Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Hepatology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 713754, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/713754
Review Article

Genetic Diseases That Predispose to Early Liver Cirrhosis

1CEINGE—Biotecnologie Avanzate Scarl, Via Gaetano Salvatore 486, 80145 Napoli, Italy
2Dipartimento di Medicina Molecolare e Biotecnologie Mediche, Università di Napoli Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy
3Università Telematica Pegaso, Piazza Trieste e Trento 48, 80132 Napoli, Italy
4Dipartimento di Bioscienze e Territorio, Università del Molise, Contrada Fonte Lappone, Pesche, 86090 Isernia, Italy

Received 7 May 2014; Accepted 30 June 2014; Published 14 July 2014

Academic Editor: Mohammad Ahmad al-Shatouri

Copyright © 2014 Manuela Scorza et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Inherited liver diseases are a group of metabolic and genetic defects that typically cause early chronic liver involvement. Most are due to a defect of an enzyme/transport protein that alters a metabolic pathway and exerts a pathogenic role mainly in the liver. The prevalence is variable, but most are rare pathologies. We review the pathophysiology of such diseases and the diagnostic contribution of laboratory tests, focusing on the role of molecular genetics. In fact, thanks to recent advances in genetics, molecular analysis permits early and specific diagnosis for most disorders and helps to reduce the invasive approach of liver biopsy.

1. Introduction

An early chronic liver involvement may be observed in a number of genetic and metabolic diseases although with different penetrance, age at onset, and outcome. Clinical symptoms and laboratory data are frequently overlapping, thus rendering a differential diagnosis difficult. A great improvement both in imaging [1] and in molecular genetics [2] in the last years helped to discriminate between the different diseases thus reducing the need of pathology (Table 1). On the other hand, liver biopsy is often complex in children, mainly due to the smaller specimen size [3]. For some diseases, prenatal diagnosis is also available [4].

tab1
Table 1: Inherited liver diseases that predispose to early cirrhosis.

Specific therapies are available for several genetic and metabolic diseases and their effectiveness is strongly related to the precocity of diagnosis. A growing number of children with such diseases now survive well into adulthood [5]. On the other hand, liver transplantation now offers a long-term survival [6].

We will review the genetic and metabolic entities responsible for early chronic liver diseases focusing on the contribution of laboratory and molecular diagnosis (Table 2).

tab2
Table 2: Main characteristics of genetic liver disease that predispose to early cirrhosis.

2. Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency

Alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency (OMIM 613490) is an autosomal recessive (codominant) disease due to mutations in the SERPINA1 gene that encodes the serine protease inhibitor AAT. The protein, mainly synthesized by liver cells, inhibits proinflammatory proteases such as neutrophil elastase, thus, protecting the lung from proteolytic damage. AAT deficiency has an incidence of 1 : 2,000–5,000 but the number of diagnosed patients is underestimated.

AAT deficiency appears with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, and disseminated bronchiectasis usually between the 4th and the 5th decade [7]. The liver involvement is widely heterogeneous according to age at onset (between the 1st year of life up to the 6th decade) and clinical severity that ranges from chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis to fulminant liver failure. The most likely pathogenic mechanism is the accumulation of AAT polymers in hepatocytes. The progression of liver disease is slow, even if few cases develop early cirrhosis with the need for transplantation; furthermore, hepatocellular carcinoma has a very high incidence among AAT deficient subjects [8]. The replacement therapy has no effect because liver damage is due to the accumulation of the AAT mutant polymers and not to the lack of circulating AAT [9].

The indications to laboratory diagnosis include various conditions exhaustively revised [10], but all infants with prolonged jaundice or nonspecific signs of liver disease should be tested for AAT deficiency.

Laboratory diagnosis includes serum AAT measured by nephelometry followed by the qualitative determination of AAT alleles by isoelectric focusing (IEF) and, finally, genotyping [11]. Serum AAT must be performed in subjects free from acute inflammation since AAT is an acute phase protein, and thus inflammation enhances its serum levels [12]. Then, AAT levels should not be considered if serum C-reactive protein levels are increased. The IEF analysis reveals the alleles of each subject. The M alleles (M1 to M6) are the most common and are considered “wild type alleles.” Most patients with liver or lung involvement are homozygous for the Z or the S or compound heterozygous for the two alleles. In these patients serum AAT levels are reduced by 40–60%. Heterozygous individuals (MZ or MS) rarely develop clinical signs. However, the IEF analysis may provide false negative results. Also for this reason, molecular analysis is indicated [11]. In the SERPINA1 disease gene (official name: serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A), more than 120 allelic variants have been identified so far; thus molecular analysis must be performed by gene sequencing. Gene variants are classified according to their effect on serum levels of alpha-1 antitrypsin [13]. Patients must be counseled before molecular analysis, and when severe mutations are identified the consanguineous should be counseled in turn and analyzed to reveal asymptomatic carriers.

3. Cystic Fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis (CF, OMIM 219700) is the most frequent lethal autosomal recessive disease among Caucasians (incidence: 1 : 2,500). CF is a systemic disease that appears mainly with pancreatic insufficiency in more than 90% of cases and pulmonary disease due to inflammation and opportunistic colonization that gradually causes respiratory insufficiency [14]. About 20% of patients experience meconium ileus.

Liver disease in CF appears mainly in the first decade of life and it is observed in up to 30% of patients, but it is still obscure why only some patients develop liver disease. In fact, CF liver disease depends on the altered activity of cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) chloride channel on the apical membrane of cholangiocytes. It causes an altered bile flow followed by a cholangiocyte-induced inflammatory response with proliferation of stellate cells, which gives rise to cholangitis and progressive periportal fibrosis [15]. CF-associated liver disease is slowly progressive, but in up to 10% of patients it may rapidly evolve to multilobular biliary cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

The possibility to predict CF patients that will develop a severe liver involvement would be useful given the efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid in the early stages of liver disease [15], but its pathogenesis is poorly known. The scarce correlation between the CFTR genotype and liver expression in CF patients is well known [16], as it is the discordant severity of liver disease in CF sib pairs [17]. A decade of studies concluded that liver expression in CF patients is influenced by modifier genes like mannose-binding lectin and AAT [18], but such genes modulate the risk for liver disease only in a small percentage of CF patients.

Finally, clinical forms showing pancreatic sufficiency, single organ involvement, and a milder outcome are included under the term of CFTR-related disorders (CFTR-RD) [19]. These disorders are not associated with liver disease.

The gold standard for CF diagnosis is the sweat test (i.e., sweat chloride levels after pilocarpine stimulation) followed by molecular analysis. Sweat test requires a specific skill and the knowledge of all conditions that may cause false positives, while the rate of false negative results is very low. However, CF diagnosis or exclusion must be based on two concordant sweat tests. The indications to sweat test include a large variety of clinical conditions [14, 15].

The search of CFTR mutations is one of the most diffuse molecular analyses worldwide, because it is used to confirm CF diagnosis and prenatal [20] or preimplantation [21] diagnosis. About 2000 mutations have been identified in the CFTR gene so far (http://www.genet.sickkids.on.ca/). Guidelines suggest a two-step molecular analysis. In the first step a panel of the most frequent mutations is analyzed, including the mutations peculiar to the geographic area of each patient [22], and commercial kits are used [16, 23]. The first step identifies about 80% alleles from CF patients; the analysis of mutations peculiar to specific ethnic or geographic groups may increase the detection rate [24], and the scanning of CFTR coding regions reveals mutations in up to 90% alleles [25]. Large gene rearrangements are present in about 2-3% of CF alleles [16]. Finally, pathogenic mutations in noncoding region of the CFTR gene have been described [26, 27], but they are not analyzed for routine purposes. The detection rate of molecular analysis is lower in CFTR-RD [28]. No mutations are specifically associated with liver disease [29].

The diagnosis of liver disease in CF patients is difficult, because neither laboratory nor imaging has a great specificity. Liver biopsy contributes to the aim, but the patchy distribution of liver alterations in CF patients reduces its sensitivity [15].

4. Wilson Disease

Wilson disease (WD, 277900) is an autosomal recessive disorder with an incidence of about 1 : 30,000. It typically appears with liver disease in the second decade and neurological disorders in the third decade, even if cases with earlier or later onset have been described [30]. Wilson disease depends on mutations in the gene encoding the ATP7B Cu translocase, a protein mainly expressed by the hepatocyte that regulates the levels of copper in the liver. Furthermore, ATP7B modulates the synthesis of ceruloplasmin [31]. When the activity of ATP7B is reduced, copper accumulates within the hepatocyte. The severity of liver involvement in WD patients is heterogeneous ranging from asymptomatic cases with mild hepatomegaly to cirrhosis with severe liver failure [32]. About two-thirds of patients show haemolytic anemia, coagulopathy, and renal failure. About 6% of WD cases appear with acute liver onset [33]. Kayser-Fleischer rings are present in about 50% of WD cases at diagnosis. About half of patients show psychiatric alterations, up to psychotic symptoms, reverted by adequate therapy [34]. Novel therapies can now effectively treat WD patients and gene therapy is effective in animal models [35].

Low serum ceruloplasmin and high urine copper help to perform the diagnosis in most cases, even if some false negatives are described [35].

Molecular analysis is available [36, 37]. Wilson disease is due to mutations in the ATP7B gene: about 300 different mutations are known so far (http://www.wilsondisease.med.ualberta.ca/database.asp); thus gene sequencing is required, reaching a detection rate of about 95%. Severe mutations (i.e., nonsense, frameshift) are associated with the most severe disease, while patients with missense mutations (about 60% of all mutations) show a variable severity and outcome [30]. Liver biopsy is now used in cases with ambiguous biochemical parameters and to evaluate liver copper levels [3].

5. Hereditary Hemochromatosis

Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH, OMIM 235200) is an autosomal recessive disease characterized by iron overload that may cause liver cirrhosis, cardiomyopathy, diabetes, arthritis, and skin pigmentation that appear during the third to fifth decade. The incidence is about 1 : 250. A myriad of diseases cause secondary hemochromatosis. However, while in secondary hemochromatosis the iron overload involves macrophages; in HH iron mainly accumulates in hepatocytes, causing chronic liver damage that ends in cirrhosis [38], with a percentage of cases evolving to hepatocellular carcinoma [39]. The pathogenesis of liver damage in HH is mainly due to the iron-induced lipid peroxidation that occurs in hepatocytes and causes hepatocellular injury or death. Kupffer cells become activated and produce cytokines, which in turn stimulate hepatic stellate cells to synthesize collagen, thereby leading to cirrhosis [38]. Symptoms of hemochromatosis depend on the phase of the disease. When HH is diagnosed by occasional laboratory evaluation, most patients are still asymptomatic; if the diagnosis is performed for symptoms, HH may appear with cirrhosis, bronze-colored skin, diabetes (and other endocrine diseases), joint inflammation, heart disease, arthralgia, and hepatomegaly.

The diagnosis is based on enhanced serum ferritin that correlates with the increased iron content of liver and the high transferrin saturation. Unsaturated iron-binding capacity has been proposed as an alternative to transferrin saturation [40], but it has a higher biological variability [41]. Molecular analysis in HFE gene with different protocols [4247] would confirm hereditary hemochromatosis but surprisingly it has a lower diagnostic sensitivity because the mutations are different in each geographic area. Homozygous patients for p.Cys282Tyr have a higher risk for iron overload.

Liver biopsy is performed in suspected patients with negative molecular analysis and ambiguous laboratory results; in addition, it may be used to assess the degree of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis and the degree of iron liver overload [3, 48]. Laboratory has a role also in the monitoring of patients through biochemical markers of (i) liver fibrosis [49]; (ii) liver protidosynthesis [50]; and (iii) hepatocarcinoma in patients with cirrhosis [51].

6. Type I Tyrosinemia

Type I tyrosinemia (TYRSN1, OMIM 276700) is an autosomal recessive disease with an incidence of about 1 : 100,000. It is the most severe form of genetic tyrosinemia and is the only one that causes a severe liver involvement [52, 53].

Type I tyrosinemia is classified in two forms: the first, more frequent, appears with a severe liver expression in the first months of life that may progress to ascites, jaundice, and gastrointestinal bleeding; the second includes cases with acute liver failure at about one year and a chronic evolution with renal-tubular dysfunction [54]. Untreated patients die within the first decade of liver failure or of early hepatocarcinoma. The use of nitisinone and a tyrosine-restricted diet quite completely revert symptoms [55]. Type I tyrosinemia is due to the altered activity of fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase, which causes the elevation of plasma and urine succinylacetone (diagnostic golden standard) and high plasma concentration of tyrosine, methionine, and phenylalanine. Sequence analysis in FAH gene may be performed for molecular diagnosis including prenatal [56].

7. Glycogen Storage Disease Type IV

Glycogen storage disease (GSD, OMIM 232500) type IV is an autosomal recessive disease with an incidence of about 1 : 600,000. It is due to mutations in the gene encoding the glycogen branching enzyme (GBE1) that catalyzes the alpha 1,6 bond of the first glucose in the side chains of glycogen [57]. The altered glycogen branching reduces its solubility, thus impairing the osmotic pressure within the hepatocyte [58]. Several clinical forms of GSD have been described including (i) a neuromuscular form that appears in the perinatal age or in childhood; most of these cases have an early fatal evolution and are typically due to two null mutations; (ii) a hepatic form that may have a progressive or a nonprogressive evolution; patients are usually compound heterozygous for a severe (null) and a mild (missense) mutation; and (iii) the polyglucosan body disease that appears in adulthood with upper and lower motor neuron involvement and executive dysfunction [59]. The hepatic form is the most frequent phenotype. In the progressive subtype, the clinical expression appears in the first months of life with failure to thrive and hepatomegaly that evolves (in a variable time) to cirrhosis with portal hypertension requiring liver transplantation [60]. In the rare nonprogressive subtype the patients show a variable combination of liver disease (that usually does not evolve to cirrhosis), myopathy, and hypotonia. The diagnosis of GSD is based on biochemical findings from a liver biopsy that reveals an abnormal glycogen content, and on the evidence of enzymatic deficiency in the liver, muscle, or fibroblasts. Now it is based on molecular analysis, that is, the sequence of the GBE1 gene followed by the search of large gene deletions [61]. In about 10% of patients a negative molecular analysis despite clinical symptoms suggests to perform the enzyme assay on cultured fibroblasts [62]. Prenatal diagnosis is possible if the disease-causing mutations in the family proband are known [63].

8. The Urea Cycle

The urea cycle includes a series of reactions that convert nitrogen from ammonia and aspartate into urea [64]. Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) are a group of inborn errors that typically cause a life-threatening hyperammonemia. Among these, argininosuccinate lyase (ASL) and citrin deficiency are usually associated with severe liver disease.

8.1. Argininosuccinate Lyase Deficiency

Argininosuccinate lyase deficiency (ASLD, OMIM 207900) is the second most common UCD with an incidence of about 1 : 70,000 and is due to the deficiency of the enzyme that cleaves argininosuccinic acid into arginine and fumarate. The disease includes a severe neonatal onset form and a late onset form: the first appears with hyperammonemia within the first few days of life with vomiting, lethargy, hypothermia, and poor feeding. On the contrary, the late onset form ranges from episodic hyperammonemia triggered by acute infections or stress to cognitive impairment, behavioral abnormalities, and/or learning disabilities in the absence of episodes of hyperammonemia [65]. Symptoms of ASL deficiency are unrelated to the severity or duration of hyperammonemic episodes and include neurocognitive deficiencies with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and developmental disability [66]. Liver disease ranges from hepatomegaly to severe liver fibrosis and cirrhosis [67]. Systemic hypertension [68] and electrolyte imbalance may be present.

Laboratory diagnosis of ASL deficiency is based on enhanced levels of citrulline and increased argininosuccinic acid in plasma and/or in urine [64]. A newborn screening for ASLD is available in all US citrulline testing. ASLD is due to heterogeneous mutations in the ASL gene [69] and sequence analysis detects mutations in about 90% of patients. ASL enzyme activity can be measured in cell homogenates from liver biopsy or from skin fibroblasts or erythrocytes [70]. Prenatal diagnosis is available [71].

8.2. Citrin Deficiency

Citrin deficiency is an autosomal recessive disorder and may appear with two phenotypes: neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis caused by citrin deficiency (NICCD, OMIM 605814) and the adult form called citrullinemia type II (CTLN2, OMIM 603471). A form that appears with dyslipidemia (FTTDCD) was described more recently [72]. Typically, citrin deficiency is characterized by food preference (protein-rich/lipid-rich foods) or aversion (carbohydrate-rich foods).

Neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis has an incidence of about 1 : 19,000 and appears with aminoacidemias, galactosemia, hypoproteinemia, cholestasis, and variable hepatic dysfunction [73]. Although such symptoms self-resolve by the first year in most cases, some infants die of infection or of liver cirrhosis [74, 75]. Citrullinemia type II has an incidence of about 1 : 100,000 and appears later between second and fourth decade with recurrent hyperammonemia with neuropsychiatric symptoms; death can be due to brain edema [76]. Symptoms are frequently triggered by alcohol and sugar intake, medication, and/or surgery. Affected patients may or may not have a prior history of NICCD or FTTDCD.

The diagnosis of citrin deficiency is based on clinical and biochemical findings that include enhanced plasma ammonia, citrulline and arginine, and threonine : serine ratio. In neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis plasma threonine, methionine, and tyrosine are elevated as bilirubin, bile acids, and alpha-fetoprotein [73]. Plasma levels of galactose, methionine, and/or phenylalanine are elevated in newborn screening blood spots in about 40% of children.

Citrin deficiency is caused by mutations in SLC25A13 gene and is characterized by a liver-specific decrease in argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS) [77, 78]. The liver reduction of ASS in CTLN2 patients is secondary to citrin deficiency [79], although its cause still remains to be clarified.

9. Cholesteryl Ester Storage Disease

Cholesterol ester storage disease (CESD, OMIM 278000) is an autosomal recessive disorder of lysosomal storage with an incidence ranging between 1 in 40,000 in the Germanic population and 1 : 300,000–1 : 500,000 in the general Caucasian population [80]. It is due to deficiency of lysosomal acid lipase (LAL), which catalyzes the intracellular hydrolysis of triacylglycerols and cholesteryl esters. Its deficiency causes a progressive accumulation of cholesteryl esters (CE), and to a lesser extent, triglycerides, mainly in lysosomal hepatocytes, adrenal glands, and macrophages [81].

Usually patients develop hepatomegaly that leads to fibrosis and micronodular cirrhosis [82] within the first ten years of life. CESD can appear as two forms: Wolman disease, that is, the severe pediatric form, fatal within 1-2 years of life, and the later onset CESD, a more benign disease, associated with some residual LAL activity [80].

Wolman disease is a rare, neonatal onset, lethal disorder that appears in the first months of life with vomiting and diarrhea and severe hepatosplenomegaly. About 50% of patients show adrenal calcifications [83]. In contrast, CESD is often undiagnosed, has a later onset, and may appear in infancy or childhood, depending on the residual levels of LAL activity [83, 84]. CESD should be suspected in children with hepatomegaly and splenomegaly with elevated transaminases, high cholesterol, and low HDL [85].

Liver biopsy helps the diagnosis even if false negatives were reported [86, 87]. To confirm the diagnosis of CESD, LAL activity and molecular analysis of the acid lipase gene (LIPA) are available.

To date, over 40 LIPA mutations have been identified in patients with CESD [88]. No genotype-phenotype correlation has been established. Prenatal diagnosis is also available [80].

10. Alström Syndrome

Alström syndrome (ALMS, OMIM 203800) is a rare autosomal recessive disease with an incidence of 1 : 1,000,000. It appears in infancy with a wide variability in age at onset and severity, and typically leads to organ failure causing a reduced life expectancy, rarely exceeding 50 years. Alström syndrome appears with cone-rod dystrophy, obesity, progressive sensorineural hearing impairment, dilated or restrictive cardiomyopathy, the insulin resistance syndrome, and multiple organ failure [89, 90]. Therapy is complex due to the combination of multiple endocrine disorders, sensorineural deficits, cardiac, renal, and hepatic abnormalities [91]. Fibrosis develops in multiple organs [89]. Liver expression ranges from steatohepatitis to portal hypertension and cirrhosis and can cause hepatic encephalopathy and life-threatening esophageal varices. The diagnosis is based on clinical features [92], and genetic testing is used when major (vision) and minor criteria do not permit a clinical diagnosis. Molecular testing of the disease gene, ALMS1, detects mutations in up to 80% of patients of northern European descent, and in about 40% of cases worldwide [93, 94]. Carrier and prenatal diagnosis can be offered if the disease-causing mutations have been identified in a family proband [95].

11. Congenital Hepatic Fibrosis

Congenital hepatic fibrosis (CHF) is an autosomal recessive disease characterized by periportal fibrosis and irregularly shaped proliferating bile ducts. The incidence is about 1 : 20,000 [96].

In most patients, the first symptom is portal hypertension (PH) with gastrointestinal bleeding [97]. Pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary vascular shunts are typical complications of PH. Frequently CHF is associated with ciliopathies and renal disease, the so-called hepatorenal fibrocystic disease [98].

Congenital hepatic fibrosis involves various organs (e.g. renal, central nervous system, etc.), but most cases are referred for liver diseases. Four clinical forms have been described [99]: (i) portal hypertension (most common and more severe in the presence of portal vein abnormality); (ii) cholangitis with cholestasis and recurrent cholangitis; (iii) both portal hypertension and cholangitic symptoms; and (iv) latency that appears at a late age with hard hepatomegaly.

Symptoms of CHF are nonspecific, making the diagnosis difficult. The late onset and the clinical evolution suggest that CHF is a dynamic and progressive condition [100, 101].

The diagnosis of CHF can be made by liver biopsy that shows a progressive hepatic fibrosis with nodular formation. Such findings may be mistaken for cirrhosis, but, unlike cirrhosis, hepatic lobules are usually normal with normal hepatocyte morphology, particularly in the early phases [100, 102]. The gene/s causing CHF is/are unknown.

12. Hereditary Fructose Intolerance

Hereditary fructose intolerance (HFI, OMIM 229600) is an autosomal recessive disease (incidence 1 : 20,000) due to the deficiency of fructose 1-phosphate aldolase (aldolase B) involved in the metabolism of fructose-1-phosphate (exogenous fructose) into dihydroxyacetone phosphate and D-glyceraldehyde [103].

Onset of symptoms can occur at any age. The persistent intake of fructose, sucrose, or sorbitol in childhood leads to chronic toxicity [104, 105] that causes irreversible damage to the liver (early cirrhosis) and kidney [105]. The strict dietary exclusion leads to normal growth and longevity, but it is difficult to achieve [106].

The early diagnosis of HFI is crucial to start the strict exclusion diet thus avoiding tissue injury and growthretardation. 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy has been used successfully [107]. The fructose tolerance test (breath test) has a high diagnostic sensitivity [106]. Molecular diagnosis of HFI consists in direct sequencing of the gene encoding aldolase B (ALDOB). About 45 different mutations are known so far (http://www.bu.edu/aldolase/HFI/hfidb/hfidb.html) and it is now the diagnostic gold standard [108111].

13. Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis Type 3

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) refers to a heterogeneous group of inherited cholestatic disorders that impair bile formation and appear with cholestasis of hepatocellular origin. Three types of PFIC are known. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 (PFIC3, OMIM 602347) is an autosomal recessive disorder with a prevalence estimated of about 1 : 100,000 [112].

PFIC3 may appear in infancy, in childhood, or during young adulthood. Main symptoms include gastrointestinal bleeding due to portal hypertension, early cirrhosis, and moderate pruritus [113]. The phenotypic expression of PFIC3 ranges from neonatal cholestasis to cirrhosis in young adults [114]. The evolution of the disease is characterized by chronic icteric or anicteric cholestasis, portal hypertension, and liver failure. In about 50% of the patients, liver transplantation is required at a mean age of 7.5 years [115]. Laboratory findings show high serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) activity (while other two types of PFIC have normal serum γ-GT activity), normal cholesterol levels, and moderately enhanced bile acid concentrations. Liver histology shows portal fibrosis and true ductular proliferation with mixed inflammatory infiltrate and, in advanced phases, signs of biliary cirrhosis. Interlobular bile ducts are seen in most portal tracts and there is neither periductal fibrosis nor biliary epithelium injury [113].

PFIC3 is caused by mutations in the ABCB4 gene encoding the multidrug resistance protein 3 (MDR3) protein. This gene is expressed in the canalicular membrane of the hepatocyte and is responsible for phospholipid transport into bile [116]. Reduced or absent activity of the MDR3 transporter causes impaired phospholipid secretion, previously identified as “low phospholipid syndrome” [117]. The diagnosis of PFIC3 is confirmed by molecular genetic analysis of the ABCB4 gene by sequencing of exons and their splice junctions (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/) [118]. There are several mutations in ABCB4 that have a clear effect on the protein and a genotype-phenotype correlation is observed [119122]. Prenatal diagnosis is available.

14. Conclusions and Future Prospects

A chronic liver involvement that can predispose to cirrhosis may be observed in a number of genetic diseases with a different penetrance, age at onset, and outcome. Clinical symptoms and laboratory data are frequently overlapping, thus rendering a differential diagnosis difficult. In the present review we critically discussed the genetic entities responsible for early liver cirrhosis, describing for each disease the laboratory diagnosis and molecular genetics.

In fact, the recent advances made in understanding the genetics and pathophysiology of inherited liver diseases can contribute to the identification of novel strategies for the diagnosis of these conditions. Molecular analysis changed the diagnostic approach in these genetic diseases and led to reduction of invasive and expensive procedures and diagnostic errors.

Disease-genes identification is a step forward in the diagnostic approach to a patient in whom early liver cirrhosisis strongly suspected. However, we have to point out some critical points: (i) molecular analysis would be based on scanning procedures using the gene sequencing; (ii) the negative result of molecular analysis does not exclude the disease, because mutations may involve noncoding, regulatory areas; (iii) some liver diseases are very rare; it is necessary that laboratories also offer molecular diagnosis for such diseases.

However, the availability of new technologies as high throughput sequencing at reasonable costs could help to perform extensive analyses, especially in cases in which more disease genes are involved. No clear genotype-phenotype correlation has been established in most cases, so proteomic and functional studies on the effect of the mutations may guide physicians in the prescription of treatment procedures. In some cases, molecular analysis has been used for prenatal diagnosis to help high risk couples to better plan their reproductive options.

However, given the increased number of genetic liver diseases, the complexity of genotype-phenotype correlations and the need of multidisciplinary counseling to the families, a strict collaboration between physicians and molecular laboratories is mandatory in this field.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgment

Grants from Regione Campania (DGRC 1901/09 and POR, FSE 2007-13, project CREME) are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. T. Taddei, P. Mistry, and M. L. Schilsky, “Inherited metabolic disease of the liver,” Current Opinion in Gastroenterology, vol. 24, pp. 278–286, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. G. Castaldo, F. Lembo, and R. Tomaiuolo, “Molecular diagnostics: between chips and customized medicine,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 48, pp. 973–982, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  3. N. Ovchinsky, R. K. Moreira, J. H. Lefkowitch, and J. E. Lavine, “Liver biopsy in modern clinical practice: a pediatric point-of-view,” Advances in Anatomic Pathology, vol. 19, pp. 250–262, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  4. G. M. Maruotti, G. Frisso, G. Calcagno et al., “Prenatal diagnosis of inherited diseases: the 20 years experience of an Italian Regional Reference Centre,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 51, pp. 2211–2217, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  5. M. E. Mailliard and J. L. Gollan, “Metabolic liver disease in the young adult,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 17, pp. 307–322, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Burdelski, B. Rodeck, A. Latta et al., “Treatment of inherited metabolic disorders by liver transplantation,” Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, vol. 14, pp. 604–618, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. S. K. Brode, S. C. Ling, and K. R. Chapman, “Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: a commonly overlooked cause of lung disease,” Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 184, no. 12, pp. 1365–1371, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. K. D. Fairbanks and A. S. Tavill, “Liver disease in alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency: a review,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 103, pp. 2136–2141, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Kaplan and L. Cosentino, “Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency: forgotten etiology,” Canadian Family Physician, vol. 56, pp. 19–24, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. K. Stoller, G. L. Snider, M. L. Brantly et al., “American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: standards for the diagnosis and management of individuals with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency,” Pneumologie, vol. 59, pp. 36–68, 2005 (German). View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. F. Zarrilli, A. Elce, M. Scorza, S. Giordano, F. Amato, and G. Castaldo, “An update on laboratory diagnosis of liver inherited diseases,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 697940, 7 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. R. Bals, “Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency,” Best Practice & Research Gastroenterology, vol. 24, pp. 629–633, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  13. E. K. Silverman and R. A. Sandhaus, “Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 360, pp. 2749–2757, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. B. J. Rosenstein and G. R. Cutting, “The diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: a consensus statement,” The Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 132, pp. 589–595, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. D. Debray, D. Kelly, R. Houwen, B. Strandvik, and C. Colombo, “Best practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cystic fibrosis-associated liver disease,” The Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, vol. 10, pp. S29–S36, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  16. R. Tomaiuolo, F. Sangiuolo, C. Bombieri et al., “Epidemiology and a novel procedure for large scale analysis of CFTR rearrangements in classic and atypical CF patients: a multicentric Italian study,” The Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 347–351, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. G. Castaldo, A. Fuccio, D. Salvatore et al., “Liver expression in cystic fibrosis could be modulated by genetic factors different from the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator genotype,” The American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 98, pp. 294–307, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. R. Tomaiuolo, D. Degiorgio, D. A. Coviello et al., “An MBL2 haplotype and ABCB4 variants modulate the risk of liver disease in cystic fibrosis patients: a multicentre study,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 817–822, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. C. Bombieri, M. Claustres, K. de Boeck et al., “Recommendations for the classification of diseases as CFTR-related disorders,” The Journal of Fibrosis, vol. 10, pp. S86–S102, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  20. R. Tomaiuolo, P. Nardiello, P. Martinelli, L. Sacchetti, F. Salvatore, and G. Castaldo, “Prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: an experience of 181 cases,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 51, pp. 2227–2232, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  21. A. Elce, A. Boccia, G. Cardillo et al., “Three novel CFTR polymorphic repeats improve segregation analysis for cystic fibrosis,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 55, pp. 1372–1379, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  22. G. Castaldo, E. Rippa, G. Sebastio et al., “Molecular epidemiology of cystic fibrosis mutations and haplotypes in southern Italy evaluated with an improved semiautomated robotic procedure,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 33, pp. 475–479, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  23. R. Tomaiuolo, M. Spina, and G. Castaldo, “Molecular diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: comparison of four analytical procedures,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 41, pp. 26–32, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  24. G. Castaldo, A. Fuccio, C. Cazeneuve et al., “Detection of five rare cystic fibrosis mutations peculiar to Southern Italy: implications in screening for the disease and phenotype characterization for patients with homozygote mutations,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 45, pp. 957–962, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  25. G. Castaldo, A. Polizzi, R. Tomaiuolo et al., “Comprehensive cystic fibrosis mutation epidemiology and haplotype characterization in southern Italy population,” Annals of Human Genetics, vol. 69, pp. 15–24, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. S. Giordano, F. Amato, A. Elce et al., “Molecular and functional analysis of the large 5' promoter region of CFTR gene revealed pathogenic mutations in CF and CFTR-related disorders,” The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 15, pp. 331–340, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  27. F. Amato, M. Seia, S. Giordano et al., “Gene mutation in MicroRNA target sites of CFTR gene: a novel pathogenetic mechanism in cystic fibrosis?” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, Article ID e60448, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  28. F. Amato, C. Bellia, G. Cardillo et al., “Extensive molecular analysis of patients bearing CFTR-related disorders,” The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 14, pp. 81–89, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  29. G. Castaldo, E. Rippa, D. Salvatore et al., “Severe liver impairment in a cystic fibrosis-affected child homozygous for the G542X mutation,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 69, pp. 155–158, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. T. Okada, Y. Shiono, Y. Kaneko et al., “High prevalence of fulminant hepatic failure among patients with mutant alleles for truncation of ATP7B in Wilsons disease,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 45, pp. 1232–1237, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. V. Lalioti, I. Sandoval, D. Cassio, and J. C. Duclos-Vallée, “Molecular pathology of Wilson’s disease: a brief,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1151–1153, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. E. A. Roberts and M. L. Schilsky, “Diagnosis and treatment of Wilson disease: an update,” Hepatology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 2089–2111, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. D. Huster, W. Hermann, and M. Bartels, “Acute Wilson disease,” Der Internist, vol. 52, pp. 815–822, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. D. Huster, “Wilson disease,” Best Practice Research Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 531–539, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. K. H. Weiss and W. Stremmel, “Evolving perspectives in Wilson disease: diagnosis, treatment and monitoring,” Current Gastroenterology Reports, vol. 14, pp. 1–7, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. M. L. Schilsky and A. Ala, “Genetic testing for Wilson disease: availability and utility,” Current Gastroenterology Reports, vol. 12, pp. 57–61, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  37. J. Bennett and S. H. Hahn, “Clinical molecular diagnosis of Wilson disease,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 31, pp. 233–238, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  38. B. R. Bacon, P. C. Adams, K. V. Kowdley, L. W. Powell, and A. S. Tavill, “Diagnosis and management of hemochromatosis: 2011 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases,” Hepatology, vol. 54, pp. 328–343, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  39. E. Maillard, “Epidemiology, natural history and pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer/Radiothérapie, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 3–6, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. P. C. Adams, D. M. Reboussin, J. C. Barton et al., “Hemochromatosis and iron overload screening in a racially diverse population,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, pp. 1769–1778, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. P. C. Adams, D. M. Reboussin, R. D. Press et al., “Biological variability of transferrin saturation and unsaturated iron-binding capacity,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 120, pp. 999.e1–999.e7, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  42. A. Piperno, “Molecular diagnosis of hemochromatosis,” Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics, vol. 7, pp. 161–177, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  43. A. M. Jouanolle, V. Gérolami, C. Ged et al., “Molecular diagnosis of HFE mutations in routine laboratories. Results of a survey from reference laboratories in France,” Annales de Biologie Clinique, vol. 70, pp. 305–313, 2012 (French). View at Google Scholar
  44. C. J. McDonald, D. F. Wallace, D. H. Crawford, and V. N. Subramaniam, “Iron storage disease in Asia-Pacific populations: the importance of non-HFE mutations,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 28, pp. 1087–1094, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  45. A. del-Castillo-Rueda, M. I. Moreno-Carralero, N. Cuadrado-Grande et al., “Mutations in the HFE, TFR2, and SLC40A1 genes in patients with hemochromatosis,” Gene, vol. 508, pp. 15–20, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. P. C. Santos, J. E. Krieger, and A. C. Pereira, “Molecular diagnostic and pathogenesis of hereditary hemochromatosis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 13, pp. 1497–1511, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. I. M. Nadakkavukaran, E. K. Gan, and J. K. Olynyk, “Screening for hereditary haemochromatosis,” Pathology, vol. 44, pp. 148–152, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. M. L. Bassett, P. E. Hickman, and J. E. Dahlstrom, “The changing role of liver biopsy in diagnosis and management of haemochromatosis,” Pathology, vol. 43, pp. 433–439, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  49. G. Fortunato, G. Castaldo, G. Oriani et al., “Multivariate discriminant function based on six biochemical markers in blood can predict the cirrhotic evolution of chronic hepatitis,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 47, pp. 1696–1700, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  50. F. D. Raymond, G. Fortunato, D. W. Moss, G. Castaldo, F. Salvatore, and M. Impallomeni, “Inositol-specific phospholipase D activity in health and disease,” Clinical Science, vol. 86, pp. 447–451, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  51. G. Castaldo, G. Oriani, M. M. Lofrano et al., “Differential diagnosis between hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis through a discriminant function based on results from serum analytes,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 42, pp. 1263–1269, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  52. M. De Braekeleer and J. Larochelle, “Genetic epidemiology of hereditary tyrosinemia in Quebec and in Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 302–307, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  53. C. J. Ellaway, E. Holme, S. Standing et al., “Outcome of tyrosinaemia type III,” Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 824–832, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. C. de Laet, C. Dionisi-Vici, J. V. Leonard et al., “Recommendations for the management of tyrosinaemia type 1,” Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, vol. 8, article 8, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. P. J. McKiernan, “Nitisinone in the treatment of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1,” Drugs, vol. 66, pp. 743–750, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  56. S. I. Demers, P. Russo, F. Lettre, and R. M. Tanguay, “Frequent mutation reversion inversely correlates with clinical severity in a genetic liver disease, hereditary tyrosinemia,” Human Pathology, vol. 34, pp. 1313–1320, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. C. Lamperti, S. Salani, S. Lucchiari et al., “Neuropathological study of skeletal muscle, heart, liver, and brain in a neonatal form of glycogen storage disease type IV associated with a new mutation in GBE1 gene,” Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, vol. 32, supplement 1, pp. S161–S168, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  58. Y. Bao, P. Kishnani, J. Y. Wu, and Y. T. Chen, “Hepatic and neuromuscular forms of glycogen storage disease type IV caused by mutations in the same glycogen-branching enzyme gene,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 97, pp. 941–948, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. S. W. Moses and R. Parvari, “The variable presentations of glycogen storage disease type IV: a review of clinical, enzymatic and molecular studies,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 2, pp. 177–188, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  60. M. K. Davis and D. A. Weinstein, “Liver transplantation in children with glycogen storage disease: controversies and evaluation of the risk/benefit of this procedure,” Pediatric Transplantation, vol. 12, pp. 137–145, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  61. P. L. Magoulas, A. W. El-Hattab, A. Roy, D. S. Bali, M. J. Finegold, and W. J. Craigen, “Diffuse reticuloendothelial system involvement in type IV glycogen storage disease with a novel GBE1 mutation: a case report and review,” Human Pathology, vol. 43, pp. 943–951, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. D. H. Brown and B. I. Brown, “Studies of the residual glycogen branching enzyme activity present in human skin fibroblasts from patients with type IV glycogen storage disease,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 111, pp. 636–643, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. H. O. Akman, C. Karadimas, Y. Gyftodimou et al., “Prenatal diagnosis of glycogen storage disease type IV,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 26, pp. 951–955, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  64. S. C. Nagamani, A. Erez, and B. Lee, “Argininosuccinate lyase deficiency,” Genetics in Medicine, vol. 14, pp. 501–507, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  65. C. Ficicioglu, R. Mandell, and V. E. Shih, “Argininosuccinate lyase deficiency: longterm outcome of 13 patients detected by newborn screening,” Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 273–277, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  66. M. Tuchman, B. Lee, U. Lichter-Konecki et al., “Cross-sectional multicenter study of patients with urea cycle disorders in the United States,” Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 397–402, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. S. Mercimek-Mahmutoglu, D. Moeslinger, J. Häberle et al., “Long-term outcome of patients with argininosuccinate lyase deficiency diagnosed by newborn screening in Austria,” Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, vol. 100, pp. 24–28, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  68. N. Brunetti-Pierri, A. Erez, O. Shchelochkov, W. Craigen, and B. Lee, “Systemic hypertension in two patients with ASL deficiency: a result of nitric oxide deficiency?” Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, vol. 98, pp. 195–197, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. M. Linnebank, E. Tschiedel, J. Haberle et al., “Argininosuccinate lyase (ASL) deficiency: mutation analysis in 27 patients and a completed structure of the human ASL gene,” Human Genetics, vol. 111, no. 4-5, pp. 350–359, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. W. J. Kleijer, V. H. Garritsen, M. Linnebank et al., “Clinical, enzymatic, and molecular genetic characterization of a biochemical variant type of argininosuccinic aciduria: prenatal and postnatal diagnosis in five unrelated families,” Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, vol. 25, pp. 399–410, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  71. J. Häberle and H. G. Koch, “Genetic approach to prenatal diagnosis in urea cycle defects,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 24, pp. 378–383, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. K. Kobayashi, M. Iijima, M. Ushikai, S. Ikeda, and T. Saheki, “Citrin deficiency,” The Journal of the Pediatric Society, vol. 110, pp. 1047–1059, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  73. T. Ohura, K. Kobayashi, Y. Tazawa et al., “Clinical pictures of 75 patients with neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis caused by citrin deficiency,” Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, vol. 30, pp. 139–144, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  74. A. Tamamori, Y. Okano, H. Ozaki et al., “Neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis caused by citrin deficiency: severe hepatic dysfunction in an infant requiring liver transplantation,” European Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 161, no. 11, pp. 609–613, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  75. Y. Z. Song, M. Deng, F. P. Chen et al., “Genotypic and phenotypic features of citrin deficiency: five-year experience in a Chinese pediatric center,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 28, pp. 33–40, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  76. S. Ikeda, S. Kawa, Y. Takei et al., “Chronic pancreatitis associated with adult-onset type II citrullinemia: clinical and pathological findings,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 141, pp. W109–W110, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  77. K. Kobayashi and T. Saheki, “Molecular basis of citrin deficiency,” Seikagaku, vol. 76, pp. 1543–1559, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  78. K. Kobayashi, N. Shaheen, R. Kumashiro et al., “A search for the primary abnormality in adult-onset type II citrullinemia,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 53, pp. 1024–1030, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  79. T. Yasuda, N. Yamaguchi, K. Kobayashi et al., “Identification of two novel mutations in the SLC25A13 gene and detection of seven mutations in 102 patients with adult-onset type II citrullinemia,” Human Genetics, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 537–545, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. D. L. Bernstein, H. Hülkova, M. G. Bialer, and R. J. Desnick, “Cholesteryl ester storage disease: review of the findings in 135 reported patients with an underdiagnosed disease,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 58, pp. 1230–1243, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. G. A. Grabowski, L. Charnas, and H. Du, “Lysosomal acid lipase deficiencies: the Wolman disease/cholesteryl ester storage disease spectrum,” in Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease—OMMBID, D. Scriver Valle, A. L. Beaudet, B. Vogelstein, K. W. Kinzler, S. E. Antonarakis, and A. Ballabio, Eds., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  82. H. Chatrath, S. Keilin, and B. M. Attar, “Cholesterol ester storage disease (CESD) diagnosed in an asymptomatic adult,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 168–173, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. G. Assmann and U. Seedorf, “Acid lipase deficiency: Wolman disease and cholesteryl ester storage disease,” in The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease, C. R. Scriver, A. L. Beaudet, W. S. Sly, and D. Valle, Eds., pp. 3551–3572, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  84. L. Pisciotta, R. Fresa, A. Bellocchio et al., “Cholesteryl ester storage disease (CESD) due to novel mutations in the LIPA gene,” Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, vol. 97, pp. 143–148, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  85. B. Zhang and A. F. Porto, “Cholesteryl ester storage disease: protean presentations of lysosomal acid lipase deficiency,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, vol. 56, pp. 682–685, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  86. H. Hulkova and M. Elleder, “Distinctive histopathological features that support a diagnosis of cholesterol ester storage disease in liver biopsy specimens,” Histopathology, vol. 60, pp. 1107–1113, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  87. S. Vom Dahl, K. Harzer, A. Rolfs et al., “Hepatosplenomegalic lipidosis: what unless Gaucher? Adult cholesteryl ester storage disease (CESD) with anemia, mesenteric lipodystrophy, increased plasma chitotriosidase activity and a homozygous lysosomal acid lipase-1 exon 8 splice junction mutation,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 31, pp. 741–746, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  88. H. Klima, K. Ullrich, C. Aslanidis, P. Fehringer, K. J. Lackner, and G. Schmitz, “A splice junction mutation causes deletion of a 72-base exon from the mRNA for lysosomal acid lipase in a patient with cholesteryl ester storage disease,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 2713–2718, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  89. J. D. Marshall, R. T. Bronson, G. B. Collin et al., “New Alström syndrome phenotypes based on the evaluation of 182 cases,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 165, no. 6, pp. 675–683, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  90. E. Malm, V. Ponjavic, P. M. Nishina et al., “Full-field electroretinography and marked variability in clinical phenotype of Alström syndrome,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 126, pp. 51–57, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  91. J. D. Marshall, P. Maffei, G. B. Collin, and J. K. Naggert, “Alström syndrome: genetics and clinical overview,” Current Genomics, vol. 12, pp. 225–235, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  92. J. D. Marshall, S. Beck, P. Maffei, and J. K. Naggert, “Alström syndrome,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 15, pp. 1193–1202, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  93. J. D. Marshall, E. G. Hinman, G. B. Collin et al., “Spectrum of ALMS1 variants and evaluation of genotype-phenotype correlations in Alström syndrome,” Human Mutation, vol. 28, pp. 1114–1123, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. I. Pereiro, B. E. Hoskins, J. D. Marshall et al., “Arrayed Primer Extension technology simplifies mutation detection in Bardet Biedl and Alström Syndrome,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 19, pp. 485–488, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  95. C. J. Bell, D. L. Dinwiddie, N. A. Miller et al., “Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next-generation sequencing,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 3, p. 65ra4, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  96. M. De Vos, F. Barbier, and C. Cuvelier, “Congenital hepatic fibrosis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 222–228, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. O. Yönem, N. Ozkayar, F. Balkanci et al., “Is congenital hepatic fibrosis a pure liver disease?” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 101, pp. 1253–1259, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  98. J. A. Summerfield, Y. Nagafuchi, S. Sherlock, J. Canafalch, and P. J. Scheuer, “Hepatobiliary fibropolycystic disease: a clinical and histological review of 51 patients,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 2, pp. 141–156, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  99. A. M. di Bisceglie and A. S. Befeler, “Cystic and nodular diseases on the liver,” in Schiff's Diseases of the Liver, E. R. Schiff, W. C. Maddrey, and M. Sorrell, Eds., pp. 1231–1251, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 10th edition, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  100. A. Shorbagi and Y. Bayraktar, “Experience of a single center with congenital hepaticfibrosis a review of the literature,” The World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 16, pp. 683–690, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  101. G. Brancatelli, M. P. Federle, V. Vilgrain, M. P. Vullierme, D. Marin, and R. Lagalla, “Fibropolycystic liver disease: CT and MR imaging findings,” Radiographics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 659–670, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  102. S. K. Sarin and A. Kumar, “Noncirrhotic portal hypertension,” Clinical Liver Disease, vol. 10, pp. 627–651, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  103. G. Castaldo, G. Calcagno, R. Sibillo et al., “Quantitative analysis of aldolase A mRNA in liver discriminates between hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 46, pp. 901–906, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  104. G. Esposito, L. Vitagliano, R. Santamaria, A. Viola, A. Zagari, and F. Salvatore, “Structural and functional analysis of aldolase B mutants related to hereditary fructose intolerance,” FEBS Letters, vol. 531, no. 2, pp. 152–156, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  105. C. Ciacci, D. Gennarelli, G. Esposito, R. Tortora, F. Salvatore, and L. Sacchetti, “Hereditary fructose intolerance and celiac disease: a novel genetic association,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 4, pp. 635–638, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  106. M. I. Yasawy, U. R. Folsch, W. E. Schmidt, and M. Schwend, “Adult hereditary fructose intolerance,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 15, pp. 2412–2413, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  107. R. D. Oberhaensli, B. Rajagopalan, D. J. Taylor et al., “Study of hereditary fructose intolerance by use of 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy,” The Lancet, vol. 2, pp. 931–934, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  108. G. Esposito, M. R. Imperato, L. Ieno et al., “Hereditary fructose intolerance: functional study of two novel ALDOB natural variants and characterization of a partial gene deletion,” Human Mutation, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1294–1303, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  109. G. Esposito, R. Santamaria, L. Vitagliano et al., “Six novel alleles identified in Italian fructose intolerance enlarge the mutation spectrum of the aldolase B gene,” Human Mutation, vol. 24, p. 534, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  110. R. Santamaria, L. Vitagliano, S. Tamasi et al., “Novel six-nucleotide deletion in the hepatic fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase gene in a patient with hereditary fructose intolerance and enzyme structure-function implications,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 7, pp. 409–414, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  111. R. Santamaria, S. Tamasi, G. Del Piano et al., “Molecular basis of hereditary fructose intolerance in Italy: identification of two novel mutations in the aldolase B gene,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 33, pp. 786–788, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  112. E. Gonzales, A. Spraul, and E. Jacquemin, “Clinical utility gene card for: progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 22, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  113. E. Jacquemin, O. Bernard, M. Hadchouel et al., “The wide spectrum of multidrug resistance 3 deficiency: from neonatal cholestasis to cirrhosis of adulthood,” Gastroenterology, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 1448–1458, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  114. M. Ziol, V. Barbu, O. Rosmorduc et al., “ABCB4 heterozygous gene mutations associated with fibrosing cholestatic liver disease in adults,” Gastroenterology, vol. 135, pp. 131–141, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  115. A. Davit-Spraul, E. Gonzales, C. Baussan, and E. Jacquemin, “Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis,” Clinical Pediatrics, vol. 51, pp. 689–691, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  116. R. Ramraj, M. J. Finegold, and S. J. Karpen, “Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3: overlapping presentation with Wilson disease,” Clinical Pediatrics, vol. 51, pp. 689–691, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  117. O. Rosmorduc and R. Poupon, “Low phospholipid associated cholelithiasis: association with mutation in the MDR3/ABCB4 gene,” Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, vol. 2, article 29, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  118. D. Degiorgio, P. A. Corsetto, A. M. Rizzo et al., “Two ABCB4 point mutations of strategic NBD-motifs do not prevent protein targeting to the plasma membrane but promote MDR3 dysfunction,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 22, pp. 633–639, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  119. C. Colombo, P. Vajro, D. Degiorgio et al., “Clinical features and genotype-phenotype correlations in children with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 related to ABCB4 mutations,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, vol. 52, pp. 73–83, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  120. R. Tomaiuolo, D. Degiorgio, D. A. Coviello et al., “An MBL2 haplotype and ABCB4 variants modulate the risk of liver disease in cystic fibrosis patients: a multicentre study,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 41, pp. 817–822, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  121. D. Tavian, D. Degiorgio, N. Roncaglia et al., “A new splicing site mutation of the ABCB4 gene in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with raised serum gamma-GT,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 41, pp. 671–675, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  122. D. Degiorgio, C. Colombo, M. Seia et al., “Molecular characterization and structural implications of 25 new ABCB4 mutations in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3 (PFIC3),” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 15, pp. 1230–1238, 2007. View at Google Scholar