Review Article

Effects of the Use of Non-Calcium Phosphate Binders in the Control and Outcome of Vascular Calcifications: A Review of Clinical Trials on CKD Patients

Table 1

A study analyzing the effect of non-calcium-based phosphate binders.

ReferenceStudyPatient populationComparisonStudy designResults

Block et al. [15]RINDIncident HDCalcium (55)Sevelamer (54)Randomly assignedCalcium binders resulted in more increase in CACS versus sevelamer at 18 months ( ); median increase in CACS was 11 times greater with calcium versus sevelamer ( )

Chertow et al. [24]TTGPrevalent HDCalcium (75)Sevelamer (66)Randomly assignedCalcium binders with greater percentage of CACS versus sevelamer at 26 and 52 wk
,

Qunibi et al. [31]CARE-2Prevalent HDCalcium (58)Sevelamer (68)Randomly assigned with atorvastatin to both binders or 52 wkNonsignificative differences in CACS between calcium and sevelamer

Barreto et al. [32]BRiCPrevalent HDCalcium (18)Sevelamer (11)Randomly assignedNonsignificative differences in CACS between calcium and sevelamer

Boaz et al. [35]N/APredialysis ptsCalcium (28)Sevelamer (27)Low-phosphorus diet with both bindersIncrease in TCS with calcium to baseline ( ); NS with sevelamer