. Liu, “Somaclonal variation at the nucleotide sequence level in rice (Oryza sativa L.) as revealed by RAPD and ISSR markers, and by pairwise sequence analysis,” Journal of Applied Genetics, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 329–336, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. M. Kaeppler, H. F. Kaeppler, and Y. Rhee, “Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 43, no. 2-3, pp. 179–188, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Q.-M. Wang and L. Wang, “An evolutionary view of plant tissue culture: somaclonal variation and selection,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1535–1547, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. W. Bairu, A. O. Aremu, and J. van Staden, “Somaclonal variation in plants: causes and detection methods,” Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 147–173, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. C. Mgbeze and A. Iserhienrhien, “Somaclonal variation associated with oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) clonal propagation: a review,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 989–997, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. D. E. Evans, J. O. Coleman, and A. Kearns, Plant Cell Culture, Garland Science, 2003.
  7. Z. Jankauskiene and E. Gruzdeviene, “Recent results of flax breeding in Lithuania,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 75, pp. 185–194, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Mańkowski, K. Pudełko, J. Kołodziej, and T. Karaś, “Effect of herbicides on yield and quality of straw and homomorphic fibre in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.),” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 70, pp. 185–189, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y. Y. Shim, B. Gui, Y. Wang, and M. J. T. Reaney, “Flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) oil processing and selected products,” Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 162–177, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. H. Jørgensen, “Discovery, characterization and exploitation of Mlo powdery mildew resistance in barley,” in Breeding for Disease Resistance, pp. 141–152, Springer, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. R. Büschges, K. Hollricher, R. Panstruga et al., “The barley Mlo gene: a novel control element of plant pathogen resistance,” Cell, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 695–705, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Piffanelli, F. Zhou, C. Casais et al., “The barley MLO modulator of defense and cell death is responsive to biotic and abiotic stress stimuli,” Plant Physiology, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 1076–1085, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Acevedo-Garcia, S. Kusch, and R. Panstruga, “Magical mystery tour: MLO proteins in plant immunity and beyond,” The New phytologist, vol. 204, no. 2, pp. 273–281, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. Deshmukh, V. K. Singh, and B. D. Singh, “Mining the Cicer arietinum genome for the mildew locus O (Mlo) gene family and comparative evolutionary analysis of the Mlo genes from Medicago truncatula and some other plant species,” Journal of Plant Research, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 239–253, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J. Pelloux, C. Rustérucci, and E. J. Mellerowicz, “New insights into pectin methylesterase structure and function,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 267–277, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Raiola, V. Lionetti, I. Elmaghraby et al., “Pectin methylesterase is induced in Arabidopsis upon infection and is necessary for a successful colonization by necrotrophic pathogens,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 432–440, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Pinzón-Latorre and M. K. Deyholos, “Characterization and transcript profiling of the pectin methylesterase (PME) and pectin methylesterase inhibitor (PMEI) gene families in flax (Linum usitatissimum),” BMC Genomics, vol. 14, no. 1, article no. 742, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. X. Ma, J. Geiser-Lee, Y. Deng, and A. Kolmakov, “Interactions between engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) and plants: phytotoxicity, uptake and accumulation,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 408, no. 16, pp. 3053–3061, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. I. Kokina, V. Gerbreders, E. Sledevskis, and A. Bulanovs, “Penetration of nanoparticles in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) calli and regenerants,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 165, no. 2, pp. 127–132, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. Wang, E. Lombi, F.-J. Zhao, and P. M. Kopittke, “Nanotechnology: a new opportunity in plant sciences,” Trends in Plant Science, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. V. Anand, K. Singh, K. Kaur et al., “Comparative study of silver nanoparticles coated and uncoated NiO-Fe2O3-CaO-SiO2-P2O5 ferromagnetic bioactive ceramics,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 3632–3638, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. Leung, C. Xirouchaki, N. Berovic, and R. E. Palmer, “Immobilization of protein molecules by size-selected metal clusters on surfaces,” Advanced Materials, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 223–226, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. V. M. Mecea, “From quartz crystal microbalance to fundamental principles of mass measurements,” Analytical Letters, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 753–767, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. I. Kokina, E. Sledevskis, V. Gerbreders et al., “Reaction of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) calli culture to supplement of medium by carbon nanoparticles,” Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences, vol. 66, no. 4-5, pp. 200–209, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  25. S. K. Tripathy, A. Panda, and D. Lenka, “Cytological elucidation of somaclonal variation in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.),” Legume Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 177–182, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. Sahijram, J. R. Soneji, and K. T. Bollamma, “Analyzing somaclonal variation in micropropagated bananas (Musa spp.),” In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology—Plant, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 551–556, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. H. Reed and R. Frankham, “Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity,” Conservation Biology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 230–237, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. B. Nicotra, O. K. Atkin, S. P. Bonser et al., “Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 684–692, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. Z. Cao, S. Sui, X. Cai, Q. Yang, and Z. Deng, “Somaclonal variation in “Red Flash” caladium: morphological, cytological and molecular characterization,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 269–279, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. F. Bradaï, F. Pliego-Alfaro, and C. Sánchez-Romero, “Somaclonal variation in olive (Olea europaea L.) plants regenerated via somatic embryogenesis: influence of genotype and culture age on phenotypic stability,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 213, pp. 208–215, 2016. View at Google Scholar