Review Article
The Molecular Pathogenesis and Clinical Implications of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Table 1
Study results of molecular-targeted agents for hepatocellular carcinoma.
| Agent | Target | Year | Phase | Patients | CR (%) | PR (%) | SD (%) | RR (%) | PFS (months) | TTP (months) | OS (months) | Authors | Reference number |
| Sorafenib SHARP study versus placebo | RAF, VEGFR, PDGFR | 2008 | III | 299 | 0 | 2.3 | 71.0 | 2.3 | 4.1 | 5.5 | 10.7 | Llovet et al. |
[27] | | 303 | 0 | 0.7 | 67.0 | 0.7 | 4.9 | 2.8 | 7.9 | | Sorafenib Asia-Pacific study versus placebo | 2009 | III | 150 | 0 | 3.3 | 54.0 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 6.5 | Cheng et al. |
[28] | | 76 | 0 | 1.3 | 27.6 | 1.3 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 4.2 | |
| Sunitinib | VEGFR, PDGFR | 2009 | II | 37 | 0 | 2.7 | 35.1 | 2.7 | 3.7 | 5.3 | 8.0 | Faivre et al. | [53] | 2009 | II | 34 | 0 | 2.9 | 50.0 | 2.9 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 9.8 | Zhu et al. | [54] |
| Brivanib | VEGFR, FGFR | 2009 | II | 55 | NR | NR | NR | 5.0 | NR | 2.8 | 10.0 | Raoul et al. | [55] |
| Erlotinib | EGFR | 2005 | II | 38 | 0 | 9.0 | 50.0 | 9.0 | NR | 3.2 | 13.0 | Philip et al. | [56] | Erlotinib + bevacizumab | 2009 | II | 40 | 0 | 25.0 | 38.0 | 25.0 | 9.0 | NR | 15.7 | Thomas et al. | [60] |
| TSU-68 | VEGFR, PDGFR, FGFR | 2008 | I/II | 35 | 2.9 | 5.7 | 42.9 | 8.6 | NR | NR | NR | Kanai et al. | [57] |
| Bevacizumab | VEGF | 2009 | II | 46 | 2 | 11.0 | NR | 13.0 | 6.9 | NR | 12.4 | Siegel et al. | [58] |
| Cetuximab | EGF | 2007 | II | 30 | 0 | 0.0 | NR | 0 | 1.4 | NR | 9.6 | Zhu et al. | [59] |
|
|
CR: complete response; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; RR: response rate; PFS: progression-free survival; TTP: time to progression; OS: overall survival; NR: not reported.
|