Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Geophysics
Volume 2019, Article ID 5438381, 14 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5438381
Research Article

The Mitla Landslide, an Event That Changed the Fate of a Mixteco/Zapoteco Civilization in Mesoamerica

1UMSNH-INICIT-MGPT, Edificio U Ciudad Universitaria, Morelia, Mich., Mexico
2CONACyT-Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra, UMSNH, Mexico
3GEMEX, Mexico
4MGYPT-UMSNH, Mexico

Correspondence should be addressed to V. H. Garduño-Monroy; moc.liamg@monudraghv

Received 26 November 2018; Revised 6 February 2019; Accepted 24 March 2019; Published 2 May 2019

Academic Editor: Marek Grad

Copyright © 2019 V. H. Garduño-Monroy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. M. Michetti, E. Esposito, L. Guerrieri et al., “Environmental seismic intensity scale-ESI 2007,” Memorie Descrittive Della Carta Geologica D'Italia, vol. 74, no. 41, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  2. A. N. Mahgoub, N. Reyes-Guzmán, H. Böhnel, C. Siebe, G. Pereira, and A. Dorison, “Paleomagnetic constraints on the ages of the holocene malpaís de zacapu lava flow eruptions, michoacán (México): implications for archeology and volcanic hazards,” The Holocene, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 229–245, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. León Portilla, La Visión De Los Vencidos, Relaciones Indígenas De La Conquista, UNAM, 1959.
  4. V. H. Garduño-Monroy, J. L. Macías, A. Oliveros, and V. M. HernándezMadrigal, “Progress in seismic and archeoseismic studies in the zone of mitla, oaxaca,” in Proceedings of the 3rd INQUA-IGCP-567 International Workshop on Active Tectonics, Paleoseismology and Archaeoseismology, Morelia, México, 2012.
  5. F. R. Zúñiga, G. Suárez, Á. Figueroa-Soto, and A. Mendoza, “A first-order seismotectonic regionalization of Mexico for seismic hazard and risk estimation,” Journal of Seismology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1295–1322, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. Melgar, A. Ruiz-Angulo, E. S. García et al., “Deep embrittlement and complete rupture of the lithosphere during the M w 8.2 Tehuantepec earthquake,” Nature Geoscience, vol. 1, 2018. View at Google Scholar
  7. C. M. Valdes, W. D. Mooney, S. K. Singh et al., “Crustal structure of oaxaca, mexico, from seismic refraction measurements,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 547–563, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Spranger, GEOLIMEX: Eine erste Geotraverse durch Sudmexiko; Auswertung des refraktions seismischen Profils [Ph.D. thesis], Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany, 1994.
  9. H. Jödicke, A. Jording, L. Ferrari, J. Arzate, K. Mezger, and L. Rüpke, “Fluid release from the subducted Cocos plate and partial melting of the crust deduced from magnetotelluric studies in southern mexico: implications for the generation of volcanism and subduction dynamics,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 111, no. 8, Article ID B08102, pp. 1–22, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Jording, L. Ferrari, J. Arzate, and H. Jödicke, “Crustal variations and terrane boundaries in Southern Mexicoas imaged by magnetotelluric transfer functions,” Tectonophysics, vol. 327, no. 1-2, pp. 1–13, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. F. Corbo, Estudio de la subducción y su relación con la presencia de fluidos a partir de sondeos magnetotelúricos en el Bloque de Jalisco y Oaxaca [Ph.D. thesis], Centro de Geociencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City, México, 2013.
  12. J. O. Campos-Enriquez, F. Corbo-Camargo, J. Arzate-Flores et al., “The buried southern continuation of the Oaxaca-Juarez terrane boundary and Oaxaca Fault, southern mexico: magnetotelluric constraints,” Journal of South American Earth Sciences, vol. 43, pp. 62–73, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. A. Arzate-Flores, R. Molina-Garza, F. Corbo-Camargo, and V. Márquez-Ramírez, “Low angle contact between the oaxaca and juárez terranes deduced from magnetotelluric data,” in Geodynamics of the Latin American Pacific Margin, vol. 173, pp. 3357–3371, Birkhäuser, Cham, Switzerland, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. León, Lyobaa o Mictlan, Delegación Mexicana, México, 1901.
  15. I. Ferrusquía–Villafranca, J. A. Denison, R. E. Wilson, F. W. McDowell, and J. Solorio–Munguia, “Tres edades radiométricas oligocénicas y miocénicas de rocas volcánicas de las regiones de la mixteca alta y valle de oaxaca, estado de oaxaca,” Boletín de la Asociación Mexicana de Geólogos Petroleros, vol. 26, pp. 249–262, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  16. D. M. McCann and A. Foster, “Reconnaissance geophysical methods in landslide investigation,” Engineering Geology, vol. 29, pp. 59–78, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. M. Nogoshi and T. Igarashi, “On the propagation characteristics of microtremors,” Seismological Society of Japan, vol. 23, pp. 264–280, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  18. Y. Nakamura, “Method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface,” Quarterly Report of RTRI (Railway Technical Research Institute) (Japan), vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. Okada, The Microtremor Survey Method, Society of Exploration Geophysics, Tulsa, Okla, USA, 2003.
  20. H. Arai and K. Tokimatsu, “S-wave velocity profiling by inversion of microtremor H/V spectrum,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 53–63, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Y. Bard, “Microtremor measurements: a tool for site effect estimation,” in Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, vol. 3, pp. 1251–1279, AA Balkema, 1998.
  22. A. Clemente-Chavez, F. R. Zúñiga, J. Lermo et al., “On the behavior of site effects in central Mexico (the Mexican volcanic belt - MVB), based on records of shallow earthquakes that occurred in the zone between 1998 and 2011,” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1391–1406, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. SESAME WP05, “Site effects assessment using ambient excitations. Optimum deployment strategy for array measurements,” European Commission - Research General Directorate EVG1 CT 2000-00026 SESAME, SESAME European research project WP05- Deliverable D07.05, Geopsy was developed by Laboratoire de Geophysique Interne et Tectonophysique (LGIT) Grenoble, France and University of Potsdam, Germany, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. M. Wathelet, Array recordings of ambient vibrations: surface wave inversion [Ph.D. thesis], Liege University, 2005.
  25. K. Konno and T. Ohmachi, “Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 228–241, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. O. Kulhánek, Introduction to digital filtering in Geophysics, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, The Netherlands, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. K. Aki, “Space and time spectra of stationary stochastic waves, with special reference to microtremors,” in Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, vol. 35, pp. 415–456, Tokyo University, 1957. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. H. Flores-Estrella and J. Aguirre-González, “SPAC: an alternative method to estimate earthquake site effects in mexico city,” Geofísica Internacional, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 227–236, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Aguirre González, M. Rodríguez González, and R. Vázquez Rosas, Memorias del XXIII Congreso Nacional de Mecánica de Suelos, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, 2006.
  30. R. D. Barker, “Electrical imaging and its application in engineering investigations,” in Modern Geophysics in Engineering Geology, D. M. McCann, M. Eddleston, P. J. Fenning, and G. M. Reeves, Eds., vol. 12, pp. 37–43, Geological Society, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. D. Griffiths and J. Turnbull, “A multi-electrode array for resistivity surveying,” First Break, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 16–20, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. P. Stummer, H. Maurer, H. Horstmeyer, and A. G. Green, “Optimization of dc resistivity data acquisition: Real-time experimental design and a new multielectrode system,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 2727–2735, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. K. Hsu, “On sturzstroms—catastrophic debris streams generated by rockfalls,” Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 129–140, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. BSSC Program on Improved Seismic Safety Provisions, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Fema, 1998.
  35. D. K. Keefer, “Landslides caused by earthquakes,” Geological Society of America Bulletin, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 406–421, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. E. Rodríguez, J. J. Bommer, and R. J. Chandler, “Earthquake-induced landslides: 1980-1997,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 325–346, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. G. Wesnousky, “Displacement and geometrical characteristics of earthquake surface ruptures: Issues and implications for seismic-hazard analysis and the process of earthquake rupture,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 1609–1632, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. D. L. Wells and K. J. Coppersmith, “New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement,” Bulletin - Seismological Society of America, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 974–1002, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus