Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Optics
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 1370259, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1370259
Research Article

The Impact of Pixel Resolution, Integration Scale, Preprocessing, and Feature Normalization on Texture Analysis for Mass Classification in Mammograms

1Departament d’Enginyeria Informàtica i Matemàtiques, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Avinguda Paisos Catalans 26, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
2Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands

Received 6 November 2015; Revised 21 March 2016; Accepted 22 March 2016

Academic Editor: Chenggen Quan

Copyright © 2016 Mohamed Abdel-Nasser et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Malvezzi, P. Bertuccio, F. Levi, C. La Vecchia, and E. Negri, “European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2014,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1650–1656, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. F. J. Gilbert, S. M. Astley, M. G. C. Gillan et al., “Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 16, pp. 1675–1684, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Abdel-Nasser, A. Moreno, and D. Puig, “Towards cost reduction of breast cancer diagnosis using mammography texture analysis,” Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol. 28, no. 1-2, pp. 385–402, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. R. Bellotti, F. De Carlo, S. Tangaro et al., “A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database,” Medical Physics, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 3066–3075, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Melendez, C. I. Sánchez, B. Van Ginneken, and N. Karssemeijer, “Improving mass candidate detection in mammograms via feature maxima propagation and local feature selection,” Medical Physics, vol. 41, no. 8, Article ID 081904, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Oliver, X. Lladó, J. Freixenet, and J. Martí, “False positive reduction in mammographic mass detection using local binary patterns,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2007, pp. 286–293, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. V. Pomponiu, H. Hariharan, B. Zheng, and D. Gur, “Improving breast mass detection using histogram of oriented gradients,” in Medical Imaging: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, vol. 9035 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 1–6, International Society for Optics and Photonics, San Diego, Calif, USA, March 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. Y. Zheng, “Breast cancer detection with Gabor features from digital Mammograms,” Algorithms, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 44–62, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H.-P. Chan, B. Sahiner, N. Patrick et al., “Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 549–567, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. M. Rangayyan, T. M. Nguyen, F. J. Ayres, and A. K. Nandi, “Effect of pixel resolution on texture features of breast masses in mammograms,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 547–553, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Soltanian-Zadeh, F. Rafiee-Rad, and D. S. Pourabdollah-Nejad, “Comparison of multiwavelet, wavelet, Haralick, and shape features for microcalcification classification in mammograms,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1973–1986, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Oliver, J. Freixenet, R. Martí et al., “A novel breast tissue density classification methodology,” IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 55–65, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Oliver, J. Freixenet, J. Martí et al., “A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 87–110, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. P. Sampat, A. C. Bovik, G. J. Whitman, and M. K. Markey, “A model-based framework for the detection of spiculated masses on mammography,” Medical Physics, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2110–2123, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. D. Pisano, S. Zong, B. M. Hemminger et al., “Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 193–200, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Anand, R. S. S. Kumari, S. Jeeva, and T. Thivya, “Directionlet transform based sharpening and enhancement of mammographic X-ray images,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 391–399, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. S. Subashini, V. Ramalingam, and S. Palanivel, “Automated assessment of breast tissue density in digital mammograms,” Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 33–43, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Suckling, J. Parker, D. Dance et al., “The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 375–378, York, UK, July 1994.
  19. N. Karssemeijer, “Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 365–378, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Ojala, M. Pietikäinen, and T. Mäenpää, “Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 971–987, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. R. Rivera, J. R. Castillo, and O. Chae, “Local directional number pattern for face analysis: face and expression recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1740–1752, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. A. Kirsch, “Computer determination of the constituent structure of biological images,” Computers and Biomedical Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 315–328, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. N. Dalal and B. Triggs, “Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '05), vol. 1, pp. 886–893, IEEE, San Diego, Calif, USA, June 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. M. Haralick, I. Dinstein, and K. Shanmugam, “Textural features for image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 610–621, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. W. Gómez, W. C. A. Pereira, and A. F. C. Infantosi, “Analysis of co-occurrence texture statistics as a function of gray-level quantization for classifying breast ultrasound,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1889–1899, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. P. Ramos, M. Z. do Nascimento, and D. C. Pereira, “Texture extraction: an evaluation of ridgelet, wavelet and co-occurrence based methods applied to mammograms,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 11036–11047, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. P. Jones and L. A. Palmer, “An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1233–1258, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. T. Puff, E. D. Pisano, K. E. Muller et al., “A method for determination of optimal image enhancement for the detection of mammographic abnormalities,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 161–171, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. I. Christoyianni, A. Koutras, E. Dermatas, and G. Kokkinakis, “Computer aided diagnosis of breast cancer in digitized mammograms,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 309–319, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. Agrawal, M. Vatsa, and R. Singh, “Saliency based mass detection from screening mammograms,” Signal Processing, vol. 99, pp. 29–47, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. L. de Oliveira Martins, A. C. Silva, A. C. De Paiva, and M. Gattass, “Detection of breast masses in mammogram images using growing neural gas algorithm and Ripley's K function,” Journal of Signal Processing Systems, vol. 55, no. 1–3, pp. 77–90, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. C. Moura and M. A. G. López, “An evaluation of image descriptors combined with clinical data for breast cancer diagnosis,” International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 561–574, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. L. Nanni, S. Brahnam, and A. Lumini, “A very high performing system to discriminate tissues in mammograms as benign and malignant,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 1968–1971, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. L. Nanni, S. Brahnam, S. Ghidoni, E. Menegatti, and T. Barrier, “Different approaches for extracting information from the co-occurrence matrix,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 12, Article ID e83554, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. Nanni, S. Brahnam, S. Ghidoni, and E. Menegatti, “Region-based approaches and descriptors extracted from the co-occurrence matrix,” International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology, vol. 3, pp. 192–200, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  36. S. Ergin and O. Kilic, “A new feature extraction framework based on wavelets for breast cancer diagnosis,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 51, pp. 171–182, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. Dhahbi, W. Barhoumi, and E. Zagrouba, “Breast cancer diagnosis in digitized mammograms using curvelet moments,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 64, pp. 79–90, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Aksoy and R. M. Haralick, “Feature normalization and likelihood-based similarity measures for image retrieval,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 563–582, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  39. P. Juszczak, D. Tax, and R. Duin, “Feature scaling in support vector data description,” in Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Advanced School for Computing and Imaging (ASCI '02), pp. 95–102, 2002.
  40. C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, “Support-vector networks,” Machine Learning, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 273–297, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin, “LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines,” ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 2, article 27, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. G. B. Junior, A. C. Cardoso de Paiva, A. Corrêa Silva, and A. C. M. de Oliveira, “Classification of breast tissues using Moran's index and Geary's coefficient as texture signatures and SVM,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1063–1072, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. T. Fawcett, “An introduction to ROC analysis,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 861–874, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. P. Armitage, G. Berry, and J. N. Matthews, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. H. Li, M. L. Giger, Z. Huo et al., “Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location,” Medical Physics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 549–555, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus