Cognition and Implementation of Disaster Preparedness among Japanese Dialysis Facilities

Table 3

Factors related to implementation rates of disaster preparedness divided by domains using standardized coefficients.

Variables		Patients	Administration	Networks	Safety
Cognitive factors	Risk perception	0.098 [0.015, 0.182]	0.080 [−0.003, 0.162]	0.005 [−0.078, 0.089]	−0.046 [−0.127, 0.034]
	Outcome expectancy	−0.088 [−0.174, −0.001]	−0.061 [−0.147, 0.025]	0.087 [−0.004, 0.179]	−0.077 [−0.176, 0.023]
	Self-efficacy	0.236 [0.142, 0.331]	0.209 [0.118, 0.300]	0.115 [0.020, 0.0.210]	0.269 [0.172, 0.367]
	Self-responsibility	0.006 [−0.082, 0.094]	0.065 [−0.029, 0.160]	−0.024 [−0.114, 0.067]	0.098 [0.006, 0.191]
	Support from surroundings	0.213 [0.119, 0.307]	0.174 [0.079, 0.269]	0.152 [0.065, 0.239]	0.030 [−0.064, 0.124]
Job types of participants	Physician	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference
	Nurse	0.086 [−0.46, 0.217]	0.105 [−0.056, 0.266]	−0.021 [−0.150, 0.109]	0.091 [−0.093, 0.276]
	Clinical engineer	0.025 [−0.107, 0.157]	−0.044 [−0.187, 0.098]	0.009 [−0.132, 0.149]	−0.071 [−0.211, 0.070]
	Clerical staff	0.239 [0.045, 0.433]	−0.080 [−0.341, 0.181]	0.010 [−0.184, 0.203]	0.190 [−0.083, 0.463]
	Others/nonresponse	−0.003 [−0.102, 0.096]	−0.055 [−0.147, 0.037]	0.076 [−0.030, 0.182]	0.012 [−0.053, 0.073]
Position of participants	Director of the facility	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference
	Office manager	−0.205 [−0.401, −0.010]	−0.002 [−0.269, 0.265]	−0.078 [−0.271, 0.115]	−0.232 [−0.512, 0.043]
	Head of dialysis department	−0.127 [−0.268, 0.014]	−0.072 [−0.209, 0.065]	−0.109 [−0.247, 0.030]	−0.128 [−0.266, 0.011]
	Chief nurse	−0.021 [−0.164, 0.122]	−0.087 [−0.245, 0.072]	−0.016 [−0.152, 0.120]	−0.194 [−0.380,−0.008]
	Chief clinical engineer	−0.063 [−0.177, 0.051]	0.018 [−0.098, 0.134]	−0.013 [−0.136, 0.111]	−0.031 [−0.149, 0.088]
	Others/nonresponse	−0.087 [−0.205, 0.031]	0.048 [−0.081, 0.178]	−0.049 [−0.152, 0.054]	−0.024 [−0.137, 0.088]
Location of the facilities	Hokkaido	−0.085 [−0.178, 0.007]	−0.076 [−0.167, 0.105]	−0.038 [−0.131, 0.056]	−0.084 [−0.184, 0.016]
	Tohoku	−0.076 [−0.170, 0.017]	−0.018 [−0.099, 0.062]	0.102 [0.017, 0.188]	−0.041 [−0.126, 0.044]
	Kanto	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference
	Chubu	0.029 [−0.073, 0.131]	0.048 [−0.053, 0.149]	0.068 [−0.027, 0.164]	−0.046 [−0.148, 0.056]
	Kansai	0.007 [−0.089, 0.103]	−0.050 [−0.146, 0.046]	−0.119 [−0.214, −0.024]	−0.037 [−0.133, 0.058]
	Chugoku	0.003 [−0.082, 0.088]	−0.018 [−0.106, 0.070]	0.061 [−0.043, 0.165]	−0.078 [−0.168, 0.012]
	Shikoku	0.014 [−0.064, 0.093]	−0.005 [−0.073, 0.062]	0.018 [−0.066, 0.102]	0.030 [−0.047, 0.108]
	Kyushu	−0.059 [−0.150, 0.032]	−0.060 [−0.158, 0.038]	−0.063 [−0.160, 0.033]	−0.112 [−0.207, −0.016]
Founder and size	Public hospitals	0.012 [−0.092, 0.117]	0.179 [0.079, 0.290]	0.251[0.145, 0.356]	0.143 [0.049, 0.237]
	Private hospitals	−0.136 [−0.230, −0.043]	−0.025 [−0.117, 0.067]	0.006 [−0.086, 0.099]	0.017 [−0.080, 0.113]
	Clinics	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference
The number of total dialysis patients	First quartile: 60 or less patients	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference
	Second quartile: 61–100	0.068 [−0.030, 0.166]	0.132 [0.037, 0.226]	0.033 [−0.064, 0.130]	0.039 [−0.066, 0.144]
	Third quartile: 101–160	0.101 [−0.002, 0.204]	0.089 [−0.017, 0.195]	0.065 [−0.037, 0.166]	0.009 [−0.096, 0.114]
	Fourth quartile: above 160	0.094 [0.002, 0.187]	0.223 [0.125, 0.322]	0.110 [0.009, 0.212]	0.091 [−0.010, 0.193]
R square		0.239	0.229	0.229	0.161

, , and . [ ]: confidence interval.