International Journal of Microbiology

International Journal of Microbiology / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 4080725 |

Mahmoud Elhariri, Dalia Hamza, Rehab Elhelw, Mohamed Refai, "Eucalyptus Tree: A Potential Source of Cryptococcus neoformans in Egyptian Environment", International Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2016, Article ID 4080725, 5 pages, 2016.

Eucalyptus Tree: A Potential Source of Cryptococcus neoformans in Egyptian Environment

Academic Editor: Joseph Falkinham
Received16 Jun 2015
Revised22 Sep 2015
Accepted27 Sep 2015
Published13 Jan 2016


In Egypt, the River Red Gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) is a well-known tree and is highly appreciated by the rural and urban dwellers. The role of Eucalyptus trees in the ecology of Cryptococcus neoformans is documented worldwide. The aim of this survey was to show the prevalence of C. neoformans during the flowering season of E. camaldulensis at the Delta region in Egypt. Three hundred and eleven samples out of two hundred Eucalyptus trees, including leaves, flowers, and woody trunks, were collected from four governorates in the Delta region. Thirteen isolates of C. neoformans were recovered from Eucalyptus tree samples (4.2%). Molecular identification of C. neoformans was done by capsular gene specific primer CAP64 and serotype identification was done depending on LAC1 gene. This study represents an update on the ecology of C. neoformans associated with Eucalyptus tree in Egyptian environment.

1. Introduction

The basidiomycetes yeast of genus Cryptococcus includes C. neoformans/C. gattii species complex, which is composed of two separate species, C. neoformans and C. deneoformans, and five species within C. gattii. The most clinically relevant complex species were recently revised based on phenotypic and genotypic diversity, supported by the presence of distinct and consistent lines, and it proposes to recognize C. neoformans var. grubii (represented by genotypes VNI and VNII) and C. neoformans (VNIII and VNIV) as separate species, as well as five species of C. gattii (represented by genotypes VGI, VGII, VGIII, and VGIV) [1, 2].

C. neoformans has a worldwide distribution and has been recovered from pigeon droppings (Columba livia), urban environments, and soil. Many reports have shown the presence of C. neoformans in the hollows of different tree species, proposing that trees play a major role in Cryptococcus infection [3, 4]. The most common isolate responsible for this fungal infection is C. neoformans var. grubii serotype A [1, 57]. C. gattii has been proposed to have a specific ecological association with a number of Eucalyptus species [8].

E. camaldulensis is a well-known tree in Egypt since it was imported by Mohamed Ali, the Governor of Egypt (1805–1848), for fixing the River Nile banks in the 19th century. It is one of the most widely distributed trees in most of the arid and semiarid areas. This kind of tree exists on almost every roadside in Egypt, but there are no data about its role as potential carrier of fungal elements.

In Egypt, the incidence of Cryptococcus neoformans from Eucalyptus trees and pigeon droppings has been reported [9]. In this report, the author depended on the conventional differentiation methods to determine C. neoformans varieties. There is no recent noticeable information about the Eucalyptus tree role in the ecology of C. neoformans in Egyptian environment. Therefore, the present study was aimed at determining the possible role of this tree as a potential dispersing source of C. neoformans in Delta region’s environment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Sampling Collection

The study area in Delta region covered 240 kilometers (150 mi) of Mediterranean coastline of Egypt. A total 311 samples out of 200 Eucalyptus trees, including leaves, flowers, and woody trunks, were collected from four different governorates in the Delta region (Cairo, Giza, Elmenofia, Al-Sharqia) by the rate of fifty samples for each region (Table 1). The samples were stored on ice in clean, sterile plastic bags and transferred to the Microbiology Department laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine. The samples were rinsed in sterile distilled water, then immersed in sterile saline solution supplemented with chloramphenicol (10.0 mg/mL), and homogenized with ultrahomogenization for 4 min. The bottle was left for 30 min at room temperature to settle the sediment.

GovernorateTree numberSamples typeTotal
LeavesFlowersWood trunks


2.2. Isolation and Identification

From the supernatant fluid of each homogenized sample, a loopful was streaked onto plates of Sabouraud dextrose agar with chloramphenicol and incubated at 30°C for 48 hours. The colonies suspected to be C. neoformans were streaked on Eucalyptus leaves agar media [12]. The isolates were identified by classical mycological procedures of C. neoformans [13].

2.3. Molecular Characterization
2.3.1. DNA Extraction

The yeast cells from SDA slants were collected after 48-hour incubation with sterile PBS. The collected pellets were mixed into a microtube with 500 μL TES (100 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA, and 2% SDS); 50–100 μg Proteinase K from an appropriate stock solution was added and then incubated for 30 min (minimum) up to 1 h at 55°–60°C with occasional gentle mixing. The lysate mix salt concentration was adjusted to 1.4 M with 5 M NaCl (=140 μL); 1/10 vol (=65 μL) of 10% CTAB was added and incubated for 30 min at 65°C. The lysate was mixed gently and then incubated for 30 min at 0°C; finally, the mix was centrifuged for 10 min at 4°C, at 15000 rpm. The supernatant was transferred to a 1.5 mL tube followed by the addition of 0.55 vol isopropanol (=510 μL) to precipitate DNA followed by immediate centrifugation for 5 min, at 15000 rpm.

2.4. Molecular Identification by Capsular Gene

Detection of C. neoformans was done by using specific capsular gene primers CAP64. The primers for CAP64 were designed on the basis of DNA sequences (Table 2) [10].

PrimerPrimer sequence 3′-5′PCR productReference

400 bp[10]

250 bp
760 bp
880 bp

2.5. Molecular Differentiation of Serotypes

This was applied by subjecting genomic DNA of identified strains by CAP64 gene to multiplex PCR amplification using a set of four primers of the laccase gene (LAC1) (Table 2) which were used for differentiating four major serotypes, A, D, B, and C, of C. neoformans [11].

3. Results

3.1. Recovery Rate of C. neoformans from Eucalyptus camaldulensis

In this study, E. camaldulensis trees acted as a potential refuge for C. neoformans. A total of 13 (4.2%) C. neoformans isolates out of 311 examined samples in Delta region were recovered during the flowering season of Eucalyptus tree. All the recovered Cryptococcus isolates were identified as C. neoformans strains based on all conventional and physiological characters of C. neoformans (Figure 1). Among these, 7 isolates (7.9%) were recovered from 88 Eucalyptus flowers, 5 isolates (3.6%) were recovered from 138 Eucalyptus tree leaves, and 1 isolate (1.1) was recovered from 85 woody trunks (Table 3).

Total samplesGizaCairoAl-SharqiaElmenofiaTotalRecovery rate
Number of C. neoformans isolates

Woody trunks85100011.1

3.2. Molecular Identification and Differentiation of C. neoformans

All tested isolates and reference strain were produced (400 bp) by CAP64 specific capsular gene primer (Figure 2). Molecular typing of C. neoformans isolates was done by four primers for LAC1 gene (Table 2) which were used for amplification; serotype A strains produced three DNA fragments with sizes of 0.88, 0.76, and 0.25 kb (Figure 3). All tested C. neoformans strains were identified as C. neoformans var. grubii and there are no other serotypes of C. neoformans detected.

4. Discussion

In Egypt, Eucalyptus trees are in abundance mainly as windbreaks and for afforestation of the drains and canals or other watercourses, plus the highways and roads in rural or urban areas. E. camaldulensis has a potential role in C. neoformans ecology, particularly var. gattii. In Australia (home country of E. camaldulensis), Ellis and Pfeiffer, 1990 reported the first environmental isolation of C. gattii from wood, bark, leaves, and plant debris of Eucalyptus trees [14]. Although Eucalyptus is present in many of the areas known to have C. gattii cryptococcosis, the actual isolation of C. gattii from Eucalyptus trees is rare outside Australia. Moreover, imported Eucalyptus has not been associated with the environmental presence of C. gattii in Spain, Central Africa, Canada, Papua New Guinea, Egypt, and Italy [15].

On the African level, the isolation of C. gattii from the environment is somewhat limited in comparison to the isolation of C. neoformans. Only two cases were recorded in isolation of C. gattii from E. camaldulensis in African countries, Egypt [9] and Tunisia [16].

In Egypt, earlier report of Mahmoud (1999) [9] depended on canavanine-glycine-bromothymol blue (CGB) agar to determine C. neoformans variety, which evoked a high need to investigate the environmental ecology of this fungus, depending on molecular techniques to determine the actual variety of C. neoformans in relation to E. camaldulensis in order to establish a real surveillance program and applying the preventive measures for this pathogen infection.

This study was applied on Eucalyptus trees during the flowering season, as most C. neoformans and C. gattii reported cases were associated with Eucalyptus showing strong seasonality in its occurrence, which coincides with the periods of flowering [17].

The results show that the isolation of C. neoformans from Eucalyptus flowers is more frequent than from leaves and woody trunk (Table 3). All examined isolates were identified as C. neoformans var. grubii with a recovery rate of 4.2% of the total examined samples. It is normally the high isolation rate of var. grubii as the global distributed isolate responsible for cryptococcal infection [1, 57]. Also, it is commonly the recovering of C. neoformans from pigeon droppings, soil, and decaying wood in hollow trees [3].

Ambitiously, the present study documents the first record for the isolation of var. grubii from E camaldulensis leaves, flower, and woody trunks in Egypt. Most of the previous reports stated that C. grubii association with Eucalyptus trees or other types of trees is interpreted in one sentence: “C. neoformans presence might represent fecal contamination by birds inhabiting these trees” [9, 14, 16].

Globally, many reports are recorded for isolation of C. grubii from Eucalyptus tree parts or other types of trees. In India, more than one report states that C. grubii tree association and its distribution differ from each part of tree or season or time of the study. The prevalence of C. grubii (5.56%) and C. gattii (9.26%) from decayed wood inside trunk hollows of diverse tree species was reported [18].

Recently, C. grubii was isolated from the bark of Eucalyptus trees followed by flower, bud, fruit, and detritus [19]. The prevalence of C. grubii in this study (4.2%) is somewhat near to the rate of Nawange et al.’s (2006) [18] study (5.5%), while the recovery rate of C. grubii is the highest from flowers (7.9%), then leaves (3.6%), and finally woody trunks (1.1%) (Table 3).

In sunny countries, C. neoformans can escape from lethal effects of sunlight and drying by taking trees as a good natural habitat in the environment because these pathogens can live inside woody debris as well as trunk hollows.The result of the present study highlighted the potential role of tree parts of E. camaldulensis in environmental ecology of C. grubii. Eucalyptus flowers were the best natural habitat and a suitable transporting means for these pathogen infectious propagules in the surrounding environment. Flowering season of Eucalyptus tree is mainly in winter and spring from November to February. At this time of year in Egypt, the temperature is slightly low to temperate which gives a potential chance for isolation of this pathogen. The association between C. grubii and tree is controlled by many environmental factors including humidity, temperature, and solar radiation [13, 17].

In Egypt, the Eucalyptus tree exists almost along every roadside, especially in the Delta region around River Nile and its tributaries. These study results confirm the potential role of Eucalyptus trees as a major source for C. grubii in Egyptian environment which act as a high risk for immunocompromised patients.

Most of the reported cases of human cryptococcosis were registered as cryptococcal meningitis. Cryptococcal meningitis in Egypt is rarely diagnosed, but this may be due to inadequate investigation rather than absence of definite epidemiological data about the organism in Egypt. More attention should be considered for human cases of unexplained chronic meningitis that is not responding to conventional therapy as C. neoformans could be the main cause of such fetal meningitis [2023].

The only survey for fungal meningitis was done in Egypt at NAMRU-3 during the period of 1998 to 2001 of 1000 CSF samples, where 10 C. neoformans were recovered at a rate of 0.01%. All isolates belonged to serotype A (C. neoformans var. grubii) [24]. Recently, C. neoformans serotype A is the most common variety in association of pet birds droppings in the Egyptian environment [25].

This study’s findings come in the same direction with the previous surveillance of the main causes of cryptococcal infection in Egypt and it confirmed that C. neoformans var. grubii is the main etiological agent of cryptococcal infection in Egypt.

Conclusively, this is the first record describing isolation of C. neoformans var. grubii from E. camaldulensis in Africa and Egypt. The results highlighted the potential role and risk of Eucalyptus tree as a carrier reservoir of one of the high pathogenic fungal elements in Egypt.

Conflict of Interests

There is no conflict of interests.


  1. W. Meyer, A. Castañeda, S. Jackson et al., “Molecular typing of IberoAmerican Cryptococcus neoformans isolates,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 189–195, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. F. Hagen, K. Khayhan, B. Theelen et al., “Recognition of seven species in the Cryptococcus gattii/Cryptococcus neoformans species complex,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 78, pp. 16–48, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. S. Lazera, M. A. Salmito Cavalcanti, A. T. Londero, L. Trilles, M. M. Nishikawa, and B. Wanke, “Possible primary ecological niche of Cryptococcus neoformans,” Medical Mycology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 379–383, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. Castro e Silva, D. Santos, M. Martins, L. Oliveira, M. Szeszs, and M. Melhem, “First isolation of Cryptococcus neoformans genotype VNI MAT-alpha from wood inside hollow trunks of Hymenaea courbari,” Medical Mycology, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. K. Casali, L. Goulart, L. K. Rosa e Silva et al., “Molecular typing of clinical and environmental Cryptococcus neoformans isolates in the Brazilian state Rio Grande do Sul,” FEMS Yeast Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 405–415, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. W. Meyer, K. Marszewska, M. Amirmostofian et al., “Molecular typing of global isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans by polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA: a pilot study to standardize techniques on which to base a detailed epidemiological survey,” Electrophoresis, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1790–1799, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. A. Viviani, M. Cogliati, M. C. Esposto et al., “Molecular analysis of 311 Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from a 30-month ECMM survey of cryptococcosis in Europe,” FEMS Yeast Research, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 614–619, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. J. Pfeiffer and D. H. Ellis, “Ecology of Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Cryptococcus & Cryptococcosis, vol. 42, Milan, Italy, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  9. Y. A.-G. Mahmoud, “First environmental isolation of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans and var. gatti from the Gharbia Governorate, Egypt,” Mycopathologia, vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 83–86, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. C. Chang, L. A. Penoyer, and K. J. Kwon-Chung, “The second capsule gene of Cryptococcus neoformans, CAP64, is essential for virulence,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1977–1983, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  11. S. Ito-Kuwa, K. Nakamura, S. Aoki, and V. Vidotto, “Serotype identification of Cryptococcus neoformans by multiplex PCR,” Mycoses, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 277–281, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Refai, M. R. Kotb, H. Abo El-Yazeed, W. Tawakkol, R. ElAarosi, and M. El-Hariri, “Development of brown colonies and capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans on plant extract agar and media containing oils Mycology,” in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the German-Speaking Mycological Society (DMykG '05), vol. 3, pp. 25–27, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  13. D. P. Granados and E. Castañeda, “Isolation and characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans varieties recovered from natural sources in Bogotá, Colombia, and study of ecological conditions in the area,” Microbial Ecology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 282–290, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. H. Ellis and T. J. Pfeiffer, “Natural habitat of Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1642–1644, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  15. D. J. Springer and V. Chaturvedi, “Projecting global occurrence of Cryptococcus gattii,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. F. Mseddi, A. Sellami, M. A. Jarboui, H. Sellami, F. Makni, and A. Ayadi, “First environmental isolations of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii in Tunisia and review of published studies on environmental isolations in Africa,” Mycopathologia, vol. 171, no. 5, pp. 355–360, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. Montenegro and C. R. Paula, “Environmental isolation of Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii and C. neoformans var. neoformans in the city of São Paulo, Brazil,” Medical Mycology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 385–390, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. R. Nawange, K. Shakya, J. Naidu, S. M. Singh, N. Jharia, and S. Garg, “Decayed wood inside hollow trunks of living trees of Tamarindus indica, Syzygium cumini and Mangifera indica as natural habitat of Cryptococcus neoformans and their serotypes in Jabalpur City of Central India,” Journal de Mycologie Médicale, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 63–71, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. N. G. Bedi, S. R. Nawange, S. M. Singh, J. Naidu, and A. Kavishwar, “Seasonal prevalence of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii and Cryptococcus gattii inhabiting Eucalyptus terreticornis and Eucalyptus camaldulensis trees in Jabalpur City of Madhya Pradesh, Central India,” Journal de Mycologie Médicale, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 341–347, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. N. I. Girgis, Z. Farid, H. H. Youssef, A. Hafez, M. N. Hassan, and C. K. Wallace, “Fatal cryptococcal meningitis in four Egyptian patients,” Ain Shams Medical Journal, vol. 36, pp. 93–99, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  21. A. Soliman, D. Tribble, M. Louis et al., “Cryptococcal meningitis in Cairo, Egypt: report of five cases,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 89, no. 4, p. 410, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. H. A. Abdel-Salam, “Characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans serotype A and A/D in samples from Egypt,” Folia Microbiologica, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 261–268, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Mansour, I. Nakhla, M. El Sherif, Y. A. Sultan, and R. W. French, “Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii meningitis in Egypt: a case report,” Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, vol. 12, no. 1-2, pp. 241–244, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  24. M. L. Elias, A. K. Soliman, F. J. Mahoney et al., “Isolation of Cryptococcus, Candida, Aspergillus, Rhodotorula and Nocardia from meningitis patients in Egypt,” The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association, vol. 84, no. 1-2, pp. 169–181, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  25. M. Elhariri, D. Hamza, R. Elhelw, and M. Refai, “Lovebirds and cockatiels risk reservoir of Cryptococcus neoformans, a potential hazard to human health,” Journal of Veterinary Science & Medical Diagnosis, vol. 4, no. 4, 2015. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Mahmoud Elhariri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles