Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Volume 2011, Article ID 895273, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/895273
Research Article

Risk-Adjusted Control Charts for Health Care Monitoring

Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands

Received 29 July 2011; Revised 2 September 2011; Accepted 6 September 2011

Academic Editor: Frank Werner

Copyright © 2011 Willem Albers. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. H. Woodall, “The use of control charts in health-care and public-health surveillance,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 89–104, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. Thor, J. Lundberg, J. Ask et al., “Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review,” Quality and Safety in Health Care, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 387–399, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  3. S. H. Shaha, “Acuity systems and control charting,” Quality management in health care, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 22–30, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  4. C. Sonesson and D. Bock, “A review and discussion of prospective statistical surveillance in public health,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 5–21, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. J. Y. Liu, M. Xie, T. N. Goh, and P. Ranjan, “Time-between-events charts for on-line process monitoring,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEMC '04), pp. 1061–1065, October 2004.
  6. Z. Yang, M. Xie, V. Kuralmani, and K. L. Tsui, “On the performance of geometric charts with estimated control limits,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 448–458, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Xie, T. N. Goh, and X. S. Lu, “A comparative study of CCC and CUSUM charts,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 339–345, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  8. H. Ohta, E. Kusukawa, and A. Rahim, “A CCC-r chart for high-yield processes,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 439–446, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. Z. Wu, X. Zhang, and S. H. Yeo, “Design of the sum-of-conforming-run-length control charts,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 187–196, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. W. Albers, “The optimal choice of negative binomial charts for monitoring high-quality processes,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 214–225, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  11. W. Albers, “Control charts for health care monitoring under overdispersion,” Metrika, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 67–83, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. K. Poortema, “On modelling overdispersion of counts,” Statistica Neerlandica, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 5–20, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. A. Christensen, H. Melgaard, J. Iwersen, and P. Thyregod, “Environmental monitoring based on a hierarchical Poisson-gamma model,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 275–285, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  14. Y. Fang, “c-charts, X-charts, and the Katz family of distributions,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 104–114, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  15. S. H. Steiner, R. J. Cook, V. T. Farewell, and T. Treasure, “Monitoring surgical performance using riskadjusted cumulative sum charts,” Biostatistics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 441–452, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  16. O. Grigg and V. Farewell, “An overview of risk-adjusted charts,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, vol. 167, no. 3, pp. 523–539, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. O. A. Grigg and V. T. Farewell, “A risk-adjusted sets method for monitoring adverse medical outcomes,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1593–1602, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  18. R. Chen, “A surveillance system for congenital malformations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 73, pp. 323–327, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  19. R. Chen, R. R. Connelly, and N. Mantel, “The efficiency of the sets and the cuscore techniques under biased baseline rates,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1401–1411, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. W. Albers and W. C. M. Kallenberg, “Estimation in Shewhart control charts: effects and corrections,” Metrika, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 207–234, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. W. Albers and W. C. M. Kallenberg, “Are estimated control charts in control?” Statistics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 67–79, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  22. W. Albers, W. C. M. Kallenberg, and S. Nurdiati, “Parametric control charts,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 159–184, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  23. W. Albers, W. C. M. Kallenberg, and S. Nurdiati, “Exceedance probabilities for parametric control charts,” Statistics, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 429–443, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  24. M. Riaz, “Monitoring process mean level using auxiliary information,” Statistica Neerlandica, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 458–481, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. E. L. Lehmann, Testing Statistical Hypotheses, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1959.