Abstract

We study the farthest point mapping in a -normed space in virtue of subdifferential of , where is a weakly sequentially compact subset of . We show that the set of all points in which have farthest point in contains a dense subset of .

1. Introduction

Let be a real linear space. A quasinorm is a real-valued function on satisfying the following conditions. (i) for all and if and only if .(ii) for all and all .(iii)There is a constant such that for all . The pair is called a quasinormed space if is a quasinorm on . The smallest possible is called the modules of concavity of By a quasi-Banach space we mean a complete quasinormed space, that is, a quasinormed space in which every Cauchy sequence converges in .

This class includes Banach spaces. The most significant class of quasi-Banach spaces, which are not Banach spaces, is -spaces for equipped with the -norms A quasinorm is called a -norm if for all . In this case, a quasinormed (quasi-Banach) space is called a -normed (-Banach) space. By the Aoki-Rolewicz theorem [1], each quasinorm is equivalent to some -norm. Since it is much easier to work with -norms than with quasinorms, henceforth we restrict our attention mainly to -norms. See [24] for more information.

If x* is in X*, the dual of and we write as . We also consider quasinorms with . The case where turns out to be the classical normed spaces, so we will not discuss it and refer the interested reader to [57] for analogue results concerning normed spaces.

In this paper, using some strategies from [57], we study the farthest point mapping in a -normed space in virtue of subdifferential of , where is a weakly sequentially compact subset of . We show that the set of all points in which have farthest point in contains a dense subset of .

Let be a -normed space and let be a nonempty bounded subset of . The mapping defined by is called the farthest point map of . We call a remotal (uniquely remotal, resp.) set if for each the set is not empty (is singleton, resp.) [810].

2. Main Results

Let be a -normed space and let be a bounded subset of . For each , we define the subdifferential of a function at by This set may be empty even if we consider to be a Banach space [7, Example 3.8]. In a -normed space, it may happen that , although we should note that a -normed space may have a trivial dual as well as it might have a nontrivial dual, see [11, Chapter 3], for some examples. To see the nonemptiness, suppose that is a -normed space, , and . Thus, and obviously . Also for each with , we haveIt follows that , and so . Throughout the rest, we assume when we deal with this set. For an arbitrary nonempty bounded subset of , finding the set of all for which remains an open question.

Lemma 2.1. Let be a -Banach space and let be a bounded subset in . Then for each , each element of has norm less than or equal to 1 and hence is -compact.

Proof. Let and . We have By definition of we have for all [10, 12].
Hence and therefore

Note that , thus

Now we have the following proposition which is interesting on its own right.

Proposition 2.2. Let be a -Banach space and let be a bounded subset of . Then the set for some is of the first category in .

Proof. Let Then We will show that for each , (i) is a norm closed subset of ;(ii) has empty interior. To see (i), let be a sequence in which converges to an element in . For each , choose such thatBy Lemma 2.1 for all . Without loss of generality, we assume that converges to For every , we haveThis shows that converges to Since ,or equivalentlyIt follows thatand henceThis shows that It follows from (2.4) thatWe use the fact that once more to obtain the inequalityTherefore . So is a closed subset of .
To see (ii), suppose that some has nonempty interior. Then, there exists an open ball in of radius for some and center at such that . Let , and and choose such thatLet thenChoose such thatThen there exists such thatWe will show thatThis will contradict the fact that is a subdifferential of at and the proof would be completed. To achieve a contradiction, we will consider four cases as follows. (i) and .(ii) and .(iii) and .(iv) and . We investigate case (i) in detail. The other cases can be studied similarly. First of all note thatNow, we have

We recall that a set is said to be weakly sequentially compact if each sequence of elements of contains a subsequence converging weakly to some element .

Theorem 2.3. Let be a weakly sequentially compact subset in a -Banach space . Then the set for some contains a dense -set in . In particular, the set of farthest points of is nonempty.

Proof. Let and be defined as in Proposition 2.2 and let . Thenwhere each is an open dense subset of . Hence is a dense -set in . For each and , we haveBy the weak compactness of , there exists a point with HenceThis shows that for some .

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the referee for valuable comments.