International Journal of Microbiology

International Journal of Microbiology / 2009 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2009 |Article ID 472126 |

Lorena Pardo, Virginia Machado, Marta Mollerach, María Inés Mota, Lorena P. N. Tuchscherr, Pilar Gadea, Noella Gardella, Daniel O. Sordelli, Magdalena Vola, Felipe Schelotto, Gustavo Varela, "Characteristics of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) Strains Isolated from Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections in Uruguay", International Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2009, Article ID 472126, 5 pages, 2009.

Characteristics of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) Strains Isolated from Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections in Uruguay

Academic Editor: John R. Tagg
Received27 May 2009
Accepted06 Aug 2009
Published22 Oct 2009


We analyzed 90 nonduplicates community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) strains isolated from skin and soft-tissue infections. All strains were mecA positive. Twenty-four of the 90 strains showed inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance. All strains produced -toxin; 96% and 100% of them displayed positive results for lukS-F and cna genes, respectively. Eigthy-five strains expressed capsular polysaccharide serotype 8. Six different pulsotypes were discriminated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and three predominant groups of CA-MRSA strains (1, 2, and 4) were identified, in agreement with phenotypic and genotypic characteristics. Strains of group 1 (pulsotype A, CP8+, and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)+) were the most frequently recovered and exhibited a PFGE band pattern identical to other CA-MRSA strains previously isolated in Uruguay and Brazil. Three years after the first local CA-MRSA report, these strains are still producing skin and soft-tissue infections demonstrating the stability over time of this community-associated emerging pathogen.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is capable of establishing a wide spectrum of interactions with the human host. It can be part of the microbial flora or cause a variety of illnesses ranging from mild infections compromising skin and soft-tissues to severe life-threatening diseases such as necrotizing pneumonia, bacteremia, osteomyelitis, toxic shock syndrome, and meningitis [1]. S. aureus harbors several virulence factors including surface-associated adhesins, secreted exo-proteins and toxins [25]. Another important characteristic of S. aureus is the capacity to acquire resistance to antimicrobial agents. The first isolation of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was reported in 1960 and since then the prevalence of MRSA has increased in all scrutinized regions, with different figures even within the same country [6, 7]. Methicillin resistance is conferred by the mecA gene which codes for an additional penicillin-binding protein, namely, 2a (PBP2a) with reduced affinity to -lactam agents. This gene is located in a mobile genetic element of variable size called staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). So far, seven types and several subtypes of SCCmec have been characterized [811].

Since 1990 an increasing number of cases produced by MRSA acquired in the community have been reported, especially in children and young adults without the classical risk factors involved in healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (HA-MRSA) infections [1215]. These strains were called CA-MRSA (community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus) to distinguish them from HA-MRSA. Generally HA-MRSA strains are resistant to other antibiotics different from -lactams, whereas CA-MRSA are mostly resistant to methicillin only. HA-MRSA isolates frequently harbor SSCmec types-I, II and III whereas CA-MRSA strains carry types IV, V, VI and VII. Finally, unlike HA-MRSA, the majority of CA-MRSA strains carry the lukS-F genes which code for the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) [9, 16].

Previously, Ma et al. [17] reported the results of a CA-MRSA outbreak that took place in Uruguay between 2002-2003. The cases informed in this study were observed in children, young adults and inmates. Boils and abscesses were the most prevalent infections, followed by hidradenitis and cellulitis.

The aim of this study was to establish the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of CA-MRSA strains recovered from skin and soft-tissues infections.

2. Materials and Methods

We analyzed 213 S. aureus strains obtained between December 2004 and November 2005 from 213 outpatients with skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTI). These strains were recovered from four different laboratories, three of them located in Montevideo and the metropolitan area and the other located 400 Km from Montevideo.

Clinically and epidemiologically relevant information from each patient were collected from the medical records and patient interviews. Susceptibility to antimicrobial agents was determined by the disk diffusion method in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [18]. The antibiotics tested included oxacillin, cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, gentamicin, rifampin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, vancomycin, erythromycin, and clindamycin (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK). S. aureus strain ATCC 25923 was used as quality control. The double disk diffusion test was performed to determine inducible clindamycin resistance ( ) [18].

Susceptibility to mupirocin and fusidic acid was also tested by the disk diffusion method. Results were interpreted according to Fuchs et al. [19] and to the French standards for mupirocin and fusidic acid, respectively [20].

MICs to oxacillin and vancomycin were determined by the agar dilution method [18].

Ninety out of the 213 strains were defined as CA-MRSA based on the epidemiologic analysis of the patients [21] and their antibiotic susceptibility profile: cefoxitin-resistant and susceptible to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline and gentamicin. These 90 CA-MRSAstrains were further analyzed as described in what follows.

2.1. Virulence Factor Identification

Alpha-hemolysin was detected in accordance with the procedure described by Cooper et al. [22] S. aureus Wood 46 strain was included as a positive control. The presence of -hemolysin was ascertained by demonstration of increased hemolysis in sheep blood agar plates incubated at 37°C for 24 hours and then at 4°C for other 24 hours (heat-cold lysis). CP typing was performed by colony immunoblot method with CP5 and CP8-specific antibodies as described by Lee et al. [23]. Strains showing a negative reaction to this test were later investigated by immunodiffusion. Each strain was tested at least twice and those isolates with no reaction to CP5 and CP8 antibodies were defined as nontypeable (NT). The presence of cap5 or cap8 genes in NT strains was determined by PCR amplification as described elsewhere [24].

2.2. Genotyping

Bacterial DNA was obtained from isolated colonies using the Wizard genomic DNA preparation kit (Promega. Madison, Wis, USA) adding 20 mg/mL lysostaphin (Sigma Chemical) in the cell-lysis step [25]. The presence of cna, mecA and lukS-lukF genes was determined by PCR amplification [2628].

SCCmec typing was performed by a multiplex PCR method only on 23 isolates belonging to group1 and on four group 4 strains (described in what follows) [10].

2.3. Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE)

DNA macrorestriction and separation of fragments by PFGE were conducted using standardized procedures [29]. DNA was digested with SmaI (New England Biolabs). PFGE conditions were 6 V/cm at 11,3°C for 23 hours, with pulses of 5 to 35 seconds. Electrophoresis was performed using a CHEF DR II instrument (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif, USA). Band patterns were visually interpreted following the criteria of Tenover et al. [30].

3. Results and Discussion

The mecA gene was detected in the 90 CA-MRSA strains analyzed. Nevertheless, 3 out of the 90 strains displayed oxacillin inhibition zone diameters 13 mm. These results were similar to those described previously by other authors regarding the best performance of cefoxitin 30  g disk versus oxacillin 1  g disk for the screening of the MRSA phenotype confered by the mecA gene [31, 32]. The MIC for oxacillin of all the CA-MRSA strains ranged from 4 to 32  g/mL with a MIC90 of 16  g/mL, which is consistent with the heterogeneous resistance phenotype. These findings agree with reports showing that oxacillin MIC of CA-MRSA strains are lower than the values observed for HA-MRSA isolates [33].

Twenty-four out of 90 (26.6%) CA-MRSA strains showed inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B ( ) resistance by the double-disk diffusion test. This figure is similar to that obtained by Patel et al. [34] and, as suggested by these authors, it might be due to the predominance of the cassette IV in Uruguayan CA-MRSA strains [17] which do not have the erm genes associated with inducible phenotype. In this regard, twenty-three CA-MRSA strains belonging to group 1 (described in what follows) showed SSCmec type-IV, whereas four group 4 strains carried SCCmec elements type-II.

Two isolates were resistant to chloramphenicol and rifampin. Rifampin has a potent antistaphylococcal activity, however resistance develops invariably when it is used as monotherapy for the treatment of S. aureus infections. Three of the 90 strains were resistant to mupirocin whereas all strains were susceptible to fusidic acid. These results suggest that fusidic acid could be used as a topical empiric adjuvant treatment for nasal eradication of CA-MRSA.

All of the CA-MRSA strains studied were susceptible to vancomycin by the disk diffusion test and displayed MICs of 2  g/mL.

All the CA-MRSA isolates produced α-hemolysin but none produced -hemolysin.

Eighty-five isolates expressed CP8, one was CP5-positive and four strains were NT. Those four NT isolates carried the cap8 genes. This low prevalence of CP5 among the CA-MRSA (1%) could explain, at least partially, the absence of fatal cases observed in this group of patients [35].

Ninety-six percent of the CA-MRSA strains exhibited positive PCR amplification with lukS-F gene primers and all strains yielded positive amplification results with the cna gene primers. PVL production has been associated with CA-MRSA strains isolated from individuals with skin infections and necrotizing pneumonia [28, 36]. In contrast to CA-MRSA, HA-MRSA strains generally do not harbor the lukS-lukF genes. Therefore, the presence of the PVL genes emerged as a good local marker of CA-MRSA. With regard to the cna gene, several reports have described an association between the presence of this gene and the development of bacteremia associated with deep tissue infection [26, 37]. In this study we did not perform blood culture follow-up of the patients infected with CA-MRSA strains and there is no local information on the evolution of those infections caused by cna negative S. aureus strains.

Six different pulsotypes (A–F) (Figure 1(a)) were identified by PFGE. Eigthy-two of the 90 strains belonged to the pulsotype A group (Figure 1(a), lane 1 and Table 1); 4 isolates were included in the pulsotype B, whereas C, D, E, and F pulsotypes were represented by one isolate each. Three minor subtypes within pulsotype A (A1, A2, and A3) (Figure 1(b)) were identified according to Tenover’s criteria. Pulsotype A isolates exhibited a band pattern identical to those isolates identified by Ma et al. [17], being the most frequently found in Uruguay (UR06, ST30) during the 2002-2003 period. Visually, the pulsotype A band pattern (Figure 1(a), lane 1) closely resembles to a community-associated MRSA clone reported in the South West Pacific region. This finding is similar to what was previously reported by Ribeiro et al. [38] in Porto Alegre, Brazil, and it could be in agreement to a regional dissemination of the Oceanìa Southwest Pacific Clone (OSPC).

GroupPFGE typeCP i M L S B PhenotypePVLNumber of strains

1A 8 + 6 2 ( a ) , ( b )
2A, A1, A2 8 + + 1 9
3A3 8 1
4B 8 + + 4 ( c )
5C 8 + 1
6D 8 + 1
7E N T + 1 ( d )
8F 5 1


( a ) Fifty-nine isolates showed positive result by colony immunoblot method with CP8 antibody and 3 strains showed positive result by PCR for the cp8 gene. ( b ) Twenty-three strains showed SCCmec type-IV. ( c ) All strains in this group showed SCCmec type-II. ( d ) Positive PCR amplification for the cp8 gene.

Considering the PFGE results, inducible phenotype, the presence of PVL genes and the CP serotype (Table 1), our findings suggest that several groups of CA-MRSA strains were circulating in Uruguay during the period of analysis. The major group (62 of the 90 strains) presented the following characteristics: pulsotype A, CP8 and PVL. Twenty-three of these 62 strains carried SCCmec type-IV. This group also included three NT strains but with positive PCR results for the cp8 gene (Table 1). These results might be complemented by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) or spaA-typing.

In summary, three years after of the first finding of CA-MRSA isolates in Uruguay these strains are still producing SSTI, illustrating the stability over time of this emergent pathogen, as well as its excellent adaptation to the community enviroment. The cefoxitin disk test would be more reliable than the oxacillin disk test for the screening of the MRSA phenotype confered by the mecA gene and fusidic acid could be used as a topical empiric adjuvant treatment for nasal eradication of CA-MRSA. Our results also suggest that the presence of PVL genes appear as useful local markers for the detection of CA-MRSA strains. In this study we identified three major groups of CA-MRSA strains (1, 2, and 4) defined according to phenotypic and genotypic characteristics. The most frequent group, G1, showed a PFGE pattern identical to CA-MRSA strains previously isolated in Uruguay and Brazil.


This work was partially supported by a grant from the Comision Sectorial de Investigación Científica (CSIC) 2004-23, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay, and by grants ANPCyT PICT 05-32577 and UBACyT M070 to DOS.


  1. M. J. Sibbald, A. K. Ziebandt, S. Engelmann et al., “Mapping the pathways to staphylococcal pathogenesis by comparative secretomics,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 755–788, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. M. Dinges, P. M. Orwin, and P. M. Schlievert, “Exotoxins of Staphylococcus aureus,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 16–34, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  3. I. Fedtke, F. Götz, and A. Peschel, “Bacterial evasion of innate host defenses—the Staphylococcus aureus lesson,” International Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 294, no. 2-3, pp. 189–194, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. K. McCormick, J. M. Yarwood, and P. M. Schlievert, “Toxic shock syndrome and bacterial superantigens: an update,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 55, pp. 77–104, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. N. Palmqvist, J. M. Patti, A. Tarkowski, and E. Josefsson, “Expression of staphylococcal clumping factor A impedes macrophage phagocytosis,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 188–195, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. P. Jevons, ““Celbenin”-resistant staphylococci,” British Medical Journal, vol. 1, pp. 124–125, 1961. View at: Google Scholar
  7. A. Voss, D. Milatovic, C. Wallrauch-Schwarz, V. T. Rosdahl, and I. Braveny, “Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 50–55, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  8. R. H. Deurenberg and E. E. Stobberingh, “The evolution of Staphylococcus aureus,” Infection, Genetics and Evolution, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 747–763, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. B. C. Herold, L. C. Immergluck, M. C. Maranan et al., “Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children with no identified predisposing risk,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 279, no. 8, pp. 593–598, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. C. Oliveira and H. de Lencastre, “Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 2155–2161, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Ito, Y. Katayama, K. Asada et al., “Structural comparison of three types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec integrated in the chromosome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1323–1336, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Four pediatric deaths from community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-Minnesota and North Dakota, 1997–1999,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 48, pp. 707–710, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  13. E. A. Eady and J. H. Cove, “Staphylococcal resistance revisited: community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus—an emerging problem for the management of skin and soft tissue infections,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 103–124, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  14. F. D. Lowy, “Staphylococcus aureus infections,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 8, pp. 520–532, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. S. Naimi, K. H. LeDell, K. Como-Sabetti et al., “Comparison of community- and health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 290, no. 22, pp. 2976–2984, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. V. Groom, D. H. Wolsey, T. S. Naimi et al., “Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a rural American Indian community,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 286, no. 10, pp. 1201–1205, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  17. X. X. Ma, A. Galiana, W. Pedreira et al., “Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Uruguay,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 973–976, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  18. Clinical and Laboratory Standars Institute, “Performance standard for antimicrobial susceptibility testing,” 15th informational supplement, document M100-S15, Wayne, Pa, USA, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  19. P. C. Fuchs, R. N. Jones, and A. L. Barry, “Interpretive criteria for disk diffusion susceptibility testing of mupirocin, a topical antibiotic,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 608–609, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  20. C. J. Soussy, G. Carret, J. D. Cavallo et al., “Antibiogram commitee of the French society of mirobiology society. Report 2000-2001,” Pathologie Biologie, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 832–871, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  21. Minnesota Department of Health, “Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Minnesota,” Disease Control Newsletter, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 61–72, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  22. L. Z. Cooper, M. A. Madoff, and L. Weinstein, “Hemolysis of rabbit erythrocytes by purified staphylococcal alpha-toxin I. Kinetics of the lytic reaction,” The Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 87, pp. 127–135, 1964. View at: Google Scholar
  23. J. C. Lee, M. -J. Liu, J. Parsonnet, and R. D. Arbeit, “Expression of type 8 capsular polysaccharide and production of toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 are associated among vaginal isolates of Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 2612–2615, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  24. L. P. N. Tuchscherr, M. I. Gómez, F. R. Buzzola, L. F. Calvinho, J. C. Lee, and D. O. Sordelli, “Characterization of a new variant of IS257 prevalent among bovine Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in Argentina,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 75, pp. 5483–5488, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  25. S. J. Peacock, C. E. Moore, A. Justice et al., “Virulent combinations of adhesin and toxin genes in natural populations of Staphylococcus aureus,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 4987–4996, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. R. Arciola, D. Campoccia, S. Gamberini, L. Baldassarri, and L. Montanaro, “Prevalence of cna, fnbA and fnbB adhesin genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from orthopedic infections associated to different types of implant,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 246, no. 1, pp. 81–86, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. D. Fey, B. Saïd-Salim, M. E. Rupp et al., “Comparative molecular analysis of community- or hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 196–203, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. G. Lina, Y. Piemont, F. Godail-Gamot et al., “Involvement of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-producing Staphylococcus aureus in primary skin infections and pneumonia,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1128–1132, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. T. L. Bannerman, G. A. Hancock, F. C. Tenover, and J. M. Miller, “Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as a replacement for bacteriophage typing of Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 551–555, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  30. F. C. Tenover, R. D. Arbeit, R. V. Goering et al., “Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed- field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 2233–2239, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  31. Y. Lee, C. K. Kim, M. Kim, D. Yong, K. Lee, and Y. Chong, “Detection of mecA in strains with oxacillin and cefoxitin disk tests for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus,” The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 276–280, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Zeeshan, K. Jabeen, E. Khan et al., “Comparison of different phenotypic methods of detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus with the molecular detection of mecA gene,” Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 666–670, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  33. K. Okuma, K. Iwakawa, J. D. Turnidge et al., “Dissemination of new methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in the community,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 4289–4294, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Patel, K. B. Waites, S. A. Moser, G. A. Cloud, and C. J. Hoesley, “Prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance among community- and hospital-associated Staphylococcus aureus isolates,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 2481–2484, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. Watts, D. Ke, Q. Wang, A. Pillay, A. Nicholson-Weller, and J. C. Lee, “Staphylococcus aureus strains that express serotype 5 or serotype 8 capsular polysaccharides differ in virulence,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 3502–3511, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. B. Saïd-Salim, B. Mathema, and B. N. Kreiswirth, “Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an emerging pathogen,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 451–455, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  37. D. Holderbaum, T. Spech, L. A. Ehrhart, T. Keys, and G. S. Hall, “Collagen binding in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 2258–2261, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  38. A. Ribeiro, C. Dias, M. C. Silva-Carvalho et al., “First report of infection with community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in South America,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1985–1988, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2009 Lorena Pardo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles