Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Genomics
Volume 2019, Article ID 4242653, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4242653
Research Article

Complete Genome Sequence of Photobacterium damselae Subsp. damselae Strain SSPD1601 Isolated from Deep-Sea Cage-Cultured Sebastes schlegelii with Septic Skin Ulcer

1Key Laboratory of Maricultural Organism Disease Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academic of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China
2Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266237, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Zheng Zhang; nc.ca.irfsy@gnehzgnahz and Yingeng Wang; nc.ca.irfsy@gygnaw

Received 23 October 2018; Revised 16 January 2019; Accepted 20 February 2019; Published 10 April 2019

Academic Editor: Wilfred van IJcken

Copyright © 2019 Yongxiang Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae (PDD) is a Gram-negative bacterium that can infect a variety of aquatic organisms and humans. Based on an epidemiological investigation conducted over the past 3 years, PDD is one of the most important pathogens causing septic skin ulcer in deep-sea cage-cultured Sebastes schlegelii in the Huang-Bohai Sea area and present throughout the year with high abundance. To further understand the pathogenicity of this species, the pathogenic properties and genome of PDD strain SSPD1601 were analyzed. The results revealed that PDD strain SSPD1601 is a rod-shaped cell with a single polar flagellum, and the clinical symptoms were replicated during artificial infection. The SSPD1601 genome consists of two chromosomes and two plasmids, totaling 4,252,294 bp with 3,751 coding sequences (CDSs), 196 tRNA genes, and 47 rRNA genes. Common virulence factors including flagellin, Fur, RstB, hcpA, OMPs, htpB-Hsp60, VasK, and vgrG were found in strain SSPD1601. Furthermore, SSPD1601 is a pPHDD1-negative strain containing the hemolysin gene hlyAch and three putative hemolysins (emrA, yoaF, and VPA0226), which are likely responsible for the pathogenicity of SSPD1601. The phylogenetic analysis revealed SSPD1601 to be most closely related to Phdp Wu-1. In addition, the antibiotic resistance phenotype indicated that SSPD1601 was not sensitive to ceftazidime, pipemidic, streptomycin, cefalexin, bacitracin, cefoperazone sodium, acetylspiramycin, clarithromycin, amikacin, gentamycin, kanamycin, oxacillin, ampicillin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, but only the bacitracin resistance gene bacA was detected based on Antibiotic Resistance Genes Database. These results expand our understanding of PDD, setting the stage for further studies of its pathogenesis and disease prevention.

1. Introduction

Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae (PDD) is a marine bacterium widely distributed in the marine environment and can infect numerous aquatic animals, including fish, mollusks, crustaceans, and cetaceans [13]. PDD was originally isolated from the damsel fish (Chromis punctipinnis) in California and described as Vibrio damsela [4]. Subsequently, diseases caused by PDD have been reported in wild and cultivable fish in the United States, Spain, Denmark, Japan, Korea, and India, and PDD has gradually become a common pathogen in these areas [2, 5, 6]. In China, the bacterium was demonstrated to be pathogenic in Chaetodon auriga and mandarin fish in the 1990s, and the occurrence of disease caused by PDD in aquacultural animals (such as tongue sole, Epinephelus lanceolatus L., and Larimichthys crocea) has been reported in recent years [79]. Furthermore, PDD may also cause human infections, which may lead to necrotizing fasciitis with multiple organ failure and even a fatal outcome [10]. These studies suggest that PDD has gradually become a potential generalist pathogen with the ability to cause disease in a wide range of organisms.

The pathogenic mechanisms and variability in virulence genes of PDD have begun to be elucidated. Previous studies indicated that hemolysins Dly and HlyApl (renamed phobalysin (PhlyP) owing to its differential characteristics), which are encoded in the plasmid pPHDD1, play a key role in the virulence of PDD strains [11, 12]. The hemolytic activity exhibited by pPHDD1-negative strains was caused by a chromosome-encoded hemolysin termed hlyAch (PhlyC) and a phospholipase termed PlpV [13]. Recently, the immunogenicity of Hlych was evaluated, revealing that the virulence might be further enhanced in PDD with the Hlych gene [14]. Furthermore, it was reported that the CarSR-like system histidine kinase RstB is necessary for regulated production of the three major toxins Dly, PhlyP, and PhlyC [15]. The existence of a notable phenotypic heterogeneity among virulent strains of PDD, together with a wide range of hosts that can be colonized, suggests the existence of other uncharacterized virulence factors. To further understand the pathogenesis and the related virulence factors of PDD, genomic analysis of various PDD strains is crucial.

During the past 3 years, we have investigated the bacterial diversity among deep-sea cage-cultured black rockfish Sebastes schlegelii in the Huang-Bohai Sea area in the People’s Republic of China. Based on the epidemiological investigation and analysis of bacterial diseases in cage-cultured S. schlegelii, PDD is one of the most important pathogens of S. schlegelii and is present throughout the year with high abundance in this area [16]. In this study, complete genome analyses were performed to explore the biodiversity and pathogenesis of PDD strain SSPD1601, and the results will provide useful information for the understanding of the potential virulence factors of the pathogen and prevention of PDD infection.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strain Features and Pathogenic Properties

PDD strain SSPD1601 was initially isolated in Changdao, China, from deep-sea cage-cultured S. schlegelii with clinical signs of septic skin ulcer. The pathogenic correlation between SSPD1601 and S. schlegelii was determined by intramuscular infection. To obtain a pure culture, a single colony of SSPD1601 was selected and transferred to a fresh trypticase soy broth (TSB) agar plate at least three times. Then, a single colony was selected and incubated in 200 mL liquid TSB medium at 150 rpm and 28°C for 20 h. The morphology of SSPD1601 was assessed by transmission electron microscopy (JEM-1200EX, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The strain resources were archived at Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute under accession number SSPD1601.

All protocols for experiments involving live animals conducted in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee (IACUC), Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institutes (Qingdao, China), under the approval number IACUC-20170710. We conscientiously abided by the ethical principles of animal welfare and the guidelines of the IACUC.

2.2. Genomic DNA Isolation and Whole-Genome Sequencing

The genomic DNA of SSPD1601 was extracted using commercial kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of the extracted DNA was detected using Qubit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific) accordingly. Then, the qualified genomic DNA was used to prepare single-molecule real-time (SMRT) bell DNA template libraries with a fragment size >10 kb according to the manufacturer’s specification. Genome sequencing was conducted by gene denovo sequencing, and SMRT sequencing was performed on the PacBio RSII sequencer (Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA) using P4-C2 chemistry. The SMRT raw sequence data were assembled using the hierarchical genome-assembly process (HGAP) pipeline [17]. The overlap layout consensus (OLC) strategy and Quiver consensus algorithm were used to correct and validate the quality of the de novo assembly [17, 18].

2.3. Genomic Analysis

GeneMark was used to predict open reading frames (ORFs), while repetitive elements, rRNAs, and tRNAs were identified by RepeatMasker, rRNAmmer, and tRNAscan, respectively [1922]. The genes were annotated in diverse databases including Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG), nonredundant protein (nr), UniProt/Swiss-Prot, and Pfam. Furthermore, the Virulence Factors of Pathogenic Bacteria (VFDB), Pathogen Host Interactions (PHI), Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARDB), and Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes (CAZy) were identified through BLAST searches, respectively. Circular genome maps were generated using the Circos (http://circos.ca/) program based on genomic annotation information.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analyses

The complete reference genome sequences were downloaded from NCBI and used for comparative genomic analysis based on the average nucleotide identity (ANI) value [23]. The reference strains were PDD strain KC-Na-1 (accession numbers CP021151-CP021156), PDD strain Phdp Wu-1 (CP018297-CP018299), P. damselae subsp. piscicida strain 91-197 (AP018045-AP018048), Photobacterium profundum SS9 (CR354531-CR354532, CR377818), Photobacterium gaetbulicola Gung47 (CP005973-CP005974), Vibrio vulnificus strain VV2014DJH (CP019320-CP019321), Vibrio harveyi strain 345 (CP025537-CP025540), and Vibrio scophthalmi strain VS-05 (CP016414-CP016417).

2.5. Antibiotic Resistance Analyses

SSPD1601 was resuspended with 15 g/L NaCl solution and adjusted to the concentration of l07 CFU/mL based on the operating instructions of the drug disk manufacturer. The antibiotic resistance phenotype was determined by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion test, and the types and concentrations of antibiotics are listed in Table 1. The zones of inhibition were measured after incubation at 28°C for 16 h, and then the antibiotic resistance phenotypes were determined based on the aquatic bacteria susceptibility test standard issued by the American Association for Clinical Laboratory Standardization and subsequently compared with the ARDB analysis.

Table 1: Antibiotic resistance phenotype analyses of PDD SSPD1601.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. General Features and Pathogenic Properties of PDD SSPD1601

SSPD1601 was isolated from cage-cultured S. schlegelii exhibiting clinical signs of septic skin ulcer. During the early stage of infection, the disease manifested as signs of hemorrhage in the body and the fins, followed by ulcers on the body surface and caudal peduncle [16]. The same clinical symptoms were achieved during artificial infection (Figure 1(a)). Electron microscopy showed that SSPD1601 is a rod-shaped cell approximately 0.5--1.5 μm with a single polar flagellum (Figure 1(b)).

Figure 1: Gross lesions in S. schlegelii infected with PDD (a) and electron micrograph of PDD strain SSPD1601 (b).
3.2. Genomic Properties of PDD Strain SSPD1601

The complete genome of SSPD1601 comprised a total of 4,252,294 bp, including two circular chromosomes (Chr I, 2,994,134 bp with GC content of 41.37%; Chr II, 1,208,976 bp with GC content of 39.10%) and two circular plasmids (plasmid I, 37,975 bp with GC content of 41.54%; plasmid II, 11,209 bp with GC content of 36.03%) (Figure 2). A total of 2,655 coding sequences (CDSs), 184 tRNA genes, and 47 rRNA genes were detected in Chr I. Chr II contained 1,037 CDSs and 12 tRNA genes. Plasmid 1 consisted of 44 protein-coding genes, and Plasmid 2 consisted of 15 protein-coding genes. The genome sequence data of SSPD1601 have been submitted to the NCBI GenBank database under the SRA accession number PRJNA490082.

Figure 2: The circular genome maps of SSPD1601. From the outer ring to the inner circle are positive chain genes, negative chain genes, ncRNA (black represents tRNA, and red represents rRNA), GC content (red indicates greater than mean, and blue indicates less than mean), and GC skew (purple means greater than zero, and orange means less than zero).
3.3. Functional Categorization

The results of the COG functional categorization of the predicted ORFs of SSPD1601 indicated that Chr I had a higher number of unigenes than Chr II. The unigenes encoded on Chr I were categorized into 22 COG classes, including categories A (one ORF; RNA processing and modification), B (one ORF; chromatin structure and dynamics), C (182 ORFs; energy production and conversion), D (36 ORFs; cell cycle control, cell division, and chromosome partitioning), E (266 ORFs; amino acid transport and metabolism), F (82 ORFs; nucleotide transport and metabolism), G (137 ORFs; carbohydrate transport and metabolism), H (144 ORFs; coenzyme transport and metabolism), I (74 ORFs; lipid transport and metabolism), J (171 ORFs; translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis), K (191 ORFs; transcription), L (139 ORFs; replication, recombination, and repair), M (194 ORFs; cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis), N (88 ORFs; cell motility), O (122 ORFs; posttranslational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones), P (170 ORFs; inorganic ion transport and metabolism), Q (42 ORFs; secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism), R (311 ORFs; general function prediction only), S (232 ORFs; function unknown), T (227 ORFs; signal transduction mechanisms), U (90 ORFs; intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport), and V (39 ORFs; defense mechanisms). In contrast, the ORFs on Chr II were categorized into 20 classes (excluding A and B), with 67 ORFs in category C, three ORFs in category D, 95 ORFs in category E, 20 ORFs in category F, 92 ORFs in category G, 26 ORFs in category H, 21 ORFs in category I, 21 ORFs in category J, 90 ORFs in category K, 36 ORFs in category L, 44 ORFs in category M, four ORFs in category N, 47 ORFs in category O, 74 ORFs in category P, 18 ORFs in category Q, 140 ORFs in category R, 90 ORFs in category S, 86 ORFs in category T, 14 ORFs in category U, and 30 ORFs in category V. Furthermore, plasmid I contained five ORFs in categories D, K, L, and R, and plasmid II contained one ORF involved in S only.

3.4. Virulence Factors of PDD Strain SSPD1601

Hemolysins are virulence and cytotoxic factors in PDD that have been intensively studied. In this study, PDD strain SSPD1601 showed β-hemolysis on sheep blood agar, but the virulence plasmid pPHDD1 was not detected. Furthermore, as a pPHDD1-negative strain, the reported chromosome-encoded PlpV and ColP genes homologous to hemolysin were not present; only the hemolysin gene hlyAch was detected on Chr I. Based on the NCBI databases, the gene sequence of hlyAch shares 99% sequence identities with its orthologs in PDD strain RM71. In addition, three putative hemolysins, emrA (sharing 99% coverage and 100% identity with the HlyD family secretion protein of P. damselae, WP_106339580.1), yoaF (sharing 94% coverage and 96% identity with the hemolysin of P. damselae subsp. piscicida, OLQ82859.1), and VPA0226 (sharing 99% coverage and 100% identity with the thermolabile hemolysin of P. damselae, WP_106142536.1), were also found to be encoded on the chromosome and may play key roles in the pathogenesis of SSPD1601. Factors responsible for the regulated expression of hemolysins (RstB and hcpA) were found to be encoded by SSPD1601. Previous studies have indicated that RstB and hcpA are associated with hemolysin expression in PDD and V. cholerae and play a pivotal role in pathogenesis [15, 24]. Additionally, by searching VFDB (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs/main.htm), other potential virulence factors were identified (Supplementary Table S1). Interestingly, a large number of genes (14/50) homologous to genes encoding flagellin (flgC/fliI/flip/flhA; 79-100% sequence identities) and adhesion enhancer (htpB-Hsp60; 79-93% sequence identities) were found to be encoded on the chromosome [2527]. Another previous study indicated that PDD can infect marine fish and humans through skin wounds or ingestion of infected fish [28]. The discovery of a large number of motility- and adhesion-related genes may help elucidate the invasion mechanism of PDD on the surface of the skin or intestine. In addition, secretion systems in Gram-negative bacteria are associated with exotoxin secretion and cytotoxic effectors and play a pivotal role in pathogenesis [29]. The secretion system-related VasK and vgrG genes were also found in SSPD1601. On the other hand, Fur gene sequences of PDD strain SSPD1601 share 99% coverage and 100% amino acid identity with the ferric iron uptake transcriptional regulator (Fur protein) of Vibrio rotiferianus (WP_010446797.1). In previous works, the Fur gene was shown to be involved in iron uptake and the expression of virulence factors [30, 31].

3.5. Phylogenetic Analyses

In phylogenetic tree analysis based on ANI values of the selected reference genome sequences, the PDD strain SSPD1601 was most closely related to Phdp Wu-1 (Figure 3). Based on the NCBI description, the Phdp Wu-1 strain was isolated from demersal turbot heart blood in He Bei, China, which is also in the Huang-Bohai Sea area, but the characteristics of the strain have not been described in detail. The results further indicated that different kinds of PDD with strong pathogenicity are widespread in the Huang-Bohai Sea area, with a potential threat to different kinds of marine animals.

Figure 3: Phylogenetic tree analyses. Phylogenetic tree analysis based on ANI values of the complete genome sequences of PDD KC-Na-1, PDD Phdp Wu-1, P. damselae subsp. piscicida 91-197, P. profundum SS9, P. gaetbulicola Gung47, V. vulnificus VV2014DJH, V. harveyi 345, and V. scophthalmi VS-05.
3.6. Antibiotic Resistance Analyses

By searching ARDB (ardbAnno1.0), only the antimicrobial resistance gene bacA was detected in strain SSPD1601, which correlated with resistance to bacitracin. The function of bacA was previously described in Escherichia coli and Bacillus; the gene encodes an undecaprenyl pyrophosphate phosphatase and influences bacitracin biosynthesis [32, 33]. A previous study indicated that the bacitracin resistance gene bacA carried by Bacillus contributed to its resistance to ultraviolet radiation [34]. The antibiotic resistance phenotype further indicated that PDD strain SSPD1601 was not sensitive to bacitracin. Our results also showed that strain SSPD1601 was resistant to ceftazidime, pipemidic, streptomycin, cefalexin, cefoperazone sodium, acetylspiramycin, clarithromycin, amikacin, gentamycin, kanamycin, oxacillin, ampicillin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Table 1), but the corresponding drug resistance genes were not detected; this could be explained by the lack of targets in SSPD1601 for those antibiotics.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the pathogenic and genomic characteristics of SSPD1601 associated with septic skin ulcer in deep-sea cage-cultured black rockfish S. schlegelii were revealed. Transmission electron microscopy showed that SSPD1601 is a rod-shaped cell approximately 0.5--1.5 μm with a single polar flagellum. The genome of SSPD1601 includes two chromosomes and two plasmids. The phylogenetic analysis based on ANI indicated that SSPD1601 is most closely related to Phdp Wu-1. Furthermore, the virulence genes hlyAch and hlych were detected, and three putative hemolysin-encoding genes (emrA, yoaF, and VPA0226) were identified. Additionally, several predicted genes homologous to genes encoding virulence factors flagellin, adhesion enhancer, and OMPs and genes responsible for iron uptake and secretion systems were detected in the genome of SSPD1601. Moreover, the antibiotic resistance phenotype indicated that SSPD1601 is a multidrug-resistant bacterium, but only bacA was detected. In summary, our results provide important insight into the genomics of the Photobacterium species, promoting a better understanding of the versatility of this genus. Further functional studies will provide new information for the understanding of the pathogenic potential of the organism and prevention of PDD disease.

Data Availability

The genome sequence of Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae strain SSPD1601 has been deposited in the NCBI GenBank server under the SRA accession number PRJNA490082 for chromosome 1, chromosome 2, and the plasmids.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by Key Projects of Science and Technology Innovation of Shandong Province (grant number 2018YFJH0703); Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institutes, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (grant number 20603022017004); and Projects of International Exchange and Cooperation in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of People’s Republic of China-Science, Technology, and Innovation Cooperation in Aquaculture with Tropical Countries.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1: virulence factors identified in the genome of PDD strain SSPD1601 according to the Virulence Factors of Bacterial Pathogens database (VFDB). (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. I. M. Moi, N. N. Roslan, A. T. C. Leow et al., “The biology and the importance of Photobacterium species,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 101, no. 11, pp. 4371–4385, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. R. Osorio, A. Vences, X. M. Matanza, and M. S. Terceti, “Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae, a generalist pathogen with unique virulence factors and high genetic diversity,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 200, no. 15, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. Lee, H. K. Kim, H. Sohn et al., “Genomic insights into Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae strain KC-Na-1, isolated from the finless porpoise (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis),” Marine Genomics, vol. 37, pp. 26–30, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Love, D. Teebken-Fisher, J. E. Hose, J. J. Farmer, F. W. Hickman, and G. R. Fanning, “Vibrio damsela, a marine bacterium, causes skin ulcers on the damselfish Chromis punctipinnis,” Science, vol. 214, no. 4525, pp. 1139-1140, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. R. K. Sharma, M. A. Pradeep, N. Sadu, P. N. Dube, and K. K. Vijayan, “First report of isolation and characterization of Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae from cage-farmed cobia (Rachycentron canadum),” Journal of Fish Diseases, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 953–958, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. I. A. M. Eissa, H. I. Derwa, M. Ismail et al., “Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Photobacterium damselae among some marine fishes in Lake Temsah,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 114, pp. 315–322, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. X. J. Zhang, G. M. Qin, C. Z. Chen, H. Fang, and B. L. Yan, “Biological characterization and phylogenetic analysis of Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae from diseased Epinephelus lanceolatus L.,” Progress in Fishery Sciences, vol. 30, pp. 38–43, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  8. F. Zhang, Studies on the Identification and Virulence of Photobacterium Damselae Isolated from Pseudosciaen Crocea, JiMei University, 2013.
  9. N. Yang, Z. Q. Zhang, T. L. Wu, H. Wang, Q. Shi, and G. Gao, “Isolation and identification of Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae from tongue sole,” Chinese Journal of Veterinary Drug, vol. 52, pp. 19–25, 2018. View at Google Scholar
  10. A. J. Rivas, M. Balado, M. L. Lemos, and C. R. Osorio, “Synergistic and additive effects of chromosomal and plasmid-encoded hemolysins contribute to hemolysis and virulence in Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 3287–3299, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. J. Rivas, M. Balado, M. L. Lemos, and C. R. Osorio, “The Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae hemolysins damselysin and HlyA are encoded within a new virulence plasmid,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 4617–4627, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. J. Rivas, G. von Hoven, C. Neukirch et al., “Phobalysin, a small β-pore-forming toxin of Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 4335–4348, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Vences, A. J. Rivas, M. L. Lemos, M. Husmann, and C. R. Osorio, “Chromosome-encoded hemolysin, phospholipase, and collagenase in plasmidless isolates of Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae contribute to virulence for fish,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. e00401–e00417, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. L. Wu, X. M. Jin, H. B. Wang et al., “Prokaryotic expression and preparation of immune serum of Hlych gene of Photobacterium damselae,” Progress in Veterinary Medicine, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 31–35, 2018. View at Google Scholar
  15. M. S. Terceti, A. J. Rivas, L. Alvarez, M. Noia, F. Cava, and C. R. Osorio, “rstB regulates expression of the Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae major virulence factors damselysin, phobalysin P and phobalysin C,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 8, p. 582, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Z. Zhang, Y. X. Yu, K. Wang et al., “First report of skin ulceration caused by Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae in net-cage cultured black rockfish (Sebastes schlegeli),” Aquaculture, vol. 503, pp. 1–7, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. C. S. Chin, D. H. Alexander, P. Marks et al., “Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data,” Nature Methods, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 563–569, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. W. Myers, G. G. Sutton, A. L. Delcher et al., “A whole-genome assembly of Drosophila,” Science, vol. 287, no. 5461, pp. 2196–2204, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Besemer, A. Lomsadze, and M. Borodovsky, “GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2607–2618, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Tarailo-Graovac and N. Chen, “Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences,” Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 4–10, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Lagesen, P. Hallin, E. A. Rødland, H. H. Stærfeldt, T. Rognes, and D. W. Ussery, “RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 3100–3108, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. M. Lowe and S. R. Eddy, “tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 955–964, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. M. Richter and R. Rosselló-Móra, “Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 45, pp. 19126–19131, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. G. Williams, L. T. Varcoe, S. R. Attridge, and P. A. Manning, “Vibrio cholerae Hcp, a secreted protein coregulated with HlyA,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 283–289, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  25. R. A. Garduño, E. Garduño, and P. S. Hoffman, “Surface-associated hsp60 chaperonin of Legionella pneumophila mediates invasion in a HeLa cell model,” Infection and lmmunity, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 4602–4610, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  26. B. J. Stone and Y. Abu Kwaik, “Expression of multiple pill by Legionella pneumophila: identification and characterization of a type IV pilin gene and its role in adherence to mammalian and protozoan cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1768–1775, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  27. A. McNally, R. M. La Ragione, A. Best, G. Manning, and D. G. Newell, “An aflagellate mutant Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 1A strain displays altered invasion of epithelial cells, persistence in macrophages, and cytokine secretion profiles in vitro,” Microbiology, vol. 153, no. 5, pp. 1339–1349, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. N. I. Vatsos and P. Angelidis, “Human diseases associated with fish pathogens,” Scientific Annals of the Danube Delta Institute, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99–104, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  29. T. R. D. Costa, C. Felisberto-Rodrigues, A. Meir et al., “Secretion systems in Gram-negative bacteria: structural and mechanistic insights,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 343–359, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. R. Mey, E. E. Wyckoff, V. Kanukurthy, C. R. Fisher, and S. M. Payne, “Iron and Fur regulation in Vibrio cholerae and the role of Fur in virulence,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 8167–8178, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. B. Puentes, M. Balado, J. Bermúdez-Crespo, C. R. Osorio, and M. L. Lemos, “A proteomic analysis of the iron response of Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae reveals metabolic adaptations to iron levels changes and novel potential virulence factors,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 201, pp. 257–264, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. El Ghachi, A. Bouhss, D. Blanot, and D. Mengin-Lecreulx, “The bacA gene of Escherichia coli encodes an undecaprenyl pyrophosphate phosphatase activity,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 29, pp. 30106–30113, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. B. Adimpong, K. I. Sørensen, L. Thorsen et al., “Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus strains isolated from primary starters for African traditional bread production and characterization of the bacitracin operon and bacitracin biosynthesis,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 78, no. 22, pp. 7903–7914, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Q. Hu, X. X. Zhang, S. Jia et al., “Metagenomic insights into ultraviolet disinfection effects on antibiotic resistome in biologically treated wastewater,” Water Research, vol. 101, pp. 309–317, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus