Abstract

We study characteristic 𝑟-lightlike submanifolds 𝑀 tangent to the characteristic vector fields in an indefinite metric 𝒮-manifold, and we also discuss the existence of characteristic lightlike submanifolds of an indefinite 𝒮-space form under suitable hypotheses: (1) 𝑀 is totally umbilical or (2) its screen distribution 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is totally umbilical in 𝑀.

1. Introduction

In the theory of submanifolds of semi-Riemannian manifolds, it is interesting to study the geometry of lightlike submanifolds due to the fact that the intersection of normal vector bundle and the tangent bundle is nontrivial, making it interesting and remarkably different from the study of nondegenerate submanifolds. In particular, many authors study lightlike submanifolds on indefinite Sasakian manifolds (e.g., [14]).

Similar to Riemannian geometry, it is natural that indefinite 𝒮-manifolds are generalizations of indefinite Sasakian manifolds. Brunetti and Pastore analyzed some properties of indefinite 𝒮-manifolds and gave some characterizations in terms of the Levi-Civita connection and of the characteristic vector fields [5]. After then, they studied the geometry of lightlike hypersurfaces of indefinite 𝒮-manifold [6]. As Jin's generalizations of lightlike submanifolds of the Sasakian manifolds with the general codimension [3, 4, 7], Lee and Jin recently extended lightlike hypersurfaces on indefinite 𝒮-manifold to lightlike submanifolds with codimension 2 on an indefinite 𝒮-manifold, called characteristic half lightlike submanifolds [8]. However, a general notion of characteristic lightlike submanifolds of an indefinite 𝒮-manifold have not been introduced as yet.

The objective of this paper is to study characteristic 𝑟-lightlike submanifolds 𝑀 of an indefinite 𝒮-manifold 𝑀 subject to the conditions: (1) 𝑀 is totally umbilcial, or (2) 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is totally umbilcal in 𝑀. In Section 2, we begin with some fundamental formulae in the theory of 𝑟-lightlike submanifolds. In Section 3, for an indefinite metric 𝑔.𝑓.𝑓-manifold we consider a lightlike submanifold 𝑀 tangent to the characteristic vector fields, we recall some basic information about indefinite 𝒮-manifolds and deal with the existence of irrotational characteristic submanifolds of an indefinite 𝒮-space form. Afterwards, we study characteristic 𝑟-lightlike submanifolds of 𝑀 in Sections 4 and 5.

2. Preliminaries

Let (𝑀,𝑔) be an 𝑚-dimensional lightlike submanifold of an (𝑚+𝑛)-dimensional semi-Riemannian manifold (𝑀,𝑔). Then the radical distribution Rad(𝑇𝑀)=𝑇𝑀𝑇𝑀 is a vector subbundle of the tangent bundle 𝑇𝑀 and the normal bundle 𝑇𝑀, of rank 𝑟(1𝑟min{𝑚,𝑛}). In general, there exist two complementary nondegenerate distributions 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) and 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) of Rad(𝑇𝑀) in 𝑇𝑀 and 𝑇𝑀, respectively, called the screen and coscreen distributions on 𝑀, such that𝑇𝑀=Rad(𝑇𝑀)orth𝑆(𝑇𝑀),𝑇𝑀=Rad(𝑇𝑀)orth𝑆𝑇𝑀,(2.1) where the symbol orth denotes the orthogonal direct sum. We denote such a lightlike submanifold by (𝑀,𝑔,𝑆(𝑇𝑀),𝑆(𝑇𝑀)). Denote by 𝐹(𝑀) the algebra of smooth functions on 𝑀 and by Γ(𝐸) the 𝐹(𝑀) module of smooth sections of a vector bundle 𝐸 over 𝑀. We use the same notation for any other vector bundle. We use the following range of indices:𝑖,𝑗,𝑘,{1,,𝑟},𝛼,𝛽,𝛾,{𝑟+1,,𝑛}.(2.2)

Let tr(𝑇𝑀) and ltr(𝑇𝑀) be complementary (but not orthogonal) vector bundles to 𝑇𝑀 in 𝑇𝑀|𝑀 and 𝑇𝑀 in 𝑆(𝑇𝑀), respectively, and let {𝑁1,,𝑁𝑟} be a lightlike basis of Γ(ltr(𝑇𝑀)|𝒰) consisting of smooth sections of 𝑆(𝑇𝑀)|𝒰, where 𝒰 is a coordinate neighborhood of 𝑀, such that𝑔𝑁𝑖,𝜉𝑗=𝛿𝑖𝑗,𝑔𝑁𝑖,𝑁𝑗=0,(2.3) where {𝜉1,,𝜉𝑟} is a lightlike basis of Γ(Rad(𝑇𝑀)). Then we have𝑇𝑀=𝑇𝑀tr(𝑇𝑀)={Rad(𝑇𝑀)tr(𝑇𝑀)}orth𝑆(𝑇𝑀)={Rad(𝑇𝑀)ltr(𝑇𝑀)}orth𝑆(𝑇𝑀)orth𝑆𝑇𝑀.(2.4)

We say that a lightlike submanifolds (𝑀,𝑔,𝑆(𝑇𝑀),𝑆(𝑇𝑀)) of 𝑀 are characterized as follows:(1)𝑟-lightlike if 1𝑟<min{𝑚,𝑛};(2)coisotropic if 1𝑟=𝑛<𝑚;(3)isotropic if 1𝑟=𝑚<𝑛;(4)totally lightlike if 1𝑟=𝑚=𝑛.

The above three classes (2)–(4) are particular cases of the class (1) as follows: 𝑆(𝑇𝑀)={0},𝑆(𝑇𝑀)={0}, and 𝑆(𝑇𝑀)=𝑆(𝑇𝑀)={0}, respectively. The geometry of 𝑟-lightlike submanifolds is more general form than that of the other three type submanifolds. For this reason, in this paper we consider only 𝑟-lightlike submanifolds 𝑀(𝑀,𝑔,𝑆(𝑇𝑀),𝑆(𝑇𝑀)), with the following local quasiorthonormal field of frames on 𝑀: 𝜉1,,𝜉𝑟,𝑁1,,𝑁𝑟,𝐹𝑟+1,,𝐹𝑚,𝑊𝑟+1,,𝑊𝑛,(2.5) where the sets {𝐹𝑟+1,,𝐹𝑚} and {𝑊𝑟+1,,𝑊𝑛} are orthonormal basis of Γ(𝑆(𝑇𝑀)) and Γ(𝑆(𝑇𝑀)), respectively.

Let be the Levi-Civita connection of 𝑀 and 𝑃 the projection morphism of Γ(𝑇𝑀) on Γ(𝑆(𝑇𝑀)) with respect to (2.1). For an 𝑟-lightlike submanifold, the local Gauss-Weingartan formulas are given by𝑋𝑌=𝑋𝑌+𝑟𝑖=1𝑖(𝑋,𝑌)𝑁𝑖+𝑛𝛼=𝑟+1𝑠𝛼(𝑋,𝑌)𝑊𝛼,(2.6)𝑋𝑁𝑖=𝐴𝑁𝑖𝑋+𝑟𝑗=1𝜏𝑖𝑗(𝑋)𝑁𝑗+𝑛𝛼=𝑟+1𝜌𝑖𝛼(𝑋)𝑊𝛼,(2.7)𝑋𝑊𝛼=𝐴𝑊𝛼𝑋+𝑟𝑖=1𝜙𝛼𝑖(𝑋)𝑁𝑖+𝑛𝛽=𝑟+1𝜎𝛼𝛽(𝑋)𝑊𝛽,(2.8)𝑋𝑃𝑌=𝑋𝑃𝑌+𝑟𝑖=1𝑖(𝑋,𝑃𝑌)𝜉𝑖,(2.9)𝑋𝜉𝑖=𝐴𝜉𝑖𝑋𝑟𝑗=1𝜏𝑗𝑖(𝑋)𝜉𝑗,(2.10) for any 𝑋,𝑌Γ(𝑇𝑀), where and are induced linear connections on 𝑇𝑀 and 𝑆(𝑇𝑀), respectively, the bilinear forms 𝑖 and 𝑠𝛼 on 𝑀 are called the local lightlike and screen second fundamental forms on 𝑇𝑀, respectively, 𝑖 are called the local radical second fundamental forms on 𝑆(𝑇𝑀). 𝐴𝑁𝑖,𝐴𝜉𝑖, and 𝐴𝑊𝛼 are linear operators on Γ(𝑇𝑀) and 𝜏𝑖𝑗,𝜌𝑖𝛼,𝜙𝛼𝑖, and 𝜎𝛼𝛽 are 1-forms on 𝑇𝑀. Since is torsion-free, is also torsion-free and both 𝑖 and 𝑠𝛼 are symmetric. From the fact 𝑖(𝑋,𝑌)=𝑔(𝑋𝑌,𝜉𝑖), we know that 𝑖 are independent of the choice of a screen distribution. We say that (𝑋,𝑌)=𝑟𝑖=1𝑖(𝑋,𝑌)𝑁𝑖+𝑛𝛼=𝑟+1𝑠𝛼(𝑋,𝑌)𝑊𝛼(2.11) is the second fundamental tensor of 𝑀.

The induced connection on 𝑇𝑀 is not metric and satisfies𝑋𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)=𝑟𝑖=1𝑖(𝑋,𝑌)𝜂𝑖(𝑍)+𝑖(𝑋,𝑍)𝜂𝑖,(𝑌)(2.12) for all 𝑋,𝑌Γ(𝑇𝑀), where 𝜂𝑖s are the 1-forms such that𝜂𝑖(𝑋)=𝑔𝑋,𝑁𝑖,𝑋Γ(𝑇𝑀).(2.13) But the connection on 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is metric. The above three local second fundamental forms are related to their shape operators by𝑖𝐴(𝑋,𝑌)=𝑔𝜉𝑖𝑋,𝑌𝑟𝑘=1𝑘𝑋,𝜉𝑖𝜂𝑘(𝑌),(2.14)𝑖𝐴(𝑋,𝑃𝑌)=𝑔𝜉𝑖,𝑋,𝑃𝑌𝑔𝐴𝜉𝑖𝑋,𝑁𝑗=0,(2.15)𝜖𝛼𝑠𝛼𝐴(𝑋,𝑌)=𝑔𝑊𝛼𝑋,𝑌𝑟𝑖=1𝜙𝛼𝑖(𝑋)𝜂𝑖(𝑌),(2.16)𝜖𝛼𝑠𝛼(𝐴𝑋,𝑃𝑌)=𝑔𝑊𝛼,𝑋,𝑃𝑌𝑔𝐴𝑊𝛼𝑋,𝑁𝑖=𝜖𝛼𝜌𝑖𝛼(𝑋),(2.17)𝑖𝐴(𝑋,𝑃𝑌)=𝑔𝑁𝑖𝑋,𝑃𝑌,𝜂𝑗𝐴𝑁𝑖𝑋+𝜂𝑖𝐴𝑁𝑗𝑋=0,(2.18) where 𝑋,𝑌Γ(𝑇𝑀) and 𝜖𝛼 is the sign of 𝑊𝛼 but it is ±1 related to the causal character of 𝑊𝛼. From (2.18), we know that each 𝐴𝑁𝑖 is shape operator related to the local second fundamental form 𝑖 on 𝑆(𝑇𝑀). Replacing 𝑌 by 𝜉𝑗 in (2.14), we have𝑖𝑋,𝜉𝑗+𝑗𝑋,𝜉𝑖=0,(2.19) for all 𝑋Γ(𝑇𝑀). It follows𝑖𝑋,𝜉𝑖=0,𝑖𝜉𝑗,𝜉𝑘=0.(2.20) Also, replacing 𝑋 by 𝜉𝑗 in (2.14) and using (2.20), we have𝑖𝑋,𝜉𝑗=𝑔𝑋,𝐴𝜉𝑖𝜉𝑗,𝐴𝜉𝑖𝜉𝑗+𝐴𝜉𝑗𝜉𝑖=0,𝐴𝜉𝑖𝜉𝑖=0.(2.21) For an 𝑟-lightlike submanifold, replace 𝑌 by 𝜉𝑖 in (2.16), we have𝑠𝛼𝑋,𝜉𝑖=𝜖𝛼𝜙𝛼𝑖(𝑋),𝑋Γ(𝑇𝑀).(2.22)

Note 1. Using (2.14) and the fact that 𝑖 are symmetric, we have 𝑔𝐴𝜉𝑖𝑋,𝑌𝑔𝑋,𝐴𝜉𝑖𝑌=𝑟𝑘=1𝑘𝑋,𝜉𝑖𝜂𝑘(𝑌)𝑘𝑌,𝜉𝑖𝜂𝑘.(𝑋)(2.23) From this, (2.20) and (2.21), we show that 𝐴𝜉𝑖 are self-adjoint on Γ(𝑇𝑀) with respect to 𝑔 if and only if 𝑖(𝑋,𝜉𝑗)=0 for all 𝑋Γ(𝑇𝑀),𝑖 and 𝑗 if and only if 𝐴𝜉𝑖𝜉𝑗=0 for all 𝑖,𝑗. We call self-adjoint 𝐴𝜉𝑖 the lightlike shape operators of 𝑀. It follows from the above equivalence and (2.10) that the radical distribution Rad(𝑇𝑀) of a lightlike submanifold 𝑀, with the lightlike shape operators 𝐴𝜉𝑖, is always an integrable distribution.

3. Characteristic Lightlike Submanifolds

A manifold 𝑀 is called a globally framed f-manifold (or 𝑔.𝑓.𝑓-manifold) if it is endowed with a nonnull (1,1)-tensor field 𝜙 of constant rank, such that ker𝜙 is parallelizable, that is, there exist global vector fields 𝜉𝛼, 𝛼{1,,𝑘}, with their dual 1-forms 𝜂𝛼, satisfying 𝜙2=𝐼+𝜂𝛼𝜉𝛼 and 𝜂𝛼(𝜉𝛽)=𝛿𝛼𝛽.

The 𝑔.𝑓.𝑓-manifold (𝑀2𝑛+𝑟,𝜙,𝜉𝛼,𝜂𝛼), 𝛼{1,,𝑘}, is said to be an indefinite metric 𝑔.𝑓.𝑓-manifold if 𝑔 is a semi-Riemannian metric, with index 𝜈, 0<𝜈<2𝑛+𝑘, satisfying the following compatibility condtion 𝑔𝜙𝑋,=𝜙𝑌𝑔(𝑋,𝑌)𝑟𝛼=1𝜖𝛼𝜂𝛼(𝑋)𝜂𝛼,(𝑌)(3.1) for any 𝑋,𝑌Γ(𝑇𝑀), being 𝜖𝛼=±1 according to whether 𝜉𝛼 is spacelike or timelike. Then, for any 𝛼{1,,𝑘}, one has 𝜂𝛼(𝑋)=𝜖𝛼𝑔(𝑋,𝜉𝛼). An indefinite metric 𝑔.𝑓.𝑓-manifold is called an indefinite 𝒮-manifold if it is normal and 𝑑𝜂𝛼=Φ, for any 𝛼{1,,𝑘}, where Φ(𝑋,𝑌)=𝑔(𝑋,𝜙𝑌) for any 𝑋,𝑌Γ(𝑇𝑀). The normality condition is expressed by the vanishing of the tensor field 𝑁=𝑁𝜙+2𝑑𝜂𝛼𝜉𝛼, 𝑁𝜙 being the Nijenhuis torsion of 𝜙. Furthermore, as proved in [5], the Levi-Civita connection of an indefinite 𝒮-manifold satisfies:𝑋𝜙𝑌=𝑔𝜙𝑋,𝜙𝑌𝜉+𝜂(𝑌)𝜙2(𝑋),(3.2) where 𝜉=𝑘𝛼=1𝜉𝛼 and 𝜂=𝑘𝛼=1𝜖𝛼𝜂𝛼. We recall that 𝑋𝜉𝛼=𝜖𝛼𝜙𝑋 and ker𝜙 is an integrable flat distribution since 𝜉𝛼𝜉𝛽=0 (more details in [5]).

Following the notations in [9], we adopt the curvature tensor 𝑅, and thus we have 𝑅(𝑋,𝑌,𝑍)=𝑋𝑌𝑍𝑌𝑋𝑍[𝑋,𝑌]𝑍, and 𝑅(𝑋,𝑌,𝑍,𝑊)=𝑔(𝑅(𝑍,𝑊,𝑌),𝑋), for any 𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍, 𝑊Γ(𝑇𝑀).

An indefinite 𝒮-manifold (𝑀,𝜙,𝜉𝛼,𝜂𝛼) is called an indefinite 𝒮-space form, denoted by 𝑀(𝑐), if it has the constant 𝜙-sectional curvature 𝑐 [5]. The curvature tensor 𝑅 of this space form 𝑀(𝑐) is given by4𝑅(𝑋,𝑌,𝑍,𝑊)=(𝑐+3𝜖)𝑔𝜙𝑌,𝜙𝑍𝑔𝜙𝑋,𝜙𝑊𝑔𝜙𝑋,𝜙𝑍𝑔𝜙𝑌,𝜙𝑊(𝑐𝜖){Φ(𝑊,𝑋)Φ(𝑍,𝑌)Φ(𝑍,𝑋)Φ(𝑊,𝑌)+2Φ(𝑋,𝑌)Φ(𝑊,𝑍)}4𝜂(𝑊)𝜂(𝑋)𝑔𝜙𝑍,𝜙𝑌𝜂(𝑊)𝜂(𝑌)𝑔𝜙𝑍,+𝜙𝑋𝜂(𝑌)𝜂(𝑍)𝑔𝜙𝑊,𝜙𝑋𝜂(𝑍)𝜂(𝑋)𝑔𝜙𝑊,,𝜙𝑌(3.3) for any vector fields 𝑋,𝑌,𝑍,𝑊Γ(𝑇𝑀).

Note 2. Although 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is not unique, it is canonically isomorphic to the factor vector bundle 𝑆(𝑇𝑀)=𝑇𝑀/Rad(𝑇𝑀) considered by Kupeli [10]. Thus all screen distributions 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) are mutually isomorphic. For this reason, we newly define generic lightlike submanifolds of 𝑀 as follows.

Definition 3.1. Let 𝑀 be a 𝑟-lightlike submanifold of 𝑀 such that all the characteristic vector fields 𝜉𝛼 are tangent to 𝑀. A screen distribution 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is said to be characteristic if ker𝜙𝑆(𝑇𝑀) and 𝜙(𝑆(𝑇𝑀))Γ(𝑆(𝑇𝑀)).

Definition 3.2. A 𝑟-lightlike submanifold 𝑀 of 𝑀 is said to be characteristic if ker𝜙𝑇𝑀 and a characteristic screen distribution (𝑆(𝑇𝑀)) is chosen.

Proposition 3.3 (see [6]). Let (𝑀,𝑔,𝑆(𝑇𝑀)) be a lightlike hypersurface of an indefinite 𝒮-manifold (𝑀,𝜙,𝜉𝛼,𝜂𝛼,𝑔) such that the characteristic vector fields are tangent to 𝑀. Then there exists a screen distribution such that ker𝜙𝑇𝑀 and 𝜙(𝐸)Γ(𝑆(𝑇𝑀)), where 𝐸 is a nonzero section of Rad(𝑇𝑀).

Proposition 3.4 (see [8]). Let (𝑀,𝑔,𝑆(𝑇𝑀)) be a 1-lightlike submanifold of codimension 2 of an indefinite 𝒮-manifold (𝑀,𝜙,𝜉𝛼,𝜂𝛼,𝑔). Then 𝑀 is a characteristic lightlike submanifold of 𝑀.

Definition 3.5. A lightlike submanifold 𝑀 is said to be irrotational [10] if 𝑋𝜉𝑖Γ(𝑇𝑀) for any 𝑋Γ(𝑇𝑀) and 𝜉𝑖Γ(Rad(𝑇𝑀)) for all 𝑖.

Note 3. For an 𝑟-lightlike 𝑀, the above definition is equivalent to 𝑗𝑋,𝜉𝑖=0,𝑠𝛼𝑋,𝜉𝑖=𝜙𝛼𝑖(𝑋)=0,𝑋Γ(𝑇𝑀).(3.4)

The extrinsic geometry of lightlike hypersurfaces depends on a choice of screen distribution, or equivalently, normalization. Since the screen distribution is not uniquely determined, a well-defined concept of 𝒮-manifold is not possible for an arbitrary lightlike submanifold of a semi-Riemannian manifold, then one must look for a class of normalization for which the induced Riemannian curvature has the desired symmetries. Let (𝑀,𝑔) be a semi-Riemannian manifold, 𝑝𝑀. 𝐹4𝑇𝑝𝑀 is said to be an algebraic curvature tensor [11] on 𝑇𝑝𝑀 if it satisfies the following symmetries: 𝐹𝐹(𝑋,𝑌,𝑍,𝑊)=𝐹(𝑌,𝑋,𝑍,𝑊)=𝐹(𝑍,𝑊,𝑋,𝑌),(𝑋,𝑌,𝑍,𝑊)+𝐹(𝑌,𝑍,𝑋,𝑊)+𝐹(𝑍,𝑋,𝑌,𝑊)=0.(3.5)

Definition 3.6. A screen distribution 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is said to be admissible if the associated induced Riemannian curvature is an algebraic curvature tensor.

Theorem 3.7. Let (𝑀,𝑔,𝑆(𝑇𝑀)) be an irrotational generic characteristic lightlike submanifold of an indefinite 𝒮-space form (𝑀(𝑐),𝜙,𝜉𝛼,𝜂𝛼,𝑔) with an admissible screen distribution 𝑆(𝑇𝑀). Then one has 𝑐=𝜖.

Proof. Denote by 𝑅 and 𝑅 the curvature tensors of and , respectively. Using the local Gauss-Weingarten formulas for 𝑀, we obtain 𝑅(𝑋,𝑌)𝑍=𝑅(𝑋,𝑌)𝑍+𝑟𝑖=1𝑖(𝑋,𝑍)𝐴𝑁𝑖𝑌𝑖(𝑌,𝑍)𝐴𝑁𝑖𝑋+𝑛𝛼=𝑟1𝑠𝛼(𝑋,𝑍)𝐴𝑊𝛼𝑌𝑠𝛼(𝑌,𝑍)𝐴𝑊𝛼𝑋+𝑟𝑖=1𝑋𝑖(𝑌,𝑍)𝑌𝑖+(𝑋,𝑍)𝑟𝑗=1𝜏𝑗𝑖(𝑋)𝑗(𝑌,𝑍)𝜏𝑗𝑖(𝑌)𝑗(+𝑋,𝑍)𝑛𝛼=𝑟+1𝜙𝛼𝑖(𝑋)𝑠𝛼(𝑌,𝑍)𝜙𝛼𝑖(𝑌)𝑠𝛼𝑁(𝑋,𝑍)𝑖+𝑛𝛼=𝑟+1𝑋𝑠𝛼(𝑌,𝑍)𝑌𝑠𝛼(+𝑋,𝑍)𝑟𝑖=1𝜌𝑖𝛼(𝑋)𝑖(𝑌,𝑍)𝜌𝑖𝛼(𝑌)𝑠𝛼+(𝑋,𝑍)𝑛𝛽=𝑟+1𝜎𝛽𝛼(𝑋)𝑠𝛽(𝑌,𝑍)𝜎𝛽𝛼(𝑌)𝑠𝛽(𝑊𝑋,𝑍)𝛼,(3.6) for all 𝑋,𝑌,𝑍Γ(𝑇𝑀). Replace 𝑍 by 𝜉𝑘 in (3.6) and use (2.10), (2.15), (2.17), and (3.4), we have 𝑅(𝑋,𝑌)𝜉𝑘=𝑅(𝑋,𝑌)𝜉𝑘+𝑟𝑖=1𝑔𝐴𝜉𝑖𝑌,𝐴𝜉𝑘𝑋𝐴𝑔𝜉𝑖𝑋,𝐴𝜉𝑘𝑌𝑁𝑖+𝑛𝛼=𝑟+1𝜖𝛼𝑔𝐴𝑊𝛼𝑌,𝐴𝜉𝑘𝑋𝐴𝑔W𝛼𝑋,𝐴𝜉𝑘𝑌𝑊𝛼.(3.7) Using (3.7), the fact 𝑅(𝑋,𝑌)𝑍Γ(𝑇𝑀) for 𝑋,𝑌,𝑍Γ(𝑇𝑀), and a screen distribution 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is admissible, we get 𝑔𝑅(𝑋,𝑌)𝑍,𝜉𝑘=𝑔𝑅(𝑋,𝑌)𝜉𝑘,𝑍=𝑔𝑅(𝑋,𝑌)𝜉𝑘+,𝑍𝑟𝑖=1𝑔𝐴𝜉𝑖𝑋,𝐴𝜉𝑘𝑌𝐴𝑔𝜉𝑖𝑌,𝐴𝜉𝑘𝑋𝜂𝑖(𝑍)=𝑔𝑅(𝑋,𝑌)𝑍,𝜉𝑘+𝑟𝑖=1𝑔𝐴𝜉𝑖𝑋,𝐴𝜉𝑘𝑌𝐴𝑔𝜉𝑖𝑌,𝐴𝜉𝑘𝑋𝜂𝑖=(𝑍)𝑟𝑖=1𝑔𝐴𝜉𝑖𝑋,𝐴𝜉𝑘𝑌𝐴𝑔𝜉𝑖𝑌,𝐴𝜉𝑘𝑋𝜂𝑖(𝑍),𝑋,𝑌,𝑍Γ(𝑇𝑀).(3.8) On the other hand, since 𝜂(𝜉𝛼)=0 and 𝑔(𝜙𝜉𝛼,𝜙𝑋)=0 for any 𝑋Γ(𝑇𝑀), 𝑀(𝑐) is an indefinite 𝒮-space form implies the Riemannian curvature 𝑅 in (3.3) is given by 4𝑅𝑋,𝑌,𝑍,𝜉𝛼Φ𝜉=(𝑐𝜖)𝛼𝜉,𝑋Φ(𝑍,𝑌)Φ(𝑍,𝑋)Φ𝛼𝜉,𝑌+2Φ(𝑋,𝑌)Φ𝛼,𝑍=(𝑐𝜖)𝑔𝜙𝜉𝛼,𝑋Φ(𝑍,𝑌)Φ(𝑍,𝑋)𝑔𝜙𝜉𝛼,𝑌+2Φ(𝑋,𝑌)𝑔𝜙𝜉𝛼,,𝑍(3.9) for any 𝑋,𝑌,𝑍,Γ(𝑇𝑀). So, replacing 𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍 by 𝑃𝑋, 𝜉, 𝑃𝑍 in (3.9), we find 4𝑅𝑋,𝑌,𝑍,𝜉𝛼=(𝑐𝜖)𝑔𝜙𝜉𝛼,𝑃𝑋𝑔𝑃𝑍,𝜙𝜉𝛼2𝑔𝑋,𝜙𝜉𝛼𝑔𝜙𝜉𝛼,𝑍=3(𝑐𝜖)𝑔𝜙𝜉𝛼,𝑃𝑋𝑔𝜙𝜉𝛼.,𝑃𝑍(3.10) Then, using (3.3), (3.8), and (3.9), we get 4𝑟𝑖=1𝑔𝐴𝜉𝑖𝑋,𝐴𝜉𝑘𝑌𝐴𝑔𝜉𝑖𝑌,𝐴𝜉𝑘𝑋𝜂𝑖(𝑍)=3(𝑐𝜖)𝑔𝜙𝜉𝛼,𝑃𝑋𝑔𝜙𝜉𝛼,𝑃𝑍,𝑋,𝑌,𝑍Γ(𝑇𝑀).(3.11) Choosing 𝑋=𝑍=𝜙𝑁𝛼Γ(𝑆(𝑇𝑀)), we obtain 𝑐=𝜖.

Corollary 3.8. There exist no irrotational characteristic 𝑟-lightlike submanifolds (𝑀,𝑔,𝑆(𝑇𝑀)) of an indefinite 𝒮-space form (𝑀(𝑐),𝜙,𝜉𝛼,𝜂𝛼,𝑔) with 𝑐𝜖 such that the screen distribution 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is admissible.

4. Totally Umbilical Characteristic Lightlike Submanifolds

Definition 4.1. An 𝑟-lightlike submanifold 𝑀 of 𝑀 is said to be totally umbilical [1] if there is a smooth vector field Γ(tr(𝑇𝑀)) such that (𝑋,𝑌)=𝑔(𝑋,𝑃𝑌),(4.1) for all 𝑋,𝑌Γ(𝑇𝑀). In case =0, we say that 𝑀 is totally geodesic.

It is easy to see that 𝑀 is totally umbilical if and only if, on each coordinate neighborhood 𝒰, there exist smooth functions 𝐴𝑖 and 𝐵𝛼 such that 𝑖(𝑋,𝑌)=𝐴𝑖𝑔(𝑋,𝑌),𝑠𝛼(𝑋,𝑌)=𝐵𝛼𝑔(X,𝑌),(4.2) for any 𝑋,𝑌Γ(𝑇𝑀). From (4.2) we show that any totally umbilical 𝑟-lightlike submanifold of 𝑀 is irrotational. Thus, by Theorem 3.7, we have the following.

Theorem 4.2. Let (𝑀,𝑔,𝑆(𝑇𝑀)) be a totally umbilical characteristic 𝑟-lightlike submanifold of an indefinite 𝒮-space form (𝑀(𝑐),𝜙,𝜉𝛼,𝜂𝛼,𝑔). Then one has 𝑐=𝜖.

Theorem 4.3. Let (𝑀,𝑔,𝑆(𝑇𝑀)) be a totally umbilical characteristic 𝑟-lightlike submanifold of an indefinite 𝒮-manifold (𝑀,𝜙,𝜉𝛼,𝜂𝛼,𝑔). Then 𝑀 is totally geodesic.

Proof. Apply 𝑋 to 𝑔(𝜙𝜉𝑖,𝑊𝛼)=0 with 𝑋Γ(𝑇𝑀), for all 𝑖 and 𝛼, and use (2.8), (2.10), (2.15), (2.17), (2.22), and (3.2), we have 𝑖𝑋,𝜙𝑊𝛼=𝜖𝛼𝑠𝛼𝑋,𝜙𝜉𝑖,𝑋Γ(𝑇𝑀).(4.3) Assume that 𝑀 is totally umbilical. Then we have 𝐴𝑖𝑔𝑋,𝜙𝑊𝛼=𝜖𝛼𝐵𝛼𝑔𝑋,𝜙𝜉𝑖,𝑋Γ(𝑇𝑀).(4.4) Replace 𝑋 by 𝜙𝑁𝑖 and 𝑋 by 𝜙𝑊𝛼 by turns, we get 𝐴𝑖=0 for all 𝑖 and 𝐵𝛼=0 for all 𝛼. Thus we show that =𝑟𝑖=1𝐴𝑖𝑁𝑖+𝑛𝛼=𝑟+1𝐵𝛼𝑊𝛼=0 and 𝑀 is totally geodesic.

Corollary 4.4 (see [1]). Let (𝑀,𝑔,𝑆(𝑇𝑀)) be a totally umbilical characteristic 𝑟-lightlike submanifold of an indefinite 𝒮-manifold (𝑀,𝜙,𝜉𝛼,𝜂𝛼,𝑔). Then there exists a unique torsion-free metric connection on 𝑀 induced by the connection on 𝑀.

Proof. From (4.2) and Theorem 4.3, we have 𝑖(𝑋,𝑌)=0 for all 𝑋,𝑌Γ(𝑇𝑀) and 𝑖. Thus, using (2.12), we obtain our assertion.

5. Totally Umbilical Screen Distributions

Definition 5.1. A screen distribution 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) of 𝑀 is said to be totally umbilical [1] in 𝑀 if, for each locally second fundamental form 𝑖, there exist smooth functions 𝐶𝑖 on any coordinate neighborhood 𝒰 in 𝑀 such that 𝑖(𝑋,𝑃𝑌)=𝐶𝑖𝑔(𝑋,𝑌),𝑋,𝑌Γ(𝑇𝑀).(5.1) In case 𝐶𝑖=0 for all 𝑖, we say that 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is totally geodesic in 𝑀.

Due to (2.18) and (5.1), we know that 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is totally umbilical in 𝑀 if and only if each shape operators 𝐴𝑁𝑖 of 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) satisfies𝑔𝐴𝑁𝑖𝑋,𝑃𝑌=𝐶𝑖𝑔(𝑋,𝑃𝑌),𝑋,𝑌Γ(𝑇M),(5.2) for some smooth functions 𝐶𝑖 on 𝒰𝑀.

In general, 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is not necessarily integrable. The following result gives equivalent conditions for the integrability of a screen 𝑆(𝑇𝑀).

Theorem 5.2 (see [1]). Let 𝑀 be an 𝑟-lightlike submanifold of a semi-Riemannian manifold (𝑀,𝑔). Then the following assertions are equivalent: (1)𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is integrable,(2)𝑖 is symmetric on Γ(𝑆(𝑇𝑀)), for each 𝑖,(3)𝐴𝑁𝑖 is self-adjoint on Γ(𝑆(𝑇𝑀)) with respect to 𝑔, for each 𝑖.

We know that, from (5.2), each shape operator 𝐴𝑁𝑖 is self-adjoint on Γ(𝑆(𝑇𝑀)) with respect to 𝑔, which further follows from that above theorem that any totally umbilical screen distribution 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) of 𝑀 is integrable.

Theorem 5.3. Let (𝑀,𝑔,𝑆(𝑇𝑀)) be a characteristic 𝑟-lightlike submanifold of an indefinite 𝒮-manifold (𝑀,𝜙,𝜉𝛼,𝜂𝛼,𝑔). If 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is totally umbilical in 𝑀, then 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is totally geodesic in 𝑀.

Proof. Apply the operator 𝑋 to 𝑔(𝜙𝑁𝑘,𝑁𝑗)=0 for some 𝑘,𝑗 such that 𝑘𝑗, and use (2.7) and (2.18) 𝑘𝑋,𝜙𝑁𝑗=𝑗𝑋,𝜙𝑁𝑘,𝑋Γ(𝑇𝑀).(5.3) Assume that 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is totally umbilical in 𝑀. Then we have 𝐶𝑘𝑔𝑋,𝜙𝑁𝑗=𝐶𝑗𝑔𝑋,𝜙𝑁𝑘,𝑋Γ(𝑇𝑀).(5.4) Replacing 𝑋 by 𝜙𝜉𝑗 in (5.4) and taking (𝑘,𝑗)=(1,2),(2,3),,(𝑟1,𝑟) and (𝑟,1) by turns and use the above method, we have 𝐶𝑖=0 for all 𝑖{1,,𝑟}. Thus we have our assertion.

Theorem 5.4. Let (𝑀,𝑔,𝑆(𝑇𝑀)) be a characteristic 𝑟-lightlike submanifold of an indefinite 𝒮-manifold (𝑀,𝜙,𝜉𝛼,𝜂𝛼,𝑔) such that 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is totally umbilical in 𝑀. Then 𝑀 is not irrotational.

Proof. Apply the operator 𝑋 to 𝑔(𝜙𝜉𝑖,𝑁𝑗)=0 for all 𝑖 and 𝑗, and use (2.6), (2.10), (2.15), (2.18), and Theorem 5.3, we have 𝑖𝑋,𝜙𝑁𝑗=𝑗𝑋,𝜙𝜉𝑖,𝑋Γ(𝑇𝑀).(5.5) Since 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is totally umbilical, by Theorem 5.3, we have that 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) is totally geodesic. Then, by (5.5), we have 𝑖𝑋,𝜙𝑁𝑗=0,𝑋Γ(𝑇𝑀).(5.6) Apply the operator 𝑋 to 𝑔(𝜉𝛼,𝜉𝑖)=0 and use (2.6), (2.10), (2.15), we have 𝑖𝑋,𝜉𝛼=𝜖𝛼𝑔𝑋,𝜙𝜉𝑖,𝑋Γ(𝑇𝑀).(5.7) Replace 𝑋 by 𝜙𝑁𝑖 in this equation and (5.6), we have 0=𝑖𝜙𝑁𝑖,𝜉𝛼=𝑔𝜙𝑁𝑖,𝜙𝜉𝑖=1.(5.8) It is a contradiction. Thus 𝑀 is not irrotational.

Since any totally umbilical 𝑟-lightlike submanifold of 𝑀 is irrotational, by Theorem 5.4, we have the following result.

Corollary 5.5. There exist no totally umbilical characteristic 𝑟-lightlike submanifolds (𝑀,𝑔,𝑆(𝑇𝑀)) of an indefinite 𝒮-manifold (𝑀,𝜙,𝜉𝛼,𝜂𝛼,𝑔) equipped with a totally umbilical screen distribution 𝑆(𝑇𝑀) in 𝑀.