Abstract
We define the Cantor-type set
We define the Cantor-type set
A. S. Besicovitch, “On the sum of digits of real numbers represented in the dyadic system,” Mathematische Annalen, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 321–330, 1935.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNetP. Billingsley, Ergodic Theory and Information, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1965.
View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNetE. Borel, “Sur les probabilites denombrables et leurs applications arithmetiques,” Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, vol. 26, pp. 247–271, 1909.
View at: Google ScholarH. G. Eggleston, “The fractional dimension of a set defined by decimal properties,” The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics. Oxford. Second Series, vol. 20, pp. 31–36, 1949.
View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNetK. Falconer, Techniques in Fractal Geometry, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNetS. Ikeda and M. Nakamura, “Dimensions of measures on perturbed Cantor sets,” Topology and Its Applications, vol. 122, no. 1-2, pp. 223–236, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNetM. Morán and J.-M. Rey, “Singularity of self-similar measures with respect to Hausdorff measures,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 350, no. 6, pp. 2297–2310, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNetS. J. Taylor and C. Tricot, “Packing measure, and its evaluation for a Brownian path,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 288, no. 2, pp. 679–699, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet