Research Article | Open Access

Bipul Kumar Sarmah, "Proof of Some Conjectures of Melham Using Ramanujan’s Formula", *International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences*, vol. 2014, Article ID 738948, 6 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/738948

# Proof of Some Conjectures of Melham Using Ramanujan's Formula

**Academic Editor:**Wolfgang zu Castell

#### Abstract

We employ Ramanujan's formula to prove three conjectures of R. S. Melham on representation of an integer as sums of polygonal numbers.

#### 1. Introduction

Jacobi’s classical two-square theorem is as follows.

Theorem 1 (see [1]). *Let denote the number of representations of as a sum of two squares, counting order and sign, and let denote the number of positive divisors of congruent to modulo . Then
*

The above theorem can also be recasted in terms of Lambert series as Similar representation theorems involving squares and triangular numbers were found by Dirichlet [2], Lorenz [3], Legendre [4], and Berndt [5]. For example, the following two theorems are due to Lorenz and Ramanujan, respectively.

Theorem 2 (see [3]). *Let denote the number of representations of as a sum of times a square and times a square. Then
*

Theorem 3 (see [5]). *Let denote the number of representations of as a sum of times a triangular number and times a triangular number. Then
*

Hirschhorn [6, 7] obtained forty-five similar identities (including those obtained by Legendre and Ramanujan) involving squares, triangular numbers, pentagonal numbers, and octagonal numbers employing dissection of the -series representations of the identities obtained by Jacobi, Dirichlet, and Lorenz. In [8], Baruah and the author obtained twenty-five more such identities involving squares, triangular numbers, pentagonal numbers, heptagonal numbers, octagonal numbers, decagonal numbers, hendecagonal numbers, dodecagonal numbers, and octadecagonal numbers. More works on this topic have been done in [9–11]. In [11], Melham presented 21 conjectured analogues of Jacobi’s two-square theorem which are verified using computer algorithms. In [12], Toh offered a uniform approach to prove these conjectures using known formulae for . In this paper, we show that some of these conjectures can also be proved by using Ramanujan’s famous formula. We prove three conjectures enlisted in the following theorem which have appeared as , , and , respectively, in [11].

Theorem 4. *Consider
*

The next section of this paper is devoted to notations, definitions, and preliminary results.

#### 2. Notations and Preliminary Results

Ramanujan’s general theta-function is defined by [5, page 34, (18.1)] Jacobi’s famous triple product identity takes the simple form [5, page 35, Entry 19] where, here and throughout the paper, for ,

We also use the following notation for the sake of brevity of expressions: One important special case of is where the product representations in (12) arise from (9).

From [5, page 46, Entry 30] we find that Also if , then [5, page 45, Entry 29]

We recall Ramanujan’s formula in the form [5, page 34, (17.6)] where

Finally, we note that

#### 3. Proof of the Conjectures (5)–(7)

*Proof of Conjecture (5). *In view of (17), we rewrite (5) as

Replacing by and then setting , , and in (15), we have
Expanding the -products on the left side of (19) and noting that , we obtain
Also

Thus, from (20) and (21), we have
Replacing by and then setting , , and in (15), and proceeding as in case of (22), we find that
Multiplying (23) by and adding to (22), we obtain
Setting and in (13), we find that
Thus, (24) reduces to
Now
We have
Similarly
Hence from (27), (28), and (29) we have
Using (30) in (26), we find that
This completes the proof of (18).

*Proof of Conjecture (6). *In view of (17), we rewrite (6) as
Replacing by and then setting , , and in (15), and proceeding as in case of (22), we find that

Replacing by and then setting , , and in (15), and proceeding in a way similar to obtaining (22), we have
Multiplying (34) by and then adding to (33), we find that
Setting , , , and in (14), we find that
Using (36) in (35), we have
Now
Using (38) in (37), we have
This completes the proof of (32).

*Proof of Conjecture (7). *In view of (17), we rewrite (7) as

Replacing by and then setting , , and in (15), and proceeding as in case of (22), we find that

Also, replacing by and then setting , , and in (15), and proceeding similar to (22), we obtain
Multiplying (42) by and then adding to (41), we find that
Setting , , , and in (14), we find that
Hence, (43) reduces to
Now
Using (46) in (45), we have
This completes the proof of (40).

#### 4. Concluding Remarks

All conjectures in [11] can easily be reformulated as theta function identity using Ramanujan’s formula. However, these identities might be too complicated to actually have a proof.

#### Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

#### References

- C. G. J. Jacobi,
*Fundamenta Nova Theoriae Functionum Ellipticarum*, vol. 107 of*Werke I 162-163; Letter to Legendre 9/9/1828, Werke I 424*, 1829. - P. G. L. Dirichlet, J. Math. 21 (1840) 3, 6; Werke 463, 466.
- L. Lorenz, “Bidrag til tallenes theori,”
*Tidsskrift for Mathematik*, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 97–114, 1871. View at: Google Scholar - A. M. Legendre,
*Traité des Fonctions Elliptiques et des Intégrales Euleriennes, III*, Huzard-Courcier, Paris, France, 1828. - B. C. Berndt,
*Ramanujan's Notebooks, Part III*, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1991. - M. D. Hirschhorn, “The number of representations of a number by various forms,”
*Discrete Mathematics*, vol. 298, no. 1–3, pp. 205–211, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - M. D. Hirschhorn, “The number of representation of a number by various forms involving triangles, squares, pentagons and octagons,” in
*Ramanujan Rediscovered*, N. D. Baruah, B. C. Berndt, S. Cooper, T. Huber, and M. Schlosser, Eds., RMS Lecture Note Series, No. 14, pp. 113–124, Ramanujan Mathematical Society, 2010. View at: Google Scholar - N. D. Baruah and B. K. Sarmah, “The number of representations of a number as sums of various polygonal numbers,”
*Integers*, vol. 12, 2012. View at: Google Scholar - H. Y. Lam, “The number of representations by sums of squares and triangular numbers,”
*Integers*, vol. 7, article A28, 2007. View at: Google Scholar - R. S. Melham, “Analogues of two classical theorems on the representations of a number,”
*Integers*, vol. 8, article A51, 2008. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet - R. S. Melham, “Analogues of Jacobi's two-square theorem: an informal account,”
*Integers*, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 83–100, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - P. C. Toh, “On representations by figurate numbers: a uniform approach to the conjectures of Melham,”
*International Journal of Number Theory*, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1055–1071, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet

#### Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Bipul Kumar Sarmah. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.