International Journal of Microbiology / 2010 / Article / Tab 1 / Research Article
The Response of Enterococcus faecalis V583 to Chloramphenicol Treatment Table 1 Genes whose expression was significantly different from 0 (upregulated or downregulated during the whole time series (three time points)).
t0 t90 t180 Gene Function logFC ML1 logFC GP2 logFC ML logFC GP logFC ML logFC GP EF0290 Cystathionine beta-lyase −0.45 −0.46 −1.66 −1.36 1.07 0.97 EF0727 Conserved hypothetical protein TIGR00147 0.65 0.64 0.40 0.38 1.42 1.34 EF1527 P-binding protein 0.82 0.83 0.56 0.57 1.31 1.28 EF1694 Ribosomal protein S16 1.25 1.28 0.91 0.95 1.62 1.74 EF1733 ABC transporter 0.48 0.51 3.00 2.96 2.77 1.79 EF2173 Transposase 0.62 0.61 0.43 0.48 1.12 1.36 EF2185 Transposase 0.73 0.70 0.89 0.84 1.08 1.15 EF2420 Homoserine kinase 0.63 0.55 0.71 0.69 1.28 1.28 EF2443 Ribosomal protein S20 0.81 0.76 0.80 0.81 1.83 1.84 EF2633 Chaperonin −0.56 −0.52 0.89 0.89 −2.79 −2.67 EF2634 Chaperonin −0.87 −0.90 0.99 1.00 −2.11 −1.83 EF2868 Conserved hypothetical protein 0.57 0.54 1.00 1.00 1.71 1.49 EF2973 Alkaline phosphatase 0.72 0.64 1.46 1.25 1.23 1.14 EF3254 1,4-dihydroxy-2-naphthoate octaprenyl transferase, putative 0.65 0.66 1.45 1.32 1.58 1.43 EF3295 Hypothetical protein 0.51 0.49 0.49 0.49 2.09 1.90
1 logFC ML; log-value of transcription ratio of gene based on the analysis using the prototype image analysis program;2 logFC GP; log-value of transcription ratio of gene based on the analysis using the GenePix method for image analysis.