Is Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio a Predictor of Coronary Artery Disease in Western Indians?
Table 1
Comparison of parameters between group 1 (population without CAD) and group 2 (population with CAD).
Variables
Groups
Mean
Standard deviation
Significance
WBC
Group 1
10175.6
3772.0
0.034
Group 2
12045.8
4596.6
Neutrophil
Group 1
7284.2
3924.9
0.041
Group 2
9184.2
4532.9
Lymphocyte
Group 1
2265.6
951.9
0.507
Group 2
2191.0
922.6
Eosinophil
Group 1
257.4
169.3
0.391
Group 2
254.8
190.2
Monocyte
Group 1
370.1
304.5
0.0001
Group 2
476.9
209.1
Basophil
Group 1
0.7
6.5
0.404
Group 2
1.3
13.9
Platelet
Group 1
308440.0
120954.6
0.818
Group 2
318787.4
159314.1
MPV
Group 1
6.6
1.3
0.150
Group 2
6.9
1.5
NLR
Group 1
4.3
3.8
0.001
Group 2
5.6
4.5
PLR
Group 1
163.4
107.9
0.751
Group 2
190.8
266.4
RDW
Group 1
12.4
2.0
0.002
Group 2
12.9
1.6
hs-CRP
Group 1
1.8
4.2
<0.0001
Group 2
3.3
4.3
CPK-MB
Group 1
51.4
76.7
<0.0001
Group 2
116.4
152.5
Troponin I
Group 1
6.3
14.4
<0.0001
Group 2
14.0
18.8
ESR
Group 1
22.4
8.3
0.227
Group 2
23.6
8.5
CAD: coronary artery disease, Group 1: population without CAD, group 2; population with CAD, WBC: white blood cell, MPV: mean platelet volume, NLR: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, PLR: platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, PWBC: platelet white blood cell ratio, RDW: red cell distribution width, hs-CRP: high sensitivity C-reactive protein, CPK-MB: creatinine phosphokinase-MB, and ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
