International Journal of Nephrology

International Journal of Nephrology / 2020 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 2917474 |

Yuhua Ma, Manman Shi, Yuxin Wang, Jian Liu, "PPARγ and Its Agonists in Chronic Kidney Disease", International Journal of Nephrology, vol. 2020, Article ID 2917474, 10 pages, 2020.

PPARγ and Its Agonists in Chronic Kidney Disease

Academic Editor: Jochen Reiser
Received06 Sep 2019
Revised11 Jan 2020
Accepted03 Feb 2020
Published25 Feb 2020


Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has become a global healthcare issue. CKD can progress to irreversible end-stage renal diseases (ESRD) or renal failure. The major risk factors for CKD include obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. Understanding the key process involved in the disease development may lead to novel interventive strategies, which is currently lagging behind. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is one of the ligand-activated transcription factor superfamily members and is globally expressed in human tissues. Its agonists such as thiazolidinediones (TZDs) have been applied as effective antidiabetic drugs as they control insulin sensitivity in multiple metabolic tissues. Besides, TZDs exert protective effects in multiple other CKD risk disease contexts. As PPARγ is abundantly expressed in major kidney cells, its physiological roles in those cells have been studied in both cell and animal models. The function of PPARγ in the kidney ranges from energy metabolism, cell proliferation to inflammatory suppression, although major renal side effects of existing agonists (including TZDs) have been reported, which limited their application in treating CKD. In the current review, we systemically assess the function of PPARγ in CKDs and the benefits and current limitations of its agonists in the clinical applications.

1. Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has become one of the most common diseases in the world. Chronic renal failure is the end stage of the progression of various types of CKD. In Europe and the United States, the number of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is rapidly increasing at a rate of 5%–8% per year [1]. ESRD is pathologically characterized by renal fibrosis, including glomerular sclerosis and renal interstitial fibrosis. Renal fibrosis is almost the result of all progressive kidney diseases and is a complex common chronic process involving multiple mechanisms such as extracellular matrix (ECM) and cytokine secretion, energy metabolism, podocyte injury, cell proliferation and differentiation, endoplasmic reticulum stress, autophagy, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and activation of fibroblasts [2].

2. PPARγ Structure and Function

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated transcription factors (TFs) of nuclear hormone receptor superfamily [3]. Three PPAR subtypes (PPARα, PPAR β/δ, and PPARγ) have been found in different species. In humans, the PPARγ gene is located on chromosome 3 (3p25.2) and contains 9 exons expanding more than 100 kb, which generates 4 PPARγ variants (γ1, γ2, γ3, and γ4) [4]. These isoforms are expressed differently in different tissues. PPAR family proteins share structural similarities, all containing a C-terminus ligand-binding domain which responds to ligand stimulation and controls heterodimerization with retinoid X receptors (RXR) upon activation [5]. Ligand stimulation leads to posttranslational modifications in PPARγ through MAPK and PI3K pathways [6], and this is followed by conformational changes to a proactive form. The N-terminus DNA-binding domain recognizes and binds to specific responsive elements to modulate gene transcription [5]. Additional regulatory mechanisms involve coregulator complexes which recruit and release dynamically to control PPAR activation in the chromatin level [7]. For PPARγ, it interacts with multiple published coregulators in energy metabolism, and these include coactivators of steroid receptor coactivator 2 (SRC-2), PPARγ coactivator 1 (PGC-1) and receptor interacting protein 140 (RIP140), and PR domain containing 16 (PRDM16), as well as corepressors such as nuclear receptor corepressor 1 (NCOR1) and NCOR2 [8]. In addition, PPARγ represses inflammatory TF activations, a process referred to as transrepression [9]. For example, the PPARγ agonist inhibits NF-kB, activator protein-1- (AP-1-) mediated inflammatory responses in multiple tissues [10]. More TFs have been reported to be coregulated by PPARγ, and these include the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) family [11], SREBP [12], REV-ERBa [13], and GATA3 [14]. Due to its wide-spectrum of regulatory effects, mutations in PPARγ have been identified in the humans and led to dysfunctional lipid and glucose metabolism, insulin resistance, which developed into obesity-induced T2DM, dyslipidemia, NAFLD, and cancer [1518].

3. PPARγ and Kidney Fibrosis

PPARγ is abundantly expressed in the medullary collecting duct and paraurethral and bladder epithelial cells [19], and it is also expressed in podocytes, mesangial cells, and vascular endothelial cells [20]. Although not fully delineated, accumulating studies have suggested that PPARγ plays an important role in regulating physiological functions of the kidney [21]. Current studies using PPARγ null mice or agonists have been concluded in Table 1.

StudiesCell type of PPAR gamma deletionAnimal modelPhenotype

Desch et al. [22].Juxtaglomerular (JG) cells of the kidneyRC-PPARgamma(fl/fl) miceReduced PPARgamma expression, stronger renin signal and higher renin mRNA levels and plasma renin concentration in RC-PPARgamma (fl/fl) mice than in littermate control RC-PPARgamma (wt/wt) mice

Zhang et al. [23].Renal collecting ductCollecting duct-specific deletion of PPARgamma miceMice with CD knockout of PPARG were resistant to the rosiglitazone- (RGZ-) induced increases in body weight and had diminished plasma volume expansion, PPARgamma expression and reduced urinary sodium excretion in response to RGZ

Chafin et al. [24].Hematopoietic cellAntiglomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) mouse modelPPARγ (–/–) mice had a more severe glomerular and tubulointerstitial disease, decreased CD4(+) CD25(+) regulatory T cells, increased CD8(+) : CD4(+) ratio and plasma interleukin-6 levels compared with the PPARγ(+/+) animals

Toffoli et al. [25].Epiblast-specific deletionPPARγ null miceRenal hypertrophy, glucosuria, albuminuria, renal insufficiency with decreased creatinine clearance progress, renal fibrosis, mesangial expansion, and antiphospholipid syndrome

Yang et al. [26].Systemic PPARγ deletionMoxCre/flox miceSuppressed circadian variations in oxygen consumption, CO2 production, food and water intake, locomotor activity, and cardiovascular parameters

Zhou et al. [27].Systemic PPARγ deletionWhole-body PPARγ knockout miceThe null mice developed severe polydipsia and polyuria, reduced urine osmolality, modest hyperphagia, and progressive weight loss; after 24 h of water deprivation, the null mice had a lower urine osmolality, a higher urine volume, a greater weight loss, and a greater rise in hematocrit; the response of urine osmolality to acute and chronic 1-desamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin treatment was attenuated

The antifibrotic role of PPARγ has been well accepted (Figure 1). Treatment of mice with synthetic PPARγ ligands was shown to attenuate experimentally induced hepatic, cardiac, and kidney fibrosis [28]. The antifibrotic and renoprotective effects of the PPARγ agonists pioglitazone and troglitazone were also confirmed in type 2 diabetes (T2D) rat models [29, 30] and unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) mice [31, 32] models, respectively.

Multiple mechanisms are potentially involved in the renoprotective effects of PPARγ activation.

First, PPARγ inhibits cell proliferation and apoptosis. It was reported that PPARγ agonist pioglitazone inhibits mesangial cell proliferation and reduces proteinuria by downregulating p27, Bcl-2 (B-cell lymphoma 2) expression, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation [33]. This was confirmed by a separate study using another PPARγ agonist ciglitazone. The in vitro treatment of ciglitazone inhibited the proliferation of mouse mesangial cells induced by the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) by directly affecting the MAPK pathways linked with the downregulation of p21 and cyclin D1 and exerting the antiglomerular sclerosis effect [34]. Pretreatment with rosiglitazone significantly inhibited mesangial cell hypertrophy and proliferation in diabetic rats [35]. The effect of thiazolidinediones (TZDs) on puromycin aminonucleoside nephrosis (PAN) increased WT-1 expression, inhibited its necrosis and apoptosis, which may be related to up-regulation of Bcl-xl expression and inhibition of Caspase-3 activity, and decreased TGF-beta [36]. PPARγ agonists can not only inhibit the apoptosis of endothelial cells induced by tumor necrosis factor (TNF) but also inhibit the spontaneous apoptosis of endothelial cells and reduce the damage of glomerular capillary endothelium [37].

Second, PPARγ inhibits inflammation in the kidney diseases.

Inflammation is one of the major causes of the kidney injury and decline of kidney function. Inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein and inflammatory cytokines, correlate with the end stage of kidney disease [38]. Activation of PPARγ alleviates inflammation in different types of kidney cells. A synthesized PPARγ ligand 15d-PGJ2 was reported to inhibit the chemokines induced by interferon-7 (INF-7) by inhibiting the JAK/STAT1 signaling pathway in mesangial cells [39]. Rosiglitazone activates PPARγ SUMOylation, inhibiting NCoR degradation and NF-κB activation in LPS-stimulated renal proximal tubular cells, which in turn decreases IL-8 and MCP1 expression [40]. PPARγ agonist (rosiglitazone, troglitazone, and thiazolidinedione) attenuates excessive inflammatory response in activated proximal tubular epithelial cells in IgAN through suppressing ATR1 expression [41]. Loss of PPARγ abundance and transcriptional activity was observed in glomerular podocytes in experimental RPGN. Blunted expression of PPARγ in podocyte nuclei was also found in kidneys from patients diagnosed with crescentic GN [42].

Third, PPARγ represses transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) pathways. TGF-β signaling pathways play an important role in kidney fibrosis. Studies have shown that rosiglitazone effectively blocked fibrotic responses elicited by TGF-β in explanted fibroblasts and attenuated bleomycin-induced skin fibrosis in vivo [43]. Subsequent studies in a variety of cell types and model systems have confirmed and expanded these findings [44]. PPARγ activation inhibits plasminogen activating-inhibiting factor-1 (PAI-1) and TGF-β in human mesangial cells [45]. The expression of the extracellular matrix is reduced, and the mechanism may be partly through the positive regulation of PPARγ on hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), causing increased endogenous HGF, thereby inhibiting TGF- β/SMAD pathways [46]. PPARγ agonists (15d-PGJ2, troglitazone, and ciglitazone) can inhibit TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathways to alleviate renal fibroblast activation, resulting in decreased expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and extracellular matrix synthesis [47], all contributing to reduced renal fibrosis progression.

Besides, PPARγ can be influenced by epigenetic modification in kidney diseases. MicroRNA-27a induces mesangial cell and podocyte injury by PPARγ in diabetic nephropathy (DN). And, micro-RNA23 can be mediated by PPARγ in renal calcium oxalate crystal formation. lncRNA TUG1 could modulate ECM accumulation in DN by regulating miR-377 targeting PPARγ [4850]. However, the role of the epigenetic modification in PPARγ function in kidney diseases still needs further exploration.

4. PPARγ in Renal Glucose Control

PPARγ is important for regulating systemic glucose homeostasis. PPARγ activation improves peripheral insulin sensitivity partly by increasing beneficial adipokines [51] (i.e., adiponectin, resistin, and leptin) and myokines [52] and reducing inflammatory cytokines (such as TNF-α) in adipose tissue and muscles [53]. It also induces the expression of key genes involved in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in pancreatic beta cells [54]. Besides, glucose filtration, reabsorption, and gluconeogenesis in the kidney regulated by PPARγ are essential for glucose metabolism. A recent study showed that PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone induced the hypoglycemic effects through inhibition of gluconeogenesis on proximal tubule cells [55]. The transport of glucose in kidney depends on sodium-dependent glucose cotransporters (SGLTs), localized in the epithelial cells of the proximal renal tubules, and glucose transporters (GLUTs), localized in the basolateral membrane [56]. SGLT2 is a well-characterized cotransporter in SGLTs family and primarily found in renal tissues. About 90% of glucose filtered from glomeruli is absorbed by SGLT2, and mutations of this gene are associated with elevated urine glucose, suggesting that SGLT2 is the key factor for glucose reabsorption in the kidney [57]. SGLT2 can inhibit increased secretion of glucagon from pancreatic α cells induced in hyperglycemia, which in turn is inhibited by high glucose environment [58]. Troglitazone, as a PPARγ agonist, can increase the expression of SGTL2 in the renal proximal tubules and reverse the downregulation of SGLT2 expression and upregulation of glucagon secretion induced by high glucose [59, 60]. Accordingly, PPARγ antagonist (GW9662) decreased the expression of SGLT2 and increased glucagon, similar with high glucose [59]. Those effects were potentially mediated through PI3K/Akt signaling pathways, as hyperglycemia increased both PI3K and Akt phosphorylations (P-AKT) in alpha cells which contributed to the SGLT2 expression [59]. Troglitazone treatment decreased PI3K and P-AKT in high glucose-treated alpha cells. In addition, PI3K inhibitor reversed high glucose-induced SGLT2 decrease and glucagon increase in alpha TC cells [59].

When glucose has been transported to the renal tubular epithelial cells and the concentration is higher than that in the renal interstitial, it diffuses to the renal interstitial through the GLUTs on the basolateral membrane. Studies have suggested that mice with GLUT2 deletion present with glycosuria and human with GLUT2 mutations present with Fanconi syndrome, glycosuria, and proximal tubule dysfunction [61].

5. PPARγ in Renal Lipid Metabolism

An important biological function of PPARγ is its involvement in lipid metabolism. PPARγ can be activated by fatty acids and exogenous peroxisome proliferators to regulate the expression of enzymes conducting lipid metabolism [62]. Increased expression of PPARγ was found in multiple tissues in diet-induced obesity models (DIO) [63]. PPARγ can be induced before transcription activation of adipocyte genes and plays an important role in adipocyte differentiation [64]. PPARγ localizes at the brown-fat-specific enhancers, and the binding of nuclear factor I-A (NFIA) to the brown fat enhancers precedes and facilitates the binding of PPARγ, leading to increased chromatin accessibility and active transcription [65]. PPARγ can also regulate the mutual transformation between adipocytes and osteoblasts, thereby affecting lipid metabolism, which can promote the differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into adipocytes and inhibit the differentiation into osteoblasts [66]. Several studies which reported mutations in the PPARγ protein were related to some diseased states; for example, PPARγ P115Q results in severe obesity, and P467L and V290M mutations are partially involved in familial lipodystrophy type 3 [67].

The kidney is one of the target organs of PPARγ-regulated lipid metabolism. All PPARs have been detected in rodent and human kidney, including glomeruli, medullary collecting duct, and pelvic urothelium. Renal proximal tubule expresses lipid metabolism-related enzymes that can upregulate transcriptional activity by sufficient expression of PPARγ [68]. Kidney can process free fatty acids (FFAs), including reabsorption by proximal tubule and metabolism within mitochondria of proximal tubule [69]. FFAs are usually metabolized with the method of β-oxidation and then constitute the largest energy pool in the human body. Moorhead et al. were the first to report the relationship between lipid metabolism and kidney disease [70]. Mutations in lipid metabolism enzymes resulted in lipotoxicity and renal function deterioration [71]. Studies about animal models showed that PPARγ-deficient mice presented lipid metabolic disorders. One earlier study using PPARγ2 and leptin double knockout mice (POKO) showed that those mice presented spontaneous metabolic syndrome, hypertension, albuminuria, and renal dysfunction [72, 73]. Another study showed that lipotoxicity accelerates lipid accumulation and inflammation and then leads to glomerular diseases, which suggested that renal lipid metabolism may serve as a target for specific therapies aimed at slowing the progression of podocyte failure during metabolic syndrome [74].

6. PPARγ Activation in Kidney Immune Cells

Renal resident macrophages play important roles in kidney homeostasis and pathology. Macrophages are involved in the acute kidney disease and chronic kidney disease by adopting different type of phenotypes including M1 macrophage, subtypes of M2 macrophage, and MDSCs. While M1 cell promotes kidney injury, M2 cells contribute to the repairing response to the kidney injury (Figure 2). In kidney, the deletion of PPARγ in hematopoietic cells enhances inflammatory renal disease in the anti-GBM antibody-induced glomerulonephritis mouse model [24]. Mice lacking macrophage expression of PPARγ develop glomerulonephritis similar to autoimmune glomerulonephritis [75]. In addition, PPARγ agonist pioglitazone decreased renal calcium oxalate crystal formation by suppressing M1 macrophage polarization [48], and it also promotes the differentiation of monocytes into M2-type macrophages [76]. Deletion of PPARγ in the macrophages leads to impaired phagocytosis and macrophage polarization and altered lipid handling [77]. PPARγ agonists downregulate the expression of inflammatory factors in monocytes and macrophages by inhibiting NF-kappaB (NF-κB), signal transducer and activator of transcription (STATs), and AP-1 pathways. PPARγ agonists (15d-PGJ2) block the proinflammatory effects of IFN-γ by inhibiting the JAK/STAT (Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of tranions) pathways [78]. In the rat model of type 2 diabetes, pioglitazone significantly reduces macrophage infiltration in renal tissue along with inflammatory and fibrotic factors such as NF-κB, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) TGF-B, PAI, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [29].

In addition, PPARγ activation also modulates the function of other types of kidney-resident immune cells such as T cells [79]. Deletion of PPARγ in Th17 cell caused loss of Th17 cell differentiation and predisposes to autoimmune diseases [80].

7. Hypertension and PPARγ

Hypertension is both important cause and consequence of kidney diseases. Kidney function is always associated with increasing blood pressure (BP). In CRIC study, the prevalence of hypertension was 86%, much higher than the general population [81]. Hypertension was one of the independent risk factors for the progression of CKD.

Besides the wide distribution in adipocytes, adrenal gland, spleen, muscle, etc., PPARγ is also widely expressed in vascular endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells and regulates smooth muscle proliferation, migration and apoptosis, inflammation, atherosclerosis, and other pathologic processes [82]. Studies both in vivo and in vitro supported that PPARγ plays a vital protective role in cardiovascular disorders. In the study of DOCA-salt-hypertensive rats, rosiglitazone was effective in preventing the increased blood pressure and partially improved endothelial dysfunction [83]. Recent studies observed increased expression of PPARγ in blood vessels of spontaneously hypertensive rats, which is beneficial to the vascular function and lowers the blood pressure [84]. PPARγ can also inhibit the growth of vascular cells, induce apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC), and improve the vascular structure [85]. Nicol et al. has shown the ability of lowering blood pressure (BP) by endothelial-specific PPARγ activation in the context of a high-fat diet mouse model [86]. Benkirane et al. figured out that PPARγ might be responsible for the amelioration of vascular remodeling in hypertension, the mechanisms of which may include inhibiting the expression of matrix metalloprotein-9 (MMP-9) and disturbing PI3K and MAPK signaling pathways [87, 88]. Recent studies reported that PPARγ can regulate BP through renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), which acts as a negative regulator of Ang II receptor 1 transcription via the following pathways: inhibiting the expression of angiotensinogen, inhibiting Ang II activity, and degrading the angiotensin receptor I expression in the VSMCs [21, 82]. Clinical researchers have found a significant reduction in blood pressure after the rosiglitazone treatment in type 2 diabetic patients [89]. The data by Barroso et al. figured out that PPARγ-dominant negative mutations are associated with hypertension [90]. In addition, PPARγ is also important to circadian variations of blood pressure and heart rate through Bmal1. It controls cardiovascular rhythms via an influence on sympathetic nerve activity and the molecular clocks. PPARγ also protects against age-related hypertension [91].

Based on those functions, activators of PPARs (TZDs) may become therapeutic agents useful for the prevention of cardiovascular disease beyond their effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Although concerns of the side effects, such as the systemic fluid retention, have been proposed, Scnn1, identified as a critical PPARγ target gene, has played an important role in the control of edema [23, 92].

8. Clinical Application of PPARγ Agonist in Kidney Diseases

PPARγ agonists have shown great clinical effects in treating metabolic disorders. Many agonists have been developed, including 15-deoxy-Δ12, 14-prostaglandin J2 (15dPGJ2), and TZDs [93]. PPARγ agonists appear to be useful in reversing this early stage of the renal fibrosis (epithelial-mesenchymal transition, EMT) in the condition of the high glucose and to restore the function of SGLT-proteins mediated glucose uptake [56, 60]. TZDs, which used in the treatment of T2D, were proved to indirectly slow down the progression of renal disease by improving glucose intolerance and reducing the urinary albumin [21, 94]. A meta-analysis involving 2860 diabetic patients demonstrated that TZDs produced significant decreases in the levels of urinary albumin, which was in addition to that of RAS blockade because practically all patients in the latter studies were treated with ACEI or ARBs [95].

Accumulating evidence suggested that PPARγ agonists could also provide a protection in wider spectrum of kidney diseases, such as the acute nephrotic syndrome, nondiabetic glomerulosclerosis, and the polycystic kidney [96, 97]. Pioglitazone was reported to improve the renal functions in animal models of renal ischemia reperfusion-induced AKI via regulating Tnf and Nrf2 expression [98]. Furthermore, recent studies have highlighted beneficial roles of PPARγ agonists for patients with chronic renal failure, hemodialysis, as well as peritoneal dialysis (PD) could also benefit from [99, 100]. Liu et al. pointed out that rosiglitazone could protect against high phosphate-induced vascular calcification in CKD mice [101]. Zhang et al. provided the evidence that rosiglitazone had the protective effects on rat peritoneal mesothelial cells against PD solution-induced damage probably by inhibiting inflammation and regulating AQP 1 and ZO 1 gene expressions [102].

Interestingly, as a member of the RAAS inhibitors is widely used in the treatment of renal disease, telmisartan (characterized as selective PPARγ modulators in 2005) had advantages in reducing albuminuria, serum creatinine, and glomerulosclerosis in a nondiabetic model by its partial agonistic activity on PPARγ. Besides, treatment with telmisartan confirmed the protective effects against daunorubicin- (DNR-) induced nephrotoxicity by reducing the level of Ang II and ET-1 expression, which was associated with reduced inflammation and oxidative stress in part through the activation of PPARγ [103105].

Previous studies have shown that PPARγ agonists may have some protective effects on CVD end of CKD. In a PROactive study, CKD patients treated with pioglitazone were less likely to reach a composite end point of all-cause death, MI, and stroke [106]. These effects may be related to anti-inflammation effect and protection of endothelial cells. Short-term rosiglitazone therapy reduced insulin resistance, markers of inflammation, and abnormal endothelial function in patients with CKD [107]. In nondiabetic ESRD patients, pioglitazone significantly changes the visceral-subcutaneous fat distribution and improves the adipokine profile with a decrease in hepatic insulin resistance [108]. In nondiabetic renal allograft recipients, pioglitazone treatment reduces the progression of carotid IMT and improves insulin resistance [109]. However, the protective effect of PPARγ agonists on the progress of renal function needs further exploration.

9. Side Effects of PPARγ Agonists in Kidney

Despite the evidence that PPARγ agonists could obviously bring benefits to renal functions as stated above, these beneficial effects were shadowed by the risk for fluid retention, peripheral edema, or blood volume expansion [92], which could increase various degrees of burdens on kidney. For example, some studies proved that TZDs contributed the fluid retention by altered sodium and water reabsorption in the distal collecting ducts of the kidney [23, 110]. Clinical research figured out that uncomplicated diabetic patients’ combined use of RAAS inhibitors and PPARγ agonists promotes anemia [111]. Besides, people with long-term TZDs drug treatment are also peculiarly prone to the osteoporosis and heart failure [112]. Safety warnings and even drug withdrawal in Europe have come out because of the increasing risk in bladder cancer by pioglitazone [113115]. A combined therapy including PPARγ agonists and other renoprotective measures appears to be more reasonable than one single intervention. Ongoing efforts have been made to identify more selective modulators of PPARγ that reduce or eliminate the adverse effects of PPARγ agonists.

10. Conclusion

Overall, PPARγ is one of the ligand-activated transcription factor superfamily members and is abundantly expressed many types of kidney cells. It is involved in renal disease by participating in cell proliferation and apoptosis, TGF-β pathway, inflammation and oxidative stress, lipid metabolism, hypertension, and so on. Activation of PPARγ improves kidney injury. The application as clinical treatment was restricted by the side effect. And, the cell-specific function of PPARγ agonist was still unclear. So, understanding the mechanism of PPARγ function, exploring the cell specific reaction to the activation of PPARγ agonist, and developing a new type of PPARγ agonist with less side-effect may help application of the PPARγ agonist into clinical treatment and ameliorate the renal injury.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Ma Y andLiu J structured and drafted the review. Shi M and Wang Y provided input. Liu J revised and finalized the manuscript.


  1. K. P. McCullough, H. Morgenstern, R. Saran, W. H. Herman, and B. M. Robinson, “Projecting ESRD incidence and prevalence in the United States through 2030,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 127–135, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. B. D. Humphreys, “Mechanisms of renal fibrosis,” Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 309–326, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. N. Liang, T. Jakobsson, R. Fan, and E. Treuter, “The nuclear receptor-co-repressor complex in control of liver metabolism and disease,” Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 10, p. 411, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. Fajas, D. Auboeuf, E. Raspé et al., “The organization, promoter analysis, and expression of the human PPARγ gene,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 30, pp. 18779–18789, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Kersten, B. Desvergne, and W. Wahli, “Roles of PPARs in health and disease,” Nature, vol. 405, no. 6785, pp. 421–424, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. M. Fayyad, A. A. Khan, S. H. Abdallah, S. S. Alomran, K. Bajou, and M. N. K. Khattak, “Rosiglitazone enhances browning adipocytes in association with MAPK and PI3-K pathways during the differentiation of telomerase-transformed mesenchymal stromal cells into adipocytes,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 7, p. 1618, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. N. Liang, A. Damdimopoulos, S. Goñi et al., “Hepatocyte-specific loss of GPS2 in mice reduces non-alcoholic steatohepatitis via activation of PPARα,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 1684, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. I. M. S. de Vera, J. Zheng, S. Novick et al., “Synergistic regulation of coregulator/nuclear receptor interaction by ligand and DNA,” Structure, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1506–1518, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. G. Pascual, A. L. Fong, S. Ogawa et al., “A SUMOylation-dependent pathway mediates transrepression of inflammatory response genes by PPAR-γ,” Nature, vol. 437, no. 7059, pp. 759–763, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. P. A. Konstantinopoulos, G. P. Vandoros, G. Sotiropoulou-Bonikou, A. Kominea, and A. G. Papavassiliou, “NF-kappaB/PPAR γ and/or AP-1/PPAR γ “on/off” switches and induction of CBP in colon adenocarcinomas: correlation with COX-2 expression,” International Journal of Colorectal Disease, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 57–68, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. I. Lefterova, Y. Zhang, D. J. Steger et al., “PPAR and C/EBP factors orchestrate adipocyte biology via adjacent binding on a genome-wide scale,” Genes & Development, vol. 22, no. 21, pp. 2941–2952, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. B. König, A. Koch, J. Spielmann et al., “Activation of PPARα and PPARγ reduces triacylglycerol synthesis in rat hepatoma cells by reduction of nuclear SREBP-1,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 605, no. 1–3, pp. 23–30, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. Fontaine, G. Dubois, Y. Duguay et al., “The orphan nuclear receptor rev-Erbα is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ target gene and promotes PPARγ-induced adipocyte differentiation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 39, pp. 37672–37680, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. Cipolletta, M. Feuerer, A. Li et al., “PPAR-γ is a major driver of the accumulation and phenotype of adipose tissue Treg cells,” Nature, vol. 486, no. 7404, pp. 549–553, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Cheng, K. Qian, Y. Wang et al., “PPARγ inhibition regulates the cell cycle, proliferation and motility of bladder cancer cells,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 3724–3736, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. F. Gilardi, C. Winkler, L. Quignodon et al., “Systemic PPARγ deletion in mice provokes lipoatrophy, organomegaly, severe type 2 diabetes and metabolic inflexibility,” Metabolism, vol. 95, pp. 8–20, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. T. Demir, H. Onay, D. B. Savage et al., “Familial partial lipodystrophy linked to a novel peroxisome proliferator activator receptor -γ (PPARG) mutation, H449L: a comparison of people with this mutation and those with classic codon 482 Lamin A/C (LMNA) mutations,” Diabetic Medicine, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1445–1450, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S.-J. Gu, Z.-R. Guo, Z.-Y. Zhou, X.-S. Hu, M. Wu, and N. Zhang, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ polymorphisms as risk factors for dyslipidemia,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 2759–2763, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. T. Yang, D. E. Michele, J. Park et al., “Expression of peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptors and retinoid X receptors in the kidney,” American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, vol. 277, no. 6, pp. F966–F973, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. E. Kiss-Tóth and T. Roszer, “PPARγ in kidney physiology and pathophysiology,” PPAR Research, vol. 2008, Article ID 183108, 9 pages, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. Corrales, A. Izquierdo-Lahuerta, and G. Medina-Gómez, “Maintenance of kidney metabolic homeostasis by PPAR γ,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 7, p. 2063, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Desch, A. Schreiber, F. Schweda et al., “Increased renin production in mice with deletion of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ in juxtaglomerular cells,” Hypertension, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 660–666, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. H. Zhang, A. Zhang, D. E. Kohan, R. D. Nelson, F. J. Gonzalez, and T. Yang, “Collecting duct-specific deletion of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma blocks thiazolidinedione-induced fluid retention,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 102, no. 26, pp. 9406–9411, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. Chafin, S. Muse, R. Hontecillas et al., “Deletion of PPAR-γ; in immune cells enhances susceptibility to antiglomerular basement membrane disease,” Journal of Inflammation Research, vol. 3, pp. 127–134, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. B. Toffoli, F. Gilardi, C. Winkler et al., “Nephropathy in Pparg-null mice highlights PPARγ systemic activities in metabolism and in the immune system,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 2, Article ID e0171474, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. G. Yang, Z. Jia, T. Aoyagi, D. McClain, R. M. Mortensen, and T. Yang, “Systemic PPARγ deletion impairs circadian rhythms of behavior and metabolism,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 8, Article ID e38117, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. L. Zhou, A. Panasiuk, M. Downton et al., “Systemic PPARγ deletion causes severe disturbance in fluid homeostasis in mice,” Physiological Genomics, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 541–547, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H.-C. Yang, S. Deleuze, Y. Zuo, S. A. Potthoff, L.-J. Ma, and A. B. Fogo, “The PPARγ agonist pioglitazone ameliorates aging-related progressive renal injury,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 2380–2388, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. G. J. Ko, Y. S. Kang, S. Y. Han et al., “Pioglitazone attenuates diabetic nephropathy through an anti-inflammatory mechanism in type 2 diabetic rats,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 2750–2760, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. Isshiki, M. Haneda, D. Koya, S. Maeda, T. Sugimoto, and R. Kikkawa, “Thiazolidinedione compounds ameliorate glomerular dysfunction independent of their insulin-sensitizing action in diabetic rats,” Diabetes, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1022–1032, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Efrati, S. Berman, A. Chachashvili et al., “Rosiglitazone treatment attenuates renal tissue inflammation generated by urinary tract obstruction,” Nephrology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 189–197, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. Kawai, T. Masaki, S. Doi et al., “PPAR-gamma agonist attenuates renal interstitial fibrosis and inflammation through reduction of TGF-beta,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 47–58, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. T. Okada, J. Wada, K. Hida et al., “Thiazolidinediones ameliorate diabetic nephropathy via cell cycle-dependent mechanisms,” Diabetes, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1666–1677, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. S. Ghosh, T. W. B. Gehr, S. Ghosh et al., “PPARγ ligand attenuates PDGF-induced mesangial cell proliferation: role of MAP kinase,” Kidney International, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 52–62, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Weissgarten, S. Berman, S. Efrati, M. Rapoport, Z. Averbukh, and L. Feldman, “Apoptosis and proliferation of cultured mesangial cells isolated from kidneys of rosiglitazone-treated pregnant diabetic rats,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1198–1204, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. T. Kanjanabuch, L. J. Ma, J. Chen et al., “PPAR-gamma agonist protects podocytes from injury,” Kidney International, vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 1232–1239, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. Artwohl, T. Hölzenbein, C. Fürnsinn et al., “Thiazolidinediones inhibit apoptosis and heat shock protein 60 expression in human vascular endothelial cells,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 810–815, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. J. Carrero, M. I. Yilmaz, B. Lindholm, and P. Stenvinkel, “Cytokine dysregulation in chronic kidney disease: how can we treat it?” Blood Purification, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 291–299, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. U. Panzer, G. Zahner, U. Wienberg et al., “15-Deoxy- 12,14-prostaglandin J2 inhibits INF- -induced JAK/STAT1 signalling pathway activation and IP-10/CXCL10 expression in mesangial cells,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 3776–3785, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. Y. Lu, Q. Zhou, Y. Shi et al., “SUMOylation of PPARγ by rosiglitazone prevents LPS-induced NCoR degradation mediating down regulation of chemokines expression in renal proximal tubular cells,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e79815, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. Xiao, J. C. K. Leung, L. Y. Y. Chan, H. Guo, and K. N. Lai, “Protective effect of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists on activated renal proximal tubular epithelial cells in IgA nephropathy,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 2067–2077, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. C. Henique, G. Bollee, O. Lenoir et al., “Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 drives podocyte-specific expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ essential for resistance to crescentic GN,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 172–188, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Wu, D. S. Melichian, E. Chang, M. Warner-Blankenship, A. K. Ghosh, and J. Varga, “Rosiglitazone abrogates bleomycin-induced scleroderma and blocks profibrotic responses through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 519–533, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. F. Zheng, A. Fornoni, S. J. Elliot et al., “Upregulation of type I collagen by TGF-β in mesangial cells is blocked by PPARγ activation,” American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, vol. 282, no. 4, pp. F639–F648, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. L.-J. Ma, C. Marcantoni, M. F. Linton, S. Fazio, and A. B. Fogo, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist troglitazone protects against nondiabetic glomerulosclerosis in rats,” Kidney International, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1899–1910, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. Y. Li, X. Wen, B. C. Spataro, K. Hu, C. Dai, and Y. Liu, “Hepatocyte growth factor is a downstream effector that mediates the antifibrotic action of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 54–65, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. W. Wang, F. Liu, and N. Chen, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-γ) agonists attenuate the profibrotic response induced by TGF-beta1 in renal interstitial fibroblasts,” Mediators Inflamm, vol. 2007, Article ID 62641, 7 pages, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. Z. Chen, P. Yuan, X. Sun et al., “Pioglitazone decreased renal calcium oxalate crystal formation by suppressing M1 macrophage polarization via the PPAR-γ-miR-23 axis,” American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, vol. 317, no. 1, pp. F137–F151, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. L. Wu, Q. Wang, F. Guo et al., “MicroRNA-27a induces mesangial cell injury by targeting of PPARγ, and its in vivo knockdown prevents progression of diabetic nephropathy,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 26072, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. Z. Zhou, J. Wan, X. Hou, J. Geng, X. Li, and X. Bai, “MicroRNA-27a promotes podocyte injury via PPARγ-mediated β-catenin activation in diabetic nephropathy,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 8, no. 3, Article ID e2658, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. F. F. Samaha, P. O. Szapary, N. Iqbal et al., “Effects of rosiglitazone on lipids, adipokines, and inflammatory markers in nondiabetic patients with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and metabolic syndrome,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 624–630, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. K. Eckardt, S. W. Görgens, S. Raschke, and J. Eckel, “Myokines in insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes,” Diabetologia, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1087–1099, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. W. Wahli and L. Michalik, “PPARs at the crossroads of lipid signaling and inflammation,” Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 351–363, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. M. Ahmadian, J. M. Suh, N. Hah et al., “PPARγ signaling and metabolism: the good, the bad and the future,” Nature Medicine, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 557–566, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. R. A. Derlacz, K. Hyc, M. Usarek, A. K. Jagielski, J. Drozak, and R. Jarzyna, “PPAR-γ-independent inhibitory effect of rosiglitazone on glucose synthesis in primary cultured rabbit kidney-cortex tubules,” Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 396–404, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. A. Mather and C. Pollock, “Glucose handling by the kidney,” Kidney International, vol. 79, pp. 1–6, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. R. Santer, M. Kinner, C. L. Lassen et al., “Molecular analysis of the SGLT2 gene in patients with renal glucosuria,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 2873–2882, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. C. Bonner, J. Kerr-Conte, V. Gmyr et al., “Inhibition of the glucose transporter SGLT2 with dapagliflozin in pancreatic alpha cells triggers glucagon secretion,” Nature Medicine, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 512–517, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. Kim, E. J. Lee, H. M. Shin et al., “The effect of PPARγ agonist on SGLT2 and glucagon expressions in alpha cells under hyperglycemia,” Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1069–1076, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. Y. J. Lee and H. J. Han, “Troglitazone ameliorates high glucose-induced EMT and dysfunction of SGLTs through PI3K/Akt, GSK-3β, Snail1, and β-catenin in renal proximal tubule cells,” American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, vol. 298, no. 5, pp. F1263–F1275, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. M.-T. Guillam, E. Hümmler, E. Schaerer et al., “Early diabetes and abnormal postnatal pancreatic islet development in mice lacking Glut-2,” Nature Genetics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 327–330, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. K. Murakami, K. Tobe, T. Ide et al., “A novel insulin sensitizer acts as a coligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPAR-alpha) and PPAR-gamma: effect of PPAR-alpha activation on abnormal lipid metabolism in liver of Zucker fatty rats,” Diabetes, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 1841–1847, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. B. MochizukiOhashi, B. Parim, V. R. Chunduri et al., “Antiobesity potential of piperonal: promising modulation of body composition, lipid profiles and obesogenic marker expression in HFD-induced obese rats,” Nutrition & Metabolism, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 72, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. N. Das, M. Dhanawat, and S. K. Shrivastava, “Benzoxazinones as human peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonists: a docking study using glide,” Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 159–164, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. Y. Hiraike, H. Waki, J. Yu et al., “NFIA co-localizes with PPARγ and transcriptionally controls the brown fat gene program,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1081–1092, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. J. Kim, Y.-J. Lee, J. M. Kim et al., “PPARγ agonists induce adipocyte differentiation by modulating the expression of Lipin-1, which acts as a PPARγ phosphatase,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 81, pp. 57–66, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. J.-L. Huret, S. L. Minor, F. Dorkeld, P. Dessen, and A. Bernheim, “Atlas of genetics and cytogenetics in oncology and haematology, an interactive database,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 349–351, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. Z. Lyu, Z. Mao, Q. Li et al., “PPARγ maintains the metabolic heterogeneity and homeostasis of renal tubules,” EBioMedicine, vol. 38, pp. 178–190, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. H. H. Szeto, S. Liu, Y. Soong, N. Alam, G. T. Prusky, and S. V. Seshan, “Protection of mitochondria prevents high-fat diet-induced glomerulopathy and proximal tubular injury,” Kidney International, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 997–1011, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. J. F. Moorhead, M. El-Nahas, M. K. Chan, and Z. Varghese, “Lipid nephrotoxicity in chronic progressive glomerular and tubulo-interstitial disease,” The Lancet, vol. 320, no. 8311, pp. 1309–1311, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. A. Izquierdo-Lahuerta, C. Martínez-García, and G. Medina-Gómez, “Lipotoxicity as a trigger factor of renal disease,” Journal of Nephrology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 603–610, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. C. Martinez-Garcia, A. Izquierdo, V. Velagapudi et al., “Accelerated renal disease is associated with the development of metabolic syndrome in a glucolipotoxic mouse model,” Disease Models & Mechanisms, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 636–648, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. G. Medina-Gomez, L. Yetukuri, V. Velagapudi et al., “Adaptation and failure of pancreatic cells in murine models with different degrees of metabolic syndrome,” Disease Models & Mechanisms, vol. 2, no. 11-12, pp. 582–592, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. C. Martínez-García, A. Izquierdo-Lahuerta, Y. Vivas et al., “Renal lipotoxicity-associated inflammation and insulin resistance affects actin cytoskeleton organization in podocytes,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 11, Article ID e0142291, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. T. Roszer, M. P. Menéndez-Gutiérrez, M. I. Lefterova et al., “Autoimmune kidney disease and impaired engulfment of apoptotic cells in mice with macrophage peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma or retinoid X receptor alpha deficiency,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 1, pp. 621–631, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. M. A. FischerRicote, B. Derudas, E. Rigamonti et al., “PPARγ activation primes human monocytes into alternative M2 macrophages with anti-inflammatory properties,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 137–143, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. T. E. Akiyama, S. Sakai, G. Lambert et al., “Conditional disruption of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gene in mice results in lowered expression of ABCA1, ABCG1, and apoE in macrophages and reduced cholesterol efflux,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 2607–2619, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. M. Ricote, A. C. Li, T. M. Willson, C. J. Kelly, and C. K. Glass, “The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma is a negative regulator of macrophage activation,” Nature, vol. 391, no. 6662, pp. 79–82, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. C. K. Glass and K. Saijo, “Nuclear receptor transrepression pathways that regulate inflammation in macrophages and T cells,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 365–376, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. M. P. Menendez-Gutierrez, T. Roszer, and M. Ricote, “Biology and therapeutic applications of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors,” Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 48–584, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. J. P. Lash, A. S. Go, L. J. Appel et al., “Chronic renal insufficiency cohort (CRIC) study: baseline characteristics and associations with kidney function,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 1302–1311, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. M. Szkup, A. J. Owczarek, D. Schneider-Matyka, J. Brodowski, B. Łóo, and E. Grochans, “Associations between the components of metabolic syndrome and the polymorphisms in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ), the fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO), and the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) genes,” Aging, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 72–82, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. M. Iglarz, R. M. Touyz, F. Amiri, M.-F. Lavoie, Q. N. Diep, and E. L. Schiffrin, “Effect of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha and -gamma activators on vascular remodeling in endothelin-dependent hypertension,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. L. Wu, R. Wang, J. De Champlain, and T. W. Wilson, “Beneficial and deleterious effects of rosiglitazone on hypertension development in spontaneously hypertensive rats,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 749–756, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. M. Zhang, J. Zhang, L. Li, Q. Wang, and L. Feng, “Association between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ-2 gene Pro12Ala polymorphisms and risk of hypertension: an updated meta-analysis,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 39, no. 2, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. C. J. Nicol, M. Adachi, T. E. Akiyama, and F. J. Gonzalez, “PPARgamma in endothelial cells influences high fat diet-induced hypertension,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 549–556, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. K. Benkirane, E. C. Viel, F. Amiri, and E. L. Schiffrin, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma regulates angiotensin II-stimulated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase in blood vessels in vivo,” Hypertension, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 102–108, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. E. L. Schiffrin, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and cardiovascular remodeling,” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 288, no. 3, pp. H1037–H1043, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. C. J. Magri, N. Gatt, R. G. Xuereb, and S. Fava, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ and the endothelium: implications in cardiovascular disease,” Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1279–1294, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. I. Barroso, M. Gurnell, V. E. Crowley et al., “Dominant negative mutations in human PPARgamma associated with severe insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus and hypertension,” Nature, vol. 402, no. 6764, pp. 880–883, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. N. Wang, G. Yang, Z. Jia et al., “Vascular PPARgamma controls circadian variation in blood pressure and heart rate through Bmal1,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 482–491, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. Y. Guan, C. Hao, D. R. Cha et al., “Thiazolidinediones expand body fluid volume through PPARgamma stimulation of ENaC-mediated renal salt absorption,” Nature Medicine, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 861–866, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. S. A. Kliewer, H. E. Xu, M. H. Lambert, and T. M. Willson, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: from genes to physiology,” Recent Progress in Hormone Research, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 239–263, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. J. Yang, D. Zhang, J. Li, X. Zhang, F. Fan, and Y. Guan, “Role of PPARgamma in renoprotection in Type 2 diabetes: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential,” Clinical Science, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. P. A. Sarafidis, P. C. Stafylas, P. I. Georgianos, A. N. Saratzis, and A. N. Lasaridis, “Effect of thiazolidinediones on albuminuria and proteinuria in diabetes: a meta-analysis,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 835–847, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. Y. Zuo, H. C. Yang, S. A. Potthoff et al., “Protective effects of PPARgamma agonist in acute nephrotic syndrome,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 174–181, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. D. Yoshihara, H. Kurahashi, M. Morita et al., “PPAR-gamma agonist ameliorates kidney and liver disease in an orthologous rat model of human autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease,” American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, vol. 300, no. 2, pp. F465–F474, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. S. Elshazly and E. Soliman, “PPAR gamma agonist, pioglitazone, rescues liver damage induced by renal ischemia/reperfusion injury,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 362, pp. 86–94, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. A. Sugawara, A. Uruno, M. Kudo, K. Matsuda, C. W. Yang, and S. Ito, “Effects of PPARgamma on hypertension, atherosclerosis, and chronic kidney disease,” Endocrine Journal, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 847–852, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. P. Iglesias and J. J. Díez, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists in renal disease,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 154, no. 5, pp. 613–621, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. L. Liu, Y. Liu, Y. Zhang et al., “High phosphate-induced downregulation of PPARγ contributes to CKD-associated vascular calcification,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 114, pp. 264–275, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. Y.-F. Zhang, Q. Wang, Y.-Y. Su et al., “PPAR-γ agonist rosiglitazone protects rat peritoneal mesothelial cells against peritoneal dialysis solution-induced damage,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1786–1792, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. A. Barnett, “Preventing renal complications in type 2 diabetes: results of the diabetics exposed to telmisartan and enalapril trial,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. S132–S135, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. W. Arozal, K. Watanabe, P. T. Veeraveedu et al., “Telmisartan prevents the progression of renal injury in daunorubicin rats with the alteration of angiotensin II and endothelin-1 receptor expression associated with its PPAR-γ agonist actions,” Toxicology, vol. 279, no. 1–3, pp. 91–99, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. M. Schupp, M. Clemenz, R. Gineste et al., “Molecular characterization of new selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ modulators with angiotensin receptor blocking activity,” Diabetes, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 3442–3452, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. C. A. Schneider, E. Ferrannini, R. Defronzo, G. Schernthaner, J. Yates, and E. Erdmann, “Effect of pioglitazone on cardiovascular outcome in diabetes and chronic kidney disease,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 182–187, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. D. T. Chan, G. F. Watts, A. B. Irish, and G. K. Dogra, “Rosiglitazone does not improve vascular function in subjects with chronic kidney disease,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 3543–3549, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. A. Zanchi, L. Tappy, K.-A. Lê et al., “Pioglitazone improves fat distribution, the adipokine profile and hepatic insulin sensitivity in non-diabetic end-stage renal disease subjects on maintenance dialysis: a randomized cross-over pilot study,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 10, Article ID e109134, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. S. J. Han, K. Y. Hur, Y. S. Kim et al., “Effects of pioglitazone on subclinical atherosclerosis and insulin resistance in nondiabetic renal allograft recipients,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 976–984, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. K. Kuba, Y. Imai, S. Rao et al., “A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury,” Nature Medicine, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 875–879, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. A. E. Raptis, D. Bacharaki, M. Mazioti et al., “Anemia due to coadministration of renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors and PPARγ agonists in uncomplicated diabetic patients,” Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes, vol. 120, no. 7, pp. 416–419, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. J. Kung and R. R. Henry, “Thiazolidinedione safety,” Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 565–579, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. A. Neumann, A. Weill, P. Ricordeau, J. P. Fagot, F. Alla, and H. Allemand, “Pioglitazone and risk of bladder cancer among diabetic patients in France: a population-based cohort study,” Diabetologia, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1953–1962, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. I. N. Colmers, S. L. Bowker, S. R. Majumdar, and J. A. Johnson, “Use of thiazolidinediones and the risk of bladder cancer among people with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis,” Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 184, no. 12, pp. E675–E683, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. S. E. Nissen and K. Wolski, “Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356, no. 24, pp. 2457–2471, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Yuhua Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.