Research Article

Machine Learning: A Novel Approach to Predicting Slope Instabilities

Table 2

Results of the comparison between inverse velocity (IV) method and machine learning (ML) method from 22 different failure examples.

#Actual time of failurePrediction:
IV
Delta time (hr)Prediction:
ML
Delta time (hr)IV – ML (hr)

(1)3/10/09 7:123/10/09 7:510.653/10/09 6:17−0.92−0.27
(2)3/13/13 9:483/13/13 9:19−0.483/13/13 9:520.070.41
(3)3/5/12 4:093/5/12 4:340.433/5/12 3:24−0.75−0.32
(4)8/3/13 22:068/3/13 23:531.798/3/13 21:56−0.171.62
(5)7/27/12 18:507/27/12 19:380.817/27/12 18:510.020.79
(6)10/24/13 22:3910/24/13 22:400.0310/24/13 22:400.020.01
(7)5/5/14 5:045/6/14 2:4121.625/5/14 4:13−0.8520.77
(8)6/16/14 6:586/16/14 7:100.216/16/14 6:57−0.020.19
(9)1/28/12 9:141/28/12 12:042.841/28/12 8:19−0.921.92
(10)10/29/12 12:1510/31/12 18:5854.7310/29/12 11:59−0.2754.46
(11)9/25/12 8:409/26/12 18:1633.619/25/12 8:440.0733.54
(12)3/26/13 21:034/10/13 23:08362.103/25/13 19:40−1.38360.72
(13)2/24/12 11:272/24/12 17:035.612/24/12 11:25−0.035.58
(14)3/2/14 4:233/2/14 5:551.543/2/14 4:22−0.021.52
(15)10/25/12 16:1710/25/12 16:470.5110/25/12 15:24−0.88−0.37
(16)4/22/13 13:274/22/13 13:580.524/22/13 13:310.070.45
(17)3/14/10 4:013/14/10 4:160.263/14/10 3:50−0.180.08
(18)7/11/13 0:207/11/13 0:250.107/11/13 0:19−0.020.08
(19)7/21/11 15:017/21/11 15:170.287/21/11 15:00−0.020.26
(20)6/20/09 22:246/21/09 1:092.766/20/09 22:23−0.022.74
(21)2/9/10 12:382/9/10 14:051.472/9/10 12:30−0.131.34
(22)1/30/15 18:251/30/15 21:553.511/30/15 16:34−1.851.66