International Journal of Microbiology

International Journal of Microbiology / 2009 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2009 |Article ID 719367 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/719367

Soybean Lectin Enhances Biofilm Formation by Bradyrhizobium japonicum in the Absence of Plants

Academic Editor: Dulal Borthakur
Received13 Aug 2008
Revised13 Dec 2008
Accepted13 Mar 2009
Published26 May 2009

Abstract

Soybean lectin (SBL) purified from soybean seeds by affinity chromatography strongly bound to Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110 cell surface. This lectin enhanced biofilm formation by B. japonicum in a concentration-dependent manner. Presence of galactose during biofilm formation had different effects in the presence or absence of SBL. Biofilms were completely inhibited in the presence of both SBL and galactose, while in the absence of SBL, galactose was less inhibitory. SBL was very stable, since its agglutinating activity of B. japonicum cells as well as of human group A+ erythrocytes was resistant to preincubation for one week at . Hence, we propose that plant remnants might constitute a source of this lectin, which might remain active in soil and thus favor B. japonicum biofilm formation in the interval between soybean crop seasons.

1. Introduction

Rhizobia comprise a diverse group of soil bacterial species that share the ability to form N2-fixing nodules in legume roots. As part of this group, B.japonicum specifically infects and nodulates soybean roots. A great deal of symbiotic specificity relies on a lipochitooligosaccharide molecule synthesized by rhizobia, known as Nod factor. It consists of a backbone of β-1,4 linked N-acetyl glucosamines with an N-acyl substituent at the nonreducing end and several decorations in some of its sugar residues. These decorations are responsible for the specific recognition of a given Nod factor by the symbiotic legume species [1]. Another yet uncharacterized specific recognition mechanism is provided by plant lectins [2].

The process of early rhizobia-legume interactions that leads to root infection and nodulation has been studied in detail [3]. However, only a minority of rhizobia from the soil are able to occupy the nodules: while a legume growing in natural conditions typically have up to a few hundred nodules in its root, each one occupied by a clone derived from one or a few rhizobial cells, the root system explores a soil volume of several , that may contain in the order of 107 rhizobia able to nodulate it [4]. Thus, by focusing on signal exchange, infection, and early nodulation, we probably overlook the fate of 99.99% of the rhizobial population that interacts with the root, but not necessarily produce an effective infection. Turning to the time dimension, we can consider the annual rhizobial cycle as composed by plant infection, nodulation, nodule maturation, senescence, rhizobia release, and persistence in soil. In this view, the early interaction period comprises less than 10% of the whole cycle, while the steps from nodule senescence to rhizobial persistence in soil occupy more than 60% of it. These considerations underscore the importance of the free-living, non-root-associated rhizobial state. In comparison to our knowledge on early infection and fixation, few studies were addressed at this out-of-the-root state, in which rhizobia must survive in a very complex and often hostile environment, being exposed to feast-to-famine nutrient fluctuations, cycles from flooding to desiccation, temperature extremes, predation, exposure to UV irradiance when near the soil surface, and inhibition by antibacterial substances like antibiotics released by other members of soil biota. Therefore, we addressed this study at B.japonicum biofilm formation in the absence of plants, which seems the preferred state of rhizobia in naked soil, nonsymbiotic rhizospheres, or noninfectable tissue on symbiotic roots.

Biofilms consist in multicellular structures where bacteria are surrounded by extracellular polymers leaving open channels inside the structure, which sets on a surface and acquires typical shapes [5]. Inside biofilms bacteria undergo physiological changes in relation to individual, planktonic cells, leading to special proteomes and metabolic activities [68]. The extracellular matrix, mostly composed by exopolysaccharides (EPSs), is believed to play a key role in biofilm endurance [5]. Biofilm formation was first reported in rhizobia by Seneviratne and Jayasinghearachchi in 2003, who observed that Bradyrhizobium sp is able to form typical biofilm structures on diverse biotic and abiotic surfaces [9]. Furthermore, roles of EPS [1012] and Nod factor [13] were observed, as well as the conditioning of biofilm formation by nutrient and osmotic cell status [14].

Although many reports exist on the participation of bacterial lectins (particularly, those taking part in pilus structure) in biofilm formation [15], studies on the participation of plant lectins are lacking. In 1974 Bohlool and Schmidt [16] observed that soybean lectin (SBL) bound specifically to 25 of 28 B. japonicum strains, while did not bind to 23 strains from different Rhizobium species. Soon these observations were expanded to other rhizobial species and the SBL receptor in the B. japonicum surface was located at the EPS [17]. This is in agreement with the general role of lectins in mediating cell-cell contacts through its binding to cell surface polysaccharides. For instance, hemagglutinating activity of SBL by binding erythrocyte surface polysaccharides was known long before a role was assigned to this protein in rhizobia agglutination [18]. Therefore, SBL may contribute to biofilm formation in B. japonicum by bridging cells together through their EPS even in the absence of plants, beyond its role on root hair infection [2, 3]. It seems plausible since SBL is released from the plant roots [19] and therefore could be present in the soil surrounding the roots even after their death, provided the protein activity has sufficient stability. In this way, SBL might modify soil environment to facilitate B. japonicum biofilm formation in the same site where host plants proliferate or will be established in the next cycle.

However, earlier studies on the participation of SBL in B. japonicum adhesion to soybean roots rendered conflicting results: it seemed to have no role during the initial process of rhizobial adhesion, but was able to modify the symbiotic capabilities of rhizobia when these were exposed to small concentrations of SBL during several hours [20, 21]. In other examples, the use of plant or algal lectins was proposed as inhibitor of biofilm formation against dental colonizers [22, 23]. Hence, a direct contribution of SBL to biofilm formation by B. japonicum seems not obvious. We addressed this question here by assessing SBL influence on biofilm formation on inert surfaces with a microtiter plate assay [10].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plants and Bacteria

Soybean Don Mario 4800 was kindly provided by Alejandro Perticari (IMyZA, INTA-Castelar, Argentina). B. japonicum USDA 110 was obtained from USDA, Beltsville, USA, and ΔP22 was kindly provided by Peter Müller, Marburg University, Germany. Both strains were grown and maintained in yeast extract-mannitol [24].

2.2. Purification of SBL

Soybean seeds were ground and sieved through a 0.84 mm mesh. This powder was suspended in N-hexane for 1 hour at , filtered, and air-dried. Then it was suspended in modified (MFS) N-free Fåhraeus solution [25] for 2 hours at with stirring, and centrifuged at  g 20 minutes. The supernatant was fractionated with ammonium sulfate between 40 and 70% saturation, and after resuspension and desalting, it was loaded into an ε-aminocaproyl-N-acetyl-β-D-galactosamine agarose affinity column (Sigma Chemical Co.) at a rate of 3 mL at [21]. The nonretained fraction of protein material was pooled and the column washed until absorbance at 280 nm reached the blank value. Then, SBL was eluted with 1 M galactose, and finally SBL was pooled, desalted by extensive dialysis against double-distilled water, and lyophilized. All the fractions were conserved at . Protein concentrations were determined with the Bradford method as described with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard [26].

2.3. Protein Analysis

Denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was done as previously described [27] with 5% polyacrylamide in the stacking gel and 12.5% polyacrylamide in the separating gel. For native PAGE, 7.5% polyacrylamide was employed, and SDS and reductants were ommited. Gels were stained either with Coomassie Brilliant Blue or silver [28], as indicated.

For immunoblot identification, samples were dropped on a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (immobilon-P Millipore), which was blocked with low fat powder milk and treated with a rabbit anti-SBL antibody obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. For development, an alkaline phosphatase-labeled antirabbit IgG (Sigma Chemical Co.) was employed [21].

2.4. Agglutinating Activity

This was performed with five-day-old yeast-extract mannitol grown B. japonicum USDA 110 cells washed and resuspended in PBS ( cell ) or fresh human group A+ erythrocytes suspended in PBS (2% v/v) essentially as described [29, 30]. Agglutinating activity was assessed as the reciprocal of the maximum SBL dilution able to cause cell agglutination.

2.5. Biofilm Formation

Rhizobia were grown as above to an of 1.0. Then, rhizobia were diluted in MFS to an of 0.1. The microtiter plate assay for biofilm quantification was used as described by Fujishige et al. [10]. Briefly, 150  L of cells or MFS were added to individual wells of a 96-well polystyrene plate. The plates were sealed with sterile parafilm “M” and incubated at . At different times the medium was removed and the was measured to verify that there was no difference in growth rate among the wells. Then, the biofilms were stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 20 minutes. Dye excess was washed and optical density at 570 nm was recorded. To evaluate the role of SBL on biofilm formation, an aliquot of the indicated concentration of SBL (or the molecule to be assessed) was added at the beginning of the experiment, together with the rhizobia. In no case there were subsequent additions of either molecule to the developing biofilms.

2.6. Adhesion to Soybean Roots

Rhizobia were grown in yeast extract-mannitol at and 180 rev rotary shaking to an optical density at 500 nm ( ) of 0.5. Then, a method previously described was used [20, 31]. In brief, 10 seedlings per treatment were incubated for 4 hours in MFS with a rhizobial suspension of approximately cells at with rotary shaking at 50 rev . Viable colony-forming units (CFUs) plate counting at the beginning and at the end of these incubations showed that no loss of viability occurred during incubation. Rootlets with adsorbed rhizobia were washed four times, each by shaking with fresh MFS for 1 minute at 120 rev . After washing, the rootlets were distributed on the bottom of petri dishes, and overlaid with molten ( ) yeast extract-mannitol agar supplemented with cycloheximide and the appropriate antibiotic concentration for selection of the assayed indicator strain. After plate incubation at , rhizobia remaining adsorbed on the embedded root surfaces developed microcolonies, which were counted along the visible surface of each primary root under a stereomicroscope at magnification. Then we estimated the total number of rhizobial CFU on the whole root surface as described [20, 31]. Total counts of microcolonies on all primary roots, expressed as the percent of the total number of CFU present in the original inoculum, represented the adhesion index, %A. Confidence intervals ( ) were obtained by employing a relationship already described [31], which takes into account the binomial distribution of adhesion index.

3. Results

3.1. Evaluation of SBL Purification

The process of SBL purification was described earlier and is based on affinity chromatography employing the sugar hapten N-acetyl β-D-galactosamine as ligand. This process allowed obtaining pure SBL from a complex soybean seed extract, with a high yield. This process rendered a single band in SDS-PAGE electrophoresis with a molecular mass coincident to SBL subunit (Figure 1(b)). In nondenaturing gels the purified protein migrated similarly as a commercially obtained SBL (Sigma Chemical Co.), although freshly obtained SBL gave a more defined band (Figure 1(a)). Furthermore, this protein had hemagglutinating activity with both group A+ human erythrocytes and B. japonicum USDA 110 cells, and reacted with an anti-SBL antibody (not shown). Based on these results and a previous more extensive analysis carried out with the same materials and methodology [21] we considered this preparation as purified SBL. When this protein was incubated with resting B. japonicum USDA 110 cells in Fåhraeus solution for 12 hours as previously described [21], it strongly bound to the bacterial surfaces, since it coprecipitated with bacterial cells after centrifugation at  g and cell lysis. To partially remove the lectin from bacterial cell surfaces, it was necessary to subject them to repeated washes in PBS containing 1 M galactose (Figure 1(c)). To confirm that such an SBL binding occurs on the EPS galactose residue we repeated the incubation with the P22 exoB mutant strain, which produces an EPS devoid of galactose [32, 33]. In Figure 1(d) we observed that SBL was absent in protein extracts from this mutant strain, by difference with USDA 110.

3.2. Participation of SBL in Biofilm Formation

The microtiter plate assay developed by Fujishige et al. [10] was employed. In a preliminary characterization we observed that the wild type USDA 110 strain formed growing biofilms within a one-week period while the EPS-defective derivative P22 was very inefficient. When SBL was added at the beginning of these incubations, the concentration previously used by us to increase B. japonicum symbiotic performance [21] was not enough to modify biofilm-forming activity. Thus, we tested a range of higher SBL concentrations, and found that with more than 100 g there was a noticeable biofilm formation in repeated experiments (Figure 2). When the same treatments were applied to P22, no difference between SBL-treated and controls was observed (Figure 3).

From these data we decided to continue our experiments with SBL at a concentration of 300 g , which gave significant differences in 24–48 hours incubations. To confirm that the biofilms were indeed enhanced by SBL and not by any protein, we replaced SBL by BSA in the same concentration and found that this protein, instead of enhancing biofilm formation, precluded it (Figure 4). The same happened with the addition of 100 mM galactose in addition to SBL to biofilms incubation; however, the same concentration of galactose by itself has much less effect on biofilm formation by USDA 110 (Figure 5).

To observe the cell aggregation caused by SBL, we carefully pipetted samples from the wells of the microtiter plates five days after inoculation and observed them in the light microscope. This is only an approximate procedure since biofilms may be altered by removing cells in this way. Nevertheless, the agglutination state of SBL-treated cells could be assessed. While cells taken from wells without SBL readily dispersed producing fairly homogeneous fields (Figure 6(a)), cells taken from SBL-treated wells remained aggregated, leaving spaces without bacteria among the aggregates, thus indicating their strengthness (Figure 6(b)).

3.3. Adhesion of B. japonicum to Soybean Roots

The methodology employed in this work allows quantification of firm adhesion of rhizobia to plant roots, since the standardized washing procedure removes loosely bound bacterial cells [34]. In previous studies, we observed that the addition of N-acetyl D-galactosamine, a specific hapten of SBL, to a rhizobia-plant incubation medium during adhesion assays had little effect on the level of rhizobial adhesion in 4-hour incubations [20]. However, preincubation of rhizobia in SBL for longer periods increased adhesion [21], and this effect was enhanced by culturing the rhizobial cells under N-starvation, a condition that also stimulated EPS production [35]. Here we compared the adhesion of B. japonicum wild type USDA 110 and the derived P22 strain, which is unable to incorporate galactose moieties into its EPS [32, 33] and therefore, does not bind SBL (Figure 1(d)). As shown in Figure 7, adhesion of P22 to soybean roots was significantly lower than USDA 110, indicating that complete EPS and/or SBL binding are required for firm adhesion of B. japonicum to soybean roots.

3.4. SBL Stability

We assessed SBL stability by incubating it for different periods ranging from 1 day to 1 week at or in double-distilled water in screw-capped polystyrene 1.5 mL vials. After these incubations were completed, double-distilled water was added if volume losses were detected, and the samples were cooled down to room temperature. Then, we performed serial dilutions in double-distilled water in microtiter plates, and added one volume of either human A+ erythrocytes or B. japonicum cells suspended in PBS to measure SBL agglutinating ability. We observed that SBL agglutinating activity was 100% stable with both cell types after the complete range of temperature and incubation periods tested, even after one week at , the maximal stringency employed in our assays.

4. Discussion

In this work the influence of SBL in biofilm formation by B. japonicum in the absence of soybean plants was demonstrated. The presence of this plant lectin increased biofilm formation in amounts that depended on SBL concentration, it could not be replaced by BSA, and the presence of galactose, a known SBL hapten, was strongly inhibitory. In addition, EPS appeared as a primary factor required for biofilm formation, since the EPS-defective strain P22, which produces a short EPS without galactose [32, 33, 36], did not bind SBL, had a reduced ability to form biofilms, did not respond to SBL, and did not agglutinate. In addition to its reduced ability to form biofilms in microtiter plates, P22 was also impaired for root adhesion. However, the effect of SBL on root adhesion was questioned by experiments where the addition of SBL to the plant-incubation medium had no influence [21], and the presence of the potent SBL hapten N-acetyl D-galactosamine had no effects on adhesion even at 10 mM concentration [20, 37, 38]. Meanwhile, the same hapten employed in micromolar concentrations inhibited both erythrocyte agglutination [39] and adhesion stimulation by rhizobia preincubation in SBL or protein seed extracts [21], which in this case seems to act by inducing a physiological change in the rhizobia rather than by a direct action on rhizobial binding [21, 40]. Thus, reduced root adhesion of P22 might be explained by a more general effect of EPS amounts and size rather than by a direct effect of SBL. By contrast to root adhesion, the presence of galactose in the incubations of microtiter biofilm assays was inhibitory. Interestingly, biofilm formation was significantly reduced in the presence of both SBL and galactose in relation to the control without any addition. This indicates that biofilm formation follows diverse pathways in the presence or absence of SBL, but we cannot anticipate whether these could be reflected in biofilm structures and properties.

The above results indicate that there exist different contributions of EPS and SBL to biofilm formation on a hydrophobic inert surface or on initial B. japonicum adhesion to soybean roots. While EPS affects both processes, SBL might have a direct effect on the first but not on the second. Biofilm formation is a slow process in comparison to the root infection carried out by rhizobia. It was estimated that a given soybean root hair remains infectable for only 6 hours [41] while biofilm formation and maturation typically occur in several days [5], unless highly concentrated inocula, almost two orders of magnitude above the rhizobial concentration normally encountered in soils, are employed. In this way, measures performed in soil indicate that growing roots passing at the vicinity of a rhizobial microcolony might maturate and become uninfectable faster than the time required for members of the microcolony to migrate to a developing root hair, attach to it, and develop a mature biofilm [42]. Root hair tips colonization was described as a two-step process, the first one being the adhesion of individual rhizobial cells and the second, the growth and maturation of a rhizobial cap on the root hair tip, which takes almost one day to complete. Although the rhizobia probably start to change physiologically as soon as they attach to the surface, the physiological pathway to biofilm development and maturation is not necessarily linked in any way to infection and nodulation. Beyond the different requirements of SBL for each process described above, the roles of different EPSs in R. leguminosarum bv viceae also diverge: the roles of glucomannan and cellulose were different depending on whether the biofilm was developed on glass surface or on root hairs, being these polysaccharides required only for cell adhesion and biofilm maturation on root hairs [12]. A similar behavior was observed with the RapA1 adhesin, which although is required for root colonization, seems not for adhesion or biofilm maturation on glass or plastic surfaces [43]. Moreover, biofilm formation was described in Sinorhizobium meliloti, which in addition to EPS required the common nod genes [13] and was sensitive to diverse environmental conditions, such as osmotic stress, pH, temperature, and N-nutrition [14]. The function of common nod genes is remarkable, since specific nod genes are not required, being only the core structure of the Nod factor which seems to play a role while decorations typically required for root hair infection are dispensable for biofilm formation [13]. The authors suggested that the function of Nod factor in biofilm formation might constitute an ancestral one, not directly related to symbiosis.

In this context, it may be surprising that a plant protein, also demonstrated as playing some role on host symbiotic specific recognition by the bacteria [19] may act in stimulating biofilm formation in the absence of plants, as observed in this work. Looking for an explanation of such phenomenon we measured the stability of SBL cell agglutinating activity. To this end, we subjected the purified protein to a high temperature treatment and found that even after one week at this activity was fully retained either with B. japonicum cells or human group A+ erythrocytes. Glycoproteins like SBL are known to be stable, and a high of unfolding was observed for this protein due to its strong hydrophobic core and subunit-subunit associations with participation of both glycans and aminoacid side chains [44]. Taken together, these results suggest that plant remnants in soil during soybean cropping or even after soybean harvest might be an excellent source of this stable protein, which could remain active for long periods providing nucleation sites to favor biofilm formation by B. japonicum. Since biofilms are widely recognized as resistant structures against factors such as desiccation, predation, antibiosis, or UV irradiance, all of which occur in naked soil after crop harvest, released SBL during soybean life cycle or even after plant death may contribute to create protecting niches for B. japonicum survival in the site where soybean proliferates, to better hold the interval from one soybean generation to the next.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Fabricio Ragone for excellent technical assistance. This work is supported by ANPCyT, Argentina. J. P. Giménez, M. J. Althabegoiti, E. J. Mongiardini, and J. I. Quelas are fellows of CONICET, Argentina. J. Covelli is fellow of ANPCyT. S. L. L. García and A. R. Lodeiro are members of the Scientific Career of CONICET.

References

  1. W. D'Haeze and M. Holsters, “Nod factor structures, responses, and perception during initiation of nodule development,” Glycobiology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 79R–105R, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. M. Hirsch, “Role of lectins (and rhizobial exopolysaccharides) in legume nodulation,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 320–326, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. D. J. Gage, “Infection and invasion of roots by symbiotic, nitrogen-fixing rhizobia during nodulation of temperate legumes,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 280–300, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. L. López-García, A. Perticari, C. Piccinetti et al., “In-furrow inoculation and selection for higher motility enhances the efficacy of Bradyrhizobium japonicum nodulation,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 357–363, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. P. Stoodley, K. Sauer, D. G. Davies, and J. W. Costerton, “Biofilms as complex differentiated communities,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 56, pp. 187–209, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Whiteley, M. G. Bangera, R. E. Bumgarner et al., “Gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms,” Nature, vol. 413, no. 6858, pp. 860–864, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. Sauer, A. K. Camper, G. D. Ehrlich, J. W. Costerton, and D. G. Davies, “Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 184, no. 4, pp. 1140–1154, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Vilain, P. Cosette, I. Zimmerlin, J.-P. Dupont, G.-A. Junter, and T. Jouenne, “Biofilm proteome: homogeneity or versatility?” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 132–136, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. G. Seneviratne and H. S. Jayasinghearachchi, “Mycelial colonization by bradyrhizobia and azorhizobia,” Journal of Biosciences, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 243–247, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. N. A. Fujishige, N. N. Kapadia, P. L. De Hoff, and A. M. Hirsch, “Investigations of Rhizobium biofilm formation,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 195–206, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. M. Russo, A. Williams, A. Edwards et al., “Proteins exported via the PrsD-PrsE type I secretion system and the acidic exopolysaccharide are involved in biofilm formation by Rhizobium leguminosarum,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 188, no. 12, pp. 4474–4486, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Williams, A. Wilkinson, M. Krehenbrink, D. M. Russo, A. Zorreguieta, and J. A. Downie, “Glucomannan-mediated attachment of Rhizobium leguminosarum to pea root hairs is required for competitive nodule infection,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 190, no. 13, pp. 4706–4715, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. N. A. Fujishige, M. R. Lum, P. L. De Hoff, J. P. Whitelegge, K. F. Faull, and A. M. Hirsch, “Rhizobium common nod genes are required for biofilm formation,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 504–515, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  14. L. Rinaudi, N. A. Fujishige, A. M. Hirsch, E. Banchio, A. Zorreguieta, and W. Giordano, “Effects of nutritional and environmental conditions on Sinorhizobium meliloti biofilm formation,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 157, no. 9, pp. 867–875, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. Danhorn and C. Fuqua, “Biofilm formation by plant-associated bacteria,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 61, pp. 401–422, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. B. B. Bohlool and E. L. Schmidt, “Lectins: a possible basis for specificity in the Rhizobium—legume root nodule symbiosis,” Science, vol. 185, no. 4147, pp. 269–271, 1974. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. C. Tsien and E. L. Schmidt, “Localization and partial characterization of soybean lectin-binding polysaccharide of Rhizobium japonicum,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 1063–1074, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  18. I. E. Liener and E. G. Hill, “The effect of heat treatment on the nutritive value and hemagglutinating activity of soybean oil meal,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 609–620, 1953. View at: Google Scholar
  19. P. van Rhijn, R. B. Goldberg, and A. M. Hirsch, “Lotus corniculatus nodulation specificity is changed by the presence of a soybean lectin gene,” The Plant Cell, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1233–1250, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. R. Lodeiro and G. Favelukes, “Early interactions of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and soybean roots: specificity in the process of adsorption,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1405–1411, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. R. Lodeiro, S. L. López-García, T. E. E. Vázquez, and G. Favelukes, “Stimulation of adhesiveness, infectivity, and competitiveness for nodulation of Bradyrhizobium japonicum by its pretreatment with soybean seed lectin,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 188, no. 2, pp. 177–184, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. E. H. Teixeira, M. H. Napimoga, V. A. Carneiro et al., “In vitro inhibition of oral streptococci binding to the acquired pellicle by algal lectins,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 1001–1006, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. R. Oliveira, M. H. Napimoga, K. Cogo et al., “Inhibition of bacterial adherence to saliva-coated through plant lectins.,” Journal of Oral Science, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 141–145, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. M. Vincent, A Manual for the Practical Study of the Root-Nodule Bacteria, IBP Handbook no. 15, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK, 1970.
  25. A. R. Lodeiro, P. González, A. Hernández, L. J. Balagué, and G. Favelukes, “Comparison of drought tolerance in nitrogen-fixing and inorganic nitrogen-grown common beans,” Plant Science, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 31–41, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. M. Bradford, “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 1-2, pp. 248–254, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. U. K. Laemmli, “Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4,” Nature, vol. 227, no. 5259, pp. 680–685, 1970. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. Blum, H. Beier, and H. Gross, “Improved silver staining of plant proteins, RNA and DNA polyacrylamide gels,” Electrophoresis, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 93–99, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. G. L. Truchet, F. B. Dazzo, and J. Vasse, “Agglutination of Rhizobium japonicum 3I1b110 by soybean lectin,” Plant and Soil, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 265–268, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. G. Pueppke, “Distribution of lectins in the jumbo virginia and spanish varieties of the peanut, Arachis hypogaea L,” Plant Physiology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 575–580, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. G. C. Anollés and G. Favelukes, “Quantitation of adsorption of rhizobia in low numbers to small legume roots,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 371–376, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  32. M. Parniske, K. Kosch, D. Werner, and P. Müller, “ExoB mutants of Bradyrhizobium japonicum with reduced competitiveness for nodulation of Glycine max,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 99–106, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  33. J. I. Quelas, S. L. López-García, A. Casabuono et al., “Effects of N-starvation and C-source on Bradyrhizobium japonicum exopolysaccharide production and composition, and bacterial infectivity to soybean roots,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 186, no. 2, pp. 119–128, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. R. Lodeiro, A. Lagares, E. N. Martinez, and G. Favelukes, “Early interactions of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli and bean roots: specificity in the process of adsorption and its requirement of Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1571–1579, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  35. S. L. López-García, T. E. E. Vázquez, G. Favelukes, and A. R. Lodeiro, “Improved soybean root association of N-starved Bradyrhizobium japonicum,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 183, no. 24, pp. 7241–7252, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. B. U. Becker, K. Kosch, M. Parniske, and P. Müller, “Exopolysaccharide (EPS) synthesis in Bradyrhizobium japonicum: sequence, operon structure and mutational analysis of an exo gene cluster,” Molecular and General Genetics, vol. 259, no. 2, pp. 161–171, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. J. Vesper and W. D. Bauer, “Characterization of Rhizobium attachment to soybean roots,” Symbiosis, vol. 1, pp. 139–162, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  38. S. C. Ho, W. Z. Ye, M. Schindler, and J. L. Wang, “Quantitative assay for binding of Bradyrhizobium japonicum to cultured soybean cells,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 170, no. 9, pp. 3882–3890, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  39. H. Lis, B.-A. Sela, L. Sachs, and N. Sharon, “Specific inhibition by N-acetyl-D-galactosamine of the interaction between soybean agglutinin and animal cell surfaces,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 211, no. 3, pp. 582–585, 1970. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. L. J. Halverson and G. Stacey, “Effect of lectin on nodulation by wild-type Bradyrhizobium japonicum and a nodulation-defective mutant,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 753–760, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  41. T. V. Bhuvaneswari, B. G. Turgeon, and W. D. Bauer, “Early events in the infection of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr) by Rhizobium japonicum. I. Localization of infectible root cells,” Plant Physiology, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 1027–1031, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  42. M. Watt, W. K. Silk, and J. B. Passioura, “Rates of root and organism growth, soil conditions, and temporal and spatial development of the rhizosphere,” Annals of Botany, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 839–855, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. E. J. Mongiardini, N. Ausmees, J. Pérez-Giménez et al., “The rhizobial adhesion protein RapA1 is involved in adsorption of rhizobia to plant roots but not in nodulation,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 279–288, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. Sinha, N. Mitra, G. Kumar, K. Bajaj, and A. Surolia, “Unfolding studies on soybean agglutinin and concanavalin a tetramers: a comparative account,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 1300–1310, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2009 Julieta Pérez-Giménez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1185 Views | 983 Downloads | 22 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.