International Journal of Microbiology

International Journal of Microbiology / 2012 / Article
Special Issue

Host-Fungal Interactions: Pathogenicity versus Immunity

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 654251 | 21 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/654251

Protein Glycosylation in Aspergillus fumigatus Is Essential for Cell Wall Synthesis and Serves as a Promising Model of Multicellular Eukaryotic Development

Academic Editor: Nir Osherov
Received29 Jun 2011
Accepted19 Jul 2011
Published28 Sep 2011

Abstract

Glycosylation is a conserved posttranslational modification that is found in all eukaryotes, which helps generate proteins with multiple functions. Our knowledge of glycosylation mainly comes from the investigation of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mammalian cells. However, during the last decade, glycosylation in the human pathogenic mold Aspergillus fumigatus has drawn significant attention. It has been revealed that glycosylation in A. fumigatus is crucial for its growth, cell wall synthesis, and development and that the process is more complicated than that found in the budding yeast S. cerevisiae. The present paper implies that the investigation of glycosylation in A. fumigatus is not only vital for elucidating the mechanism of fungal cell wall synthesis, which will benefit the design of new antifungal therapies, but also helps to understand the role of protein glycosylation in the development of multicellular eukaryotes. This paper describes the advances in functional analysis of protein glycosylation in A. fumigatus.

1. Introduction

The Aspergilli are filamentous fungi, which are multicellular eukaryotes with a relatively simple life cycle. Over 200 species have been classified in the genus Aspergillus. Many of them have long been used in food production, industrial fermentation, and agriculture. On the other hand, a few, such as A. fumigatus, A. flavus, A. niger, A. nidulans, and A. terreus, are opportunistic fungal pathogens, causing life-threatening invasive aspergillosis (IA) in immunosuppressed patients [1, 2], in which A. fumigatus is the predominant pathogen [35]. The crude mortality for IA is 60–90% and remains around 29–42% even when treatment is given [6]. The main reasons for patient death are late diagnosis and the low efficiency of the drug therapies available to treat IA.

The fungal cell wall is a protective physical barrier against adverse environmental conditions. The fungal cell wall is a unique organ not found in mammalian cells. It maintains cell shape and provides osmotic protection [7, 8] and has therefore been recognized for a long time as an ideal drug target. Indeed, several cell-wall-targeted drugs, such as echinocandins, caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin, have been introduced as therapies. For example, echinocandins, which inhibit synthesis of β-1,3-glucan, a crucial component of the cell wall are effective in the treatment of invasive fungal infections including IA [9]. Unfortunately, the echinocandins also trigger an increase of chitin [9, 10], which partially compensates for the loss of β-1,3-glucan and reduces the efficiency of treatment due to the complicated mechanism of cell wall biogenesis in A. fumigatus. Therefore, a more profound understanding of the mechanisms of cell wall biosynthesis in A. fumigatus would help to improve the efficiency of drug therapies, especially for drugs which target the cell wall.

The cell wall of A. fumigatus is composed of a unique β-1,3/1,4-glucan skeleton with chitin and galactomannan covalently linked to the nonreducing ends of β-1,3-glucan. The cell wall is mainly coated with GPI proteins, which contain N- and O-glycans [11, 12]. While there is no doubt that glycosylation is involved in cell wall organization, the functional importance of protein glycosylation in cell wall organization has, until recently, remained poorly understood. However, during the past few years, it has become increasingly evident that glycosylation is vital for cell wall synthesis and thus vital for growth and morphology of A. fumigatus.

Basically, all eukaryotes possess three types of protein glycosylation, N-glycosylation of asparagine residues, O-glycosylation of threonine and serine residues, and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchoring (GPI-anchoring) of the C-terminus of some proteins. Humans lacking individual glycosyltransferases suffer from severe congenital diseases, known as carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndromes (CDGs) [1214]. Clearly, the sugar components of proteins play a major role in embryonic and postembryonic development of humans as well as of all higher eukaryotes. However, the molecular details leading to CDGs are only vaguely understood. During the past 20 years, the combination of carbohydrate chemistry and biology has developed rapidly. It is now known that carbohydrates play increasingly important roles in regulating the development of higher organisms [15]. However, the mechanism by which carbohydrates play a role in development and disease is still unclear. Our knowledge of protein glycosylation comes mainly from investigation of the model yeast S. cerevisiae and of mammalian cells [15]. Although investigation of the model yeast has been very useful in elucidating the biochemical features of protein glycosylation at the cellular level, they cannot reveal the complicated functions of glycosylation in the development of multicellular eukaryotes. Therefore, investigation of glycosylation in the multicellular fungus A. fumigatus not only helps understand the mechanism of cell wall synthesis in this species but also provides insights into the role of glycosylation in the development of multicellular eukaryotes. This paper concentrates on protein glycosylation in A. fumigatus, which will be discussed with respect to the enzymatic pathways involved and their functional importance. Furthermore, the utility of A. fumigatus as a model for glycosylation during development of multicellular eukaryotes will be outlined.

2. Cell Wall Organization and Its Compensatory Mechanism in A. fumigatus

2.1. Cell Wall Organization

The cell wall of A. fumigatus is mainly composed of β-1,3-glucans that are highly branched with β-1,6 linkages. Together they constitute a three-dimensional network with a large number of nonreducing ends, to which chitin, galactomannan, and β-1,3/1,4-glucan are covalently anchored [16]. The cell wall is mainly coated with GPI proteins, which contain N- and O-glycans derived primarily from the process of glycosylation [11, 17]. Glycoproteins such as Gel2p and Ecm33p are also involved in cell wall polysaccharide synthesis. Gel2p is a member of a new family of GPI-anchored β1,3-glucanosyltransferases. Deletion of gel2 leads to slower growth, abnormal conidiogenesis, an altered cell wall composition, and reduced virulence [18, 19]. It has been proposed that Gel2p is responsible for the elongation of β-1,3-glucan side chains of β-1,3/1,6 branched glucan to provide new nonreducing ends. Ecm33p is also involved in maintaining proper cell wall architecture though its function is unknown. Disruption of ECM33 results in morphogenetic aberrations such as defects in conidial separation, increase of chitin in conidial cell walls, rapid conidial germination, and increased virulence [20, 21]. It is clear that glycoproteins are directly, as structural components of the cell wall, and indirectly, as enzymes required for cell wall synthesis, involved in maintaining proper cell wall architecture in A. fumigatus. However, it remains unclear how glycosylation affects the function of these proteins.

2.2. Cell Wall Integrity (CWI) Signaling Pathway

Increased chitin synthesis has been known as an important compensatory response to cell wall stress both in S. cerevisiae and filamentous fungi [2226]. In S. cerevisiae, the cell wall is required to maintain cell shape, which is essential for the formation of a bud and hence cell division. The yeast cell remodels its rigid structure to accommodate cell expansion during vegetative proliferation, mating pheromone-induced morphogenesis, and nutrient-driven filamentation through the cell wall integrity (CWI) signaling pathway. Cell wall defects or damage induces the cells to activate the CWI pathway to survive, and the compensatory mechanism characterized by an increased chitin content is triggered [27].

The CWI signaling pathway in S. cerevisiae is activated in response to low osmolarity, thermal stress, or mating pheromone and polarized growth. It is comprised of a family of cell surface sensors coupled to the small G-protein Rho1p, which activates the CWI MAPK cascade via protein kinase C (Pkc1p). This signaling cascade activates the expression of genes encoding for cell wall proteins that stabilize the cell wall. Meanwhile, activated Rho1p also activates a set of additional effectors such as Bni1p and Bnr1p formin proteins, Skn7p transcription factor, and the Sec3p exocyst component, which regulate a diverse set of processes including β-glucan synthesis at the site of cell wall remodeling, gene expression related to cell wall biogenesis, organization of the actin cytoskeleton, and secretory vesicle targeting to the growth site [28].

A family of cell surface sensors is responsible for detecting and transmitting the status of the cell wall to Rho1p [28]. These sensor molecules include Wsc1p (Hcs77p/Slg1p) [2931], Wsc2p and Wsc3p [31], and Mid2p and Mtl1p [32, 33]. Among these cell wall stress sensors, Wsc1p and Mid2p appear to be the most important and serve a partially overlapping role in CWI signaling. The extensive O-mannosylation of Mid2p and Wsc1p is important to their stability [34]. Reduced O-mannosylation leads to incorrect proteolytic processing of these proteins, which in turn results in impaired activation of the PKC1 pathway and finally causes cell death in the absence of osmotic stabilization [35]. More recently, N-glycan is found to be directly involved in Mid2p sensing. It has been shown that both the extent of the N-linked glycan and its distance from the plasma membrane affect Mid2p function. Non-N-glycosylated Mid2p fails to perceive cell wall challenges [36]. These observations demonstrate that N- and O-glycosylation are important for CWI sensing and thus important for cell wall biogenesis and polarized growth in yeast.

The presence of A. fumigatus genes encoding for proteins homologous to the yeast Rho1p, Rho3p, and Cdc42p suggests a similar mechanism for the CWI pathway. Indeed, it has been recently shown that Afcdc42/CDC42, Afrho1/RHO1, and Afrho3/RHO3 are highly expressed in the mutant devoid of Cwh41p (glucosidase I), which suggests an activation of these genes induced by cell wall damage [37]. Also, increased expression and activation of the A. fumigatus MpkAp, an ortholog of the S. cerevisiae Mpk1p, is also induced by cell wall damage [38, 39]. It is becoming clear that, as in yeast, defects in cell wall integrity also trigger the CWI MAPK cascade in A. fumigatus.

On the other hand, in contrast to yeast, little is known about the cell wall stress sensors in A. fumigatus. In the last release of the A. fumigatus genomic database (http://www.aspergillus.org.uk/indexhome.htm?secure/sequence_info/index.php~main), only one protein (AFUA_5G09020) is annotated as a homologue of the Wsc4p, which does not appear to contribute to CWI signaling in yeast. Therefore, the A. fumigatus cell wall stress sensor molecule remains to be identified and investigated.

3. Importance of Glycosylation in A. fumigatus

The precursor of all mannose residues found in galactomannan, glycoprotein, and GPI anchor in A. fumigatus is GDP-mannose. Therefore, its biosynthesis has drawn special attention. In all eukaryotes, the activation of mannose initiates from formation of mannose 6-phosphate (Man-6-P), which occurs by one of two routes: direct phosphorylation of mannose by hexokinase or interconversion from fructose 6-phosphate (Fru-6-P) via phosphomannose isomerase (PMI), and the latter pathway requires three enzymes: PMI, phosphomannomutase (PMM), and GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase (GMPP). Fru-6-P is converted to Man-6-P by PMI, and then Man-6-P is converted to mannose 1-phosphate (Man-1-P) by PMM. Subsequently, Man-1-P is ligated with the guanosine 5-triphosphate molecule (GTP) to form GDP-mannose by Man-1-P guanylyltransferase [4063].

The interconversion of Man-6-P and Fru-6-P catalysed by PMI is the first committed step in the synthesis of Man-containing sugar chains and provides a link between glucose metabolism and mannosylation. PMI deficiency is the cause of carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome type Ib (CDG-Ib, OMIM 602579) in humans, but the clinical symptoms and aberrant glycosylation can be corrected with dietary mannose supplements [40].

Genes encoding for PMIs have been investigated in several fungal species, such as S. cerevisiae, Candida albicans, A. nidulans, and Cryptococcus neoformans [4851]. The S. cerevisiae PMI is encoded by the PMI40 gene [51]. The pmi mutant shows a significantly reduced growth rate at high concentrations of mannose. Biochemical and genome-wide analysis reveals that excess mannose leads to an accumulation of Man-6-P, which mainly inhibits the activity of phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI) and thus represses glycolysis, protein biosynthesis, and cell wall biogenesis [52].

The A. nidulans manA1 mutant exhibits abnormal ballooning of hyphal tips and eventually ceases to grow [53]. Disrupted MAN1 mutant of C. neoformans leads to poor capsule formation, reduced polysaccharide secretion, morphological abnormalities, and attenuated virulence [50]. In A. fumigatus, PMI activity is essential for viability and plays a central regulatory role in both glycosylation and energy production. Deletion of the A. fumigatus pmi1 gene leads to uncoupling of the link between energy production and glycosylation and accumulation of Man-6-P, which then results in defects in cell wall integrity, conidiation, and morphology [54]. Although extracellular mannose can rescue the growth of PMI deficient mutants in A. fumigatus, both lower and higher concentrations of mannose lead to a reduction in the levels of α-glucan in the cell wall and an accumulation of Man-6-P [54]. The phenotypes associated with the mutant under mannose starvation are mainly due to an insufficient supply of GDP-Man required for cell wall synthesis. The abnormal morphology associated with the Δpmi1 mutant under mannose-replete conditions is mainly ascribed to an accumulation of Man-6-P, which cannot efficiently enter glycolysis, instead becoming trapped in a cycle of dephosphorylation and rephosphorylation resulting in depletion of intracellular ATP. It should be pointed out that the PMI in A. fumigatus mainly catalyzes the conversion of Fru-6-P to Man-6-P, and its binding affinity for Man-6-P is similar to that of yeasts but different from the ones from bacteria or animals (Table 1). This suggests that it may be possible to design a specific inhibitor for fungal PMIs [54].


SpeciesMW
(kD)
Km for Man-6-P (mM) (μmol/min/mg)Reference

Aspergillus fumigates551753[54]
Saccharomyces cerevisiae450.65980[51]
Escherichia coli42NDND[41]
Candida albicans491.241200[42]
 human46.70.25110[42]
 PorcineND0.17140[42]
Salmonella typhimurium42.61.34833.3 [43, 44]
Xanthomonas campestris58233.5[45]
Pseudomonas aeruginosa543.030.83 [46]
Burkholderia cepacia559.0121[47]

ND, not detected.

GMPP is the final enzyme in the pathway generating GDP-mannose. Several GMPPs have been identified and characterized in different species [5559]. In S. cerevisiae and C. albicans, GMPP is essential [60, 61], while in Leishmania mexicana GMPP is not required for viability [62]. Repression of GMPP in yeast leads to pleiotropic phenotypes including cell lysis, failure of cell separation, impaired budding and hyphal switching, clumping and flocculation, and cell wall defects [61]. Repression of expression of A. fumigatus GMPP srb1, a homologue of yeast SRB1/PSA1/VIG9, leads to hyphal lysis, a defective cell wall, impaired polarity maintenance, and branching site selection, as well as rapid germination and reduced conidiation. In contrast to yeast, inducible repression of srb1 expression in A. fumigatus does affect the ability to direct polarity establishment and septation [63].

These reports imply that mannose activation is specifically crucial for the synthesis and organization of the cell wall and thus essential for survival of fungal species. This further suggests that glycosylation is essential for the viability of pathogenic fungal species such as A. fumigates, and inhibitors that specifically block mannose activation in fungi may be potential drugs to treat fungal infections.

4. Biosynthesis and Function of N-Glycosylation in A. fumigatus

N-glycosylated proteins contain oligosaccharides that are N-glycosidically linked to the γ-amido group of asparagine. This type of glycoprotein has been intensively studied in many model systems from yeast to human cells with respect to their structure, biosynthesis, and function [15]. It has been shown that the formation of the highly variable N-linked oligosaccharides is initiated by the assembly of a lipid-linked oligosaccharide Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-PP-Dol by a series of glycosyltransferases located on the cytoplasmic and luminal faces of the ER membrane. The most complete understanding of biosynthesis of the lipid bound precursor has been obtained from S. cerevisiae and from mammals. As far as it is known, the corresponding reactions proceed almost identically in other eukaryotes [15].

Subsequently, the Dol-PP-linked Glc3Man9GlcNAc2 is transferred as a whole to an asparagine residue within an N-X-T/S consensus sequence of a nascent peptide, which is catalyzed by the oligosaccharyltransferase (OST), and then the N-glycosylated proteins are modified in a species-specific manner and transferred through the secretory pathway to the cell surface where they either get exported or anchored to the plasma membrane, to the extracellular matrix, or to the cell wall (Figure 1).

4.1. Initiation of N-Glycosylation

OST is a membrane complex consisting of several subunits. In S. cerevisiae, the OST complex consists of at least eight different subunits, including Ost1p, Ost2p, Wbp1, Stt3p, Swp1p, Ost4p, Ost5p, and Ost3p/Ost6p [6467]. Although the function of each subunit is still unclear, Stt3p is believed to be the catalytic subunit [6870], and its homologues are found in almost all eukaryotes [71]. The S. cerevisiae STT3 is an essential gene [72, 73]. It appears that the A. fumigatus stt3 is also essential as no viable knockout mutant has been recovered [39]. Repression of the stt3 gene in A. fumigatus leads to a severe retardation of growth and a slight defect in cell wall integrity [39]. Further analysis shows that repression of stt3 upregulates expression of the genes responsible for glucan and chitin synthesis, especially gel1, gel2, fskA, chsE, and chsG. Indeed, an increase of cell wall mannoprotein and chitin was observed following repression of the stt3 gene. However, this upregulation of chitin is not accompanied by an activation of the MpkA kinase. Indeed, only the unfolded protein response (UPR) is induced. As the UPR has been shown to be involved in CWI signaling in A. fumigatus [74], it is likely that UPR, instead of the MpkA-dependent CWI signaling pathway, is the major compensatory mechanism induced by repression of the N-glycosylation in A. fumigatus [39].

4.2. N-Glycan Processing and Protein Folding Quality Control in ER

Once Glc3Man9GlcNAc2 is transferred to proteins, the N-glycan is processed sequentially in the ER and Golgi. N-Glycan processing is initiated by the removal of the glucose residues catalyzed by ER glucosidase I and glucosidase II.

In mammalian cells, N-linked glycan plays a decisive role as a quality control (QC) of the folding of secretory proteins, which is composed of calnexin, calreticulin, UDP-glucose:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase (GT) and glucosidase II (GII) and is essential for cellular survival [7577]. N-glycans initially serve to increase the hydrophilicity of the as-yet-unstructured nascent polypeptides. Subsequently, the two outermost glucose residues of the N-glycan are removed by the sequential action of glucosidase I (GI) and GII to the monoglucosylated form, which is recognized and bound by calnexin, a type I ER membrane lectin, and calreticulin, its soluble relative. For many glycoproteins, the interaction with calnexin or calreticulin slows down the rate of folding but increases efficiency. GII-catalyzed removal of the third glucose residue follows the dissociation of folding substrates from calnexin and is required for release of native polypeptides from the ER and transport to their final destination. The folding sensor GT adds back a terminal glucose to promote reassociation of nonnative polypeptides released from calnexin, thus prolonging their retention in the ER folding environment. Cycles of de-/reglucosylation might be protracted until the polypeptide released from calnexin fulfills quality control requirements. When correct folding is not achieved, an ER-specific N-glycan-dependent pathway of degradation removes the misfolded proteins. When N-glycosylation is inhibited, the most commonly observed effect is the generation of misfolded, aggregated proteins that fail to reach a functional state [75, 76].

Before entering the QC system, the outermost glucose residue of the N-glycan is trimmed by ER glucosidase I [78]. A human inherited glucosidase I deficiency has been reported to result in neonatal birth with severe generalized hypotonia and dysmorphic features [79].

Unlike mammalian cells, S. cerevisiae lacks a calnexin cycle and GT and only has an effective mannosidase I-dependent ERAD system [80, 81]. The yeast glucosidase I (Cwh1p) is encoded by the CWH41 gene [82]. Mutational defects in the CWH41 gene cause severe and selective instability of glycoprotein Kre6p, a putative Golgi glucan synthase required for β-l,6-glucan synthesis [23, 83, 84].

Some filamentous fungi have been proposed to possess N-glycan-dependent QC of glycoprotein folding based on fungal genome sequence data [85]. Recently, evidence that filamentous fungi possess an N-glycan-dependent QC system has been reported in A. fumigatus [37, 86]. Indeed, calnexin (AAS68033), glucosidase II, and GT have been annotated in the last release of the A. fumigatus genomic database (Figure 2) [87]. Zhang et al. [37] reported that deletion of the cwh41 gene in A. fumigatus results in defective N-glycan processing of the proteins secreted by A. fumigatus. Although Afcwh41 is not essential for hyphal growth and virulence, a severe reduction in conidial formation, abnormalities of polar growth and septation, and a temperature-sensitive deficiency of cell wall integrity were documented. Also, the genes encoding Rho-type GTPases (Rho-type GTPase/CDC42) were upregulated, which suggests that the CWI pathway was activated in the mutant [37].

4.3. N-Glycan Proces sing in the Golgi

After processing by two ER α-glucosidases, the N-glycan is further processed by the action of various α1,2-mannosidases, which can remove one or more of the four α1,2-linked mannose residues. In mammalian cells, Man9GlcNAc2 is converted to Man5GlcNAc2 by the action of ER and Golgi α-mannosidases, which is the precursor for complex, hybrid, and high-mannose N-glycans [88]. In S. cerevisiae, a specific ER α1,2-mannosidase converts Man9GlcNAc2 into Man8GlcNAc2, which is elongated in the Golgi to form an outer chain containing up to 200 residues of mannose [89, 90]. A. saitoi and Trichoderma reesei have been found to produce N-glycan structures containing five mannose units (Man5GlcNAc2), suggesting further processing of the Man9GlcNAc2 precursor [91, 92]. The N-glycans on mature secreted glycoprotein produced by A. fumigatus are Man6GlcNAc2, Man7GlcNAc2, and Man8GlcNAc2, in which Man6GlcNAc2 is the major glycoform [37]. These observations demonstrate that N-glycan synthesis in filamentous fungi seems to differ from that in yeast and is similar to that in higher eukaryotes (Figure 3). Although small N-glycans are commonly found on glycoproteins of A. fumigatus, Hex5-13HexNAc2 glycans on the galactomannoproteins, and Man5-9GlcNAc2 as well as Galf1Man5-7GlcNAc2 structures on other secreted glycoproteins have been identified in A. fumigatus [93, 94]. The enzyme (UDP-Galp mutase) required to synthesize the requisite UDP-Galf donor has been shown to be an important factor in biosynthesis of the cell wall in A. fumigatus [94], while the gene/enzyme responsible for the transfer of Galf has not been identified. Recently, the A. fumigatus Och1, a key mannosyltransferase for synthesis of elaborated protein N-glycans in yeast, has been identified. Deletion of the och1 gene results in a reduction of sporulation in the presence of high calcium concentrations. This evidence suggests that polymannosylated N-glycans exist in A. fumigatus and certain proteins engaged in sporulation require N-glycan outer chains to be fully functional [95].

The α-mannosidases have been classified into two groups: Class I and Class II [102, 120, 121]. Class I α-mannosidases include ER Man9-mannosidase, endomannosidase, and Golgi mannosidase I. Class II α-mannosidases include the lysosomal mannosidases, Golgi mannosidase II, yeast vascular mannosidase [98, 99], and ER α-mannosidase II [122, 123]. Several Golgi α-mannosidases have been cloned and characterized from Penicillium citrinum [124, 125], A. saitoi [126], A. oryzae [127], T. reesei [128], and A. nidulans [102, 129]. These enzymes are all monomeric with a molecular weight of 50–60 kDa and show the maximal activity in the semiacidic condition (pH 4–6).

Class I α-mannosidase is known to play an important role in the processing of mannose-containing glycans. In Drosophila melanogaster, deletion of the Golgi mannosidase I (MAS-1) results in viable progeny, and the null organisms synthesize the same range of oligosaccharides as the wild-type ones, albeit at different ratios [130]. In S. cerevisiae, disruption of the ER α-mannosidase gene does not prevent outer chain synthesis [96]. In the last release of the TIGR database (http://www.aspergillus.org.uk/indexhome.htm?secure/sequence_info/index.php~main) [87], nine A. fumigatus genes are annotated to encode α-mannosidases, including XP_749038.1, XP_754794.1, XP_751252.1, XP_751819.1, XP_752444.1, XP_752825.1, XP_753592.1, XP_751114.1, and XP_750572.1. Among them, MsdSp (XP_752825.1) has been identified to encode a Class I α1, 2-mannosidase and acts on Man8GlcNAc2 to produce Man6GlcNAc2. Deletion of the msdS gene leads to a defect in N-glycan processing, as well as a reduction of cell wall components (including α-glucan, β-glucan, mannoprotein, and chitin) and reduced conidiation. Morphological analysis reveals abnormal polarity and septation. However, deletion of the msdS has no effect on fungal growth and virulence [97].

4.4. Degradation of N-Glycan

In mammalian cells, free oligosaccharides (fOS) are generated by OST-mediated hydrolysis of Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-PP-dolichol in the lumen of the ER or peptide N-glycanase (PNGase)-mediated de-N-glycosylation of newly synthesized glycoproteins either in the ER or the cytosol. fOS that are liberated in the lumen of the ER can be transported into the cytosol, where they are trimmed by an endo-β-D-N-acetylglucosamine H (endo H)-like enzyme and the α-mannosidase Man2C1p in order to yield an oligosaccharide, Man5GlcNAc, that can be imported directly into lysosomes to be degraded (Figure 4) [122, 123, 131135]. In humans [136] and cattle [137139], a deficiency in α-mannosidase results in the lethal disease mannosidosis, a rare lysosomal storage disease with a collection of clinical symptoms including progressive mental retardation, impaired hearing, dysostosis multiplex, immune defects, elevation of serum and urinary oligosaccharide levels, and an enlargement of lysosomes in most cell types resulting from the accumulation of undegraded oligosaccharides.

The rat Man2C1p is involved in oligosaccharide catabolism of misfolded glycoproteins in the lumen of the ER which have been retrotranslocated into the cytoplasm for proteolytic disposal [131133]. A proteolytically cleaved version of the rat Man2C1p has been found in the lumen of the ER where it is believed to be involved in the early stages of glycoprotein maturation (also called ER α-mannosidase II) (Figure 4) [122, 123].

The yeast cytosolic α-mannosidase Ams1p, a counterpart of Man2C1p, is also involved in the processing of fOS. Since the yeast Png1p is mainly localized to the cytosol, it is proposed that the Png1p-generated fOS may both be generated and processed in the cytosol [100]. The role of the yeast Ams1p is to aid in recycling macromolecular components of the cell under nutrient deprivation [101]. Interestingly, after its synthesis in the cytosol, the Ams1p is translocated into the vacuole by the cytosol-to-vacuole targeting pathway [101], which suggests a common feature shared by the S. cerevisiae Ams1p and its mammalian counterparts. However, the yeast Ams1p only participates in recycling or utilizing of oligosaccharide but not in processing of N-glycan (Figure 4) [100]. It should also be noted that no structural studies have been performed on the products that can be generated from Man8GlcNAc2 by Ams1p, and the ultimate fate of such products remains obscure [135]. On the other hand, two Png1p-independent fOS pools, Man3GlcNAc2 and Man8GlcNAc2, are also seen in S. cerevisiae. The pool comprising small fOS (Man3GlcNAc2) appears to be disposed of by unknown enzymes in the vacuole. The pool containing mainly Man8GlcNAc2 may be generated and disposed of along the secretory pathway [135].

Similarly, A. nidulans α-mannosidase IIC is also proposed to be involved in oligosaccharide catabolism [102]. Both A. nidulansα-mannosidase IIC and S. cerevisiae Ams1p are not essential for normal cellular function since disruption of these genes has no visible effect on growth or morphology [98, 99, 102].

In contrast to its counterpart in yeast or A. nidulans, the A. fumigatus Ams1p is required for normal cellular function. Deletion of the A. fumigatus ams1 leads to a severe defect in conidial formation, especially at a higher temperature. In addition, abnormalities of polarity and septation are associated with the ΔAfams1 mutant. These results show that the Afams1 gene is required for morphogenesis and cellular function in A. fumigatus [103]. The involvement of the Afams1 gene in polarized growth demonstrates that the processes involved in fOS regulation are important for A. fumigatus. It is likely that the Ams1p is involved in cell wall synthesis and thus polarity through the CWI pathway. Therefore, probably the ΔAfams1 mutant could serve as a simple model to investigate the mechanism of α-mannosidosis.

4.5. Functions of N-Glycosylation in Cell Wall Synthesis, Morphology, and Polarity

Functional analyses of the genes required for N-glycosylation reveal that protein N-glycosylation is important for cell wall synthesis, morphogenesis, and polarized growth in A. fumigatus. 2-D gel analysis reveals that deletion of the cwh41 gene encoding glucosidase I in A. fumigatus leads to ER stress, which induces overexpression of HSP70 and calnexin chaperone and activates the ERAD. Meanwhile, the proteins required for actin rearrangement are found to be underexpressed or missing, which is consistent with the observation of random localization of actin fibers in the mutant [86]. These observations, for the first time, clearly suggest that N-glycosylation contributes to proper folding and trafficking in A. fumigatus. It appears that proteins involved in cell wall biosynthesis in A. fumigatus are more dependent on the N-glycan-dependent folding system. As in yeast, cell wall defects also trigger the CWI signaling pathway in A. fumigatus, which activates downstream effectors that regulate cell wall biogenesis and polarized growth. Zhang et al. [37, 86] have proposed that the proteins required for cell wall synthesis or cell wall stress sensing are substrates of A. fumigatus Cwh41p and require glucose trimming for their proper localization and function. Misfolding of these proteins would cause cell wall defects, which then leads to activation of the ERAD and Rho-type GTPases-mediated CWI pathway. Moreover, activation of CDC42 in the CWI pathway also activates SepA, an upstream organizer of actin ring formation at septation sites, and thus causes abnormal polarized growth associated with the Δafcwh41 mutant (Figure 5). Although the phenotypes associated with different N-glycosylation mutants vary, the finding that all of these mutants exhibit phenotypes associated with cell wall defects, abnormal polarization, and morphological changes can all be explained by this proposed model.

Obviously, more investigations are needed to identify and characterize all of the proteins affected by N-glycosylation in A. fumigatus. This information would be key to understanding the complex compensatory mechanisms participating in cell wall biosynthesis in A. fumigatus, which would serve as a basis to develop new antifungal therapies, as well as help to elucidate the molecular mechanism of human diseases associated with defects in glycosylation.

5. Biosynthesis and Function of O-Glycosylation

O-mannose glycosylated proteins were first discovered in yeast and filamentous fungi, and recently this type of glycoproteins has also been described in mammals. The O-mannosylation most likely occurs in all animals, with the exception of nematodes (e.g., Caenorhabditis elegans); it is also not detected in plants (Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa). However, it has also been discovered in one bacterial species (Mycobacterium tuberculosis) [15]. In mammalian cells, the inner O-linked mannose is elongated with the first addition of a N-acetylglucosamine and then various sugars [140]. In the case of yeast, the O-mannose type carbohydrate chain starts with a serine/threonine-linked mannose, which is extended to an oligomannose chain. In A. fumigatus, the O-linked glycans on cell wall mannoproteins are found to be Glcα1, 6Man, Gal1, 6Manα1, 6Man, Gal1, 5Gal1, 6Manα1, 6Man and Gal1, 5[Gal1,5]3 Gal1, 6Man [141], while only a single mannose residue was detected on secreted proteins [113]. A further type of protein O-glycosylation, in which a single β-O-linked GlcNAc residue is linked to serine and threonine occurs in animals, plants, and filamentous fungi, but not in S. cerevisiae. For this type of protein modification, a considerable number of reviews are available [142144]. Therefore, this type of O-glycosylation is not discussed in this paper.

Protein O-mannosylation is initiated by a family of protein O-mannosyltransferases (PMTs) that are evolutionarily conserved from yeast to human [145, 146]. In S. cerevisiae a total of seven PMT family members (ScPmt1–7p) are present [104, 147], which fall into three major groups of homology: (i) Pmt1/5/7, (ii) Pmt2/3/6, and (iii) Pmt4. Genes with significant homology to PMTs have been cloned in humans, mice, and Drosophila [148150]. Specific protein substrates that are O-mannosylated by ScPmt1p, ScPmt2p, or ScPmt4p have been described in S. cerevisiae [151153].

In comparison with S. cerevisiae, the PMT family is less redundant in higher eukaryotes. In Drosophila only two PMT family members are present (rotated abdomen and twisted) [149, 150]. The same is true for mice and humans (POMT1 and POMT2) [148, 150]. Mutations in human POMT1, a homologue of the yeast Pmt4, cause Walker-Warburg Syndrome (WWS), which is characterized by severe congenital muscular dystrophy, neuronal migration defects, and structural abnormalities of the eye [13]. Targeted deletion of Pomt1 in mice results in embryonic lethality due to defects in the formation of the Reichert’s membrane, the first basement membrane to form in the embryo [154]. Mutations of the Drosophila PMT homologues alter muscle structures and the alignment of adult cuticle [155].

The PMT family is crucial for viability, cell wall integrity, and morphogenesis in several fungal species, such as S. cerevisiae, S. pombe, C. albicans and C. neoformans, A. nidulans, and A. fumigatus [108, 109, 111115, 145, 156]. In S. cerevisiae, single pmt1 mutants fail to grow in anaerobic conditions on some media [105]. The pmt1,2,3-triple mutants grow only in osmotically stabilized medium, whereas the pmt1,2,4- and pmt2,3,4-triple mutants are not viable in any conditions, indicating that PMT protein activity is essential in S. cerevisiae, although individual genes are dispensable [104].

C. albicans contains five PMT genes. The pmt1 mutants are viable, but they are defective in undergoing cellular differentiation from yeast to a true hyphal growth form under some conditions [106]. The virulence of the pmt1 null mutant is significantly attenuated, which is likely due to reduced O-glycosylation of the C. albicans adhesin Als1p [106]. The pmt1,4-double mutants are not viable. The pmt phenotypes are closely linked to alterations in cell wall components, including cell wall mannoproteins and polysaccharides [107].

In S. pombe only one member of each PMT subfamily is present, namely, oma1+, oma2+, and oma4+. Deletion of oma2+, as well as simultaneous deletion of oma1+ and oma4+ is lethal. Characterization of the viable S. pombe oma1D and oma4D single mutants shows that reduced O-mannosylation results in abnormal cell wall and septum formation, therefore severely affecting cell morphology and cell-cell separation [108]. In C. neoformans, three PMT genes are present. Pmt4p is essential for morphogenesis and virulence [109]. Recently, Willger et al. showed that PMT2 is an essential gene, and the double pmt1pmt4 deletion is lethal [110].

Filamentous fungi, such as A. fumigatus, A. nidulans, Neurospora crassa, and Fusarium gramineum, contain only three pmt genes that belong to the PMT1, PMT2, and PMT4 subfamilies, respectively [107, 108, 113]. Each of the PMTs appears to function independently. All single pmt mutants in A. nidulans are viable but showed reduced growth at elevated temperatures and defects in morphogenesis [111, 112]. The double deletion pmtA/pmtC (orthologues of the PMT2 and PMT4) and pmtB/pmtC (orthologues of PMT1 and PMT4) are synthetically lethal.

Previously, Zhuo et al. have shown that a single deletion of A. fumigatus pmt1 results in temperature-sensitive phenotypes [113]. When the A. fumigatus Δpmt1 mutant was grown on solid complete medium at 37°C, no difference was found between the mutant and the wild type. A strongly retarded growth, however, was observed when this mutant was grown at 42°C and 50°C. This temperature-sensitive phenotype could be complemented by the addition of 1 M sucrose in the media. Further analysis shows that the mannoprotein, α-glucan, and chitin in the cell wall of the mutant grown at 37°C are increased, while β-glucan is reduced. When the A. fumigatus Δpmt1 mutant was cultured at 42°C, the α-glucan was increased, while the β-glucan was decreased, and the mannoprotein and chitin content remained unchanged. Moreover, deficient conidiation and reduced germination have been documented at 42°C [113]. As compared with the S. cerevisiae pmt1 mutants, the A. fumigatus Δpmt1 mutant, as well as the C. albicans and S. pombe pmt1 mutants, shows more severe defects in cell wall integrity. This significant phenotype could be explained by the fewer members of PMT family presented in A. fumigatus, C. albicans, and S. pombe. However, in a recent study by Mouyna et al., the A. fumigatus pmt1 mutant does not show any visible phenotype [115]. In the report by Zhuo et al., the pmt1 deletion mutant was constructed by replacement of the entire coding region of the pmt1 in A. fumigatus strain CEA17 (pyrG) with a pyrG cassette [113]. Therefore, the genetic background of the pmt1 null mutant is pyrG+pmt1, while in the report by Mouyna et al., the pmt1 mutant was constructed by transformation of A. fumigatus strain ΔKU80 with a deletion cassette containing the E. coli phleomycin phosphotransferase gene (PHLE) [115]. Therefore, the major differences may be due to the different genetic background of the strains used in these two reports.

The single pmt2 or double pmt1pmt4 deletion(s) are lethal [114, 115]. Fang et al. [114] reported that reduced expression of pmt2 leads to retarded growth, cell wall defects, abnormal polarity, and reduced conidiation; however, no temperature-sensitive growth was found. Interestingly, this is the first time that Pmt2p is revealed to be involved in polarized growth. These observations suggest that A. fumigatus Pmt2p is required for cell wall synthesis and morphogenesis and its function is distinct from that of A. fumigatus Pmt1p.

Disruption of A. fumigatus pmt4 leads to abnormal mycelial growth, poor conidiation, and abnormal polarity. Although an increased sensitivity to echinocandin, a β1,3-glucan synthase inhibitor, was observed in the A. fumigatus pmt4 null mutant, glucan synthase activity and β1,3-glucan content were not affected [115]. In contrast to its counterpart in C. albicans [107], A. fumigatus pmt4 is not required for full virulence.

The different functions associated with different A. fumigatus PMTs are likely due to their different substrate specificities. Further investigation of the pmt mutants will be helpful for understanding their molecular mechanism, which will not only increase our understanding of the function of O-mannosylation in A. fumigatus, but also may deepen our understanding of the molecular basis of the human Walker-Warburg Syndrome (WWS) which features mutations in POMT1, a homologue of A. fumigatus Pmt4p, and results in a failure of polarized growth during neuronal migration [13].

6. Biosynthesis and Function of GPI Anchoring in A. fumigatus

GPI anchoring is a conserved glycosylation process in eukaryotes, which enables many cell surface proteins such as cell surface enzymes, receptors, and adhesion molecules to be covalently anchored to the cell membrane [157]. The core structure of the GPI anchor consists of a lipid group, myoinositol, glucosamine, several mannose residues, and a phosphoethanolamine group, which ultimately connects the GPI anchor to the protein via an amide bond. Although the number of mannose groups and the position of side-chains on the GPI anchors vary widely between species, a common core structure of EtNMan3GlcN-PI is conserved in all GPI-anchored proteins found in protozoa, yeast, plants, and mammals (Figure 6).

GPI anchoring is not essential in mammals at a cellular level as several GPI-deficient cell lines have been established [158]. However, an acquired GPI-anchoring deficiency in haematopoietic stem cells causes paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria [14], a rare but serious human disease. Also an overexpression of PIG-P, a protein of unknown function required for GPI anchor synthesis, has been noted in fetal Down syndrome brain [159]. In contrast to mammals, GPI anchor synthesis is essential in S. cerevisiae [116]. In S. cerevisiae, many GPI-anchored proteins are known to be involved in morphogenesis and cell wall organization. Two types of functions have been assigned to these proteins depending on their localization [160]. One type is the GPI-mannoproteins covalently linked to cell wall β-1,6-glucan which play important biological functions in filamentation, mating, flocculation, or adhesion to the external matrix [161167]. The second type are the GPI proteins associated with the plasma membrane which possess enzymatic activities able to modify cell wall polymers and are involved in altering cell morphology, such as β-glucanase and β-glucosyltransferase [168170]. Recent studies in A. fumigatus suggest that at least nine GPI-anchored proteins are common to filamentous fungi and yeast. Five of them are homologues of putative GPI-anchored yeast proteins that have been shown to play a role in cell wall morphogenesis [160].

The GPI anchor is assembled at the ER in multiple steps catalyzed by the concerted actions of approximately 20 proteins [171]. The first step of GPI anchor synthesis is initiated by the transfer of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) from UDP-GlcNAc to phosphatidylinositol (PI), which is catalyzed by the glycosylphosphatidylinositol-N-acetyl-glucosaminyltransferase (GPI-GnT) complex. The mammalian GPI-GnT complex consists of seven proteins, including PIG-A, PIG-H, PIG-C, PIG-P, GPI1, PIG-Y, and DPM2 [172]. All except DPM2 have structural and functional counterparts in S. cerevisiae, where they are known as Gpi3p, Gpi15p, Gpi2p, Gpi19p, Gpi1p, and Eri1p, respectively [173]. PIG-A/Gpi3p is believed to possess the catalytic domain because Gpi3p binds a photoactivatable UDP-GlcNAc analog and is a member of glycosyltransferase Family 4 of retaining glycosyltransferases [171]. The roles of the other subunits in the GPI-GnT complex are as yet unclear, but they may mediate regulatory interactions.

In yeast, GPI anchoring is essential for viability and plays an important role in the biosynthesis and organization of the cell wall. A gpi3 temperature-sensitive mutant is not viable at 37°C [116, 117]. Similar results have been observed in the filamentous fungus N. crassa [118]. In both cases, it is postulated that the introduction of mutations in GPI3/gpig-1 genes allows for minimal level of product function and survival when growing the mutant cells below the restrictive temperatures. However, the mechanism, by which the defect in GPI anchoring leads to a lethal phenotype in these two species, is poorly understood.

It has been shown that A. fumigatus GPI anchors possess five mannose residues with a phosphoethanolamine linked on the first three residues [174, 175]. The A. fumigatus pig-a gene, the homologue of the GPI3/pig-A gene in yeast, has been investigated [119]. Deletion of Δafpig-a results in a phenotype characterized by increased cell lysis. Also, an increased content of β-glucan and mannoprotein was observed in the mycelial cell wall of the Δafpig-a mutant. Unlike the temperature-sensitive or conditional lethal phenotype seen in the yeast GPI3 mutant, Δafpig-a can survive at temperatures from 30°C to 50°C. Completely blocking GPI anchor synthesis in A. fumigatus Δafpig-a leads to cell wall defects, abnormal hyphal growth, rapid conidial germination, and aberrant conidiation. In vivo assays reveal that the mutant exhibits reduced virulence in immunocompromised mice. Therefore, the GPI anchor seems not essential for viability, but required for cell wall integrity, morphogenesis and virulence in A. fumigatus. Indeed, this is the first report that a deficiency in GPI-anchor synthesis does not lead to a temperature-sensitive or conditional lethal phenotype in microbes, which provides an opportunity to identify the basic function of GPI anchoring in fungi.

7. Outlook

During the past 50 years, proteins and nucleic acids have dominated the field of biology. Carbohydrates remained very much on the sidelines. Since the late 1980’s, the enormous advances in the analysis of complex carbohydrates have enabled us to investigate the structure and function of carbohydrates, and the field has developed enormously. It is now known that carbohydrates play very important roles, especially in the regulation of development of higher organisms. However, the mechanisms by which carbohydrates play a role in development and diseases are still poorly understood. Our knowledge of protein glycosylation comes mainly from the investigation of S. cerevisiae and mammalian cells. Although investigations of the model yeast and mammalian cells have been very useful in elucidating the biochemical features of protein glycosylation, these investigations at the cellular level cannot reflect the complicated functions of glycosylation in the development of multicellular eukaryotes. Therefore, more model systems have been introduced, such as Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and mice. However, these model systems are still too complex since deletion of individual glycosyltransferase genes in these systems sometimes leads to fetal death or nonvisible phenotypes. As compared with S. cerevisiae, C. elegans, D. melanogaster, or mice, A. fumigatus seems to be an ideal model for investigation of the function of glycosylation since A. fumigatus is a multicellular eukaryote with a relative simple life cycle, in which it undergoes a series of developmental events that require polarized growth. Recent progress shows that A. fumigatus has evolved an intact N-glycan-dependent QC system, which is present in mammalian cells but not in yeast. Disruption of either processing or degradation of N-glycan in A. fumigatus leads to phenotypes such as cell wall defects and abnormal polarity.

Based on investigations of S. cerevisiae and filamentous fungi, it is likely that glycosylation first evolved to ensure synthesis of the fungal cell wall and only later did the N-glycan-dependent QC system evolve to ensure precisely controlled cell wall synthesis and polarized growth which are important for multicellular development. However, this hypothesis is controversial. Recently, based on investigations of numerous protists and fungi, Banerjee et al. [85] showed that the N-glycan-dependent QC system is functional in Entamoeba, Trichomonas, Cryptococcus, and S. pombe, but is not functional in some fungi such as Giardia and Plasmodium, Theileria, Encephalitozoon, Toxoplasma, Cryptosporidium, and Tetrahymena. They proposed that the N-glycan-dependent QC system was likely present in the common ancestor of extant eukaryotes and was secondarily lost from some eukaryotes. For example, the S. cerevisiae Kre5 is believed to be the GT ortholog that no longer glucosylates misfolded glycoproteins but is instead thought to be involved in β-1,6-glucan synthesis [85]. Of course, the possibility that the S. cerevisiae Kre5 is the ancestor of GT cannot be excluded. It remains unclear where is the evolutionary origin of glycosylation, what is the basic function of glycosylation at the early stages of evolution, and how glycosylation is regulated. Definitely, the answers to these questions will enable us to understand the basic function and regulation of glycosylation in the development of multicellular eukaryotes and help to understand more complex functions in higher eukaryotes. On the other hand, the investigation of A. fumigatus is also a key to understanding complex compensatory mechanisms of cell wall biosynthesis and may provide a new strategy for drug development.

During the past few years, the framework of the biosynthetic pathways of glycosylation in A. fumigatus has been delineated. Functional analyses of some of the genes in this pathway have shown that glycosylation is required for cell wall synthesis, polarity, morphogenesis, and cellular function in A. fumigatus (Figure 7 and Table 2). However, a detailed understanding of this pathway remains unknown, such as details regarding the synthesis of the N-glycan precursor, the precise molecular mechanism of N-glycan processing, QC of protein folding, and modification of the GPI anchor. Moreover, the molecular mechanisms by which glycosylation plays a role in morphogenesis and development of A. fumigatus are vaguely understood. Therefore, the future direction would be looking for those key proteins that are affected by glycosylation and identifying the signal transduction pathways that link glycosylation and development, through genetic, biochemical, cell biological, and proteomic studies.


PathwayFunctionGeneSpeciesPhenotypesReference

PMI40S. cerevisiaeThe mutant only grows on media with exogenous mannose. Excess exogenous mannose leads to an accumulation of Man-6-P, which represses glycolysis, protein biosynthesis, and cell wall biogenesis[52]
Phosphomannose isomerase (PMI)MAN1C. neoformansDisrupted MAN1 mutant displays poor capsule formation, reduced polysaccharide secretion, morphological abnormalities, and attenuated virulence[50]
Mannose activationmanAA. nidulansThe manA1 mutant exhibits abnormal ballooning of hyphal tips and eventually ceases to grow.[53]
pmi1A. fumigatusDeletion of pmi1 results in defects in cell wall integrity, conidiation, and morphology. Both lower and higher concentrations of mannose lead to a reduction in the levels of α-glucan in the cell wall and an accumulation of Man-6-P in the mutant[54]
GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase (GMPP)SRB1S. cerevisiaeCell lysis, failure of cell separation, impaired budding and hyphal switching, clumping and flocculation, and cell wall defects[61]
srb1A. fumigatusDefective cell wall and impaired polarised growth, as well as rapid germination and reduced conidiation[63]

Oligosaccharyltrans- ferase (OST)STT3S. cerevisiaeEssential gene[72, 73]
stt3A. fumigatusRepression of the stt3 gene leads to a severe retardation of growth, a slight defect in cell wall integrity and UPR[39]
ER Glucosidase ICWH41S. cerevisiaeMutational defects in the CWH41 gene cause severe and selective instability of glycoprotein Kre6p, a putative Golgi glucan synthase required for β-l, 6-glucan synthesis[23, 83, 84]
cwh41A. fumigatusDeletion of cwh41 leads to severe reduction in conidial formation, abnormalities of polar growth, septation and temperature-sensitive deficiency of cell wall integrity.[37]
N-glycosylation Golgi mannosidase IIMSDSS. cerevisiaeDisruption of t MSDS does not prevent outer chain synthesis[96]
msdSA. fumigatusDeletion of msdS gene leads to a defect in N-glycan processing, as well as a reduction of cell wall components (including α-glucan, β-glucan, mannoprotein, and chitin), reduced conidiation, abnormal polarity, and septation[97]
Cytosolic/vacuolar α-mannosidaseAMS1S. cerevisiaeThe Ams1p is involved in recycling macromolecular components of the cell under nutrient deprivation. Deletion of AMS1 causes no visible effect on growth or morphology[98101]
ams1A. nidulansoligosaccharide catabolism; no visible effect on growth or morphology[102]
ams1A. fumigatusDeletion of ams1 leads to a severe defect in conidial formation (especially at a higher temperature), abnormalities of polarity, and septation[103]

PMT1 PMT2 PMT3 PMT4 PMT5 PMT6 PMT7S. cerevisiaeSingle pmt1 mutants fail to grow in anaerobic conditions on some media. The pmt1,2,3-triple mutants grow only in osmotically stabilized medium, whereas the pmt1,2,4-and pmt2,3,4-triple mutants are not viable in any conditions[104, 105]
O-glycosylationmannosyltransferasePMT1 PMT2 PMT4 PMT5 PMT6C. albicansThe pmt1 mutants are viable, but defective in undergoing cellular differentiation from yeast to a true hyphal growth form under some conditions. The virulence of the pmt1 null mutant is significantly attenuated. pmt1,4-double mutants are not viable. The pmt phenotypes are closely linked to alterations in cell wall components, including cell wall mannoproteins and polysaccharides[106, 107]
oma1+, oma2+oma4+S. pombeDeletion of , as well as simultaneous deletion of and , is lethal. The viable oma1D and oma4D single mutants show abnormal cell wall and septum formation[108]
PMT1 PMT2 PMT4C. neoformansPmt4p is essential for morphogenesis and virulence. PMT2 is an essential gene, and the double pmt1pmt4 deletion is synthetically lethal[109, 110]
pmtA pmtB pmtCA. nidulansAll single pmt mutants are viable but show reduced growth at elevated temperatures and defects in morphogenesis. Double deletion of pmtA/pmtC and pmtB/pmtC is lethal[111, 112]
pmt1 pmt2 pmt4A. fumigatusDeletion of pmt1 results in temperature- sensitive phenotypes including retarded growth, cell wall defects, deficient ability of conidiation, and reduced germination[113115]
Single pmt2 or double pmt1pmt4 deletion(s) are lethal. Repression of pmt2 leads to retarded growth, cell wall defects, abnormal polarity, and reduced conidiation
Disruption of pmt4 leads to abnormal mycelial growth, poor conidiation, and abnormal polarity.

GPI-anchoring Glycosylphosphatidyl-inositol-N-acetyl- glucosaminyltrans- ferase (GPI-GnT)GPI3S. cerevisiaeA gpi3 temperature-sensitive mutant is lethal at 37°C[116, 117]
gpig-1N. crassaTemperature-sensitive phenotypes[118]
pig-aA. fumigatusDeletion of pig-a results in a number of phenotypes including increased cell lysis, cell wall defects, abnormal hyphal growth, rapid conidial germination, aberrant conidiation, and reduced virulence[119]

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31030025 and 31011130030). The author would like to thank Dr. Nir Osherov and Dr. Thomas Hartmann for critical review and excellent comments.

References

  1. G. P. Bodey and S. Vartivarian, “Aspergillosis,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 413–437, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  2. D. W. Denning, “Invasive aspergillosis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 781–805, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  3. A. Wald, W. Leisenring, J. A. Van Burik, and R. A. Bowden, “Epidemiology of Aspergillus infections in a large cohort of patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 175, no. 6, pp. 1459–1466, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  4. G. P. Bodey, B. Bueltmann, W. Duguid et al., “Fungal infections in cancer patients: an international autopsy survey,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 99–109, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  5. G. Y. Minamoto, T. F. Barlam, and N. J. Vander Els, “Invasive aspergillosis in patients with AIDS,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 66–74, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  6. O. S. Zmeili and A. O. Soubani, “Pulmonary aspergillosis: a clinical update,” Oxford Journals of Medicine, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 317–334, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. Yoda, T. Kawada, C. Kaibara et al., “Defect in cell wall integrity of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae caused by a mutation of the GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase gene VIG9,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 1937–1941, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. O. Agaphonov, A. N. Packeiser, M. B. Chechenova, E. S. Choi, and M. D. Ter-Avanesyan, “Mutation of the homologue of GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase alters cell wall structure, protein glycosylation and secretion in Hansenula polymorpha,” Yeast, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 391–402, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. C. Bowman, P. S. Hicks, M. B. Kurtz et al., “The antifungal echinocandin caspofungin acetate kills growing cells of Aspergillus fumigatus in vitro,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 3001–3012, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. W. Denning, “Echinocandin antifungal drugs,” The Lancet, vol. 362, no. 9390, pp. 1142–1151, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. P. Latge, “The cell wall: a carbohydrate armour for the fungal cell,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 279–290, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. G. Spiro, “Protein glycosylation: nature, distribution, enzymatic formation, and disease implications of glycopeptide bonds,” Glycobiology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 43R–56R, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  13. D. B. V. de Bernabe, S. Currier, A. Steinbrecher et al., “Mutations in the O-mannosyltransferase gene POMT1 give rise to the severe neuronal migration disorder Walker-Warburg syndrome,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 1033–1043, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Takeda, T. Miyata, K. Kawagoe et al., “Deficiency of the GPI anchor caused by a somatic mutation of the PIG-A gene in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria,” Cell, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 703–711, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. Lehle, S. Strahl, and W. Tanner, “Protein glycosylation, conserved from yeast to man: a model organism helps elucidate congenital human diseases,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 45, no. 41, pp. 6802–6818, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. T. Fontaine, C. Simenel, G. Dubreucq et al., “Molecular organization of the alkali-insoluble fraction of Aspergillus fumigatus cell wall,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 36, pp. 27594–27607, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J.-P. Latgé, I. Mouyna, F. Tekaia, A. Beauvais, J. P. Debeaupuis, and W. Nierman, “Specific molecular features in the organization and biosynthesis of the cell wall of Aspergillus fumigatus,” Medical Mycology, vol. 43, supplement 1, pp. S15–S22, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. I. Mouyna, T. Fontaine, M. Vai et al., “Glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored glucanosyltransferases play an active role in the biosynthesis of the fungal cell wall,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 20, pp. 14882–14889, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. I. Mouyna, W. Morelle, M. Vai et al., “Deletion of GEL2 encoding for a β(1–3)glucanosyltransferase affects morphogenesis and virulence in Aspergillus fumigatus,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1675–1688, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Chabane, J. Sarfati, O. Ibrahim-Granet et al., “Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored Ecm33p influences conidial cell wall biosynthesis in Aspergillus fumigatus,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 3259–3267, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. Romano, G. Nimrod, N. Ben-Tal et al., “Disruption of the Aspergillus fumigatus ECM33 homologue results in rapid conidial germination, antifungal resistance and hypervirulence,” Microbiology, vol. 152, no. 7, pp. 1919–1928, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. H. Terashima, N. Yabuki, M. Arisawa, K. Hamada, and K. Kitada, “Up-regulation of genes encoding glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-attached proteins in response to cell wall damage caused by disruption of FKS1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Molecular and General Genetics, vol. 264, no. 1-2, pp. 64–74, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  23. A. F. J. Ram, A. Wolters, T. Hoopen, and F. M. Klis, “A new approach for isolating cell wall mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by screening for hypersensitivity to calcofluor white,” Yeast, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1019–1030, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L. Popolo, D. Gilardelli, P. Bonfante, and M. Vai, “Increase in chitin as an essential response to defects in assembly of cell wall polymers in the ggp1 Δ mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 179, no. 2, pp. 463–469, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  25. A. Lagorce, V. Berre-Anton, B. Aguilar-Uscanga, H. Martin-Yken, A. Dagkessamanskaia, and J. François, “Involvement of GFA1, which encodes glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase, in the activation of the chitin synthesis pathway in response to cell-wall defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 269, no. 6, pp. 1697–1707, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. F. J. Ram and F. M. Klis, “Identification of fungal cell wall mutants using susceptibility assays based on calcofluor white and congo red,” Nature Protocols, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 2253–2256, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C. Carotti, L. Ferrario, C. Roncero, M. H. Valdivieso, A. Duran, and L. Popolo, “Maintenance of cell integrity in the gasI mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires the Chs3p-targeting and activation pathway and involves an unusual Chs3p localization,” Yeast, vol. 19, no. 13, pp. 1113–1124, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. E. Levin, “Cell wall integrity signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 262–291, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. V. Gray, J. P. Ogas, Y. Kamada, M. Stone, D. E. Levin, and I. Herskowitz, “A role for the Pkc1 MAP kinase pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in bud emergence and identification of a putative upstream regulator,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 16, no. 16, pp. 4924–4937, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. J. Jacoby, S. M. Nilius, and J. J. Heinisch, “A screen for upstream components of the yeast protein kinase C signal transduction pathway identifies the product of the SLG1 gene,” Molecular and General Genetics, vol. 258, no. 1-2, pp. 148–155, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Verna, A. Lodder, K. Lee, A. Vagts, and R. Ballester, “A family of genes required for maintenance of cell wall integrity and for the stress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 25, pp. 13804–13809, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. Ketela, R. Green, and H. Bussey, “Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mid2p is a potential cell wall stress sensor and upstream activator of the PKC1-MPK1 cell integrity pathway,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 181, no. 11, pp. 3330–3340, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  33. M. Rajavel, B. Philip, B. M. Buehrer, B. Errede, and D. E. Levin, “Mid2 is a putative sensor for cell integrity signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 3969–3976, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  34. B. Philip and D. E. Levin, “Wsc1 and Mid2 are cell surface sensors for cell wall integrity signaling that act through Rom2, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rho1,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 271–280, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. Lommel, M. Bagnat, and S. Strahl, “Aberrant processing of the WSC family and Mid2p cell surface sensors results in cell death of Saccharomyces cerevisiae O-mannosylation mutants,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 46–57, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. F. Hutzler, R. Gerstl, M. Lommel, and S. Strahl, “Protein N-glycosylation determines functionality of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall integrity sensor Mid2p,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1438–1449, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. L. Zhang, H. Zhou, H. Ouyang, Y. Li, and C. Jin, “Afcwh41 is required for cell wall synthesis, conidiation, and polarity in Aspergillus fumigatus,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 289, no. 2, pp. 155–165, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. V. Valiante, T. Heinekamp, R. Jain, and A. A. Brakhage, “The mitogen-activated protein kinase MpkA of Aspergillus fumigatus regulates cell wall signaling and oxidative stress response,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 618–627, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. K. Li, H. Ouyang, Y. Lü et al., “Repression of N-glycosylation triggers the unfolded protein response (UPR) and over-expression of cell wall protein and chitin in Aspergillus fumigatus,” Microbiology, vol. 157, pp. 1968–1979, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  40. J. A. Davis, X. H. Wu, L. Wang et al., “Molecular cloning, gene organization, and expression of mouse Mpi encoding phosphomannose isomerase,” Glycobiology, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 435–442, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  41. J. S. Miles and J. R. Guest, “Nucleotide sequence and transcriptional start point of the phosphomannose isomerase gene (manA) of Escherichia coli,” Gene, vol. 32, no. 1-2, pp. 41–48, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  42. A. E. I. Proudfoot, M. A. Payton, and T. N. Wells, “Purification and characterization of fungal and mammalian phosphomannose isomerases,” Journal of Protein Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 619–627, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. L. V. Collins and J. Hackett, “Sequence of the phosphomannose isomerase-encoding gene of Salmonella typhimurium,” Gene, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 135–136, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. R. Sagurthi, G. Gowda, H. S. Savithri, and M. R. N. Murthy, “Structures of mannose-6-phosphate isomerase from salmonella typhimurium bound to metal atoms and substrate: implications for catalytic mechanism,” Acta Crystallographica Section D, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 724–732, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. V. Papoutsopoulou and D. A. Kyriakidis, “Phosphomannose isomerase of Xanthomonas campestris: a zinc activated enzyme,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 177, no. 1-2, pp. 183–191, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  46. D. Shinabarger, A. Berry, T. B. May, R. Rothmel, A. Fialho, and A. M. Chakrabarty, “Purification and characterization of phosphomannose isomerase-guanosine diphospho-D-mannose pyrophosphorylase: a bifunctional enzyme in the alginate biosynthetic pathway of Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 266, no. 4, pp. 2080–2088, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  47. S. A. Sousa, L. M. Moreira, J. Wopperer, L. Eberl, I. Sá-Correia, and J. H. Leităo, “The Burkholderia cepacia bceA gene encodes a protein with phosphomannose isomerase and GDP-d-mannose pyrophosphorylase activities,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 353, no. 1, pp. 200–206, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. F. Coulin, E. Magnenat, A. E. I. Proudfoot, M. A. Payton, P. Scully, and T. N. C. Wells, “Identification of Cys-150 in the active site of phosphomannose isomerase from Candida albicans,” Biochemistry, vol. 32, no. 51, pp. 14139–14144, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  49. D. J. Smith and M. A. Payton, “Hyphal tip extension in Aspergillus nidulans requires the manA gene. Which encodes phosphomannose isomerase,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 6030–6038, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  50. E. A. Wills, I. S. Roberts, M. Del Poeta et al., “Identification and characterization of the Cryptococcus neoformans phosphomannose isomerase-encoding gene, MAN1, and its impact on pathogenicity,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 610–620, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. D. J. Smith, A. Proudfoot, L. Friedli, L. S. Klig, G. Paravicini, and M. A. Payton, “PMI40, an intron-containing gene required for early steps in yeast mannosylation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 2924–2930, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  52. J.-P. Pitkänen, A. Törmä, S. Alff, L. Huopaniemi, P. Mattila, and R. Renkonen, “Excess mannose limits the growth of phosphomannose isomerase PMI40 deletion strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 53, pp. 55737–55743, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. S. Upadhyay and B. D. Shaw, “A phosphoglucose isomerase mutant in Aspergillus nidulans is defective in hyphal polarity and conidiation,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 739–751, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. W. Fang, X. Yu, B. Wang et al., “Characterization of the Aspergillus fumigatus phosphomannose isomerase Pmi1 and its impact on cell wall synthesis and morphogenesis,” Microbiology, vol. 155, no. 10, pp. 3281–3293, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. A. M. Griffin, E. S. Poelwijk, V. J. Morris, and M. J. Gasson, “Cloning of the aceF gene encoding the phosphomannose isomerase and GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase activities involved in acetan biosynthesis in Acetobacter xylinum,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 389–396, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. B. Ning and A. D. Elbein, “Purification and properties of mycobacterial GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 362, no. 2, pp. 339–345, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. Ohta, H. Chibana, M. Arisawa, and M. Sudoh, “The VIG9 gene products from the human pathogenic fungi Candida albicans and Candida glabrata encode GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1475, no. 3, pp. 265–272, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. S. Warit, R. M. Walmsley, and L. I. Stateva, “Cloning and sequencing of the Candida albicans homologue of SRB1/PSA1/VIG9, the essential gene encoding GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Microbiology, vol. 144, no. 9, pp. 2417–2426, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  59. S. Sacchetti, S. Bartolucci, M. Rossi, and R. Cannio, “Identification of a GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase gene from Sulfolobus solfataricus,” Gene, vol. 332, no. 1-2, pp. 149–157, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. H. Hashimoto, A. Sakakibara, M. Yamasaki, and K. Yoda, “Saccharomyces cerevisiae VIG9 encodes GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase, which is essential for protein glycosylation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 26, pp. 16308–16314, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. S. Warit, N. Zhang, A. Short, R. M. Walmsley, S. G. Oliver, and L. I. Stateva, “Glycosylation deficiency phenotypes resulting from depletion of GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase in two yeast species,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1156–1166, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. A. Garami and T. Ilg, “Disruption of mannose activation in Leishmania mexicana: GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase is required for virulence, but not for viability,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 20, no. 14, pp. 3657–3666, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. H. Jiang, H. Ouyang, H. Zhou, and C. Jin, “GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase is essential for cell wall integrity, morphogenesis and viability of Aspergillus fumigatus,” Microbiology, vol. 154, no. 9, pp. 2730–2739, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. S. Silberstein and R. Gilmore, “Biochemistry, molecular biology, and genetics of the oligosaccharyltransferase,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 849–858, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  65. R. Knauer and L. Lehle, “The oligosaccharyltransferase complex from yeast,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1426, no. 2, pp. 259–273, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. A. Yan and W. J. Lennarz, “Unraveling the mechanism of protein N-glycosylation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 5, pp. 3121–3124, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. E. Weerapana and B. Imperiali, “Asparagine-linked protein glycosylation: from eukaryotic to prokaryotic systems,” Glycobiology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 91R–101R, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. A. Yan and W. J. Lennarz, “Studies on the function of oligosaccharyl transferase subunits: stt3p is directly involved in the glycosylation process,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 49, pp. 47692–47700, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. D. J. Kelleher, D. Karaoglu, E. C. Mandon, and R. Gilmore, “Oligosaccharyltransferase isoforms that contain different catalytic STT3 subunits have distinct enzymatic properties,” Molecular Cell, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 101–111, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. I. Nilsson, D. J. Kelleher, Y. Miao et al., “Photocross-linking of nascent chains to the STT3 subunit of the oligosaccharyltransferase complex,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 161, no. 4, pp. 715–725, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. D. J. Kelleher and R. Gilmore, “An evolving view of the eukaryotic oligosaccharyltransferase,” Glycobiology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 47R–62R, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. S. Yoshida, Y. Ohya, A. Nakano et al., “STT3, a novel essential gene related to the PKC1/STT1 protein kinase pathway, is involved in protein glycosylation in yeast,” Gene, vol. 164, no. 1, pp. 167–172, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. R. Zufferey, R. Knauer, P. Burda et al., “STT3, a highly conserved protein required for yeast oligosaccharyl transferase activity in vivo,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 14, no. 20, pp. 4949–4960, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  74. D. L. Richie, L. Hartl, V. Aimanianda et al., “A role for the unfolded protein response (UPR) in virulence and antifungal susceptibility in Aspergillus fumigatus,” Plos Pathogens, vol. 5, no. 1, Article ID e1000258, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. A. Helenius and M. Aebi, “Roles of N-linked glycans in the endoplasmic reticulum,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 73, pp. 1019–1049, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. L. W. Ruddock and M. Molinari, “N-glycan processing in ER quality control,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 119, no. 21, pp. 4373–4380, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. N. Mesaeli, K. Nakamura, E. Zvaritch et al., “Calreticulin is essential for cardiac development,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 857–868, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. D. N. Hebert, S. C. Garman, and M. Molinari, “The glycan code of the endoplasmic reticulum: asparagine-linked carbohydrates as protein maturation and quality-control tags,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 364–370, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. C. M. de Praeter, G. J. Gerwig, E. Bause et al., “A novel disorder caused by defective biosynthesis of N-linked oligosaccharides due to glucosidase I deficiency,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 1744–1756, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. A. J. Parodi, “Protein glucosylation and its role in protein folding,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 69, pp. 69–93, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. C. A. Jakob, P. Burda, J. Roth, and M. Aebi, “Degradation of misfolded endoplasmic reticulum glycoproteins in saccharomyces cerevisiae is determined by a specific oligosaccharide structure,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 142, no. 5, pp. 1223–1233, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. P. A. Romero, G. J. P. Dijkgraaf, S. Shahinian, A. Herscovics, and H. Bussey, “The yeast CWH41 gene encodes glucosidase I,” Glycobiology, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 997–1003, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. B. Jiang, J. Sheraton, A. F. J. Ram, G. J. P. Dijkgraaf, F. M. Klis, and H. Bussey, “CWH41 encodes a novel endoplasmic reticulum membrane N-glycoprotein involved in β1,6-glucan assembly,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 178, no. 4, pp. 1162–1171, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  84. C. Abeijon and L. Y. Chen, “The role of glucosidase I (Cwh41p) in the biosynthesis of cell wall β- 1,6-glucan is indirect,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 2729–2738, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  85. S. Banerjee, P. Vishwanath, J. Cui et al., “The evolution of N-glycan-dependent endoplasmic reticulum quality control factors for glycoprotein folding and degradation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 28, pp. 11676–11681, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. L. Zhang, D. Feng, W. Fang et al., “Comparative proteomic analysis of an Aspergillus fumigatus mutant deficient in glucosidase I (AfCwh41),” Microbiology, vol. 155, no. 7, pp. 2157–2167, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. J. E. Galagan, S. E. Calvo, C. Cuomo et al., “Sequencing of Aspergillus nidulans and comparative analysis with A. fumigatus and A. oryzae,” Nature, vol. 438, no. 7071, pp. 1105–1115, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. R. Kornfeld and S. Kornfeld, “Assembly of asparagine-linked oligosaccharides,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 54, pp. 631–664, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  89. M. A. Kukuruzinska, M. L. Bergh, and B. J. Jackson, “Protein glycosylation in yeast,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 56, pp. 915–944, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  90. W. Tanner and L. Lehle, “Protein glycosylation in yeast,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 906, no. 1, pp. 81–99, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  91. Y. Chiba, Y. Yamagata, S. Iijima, T. Nakajima, and E. Ichishima, “The carbohydrate moiety of the acid carboxypeptidase from Aspergillus saitoi,” Current Microbiology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 281–288, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. M. Maras, A. De Bruyn, J. Schraml et al., “Structural characterization of N-linked oligosaccharides from cellobiohydrolase I secreted by the filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei RUTC 30,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 245, no. 3, pp. 617–625, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  93. W. Morelle, M. Bernard, J.-P. Debeaupuis, M. Buitrago, M. Tabouret, and J. P. Latge, “Galactomannoproteins of Aspergillus fumigatus,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 1308–1316, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. P. S. Schmalhorst, S. Krappmann, W. Vervecken et al., “Contribution of galactofuranose to the virulence of the opportunistic pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1268–1277, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. A. Kotz, J. Wagener, J. Engel et al., “Approaching the Secrets of N-glycosylation in Aspergillus fumigatus: characterization of the AfOch1 protein,” Plos One, vol. 5, no. 12, Article ID e15729, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. R. Puccia, B. Grondin, and A. Herscovics, “Disruption of the processing α-mannosidase gene does not prevent outer chain synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 290, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  97. Y. Li, L. Zhang, D. Wang et al., “Deletion of the msd gene induces abnormal polarity and septation in Aspergillus fumigatus,” Microbiology, vol. 154, pp. 1960–1972, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  98. T. Yoshihisa and Y. Anraku, “Nucleotide sequence of AMS1, the structure gene of vacuolar α-mannosidase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 908–915, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  99. T. Yoshihisa and Y. Anraku, “A novel pathway of import of α-mannosidase, a marker enzyme of vacuolar membrane, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265, no. 36, pp. 22418–22425, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  100. I. Chantret, J.-P. Frŕnoy, and S. E. H. Moore, “Free-oligosaccharide control in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae roles for peptide: N-glycanase (Png1p) and vacuolar mannosidase (Ams1p),” Biochemical Journal, vol. 373, no. 3, pp. 901–908, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. M. U. Hutchins and D. J. Klionsky, “Vacuolar localization of oligomeric α-mannosidase requires the cytoplasm to vacuole targeting and autophagy pathway components in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 23, pp. 20491–20498, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. C. J. Eades, A. M. Gilbert, C. D. Goodman, and W. E. Hintz, “Identification and analysis of a class 2 α-mannosidase from Aspergillus nidulans,” Glycobiology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 17–33, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. Y. Li, W. Fang, L. Zhang et al., “Class IIC α-mannosidase AfAms1 is required for morphogenesis and cellular function in Aspergillus fumigatus,” Glycobiology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 624–632, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. M. Gentzsch and W. Tanner, “Protein-O-glycosylation in yeast: protein-specific mannosyltransferases,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 15, pp. 5752–5759, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  105. J.-P. Bourdineaud, J. M. van der Vaart, M. Donzeau, and G. J. M. Lauquin, “Pmt1 mannosyl transferase is involved in cell wall incorporation of several proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 85–98, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. C. Timpel, S. Strahl-Bolsinger, K. Ziegelbauer, and J. F. Ernst, “Multiple functions of Pmt1p-mediated protein O-mannosylation in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 33, pp. 20837–20846, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. S. K.-H. Prill, B. Klinkert, C. Timpel, C. A. Gale, and J. F. Ernst, “PMT family of Candida albicans: five protein mannosyltransferase isoforms affect growth, morphogenesis and antifungal resistance,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 546–560, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. T. Willer, M. Brandl, M. Sipiczki, and S. Strahl, “Protein O-mannosylation is crucial for cell wall integrity, septation and viability in fission yeast,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 156–170, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. G. M. Olson, D. S. Fox, P. Wang, J. A. Alspaugh, and K. L. Buchanan, “Role of protein O-mannosyltransferase Pmt4 in the morphogenesis and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 222–234, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. S. D. Willger, J. F. Ernst, J. A. Alspaugh, and K. B. Lengeler, “Characterization of the PMT gene family in Cryptococcus neoformans,” PLoS One, vol. 4, no. 7, Article ID e6321, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. T. Oka, T. Hamaguchi, Y. Sameshima, M. Goto, and K. Furukawa, “Molecular characterization of protein O-mannosyltransferase and its involvement in cell-wall synthesis in Aspergillus nidulans,” Microbiology, vol. 150, no. 6, pp. 1973–1982, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  112. M. Goto, Y. Harada, T. Oka, S. Matsumoto, K. Takegawa, and K. Furukawa, “Protein O-mannosyltransferases B and C support hyphal development and differentiation in Aspergillus nidulans,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1465–1474, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. H. Zhuo, H. Hu, L. Zhang et al., “Protein O-mannosyl-transferase 1 (AfPmt1p) in Aspergillus fumigatus is crucial for cell wall integrity and conidia morphology especially at an elevated temperature,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 2260–2268, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  114. W. Fang, W. Ding, B. Wang et al., “Reduced expression of the O-mannosyltransferase 2 (AfPmt2) leads to deficient cell wall and abnormal polarity in Aspergillus fumigatus,” Glycobiology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 542–552, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. I. Mouyna, O. Kniemeyer, T. Jank et al., “Members of protein O-mannosyltransferase family in Aspergillus fumigatus differentially affect growth, morphogenesis and viability,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 1205–1221, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. S. D. Leidich, Z. Kostova, R. R. Latek et al., “Temperature-sensitive yeast GPI anchoring mutants gpi2 and gpi3 are defective in the synthesis of N-acetylglucosaminyl phosphatidylinositol. Cloning of the GPI2 gene,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 22, pp. 13029–13035, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. J. H. Vossen, W. H. Müller, P. N. Lipke, and F. M. Klis, “Restrictive glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor synthesis in cwh6/gpi3 yeast cells causes aberrant biogenesis of cell wall proteins,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 179, no. 7, pp. 2202–2209, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  118. S. M. Bowman, A. Piwowar, M. A. Dabbous, J. Vierula, and S. J. Free, “Mutational analysis of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor pathway demonstrates that GPI-anchored proteins are required for cell wall biogenesis and normal hyphal growth in Neurospora crassa,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 587–600, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. H. Li, H. Zhou, Y. Luo, H. Ouyang, H. Hu, and C. Jin, “Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor is required in Aspergillus fumigatus for morphogenesis and virulence,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1014–1027, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. P. F. Daniel, B. Winchester, and C. D. Warren, “Mammalian α-mannosidases—multiple forms but a common purpose?” Glycobiology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 551–566, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  121. K. W. Moremen, R. B. Trimble, and A. Herscovics, “Glycosidases of the asparagine-linked oligosaccharide processing pathway,” Glycobiology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 113–125, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  122. S. Weng and R. G. Spiro, “Demonstration that a kifunensine-resistant α-mannosidase with a unique processing action on N-linked oligosaccharides occurs in rat liver endoplasmic reticulum and various cultured cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 268, no. 34, pp. 25656–25663, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  123. S. Weng and R. G. Spiro, “Endoplasmic reticulum kifunensine-resistant α-mannosidase is enzymatically and immunologically related to the cytosolic α-mannosidase,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 325, no. 1, pp. 113–123, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. T. Yoshida, T. Inoue, and E. Ichishima, “1,2-α-D-mannosidase from Penicillium citrinum: molecular and enzymic properties of two isoenzymes,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 290, no. 2, pp. 349–354, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  125. T. Yoshida and E. Ichishima, “Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of the genomic DNA for 1,2-α-D-mannosidase gene, msdC from Penicillium citrinum,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1263, no. 2, pp. 159–162, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. E. Ichishima, N. Taya, M. Ikeguchi et al., “Molecular and enzymic properties of recombinant 1,2-α-mannosidase from Aspergillus saitoi overexpressed in Aspergillus oryzae cells,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 339, no. 3, pp. 589–597, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. T. Akao, M. Yamaguchi, A. Yahara et al., “Cloning and expression of 1,2-α-mannosidase gene (fmanIB) from filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae: in vivo visualization of the FmanIBp-GFP fusion protein,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 471–479, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. M. Maras, N. Callewaert, K. Piens et al., “Molecular cloning and enzymatic characterization of a Trichoderma reesei 1,2-α-D-mannosidase,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 77, no. 2-3, pp. 255–263, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. C. J. Eades and W. E. Hintz, “Characterization of the Class I α-mannosidase gene family in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans,” Gene, vol. 255, no. 1, pp. 25–34, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. D. B. Roberts, W. J. Mulvany, R. A. Dwek, and P. M. Rudd, “Mutant analysis reveals an alternative pathway for N-linked glycosylation in Drosophila melanogaster,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 253, no. 2, pp. 494–498, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  131. S. Duvet, O. Labiau, A. M. Mir, S. S. Krag, A. Verbert, and R. Cacan, “Cytosolic deglycosylation process of newly synthesized glycoproteins generates oligomannosides possessing one GIcNAc residue at the reducing end,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 335, no. 2, pp. 389–396, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  132. T. Grard, V. Herman, A. Saint-Pol et al., “Oligomannosides or oligosaccharide-lipids as potential substrates for rat liver cytosolic α-D-mannosidase,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 316, no. 3, pp. 787–792, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  133. J. Bischoff, K. Moreman, and H. F. Lodish, “Isolation, characterization and expression of cDNA encoding a rat liver endoplasmic reticulum α-mannosidase,” Jouranl of Biological Chemistry, vol. 28, pp. 17110–17117, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  134. T. Suzuki, I. Hara, M. Nakano et al., “Man2C1, an α-mannosidase, is involved in the trimming of free oligosaccharides in the cytosol,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 400, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. I. Chantret and S. E. H. Moore, “Free oligosaccharide regulation during mammalian protein N-glycosylation,” Glycobiology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 210–224, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  136. D. P. Rose, “Tryptophan metabolism in carcinoma of the breast,” The Lancet, vol. 1, no. 7484, pp. 239–241, 1967. View at: Google Scholar
  137. L. J. Burditt, N. C. Phillips, D. Robinson et al., “Characterization of the mutant α-mannosidase in bovine mannosidosis,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 175, no. 3, pp. 1013–1022, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  138. N. E. Norden, A. Lundblad, P. A. Ockerman, and R. D. Jolly, “Mannosidosis in angus cattle: partial characterization of two mannose containing oligosaccharides,” FEBS Letters, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 209–212, 1973. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  139. N. C. Phillips, D. Robinson, B. G. Winchester, and R. D. Jolly, “Mannosidosis in angus cattle: the enzymic defect,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 363–371, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  140. T. Endo, “O-Mannosyl glycans in mammals,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1473, no. 1, pp. 237–246, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  141. E. A. Leităo, V. C. B. Bittencourt, R. M. T. Haido et al., “β-galactofuranose-containing O-linked oligosaccharides present in the cell wall peptidogalactomannan of Aspergillus fumigatus contain immunodominant epitopes,” Glycobiology, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 681–692, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  142. F. I. Comer and G. W. Hart, “O-glycosylation of nuclear and cytosolic proteins. Dynamic interplay between O-GlcNAc and O-phosphate,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 38, pp. 29179–29182, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  143. C. Slawson, M. P. Housley, and G. W. Hart, “O-GlcNAc cycling: how a single sugar post-translational modification is changing the way we think about signaling networks,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 71–83, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. G. W. Hart, M. P. Housley, and C. Slawson, “Cycling of O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine on nucleocytoplasmic proteins,” Nature, vol. 446, no. 7139, pp. 1017–1022, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  145. S. Strahl-Bolsinger, M. Gentzsch, and W. Tanner, “Protein O-mannosylation,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1426, no. 2, pp. 297–307, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  146. T. Willer, M. C. Valero, W. Tanner, J. Cruces, and S. Strahl, “O-mannosyl glycans: from yeast to novel associations with human disease,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 621–630, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  147. B. Romero, G. Turner, I. Olivas et al., “The Aspergillus nidulans alcA promoter drives tightly regulated conditional gene expression in Aspergillus fumigatus permitting validation of essential genes in this human pathogen,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 103–114, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  148. L. A. Jurado, A. Coloma, and J. Cruces, “Identification of a human homolog of the Drosophila rotated abdomen gene (POMT1) encoding a putative protein O-mannosyl-transferase, and assignment to human chromosome 9q34.1,” Genomics, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 171–180, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  149. E. Martin-Blanco and A. Garcia-Bellido, “Mutations in the rotated abdomen locus affect muscle development and reveal an intrinsic asymmetry in Drosophila,” Proceedings of National Academy Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, pp. 6048–6052, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  150. T. Willer, W. Amselgruber, R. Deutzmann, and S. Strahl, “Characterization of POMT2, a novel member of the PMT protein O-mannosyltransferase family specifically localized to the acrosome of mammalian spermatids,” Glycobiology, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 771–783, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  151. M. Ecker, V. Mrsa, I. Hagen, R. Deutzmann, S. Strahl, and W. Tanner, “O-mannosylation precedes and potentially controls the N-glycosylation of a yeast cell wall glycoprotein,” EMBO Reports, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 628–632, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  152. M. Gentzsch and W. Tanner, “Protein-O-glycosylation in yeast: protein-specific mannosyltransferases,” Glycobiology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 481–486, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  153. S. Strahl-Bolsinger, T. Immervoll, R. Deutzmann, and W. Tanner, “PMT1, the gene for a key enzyme of protein O-glycosylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 17, pp. 8164–8168, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  154. T. Willer, B. Prados, J. M. Falcon-Perez et al., “Targeted disruption of the Walker-Warburg syndrome gene Pomt1 in mouse results in embryonic lethality,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 39, pp. 14126–14131, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  155. T. Ichimiya, H. Manya, Y. Ohmae et al., “The twisted abdomen phenotype of Drosophila POMT1 and POMT2 mutants coincides with their heterophilic protein O-mannosyltransferase activity,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 41, pp. 42638–42647, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  156. J. F. Ernst and S. K.-H. Prill, “O-glycosylation,” Medical Mycology, vol. 39, 1, pp. 67–74, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  157. H. Ikezawa, “Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 409–417, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  158. K. Ohishi, N. Inoue, Y. Maeda, J. Takeda, H. Riezman, and T. Kinoshita, “Gaa1p and gpi8p are components of a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) transamidase that mediates attachment of GPI to proteins,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1523–1533, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  159. R. Ferrando-Miguel, M. S. Cheon, and G. Lubec, “Protein levels of genes encoded on chromosome 21 in fetal Down syndrome brain (Part V): overexpression of phosphatidyl-inositol-glycan class P protein (DSCR5),” Amino Acids, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 255–261, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  160. J.-M. Bruneau, T. Magnin, E. Tagat et al., “Proteome analysis of Aspergillus fumigatus identifies glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins associated to the cell wall biosynthesis,” Electrophoresis, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 2812–2823, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  161. M. Lussier, A. M. White, J. Sheraton et al., “Large scale identification of genes involved in cell surface biosynthesis and architecture in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Genetics, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 435–450, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  162. B. P. Cormack, N. Ghori, and S. Falkow, “An adhesin of the yeast pathogen Candida glabrata mediating adherence to human epithelial cells,” Science, vol. 285, no. 5427, pp. 578–582, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  163. J. M. Rodriguez-Penz, V. J. Cid, J. Arroyo, and C. Nombela, “A novel family of cell wall-related proteins regulated differently during the yeast life cycle,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 3245–3255, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  164. B. Guo, C. A. Styles, Q. Feng, and G. R. Fink, “A Saccharomyces gene family involved in invasive growth, cell-cell adhesion, and mating,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 22, pp. 12158–12163, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  165. L. L. Hoyer, “The ALS gene family of Candida albicans,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 176–180, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  166. R. Martinez-Lopez, L. Monteoliva, R. Diez-Orejas, C. Nombela, and C. Gil, “The GPI-anchored protein CaEcm33p is required for cell wall integrity, morphogenesis and virulence in Candida albicans,” Microbiology, vol. 150, no. 10, pp. 3341–3354, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  167. P. W. De Groot, A. F. Ram, and F. M. Klis, “Features and functions of covalently linked proteins in fungal cell walls,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 657–675, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  168. C. Boone, S. S. Sommer, A. Hensel, and H. Bussey, “Yeast KRE genes provide evidence for a pathway of cell wall β-glucan assembly,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. 1833–1843, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  169. V. Cid, A. Duran, F. del Rey, M. P. Snyder, C. Nombela, and M. Sanchez, “Molecular basis of cell integrity and morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Microbiological Reviews, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 345–386, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  170. L. Popolo and M. Vai, “The Gas1 glycoprotein, a putative wall polymer cross-linker,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1426, no. 2, pp. 385–400, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  171. B. Eisenhaber, S. Maurer-Stroh, M. Novatchkova, G. Schneider, and F. Eisenhaber, “Enzymes and auxiliary factors for GPI lipid anchor biosynthesis and post-translational transfer to proteins,” BioEssays, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 367–385, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  172. Y. Murakami, U. Siripanyaphinyo, Y. Hong, Y. Tashima, Y. Maeda, and T. Kinoshita, “The initial enzyme for glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis requires PIG-Y, a seventh component,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 5236–5246, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  173. H. A. Newman, M. J. Romel, S. E. Lewis et al., “Gpi19, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of mammalian PIG-P, is a subunit of the initial enzyme for glycosylphosphatidyl inositol anchor biosynthesis,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 4, pp. 1801–1807, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  174. T. Fontaine, T. Magnin, A. Melhert, D. Lamont, and M. A. J. Ferguson, “Structures of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol membrane anchors from Aspergillus fumigatus membrane proteins,” Glycobiology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 169–177, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  175. T. Fontaine, T. K. Smith, A. Crossman, J. S. Brimacombe, and M. A. J. Ferguson, “In vitro biosynthesis of glycosylphosphatidylinositol in Aspergillus fumigatus,” Biochemistry, vol. 43, no. 48, pp. 15267–15275, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Cheng Jin. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

3455 Views | 1450 Downloads | 14 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.