Research Article  Open Access
Lin Hu, Yunxiu Shui, Yaohui Dai, Haiyu Wu, Gang Zhu, Yan Yang, "Study on Quantitative Phase Imaging by DualWavelength Digital Holography Microscopy", International Journal of Optics, vol. 2018, Article ID 2312137, 8 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2312137
Study on Quantitative Phase Imaging by DualWavelength Digital Holography Microscopy
Abstract
A dualwavelength digital holographic microscopy with premagnification is proposed to obtain the object surface measurements over the large gradient. The quantitative phase images of specimens are captured in high precision by the processing of filtering and phase compensation. The phase images are acquired without phase unwrapping, which is necessary in traditional digital holographic microscopy; thereby the proposed system can greatly increase the speed of reconstruction. The results of numerical simulation and optical experiments demonstrated that the reconstructed speed increased by 37.9 times, and the relative error of measurement is 4% compared with the traditional holographic microscopy system. It means that the proposed system can directly acquire the higher quality quantitative phase distribution for specimens.
1. Introduction
Digital holographic microscopy (DHM) is a powerful technology for the measurement of microscopic samples by recording and reconstructing the amplitude and phase of the wave. The dualwavelength digital holographic microscopy uses two different wavelength lasers to simultaneously record the hologram and numerically reconstruct the phase information according to phase distribution under two wavelengths. As early as 1998, a new method for the extraction of quantitative phase imaging by using partially coherent illumination and an ordinary transmission microscope was proposed by A. Barty et al., which can recover a phase even in the presence of amplitude modulation [1]. A solution for absolute phase measurements was presented by Cuche Etienne et al. [2]. They introduced digital reference wave and phase mask, which were applied in phasecontrast imaging and optical meteorology. This property of holograms offers phasecontrast techniques, which can be used in quantitative 3D imaging. The compensation of the inherent wave front curvature by subtracting the reference hologram in DHM for quantitative phasecontrast imaging is introduced by Ferraro, Pietro, et al. [3]. This simple method can be implemented efficiently under the ideal experimental conditions. The dualwavelength phaseshifting digital holography that selectively extracts wavelength information from five wavelengthmultiplexed holograms is presented by Tahara, Tatsuki, et al. [4]. The color hyperchaotic image encryption method by the DHM and CA encoding algorithm is proposed by Sichuan University, which has great security and robustness [5, 6]. It is an important application about digital holography. The enhanced quantitative threedimensional measurement system is introduced by JaeYong Lee. It can simplify the configuration by a dualpeak quantum dot wavelength converter and a blue LED [7]. There are great researches for reducing speckle noise and increasing the speed of reconstruction [8–10]. We have successfully achieved the near realtime threedimensional surface measurement by digital holography [11, 12].
If the optical path difference is less than the equivalent wavelength, the real phase distribution of object can be directly obtained without phase unwrapping by the dualwavelength digital holographic interferometry. If the optical path difference is greater than the equivalent wavelength, the phase unwrapping process will be simplified by dualwavelength digital holographic interferometry. The noise immunity and the scope of phase unwrapping algorithms will be improved and expanded, respectively [13–15]. C. J. Mann obtained the measurement results of the surface height over several microns of range by threewavelength digital holography [16]. The optical path length can be converted to physical thickness, and the sample height information will be provided. The dualwavelength DHM imaging experiment of a stepped phase plate and the smoke particles were conducted by P. Song et al. [17]. M.K. Kim et al. successfully achieved threedimensional imaging of resolution plates and cancer cells using dualwavelength DHM [18]. A phaseimaging technique to quantitatively study the threedimensional structure of cells by simultaneous dualwavelength reflection digital holography was presented by A. Khmaladze et al. [19]. It proves that the dualwavelength DHM allows a faster imaging, which does not rely on the surrounding pixels to correct the phase discontinuities, but simply compares two singlewavelength phases. Dualwavelength DHM has been widely applied in the fields of surface topography measurement [20–22], cell imaging [23, 24], 3D particle imaging [25, 26], transparent medium physical quantity measurement [27–29], and so on. Due to the limitation of the dualwavelength DHM technique, more noise will be introduced with the increase in synthesis wavelength and the expanding of the sample range. The accuracy of measurement decreased as the noise increased. The setup of dualwavelength DHM consists of two laser machines, which makes it difficult to ensure the concentricity of two laser beams in an optical assembly. All the above have the adverse effects on obtaining high precision phase information.
A system of dualwavelength DHM with premagnification, which can directly and accurately obtain quantitative phase images, is presented. The principle of surface topography measurement and phase unwrapping method based on dual wavelength digital holography is introduced. The effectiveness of the system is verified by computer simulations and optical experiments using the 1951 USAF target and the standard groove object. Compared with the traditional single wavelength DHM, the system can not only obtain the phase information without phase unwrapping, but also get the low noise and high precision quantitative phase images.
2. Experimental Principle
2.1. Principle
In dualwavelength digital holographic microscopy, two laser beams in different wavelengths from separated laser sources are coupled into one beam, and the optical assemblies are shown in Figure 1. The two lasers were used as coherent light sources. Both beams are collimated by spatial filter. Beam splitters (BS1) divide the beams into the reference and the object arms. The object beam passes through the sample and microscope objective. There are different tilts in orthogonal directions for reference waves of two lasers, which allows us to capture both wavelengths simultaneously. Then the interference pattern between the reference waves and object wave is recorded by a CCD camera.
The dualwavelength composite digital hologram will be acquired on the CCD, and the interference pattern can be expressed as
where is the intensity of the composite digital hologram, , are the coordinates of the holographic plane, is the complex conjugate, are object beams, and are reference beams.
The interferometric phase can be extracted by the spatial filtering method and shifted to the center position to perform the Fourier transform. The complex amplitude distribution of the reproducing light field can be obtained as follows:
The intensity and the wavefront phase distribution of optical field can be calculated according to the following expressions:
In order to overcome the issue of phase ambiguity produced by single wavelength approach, a synthetic beatwavelength is used and expressed as follows:
where is the height distribution of the specimens, which means the optical path difference of the twice of the topography for reflection scheme. is the optical path difference of the homogeneous sample in the air. is the equivalent wavelength defined as follows:
If the optical path difference is less than the equivalent wavelength, the real phase of specimens can be directly obtained without unwrapping. Otherwise, the phase distribution is wrapped between and . In this case, the package phase difference is compensated to obtain its equivalent phase.
In summary, the dualwavelength digital holographic microscopy to measure the large gradient of specimens can solve the problem of phase unwrapping with singlewavelength digital holographic microscopy. As the range of measurement increases, the noise of the phase distribution in the singlewavelength digital holographic microscope also increases. Therefore, the reasonable choice of wavelength and the method of noise reduction are key points in the dualwavelength holographic microscopy.
3. Experimental Results
3.1. Experimental Setup
The experiments were conducted in a DHM developed by our team. The schematic diagram and the setup are shown in Figure 2, where and , the equivalent wavelength, . The beams emitted by the two lasers pass through the beam expanders and collimation systems (SF), the mirror and the cube beam splitting prism (BS). Then the beam is divided into two beams by beam splitter; one is object wave, and the other is the reference wave. In the premagnification optical path, the object wave, which is reflected by mirror, passes through the microscope objective (MO, , NA = 0.25 ) and the sample. On the other hand, the reference wave passes through beam obstacle and neutral density. It should be noted that beam obstacle is turned on so that the optical path is the one of offaxis digital holography (in this experiment, the beam obstacle is turned on); otherwise, it will become inline digital holography. The two beams are combined by the cube splitting prism. Finally, the interference hologram is recorded by CCD (SENTECH STCSBS241POE; the pixel area is ). It is worth noting that the dualwavelength preamplification digital holographic microscopy systems with large numerical aperture microscope objectives can acquire more sample information, which can be compressed to amplify the CCD acceptable sampling frequency [30].
(a)
(b)
3.2. Numerical Simulation
In order to illustrate that the phase image of sample whose optical path difference is less than the equivalent wavelength can be obtained directly and quickly by dualwavelength DHM; a numerical simulation experiment is carried out. The computergenerated cone is a phase object with a maximum phase height of . The simulation parameters of cone are as follows: , , in which each single wavelength is less than the optical path difference. According to (6), the equivalent wavelength is , which means that the dualwavelength phase unwrapping will obtain a continuous phase distribution. Based on the designed height, the wrapping phase distribution of singlewavelength and the phase distribution of equivalent wavelength are shown in Figure 3, respectively.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
To demonstrate the advantages and compare the unwrapping speed of the dualwavelength DHM and traditional singlewavelength DHM, a wrapped phase image is chosen to obtain the final height distribution by unwrapping procedure, which is named the qualityguided phase unwrapping algorithm. And the results for through the qualityguided phase unwrapping algorithm [31, 32] are shown in Figure 4.
The height distributions of cone by dualwavelength DHM and qualityguided phase unwrapping method are compared. And the results are shown in Table 1. The results show that both of them can accurately obtain the height distribution of the cone, but in terms of time, the dualwavelength holographic microscopy in the system is faster. The speed of reconstruction by the proposed system is 37.9 times more than the value of the qualityguided phase unwrapping method.

3.3. Optical Experiment
3.3.1. Quantitative Phase Imaging of USAF 1951 Target
Based on the dualwavelength phase imaging system, the surface of an USAF 1951 target was measured. At the same time, the target was also measured by the scanning threedimensional profiler (NanoMap 500LS, AEP Technology Inc., USA) and the results showed that the height was about . Since the sample height is much smaller than the singlewavelength, the phase distribution of the sample can be obtained directly. Figures 5 and 6 present the measurement results using traditional singlewavelength and dualwavelength, respectively.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(a)
(b)
In the reconstruction process, filtering and secondary phase distortion compensation processing are performed [33–35]. The hologram is spectrally separated by Fourier transform. The microscope objective lens will introduce a secondary phase distortion factor in the system. In order to obtain the real phase, two holograms are recorded, which are the reference holograms for the background of the hologram and the hologram of measured sample. The real phase can be obtained by subtracting the two reconstruction phases of hologram.
The comparison of the height distribution curve along the middle symmetrical line of phase with different wavelength (in Figures 5(a), 5(b), and 6(a)) is shown in Figure 7. The height distribution along the middle symmetrical line of sample was scanned by NanoMap 500LS and its absolute height was measured to be 54 nm. The average absolute height and the relative error between the measurement result and scanning result using three measurement methods are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 shows that the result of the equivalent wavelength is much closer to scanning value. From the experimental results, it can be seen that both the traditional DHM and the dualwavelength DHM can obtain the phase distribution of the object surface. It is not hard to see that the system of dualwavelength DHM can accurately obtain the threedimensional morphology distribution of the object surface. The results prove that the measurement accuracy and stability of the proposed system are better than the traditional single wavelength.
3.3.2. Quantitative Phase Imaging of Groove
The transparent groove standard plate, which is artificially designed, was used as an experimental sample to measure its threedimensional appearance. The width of groove is and the depth is . Figure 8(a) shows the phase distribution measured by wavelength, . Figure 8(b) shows the phase distribution measured by wavelength, . It is clear to see that there is phase folding in the phase distribution at each single wavelength. The phase distribution measured by the dual wavelength interference is shown in Figure 9.
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
The height distribution of the middle symmetrical line of the groove (Figure 9(a)) is obtained by the median filtering, which is shown in Figure 10. According to the formula of the surface profile distribution and phase distribution (in (5)), the height difference between the base and the bottom of the groove . The relative error between the actual groove height and experimental result is , which is in good agreement with the theoretical values.
4. Conclusions
In order to solve the quantitative phase imaging problem of traditional digital holographic microscopy system for the large gradient of object surface, a dualwavelength preamplification digital holographic microscopy optical system is proposed. The numerical simulation and experiments are carried out and the effectiveness of the system is verified. The experimental results of the sample phase imaging of the traditional DHM and dualwavelength preamplification DHM system are compared. The results show that the experimental system can effectively overcome the limitations of the singlewavelength method in the imaging of complex surface objects, increase the observation speed, and simplify the reconstruction process, which further validates the effectiveness of the experimental system for quantitative phase imaging.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11272368 and 51875068), the International Cooperation Special Project in Science and Technology of China (No. 2015DFR70480), the Chongqing Municipal Education Commission’s science and technology research project (KJ1600929), and the Graduate Innovation Foundation of Chongqing University of Technology (No. ycx2018216).
References
 A. Barty, K. A. Nugent, D. Paganin, and A. Roberts, “Quantitative optical phase microscopy,” Optics Expresss, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 817–819, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Cuche, F. Bevilacqua, and C. Depeursinge, “Digital holography for quantitative phasecontrast imaging,” Optics Expresss, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 291–293, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Finizio, C. Magro, G. Pierattini et al., “Compensation of the inherent wave front curvature in digital holographic coherent microscopy for quantitative phasecontrast imaging,” Applied Optics, vol. 42, no. 11, p. 1938, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 T. Tahara, R. Mori, S. Kikunaga, Y. Arai, and Y. Takaki, “Dualwavelength phaseshifting digital holography selectively extracting wavelength information from wavelengthmultiplexed holograms,” Optics Express, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 2810–2813, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Li, Y. Wang, and Q. H. Wang, “Modified integral imaging reconstruction and encryption using an improved SR reconstruction algorithm,” Optics & Lasers in Engineering, pp. 112–162, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Li, D. Xiao, and Q.H. Wang, “Errorfree holographic frames encryption with CA pixelpermutation encoding algorithm,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 100, pp. 200–207, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Jeon, J. Lee, J. Cho, S. Jang, Y. Kim, and N. Park, “Wavelengthmultiplexed digital holography for quantitative phase measurement using quantum dot film,” Optics Express, vol. 26, no. 21, p. 27305, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Cho, D. Kim, Y. Yu, W. Jung, and S. Shin, “Dualwavelength Digital Holography Microscope for BGA Measurement Using Partial Coherence Sources,” Journal of the Optical Society of Korea, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 352–356, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Cho, J. Lim, S. Jeon et al., “Dualwavelength offaxis digital holography using a single lightemitting diode,” Optics Express, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 2123–2131, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
 V. Bianco, P. Memmolo, and M. Leo, “Strategies for reducing speckle noise in digital holography,” Light Science & Applications, p. 7, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
 Z. Gang, Z. Zhixiong, W. Huarui, and Y. Yan, “Near realtime digital holographic microscope based on GPU parallel computing,” in Proceedings of the SPIE 2017 International Conference on Optical Instruments and Technology: Optical Systems and Modern Optoelectronic Instruments, p. 10616, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
 Z. Zhao, “A holographic display method combing amplitude of real picture and phase of hologram,” Pro. SPIE, vol. 10255, Article ID 1025503, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Kühn, J. Conchello, C. J. Cogswell et al., “Realtime dualwavelength digital holographic microscopy for extended measurement range with enhanced axial resolution,” Biomedical Optics International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Gao, Z. Jiang, Y. Wang et al., “Phase imaging for photorefractive holographic gratings with dualwavelength digital holography,” in Proceedings of the Photonics Asia, p. 85561G, Beijing, China. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Zeng, F. Wang, H. Lei, X. Hu, and X. Hu, “Surface profile measurement of microstructures based on dualwavelength digital microscopic imageplane holography,” Guangxue Xuebao/Acta Optica Sinica, vol. 33, no. 10, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
 C. J. Mann, P. R. Bingham, V. C. Paquit, and K. W. Tobin, “Quantitative phase imaging by threewavelength digital holography,” Optics Express, vol. 16, no. 13, pp. 9753–9764, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Peiyong, 3D Topography Recovery of Objects Based on Digital Holographic Technology, Nanjing Normal University, 2011.
 D. Parshall and M. K. Kim, “Digital holographic microscopy with dualwavelength phase unwrapping,” Applied Optics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 451–459, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Khmaladze, M. Kim, and C.M. Lo, “Phase imaging of cells by simultaneous dualwavelength reflection digital holography,” Optics Express, vol. 16, no. 15, pp. 10900–10911, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Kou, E. Li, J. Di, Y. Zhang, M. Li, and J. Zhao, “Surface morphology measurement of tiny object based on dualwavelength digital holography,” Zhongguo Jiguang, vol. 41, no. 2, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
 D. G. Abdelsalam and D. Kim, “Twowavelength inline phaseshifting interferometry based on polarizing separation for accurate surface profiling,” Applied Optics, vol. 50, no. 33, pp. 6153–6161, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Yunxin, W. Dayong, Y. Yishu et al., “Application and Analysis in the Biomedicine Field Using Digital Holographic Technology,” Chinese Journal of Lasers, vol. 41, no. 2, Article ID 002, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Khmaladze, E. Seeley, J. Jasensky et al., “Dual wavelength digital holographic imaging of cells with phase background subtraction,” 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 D. G. Abdelsalam, R. Magnusson, and D. Kim, “Singleshot, dualwavelength digital holography based on polarizing separation,” Applied Optics, vol. 50, no. 19, pp. 3360–3368, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Grare, S. Coetmellec, D. Allano, G. Grehan, M. Brunel, and D. Lebrun, “Dual wavelength digital holography for 3D particle image velocimetry,” Journal of the European Optical Society: Rapid Publications, vol. 10, no. 3, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Yanan, L. Junshen, L. Yuan et al., “ThreeDimensional Displacement Tracking Technique of Particle Based on Digital Holographic Microscopy,” Chinese Journal of Lasers, pp. 44–12, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 B. Rappaz, P. Marquet, E. Cuche, Y. Emery, C. Depeursinge, and P. J. Magistretti, “Measurement of the integral refractive index and dynamic cell morphometry of living cells with digital holographic microscopy,” Optics Express, vol. 13, no. 23, pp. 9361–9373, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Boss, P. T. So, E. Beaurepaire et al., “Dualwavelength Digital Holography for quantification of cell volume and integral refractive index (RI),” in Proceedings of the European Conferences on Biomedical Optics, p. 808608, Munich, Germany. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Frómeta, G. Moreno, J. Ricardo et al., “Optimized setup for integral refractive index direct determination applying digital holographic microscopy by reflection and transmission,” Optics Communications, vol. 387, pp. 252–256, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Yanan, L. Hai, L. Yuan et al., “Compensation of the Phase Aberrationsin Digital Holographic Microscopy Based on Reference Lens Method,” Acta Photonica Sinica, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 216–222, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Lu, X. Wang, and X. Zhang, “Weighted leastsquares phase unwrapping algorithm based on derivative variance correlation map,” Optik  International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 62–66, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Li, W. Chen, and X. Su, “Reliabilityguided phase unwrapping in wavelettransform profilometry,” Applied Optics, vol. 47, no. 18, pp. 3369–3377, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Wenjing, X. Qiangsheng, and Y. Yingjie, “Compensation for the Quadratic Phase Aberration in Off2axis Digital Micro2holography,” Acta Photonica Sinica, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1972–1976, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 Z. Wang, Y. Chen, and Z. Jiang, “Dualwavelength digital holographic phase reconstruction based on a polarizationmultiplexing configuration,” Chinese Optics Letters, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Liu, “Dynamic phasecontrast microscopy of living cells by digital holography,” Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1186–1188, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Lin Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.