Research Article
Postharvest Storage Practices of Maize in Rift Valley and Lower Eastern Regions of Kenya: A Cross-Sectional Study
Table 4
Participants’ perceptions on mouldy maize.
| No | Participants’ beliefs | Total (n = 314) | Region | df | X2 | value | Rift Valley (n = 165) | Lower Eastern (n = 149) |
| 1 | Mouldy maize is safe for human consumption | 11 (3.5%) | 2 (1.2%) | 9 (6.0%) | 1 | 5.399 | 0.020 | 2 | Mouldy maize is safe for animal consumption | 74 (23.6%) | 60 (36.4%) | 14 (9.4%) | 1 | 31.611 | <0.001 | 3 | Consuming milk from cow fed on mouldy maize is safe | 87 (27.7%) | 61 (37.0%) | 26 (17.4%) | 1 | 14.894 | <0.001 | 4 | It is safe to mix wet and dry maize for storage | 12 (3.8%) | 1 (0.6%) | 11 (7.4%) | 1 | 9.782 | 0.002 | 5 | It is safe for human to consume good-looking but wet/bad smelling maize | 7 (2.2%) | 3 (1.8%) | 4 (2.7%) | 1 | 0.270 | 0.604 | 6 | It is safe to sell mouldy maize to local brewers | 47 (15.0%) | 41 (24.8%) | 6 (4.0%) | 1 | 26.670 | <0.001 |
|
|