Sum Squeezing of the Field Amplitude in Frequency Upconversion Process

Giri, Dilip Kumar; Choudhary, Binod Kumar

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1483710

International Journal of Optics

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 1483710 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1483710

Sum Squeezing of the Field Amplitude in Frequency Upconversion Process

Dilip Kumar Giri¹and Binod Kumar Choudhary²

Academic Editor: Paramasivam Senthilkumaran

Received04 Oct 2019

Revised18 Dec 2019

Accepted31 Dec 2019

Published01 Feb 2020

Abstract

Sum squeezing of the field amplitude is studied in the nondegenerate and degenerate frequency upconversion process under the short interaction time. It is shown that sum squeezing can be converted into normal squeezing via sum-frequency generation in the nondegenerate frequency upconversion process, while the amplitude-squared squeezing of the fundamental mode directly changed into the squeezing of the harmonic in the degenerate frequency upconversion process. All reachable conditions of uncorrelated modes for obtaining a sum squeezing in two modes and its dependence on the squeezing of individual field modes are investigated. It is found that the squeezed states are associated with large number of pump photons. It is also confirmed that the higher-order squeezing (sum squeezing) is directly associated with coupling of the field and interaction time.

1. Introduction

Over the past years, the squeezing [1–6] in quantized electromagnetic fields has received a great deal of attention because of its wide applications in many branches of science and technology, especially for low quantum fluctuations [7–9] having potential application in optical telecommunication [10], quantum cryptography [11, 12], and others. It is a consequence of uncertainty relations. A state is squeezed when the quantum fluctuation (amplitude noise or phase noise) in one variable is reduced below the symmetric limit at the expense of the increased quantum fluctuation in the conjugate variable such that the Heisenberg uncertainty relation is not violated. It has been focused on theoretical as well as experimental evidences of squeezed states in various nonlinear optical processes, such as harmonic generation [13–16], multiphoton processes [17–20], and Raman and hyper-Raman processes [21–25]. Hong and Mandel [26, 27] and further Hillery [28] have introduced the notion of higher-order squeezing of quantised electromagnetic field as generalization of the much discussed normal squeezing and followed by [29] for improving the performance of many optical devices. Squeezing and photon statistical effect of the field amplitude in optical parametric processes and in Raman and hyper-Raman scattering has been reported by Perina et al. [30] in which it is demonstrated that squeezing accompanies antibunching very often, but not always. In some cases, squeezing may occur and antibunching may not and vice versa. Kim and Yoon [31] have also studied higher-order sub-Poissonian statistics of light and pointed out the nonclassical measure of the higher-order sub-Poissonian photon statistics of the number state is half as same as that of the known lowest order. Recently, Prakash and Mishra [32, 33] have also reported the higher-order sub-Poissonian photon statistics and their use in detection of Hong and Mandel squeezing and amplitude-squared squeezing. Another type of seminal paper on higher-order squeezing, called sum and difference squeezing, was proposed by Hillery [34] for the two modes which are in fact the simplest versions of multimode higher-order squeezing. These concepts have been generalized to include three modes for sum and difference squeezing [35–37] as well as an arbitrary number of modes for sum and difference squeezing [38–40]. Furthermore, more recently, Prakash and Shukla [41], Mukherjee et al. [42], and Mukherjee et al. [43] have also studied and reported about sum and difference squeezing and their detections in some nonlinear optical processes.

The objective of this paper is to study the sum squeezing in the nondegenerate and degenerate frequency upconversion process under the short-time scale based on a fully quantum approach. It is a higher-order squeezing of the radiation field to achieve significantly larger quantum noise reduction. Since higher-order squeezing is the higher powers of the field amplitude, which is directly associated with the large numbers of photons that make it possible to achieve significantly larger noise reduction than ordinary squeezing. This motivates us to study sum squeezing (higher-order) in the frequency upconversion process in the line of seminal paper [34]. The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 gives the definition of one- and two-mode higher-order squeezing. Sum squeezing of the field amplitude in the nondegenerate frequency upconversion process is investigated in Section 3. Detection of sum squeezing of two-mode field in this process is also studied in Section 3. In Section 4, sum squeezing of the field amplitude in the degenerate frequency upconversion process is studied and the relation between sum squeezing and amplitude-squared squeezing is established. Finally, we conclude the paper in Section 5.

2. Definition of One- and Two-Mode Higher-Order Squeezing

Suppose a single mode of radiation field having frequency with creation and annihilation operators a^† and a, respectively, and defining amplitude-squared squeezing in terms of operators Y₁ and Y₂ given bywhere and are slowly varying operators.

Equation (1) obeys the commutation relationwhere is the number operator.

Relation (2) leads to the uncertainty relation :

Equation (3) exists amplitude-squared squeezing if it follows the condition:where j = 1 or 2 and ΔY₁ and ΔY₂ are the uncertainties in the quadrature operators Y₁ and Y₂, respectively.

A quantum state is amplitude-squared squeezed in the Y₁ direction if (ΔY₁)² < and is amplitude-squared squeezed in the Y₂ direction if (ΔY₂)²< .

Now, for two modes having frequency and with creation (annihilation) operators a^†(a) and b^†(b), let us introduce two operators which correspond to real and imaginary parts of the product of the field amplitudes aswhere A = a exp(iω_at) and B = b exp(iω_bt) are slowly varying operators.

Equations (5) and (6) follow the commutation relationand satisfy the uncertainty relation :where N_A = A^†A and N_B = B^†B are the number operators.

Sum squeezing in the W_j direction exists ifwhere j = 1 or 2 and ΔW₁ and ΔW₂ are the uncertainties in the quadrature operators W₁ and W₂, respectively.

A state is sum squeezed in the W₁ direction if (ΔW₁)² < and is sum squeezed in the W₂ direction if (ΔW₂)² < .

3. Sum Squeezing in the Nondegenerate Frequency Upconversion Process

Frequency upconversion, shown in Figure 1, is a three-wave interaction nonlinear optical phenomenon, in which two input photons (a signal and a pump photon) at different frequencies, ω_a and ω_b, annihilate and another photon at their sum frequency, ω_c, is simultaneously generated in the nonlinear optical medium.

It serves as basic building blocks for the implementation of quantum optical experiments. By using this technique, near-infrared light can be converted to light in the visible or near-visible range and therefore detected by commercially available visible detectors with high efficiency and low noise. It can be realized in nonlinear crystals, but the relatively low conversion efficiency requires a high-power laser or a resonant cavity [44]. This model is chosen to make a realistic one, and our theoretical discussions hold for all similar models.

The Hamiltonian of this process may be written as (ħ = 1)where a^†(a), b^†(b), and c^†(c) are the creation (annihilation) operators of the A, B, and C modes, respectively, and is the coupling constant between the two modes of the order of 10²–10⁴ per second and is proportional to the nonlinear susceptibility of the medium as well as the complex amplitude of the pump field [4, 30, 45]. However, to take care of complex , we have used in the place of [4].

Using the interaction Hamiltonian of equation (10) in the coupled Heisenberg equation of motion,where the dot denotes time derivative.

Equation (11) leads towhere A, B, and C are slowly varying operators, which are defined by A = a exp(iω_at), B = b exp(iω_bt), and C = c exp(iω_ct), with the relation ω_a + ω_b = ω_c. The operators A(t) and A^†(t) induce a slower dependence on time as compared to fast variation during the interaction between modes.

The system evolution during a short period of time is practically relevant because the actual interaction is in fact very short. Hence, the interaction time is taken to be short, of the order of 10⁻¹⁰ s, and a nanosecond or picosecond pulse laser can also be used as the pump field for time resolved measurements [4, 44]. For real physical situation in the short-time scale gt (gt∼10⁻⁶), the expectation value of mean pump photon numbers is very large and it is possible to obtain much simpler approximate analytical formulas describing the variances [4].

Using Taylor’s expansion on A(t) as and keeping terms up to second order in t, we havewhere and = and after simplification, we getwhere .

Similarly,

Also,

Let us examine squeezing in the C mode, and we define two general quadrature components:

Using equations (18) and (19) in equations (20) and (21), we obtain

At t = 0, for uncorrelated modes, we get

If initially the C mode is in a coherent state, thenand equations (24) and (25) reduce to

Equations (27) and (28) establish the relation between sum squeezing and normal squeezing in the frequency upconversion process. We find that if the input state is sum squeezed in the W₂ or W₁ direction, then normal squeezing will occur in the X_1C or X_2C direction, respectively. This result suggests a method for detection of nonclassical properties of radiation in the frequency upconversion process.

We plot a graph (Figures 2 and 3) between left-hand side of equations (27) and (28) say S_S and , respectively, versus with typical values (ΔW₂)² = (ΔW₁)² = so that it could satisfy equation (9).

The steady fall of the curves infers that the sum squeezing exists and responses nonlinearly to the number of pump photons. It shows that when increases, the degree of sum squeezing also increases, i.e., S_S is getting more negative. This confirms that the squeezed states are associated with large number of pump photons. It also confirms that the higher-order squeezing (sum squeezing) is directly associated with the coupling of the field and interaction time. Hence, optimum squeezing can be realized in short-time scale.

Comparing Figures 2 and 3, we inferred that the depth of nonclassicality is increasing with an increase of . Hence, it is inferred that a higher multiphoton absorption process is suitable for generation of optimum squeezed light.

It is also of interest to study sum squeezing in the C mode as a function of time; we define the quadrature operators as follows:

Under short-time approximation, we keep terms up to first order in “gt” in Taylor’s expansion to get

Using equations (31) and (32) in equations (14)–(17) gives

Using equations (33)–(36) in equation (29), we find

As the wave function of the system starts as a coherent state at t = 0 and evolves as a squeezed state at a later time [46], we use the initial coherent state.

Now, initially we consider a quantum state as a product of coherent states |α> and |β> for the pump modes A and B, respectively, and |γ> for the sum-frequency mode C, i.e.,

Using equation (38) in equation (37), we obtain

The numbers of photons are

Using equation (38), we obtain

Subtraction of equation (44) from equation (41) yieldswhere .

Equation (45) means that squeezing of W_1C will occur whenever < 0 and > 0. It suffices to choose , and the square bracket becomes nonnegative.

Let us now study the dependence of sum squeezing for two-mode states on squeezing of individual modes in which the modes are uncorrelated, i.e., mode in a coherent state at t = 0.

We define for two-mode sum squeezing as [34]

The squeezed state exists if for some .

Using equation (46), we obtain

Hence, the variance of field is

Using equation (9) in equation (49), we find

A state is squeezed if the term in brackets becomes negative. This term is smallest when

If satisfies (51), then

Therefore, a state is sum squeezed if and only if

If the modes are uncorrelated, then equation (53) becomes

Let us consider the first case. If the modes are uncorrelated, i.e., there is no linear relationship between A and B or <A> = <B> = 0 and neither the A nor the B mode is squeezed [34], then

Furthermore, if none of the A and B modes are squeezed, i.e., at coherent state, none of the pairs can be sum squeezed [34], i.e.,

Comparing equations (54) and (57), we find that the A and B modes are not sum squeezed.

In the second case, if the A mode is squeezed and the B mode is in a coherent state of amplitude β, then we havewhere <N_B> = |β|² for coherent states and the inequality in equation (54) is fulfilled; hence, state is sum squeezed.

In the third case, if the B mode is squeezed and the A mode is in a coherent state of amplitude α, we then havewhere <N_A> = |α|² and the inequality in equation (54) is satisfied hence the A and B modes are sum squeezed.

Finally, if A and B modes are squeezed, then we have

This satisfies condition (54) and hence the state is sum squeezed.

4. Sum Squeezing in Degenerate Frequency Upconversion Process

If all the two pump modes are of the same frequency (ω_a = ω_b), the process reduces to second harmonic generation described by the Hamiltonian H′ given by

Equation (15) leads to coupled Heisenberg equations of motion:

Using Taylor’s expansion upto second order in gt, we obtain

Using equations (20) and (21), this gives

If the C mode is initially in a coherent state at t = 0, then we obtain

From equations (67) and (68), we infer that X_1C becomes squeezed if Y₂ is squeezed and X_2C is squeezed if Y₁ is squeezed. In other way, the C mode is squeezed in the X_1C direction if the fundamental modes are sum squeezed in the Y₂ direction and the C mode is squeezed in the X_2C direction if the fundamental modes are sum squeezed in the Y₁ direction. These equations show that the amplitude-squared squeezing of the fundamental can be turned directly into the squeezing of the harmonic in the degenerate frequency upconversion process. This result suggests a way to detect higher-order squeezing in this process.

We plot a graph (Figure 4) between left-hand side of equation (67) or (68) say S_SW and with typical values (ΔY₂)² = (ΔY₁)² = so that it could satisfy equation (4).

Figure 4 shows that the plot responses nonlinearly to increase photon numbers. This confirms that the squeezed states are associated with large number of pump photons. It also confirms that the higher-order squeezing (sum squeezing) is directly associated with the coupling of the field and interaction time. Hence, optimum squeezing can be realized in short-time scale.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we have concluded that sum squeezing can be turned into normal squeezing via sum-frequency generation in the nondegenerate frequency upconversion process. It is also established that the amplitude-squared (higher-order) squeezing of the fundamental can be converted directly into the squeezing of the harmonic in the degenerate frequency upconversion process. These findings suggest a method for generation and detection of higher-order squeezing in the frequency upconversion process. It is observed that the sum squeezing will occur conditional to the case of first-order coupling, while to the case of second-order coupling gives unconditional sum squeezing in nondegenerate as well as in the degenerate frequency upconversion process.

We have examined all possible conditions for an uncorrelated two-mode state. If both modes are not squeezed, then the state is not sum squeezed. If one mode is squeezed and the second one is in a coherent state, then the state is sum squeezed. Finally, if both modes are squeezed, then the state may or may not be sum squeezed in the nondegenerate frequency upconversion process. The steady fall of the curves infers that the sum squeezing exists and responses nonlinearly to the number of pump photons. It shows that the squeezed states are associated with large number of pump photons. It also confirms that the higher-order squeezing (sum squeezing) is directly associated with the coupling of the field and interaction time. Hence, optimum squeezing can be realized in short-time scale. It is found that the depth of nonclassicality is increasing with an increase of the number of pump photons. Hence, it is inferred that a higher multiphoton absorption process is suitable for generation of optimum squeezed light.

These findings suggest and may help in selecting a suitable process to generate optimum squeezing of the radiation and further can be useful as a resource to improve high-quality optical telecommunication [47]. The results obtained in this paper are of interest for new experiments on the study of nonlinear optical processes in dielectric media using ultrashort intense laser pulses as exciting radiation, and the effects of damping and decoherence as well as higher-order time terms could be investigated.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

D. F. Walls, “Squeezed states of light,” Nature, vol. 306, no. 5939, pp. 141–146, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Loudon and P. L. Knight, “Squeezed light,” Journal of Modern Optics, vol. 34, no. 6-7, pp. 709–759, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Teich and B. E. A. Saleh, “Squeezed state of light,” Quantum Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 153–191, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Perina, Quantum Statistics of Linear and Nonlinear Optical Phenomena, Chapters 9, 10 and 11, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1991.
L. Mandel, “Non-Classical states of the electromagnetic field,” Physica Scripta, vol. T12, pp. 34–42, 1986.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. V. Dodonov, “‘Nonclassical’ states in quantum optics: a ‘squeezed’ review of the first 75 years,” Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. R1–R33, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, “Can the channel capacity of a light-wave communication system be increased by the use of photon-number-squeezed light?” Physical Review Letters, vol. 58, no. 25, pp. 2656–2659, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Wódkiewicz, “On the quantum mechanics of squeezed states,” Journal of Modern Optics, vol. 34, no. 6-7, pp. 941–948, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. Kimble and D. F. Walls, “Introduction,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1450–1741, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yuen and J. Shapiro, “Optical communication with two-photon coherent states—part I: quantum-state propagation and quantum-noise,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 657–668, 1978.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, and N. D. Mermin, “Quantum cryptography without Bell’s theorem,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 557–559, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kempe, “Multiparticle entanglement and its applications to cryptography,” Physical Review A, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 910–916, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Mandel, “Squeezing and photon antibunching in harmonic generation,” Optics Communications, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 437–439, 1982.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hillery, “Squeezing of the square of the field amplitude in second harmonic generation,” Optics Communications, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 135–138, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kielich, R. Tanaś, and R. Zawodny, “Squeezing in the third-harmonic field generated by self-squeezed light,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1627–1632, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-B. Zhan, “Amplitude-cubed squeezing in harmonic generations,” Physics Letters A, vol. 160, no. 6, pp. 498–502, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Perina, V. Perinova, C. Sibilia, and M. Bertolotti, “Quantum statistics of four-wave mixing,” Optics Communications, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 285–289, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. K. Razmi and J. H. Eberly, “Degenerate four-wave mixing and squeezing in pumped three-level atomic systems,” Optics Communications, vol. 76, no. 3-4, pp. 265–267, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. K. Giri and P. S. Gupta, “The squeezing of radiation in four-wave mixing processes,” Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 91–96, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. K. Giri and P. S. Gupta, “Short-time squeezing effects in spontaneous and stimulated six-wave mixing process,” Optics Communications, vol. 221, no. 1–3, pp. 135–143, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Perina and J. Krepelka, “Stimulated Raman scattering of squeezed light with pump depletion,” Journal of Modern Optics, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 2137–2151, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Perina and J. Krepelka, “Quantum statistics of stimulated Raman and hyper-Raman scattering of squeezed light with pump depletion,” Journal of Modern Optics, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1029–1041, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kumar and P. S. Gupta, “Short-time squeezing in spontaneous Raman and stimulated Raman scattering,” Quantum and Semiclassical Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 835–841, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. K. Giri and P. S. Gupta, “Higher-order squeezing of the electromagnetic field in spontaneous and stimulated Raman processes,” Journal of Modern Optics, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 1769–1781, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kumar and P. S. Gupta, “Higher-order amplitude squeezing in hyper-Raman scattering under short-time approximation,” Quantum and Semiclassical Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1053–1060, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. K. Hong and L. Mandel, “Higher-order squeezing of a quantum field,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 323–325, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. K. Hong and L. Mandel, “Generation of higher-order squeezing of quantum electromagnetic fields,” Physical Review A, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 974–982, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hillery, “Amplitude-squared squeezing of the electromagnetic field,” Physical Review A, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 3796–3802, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hillery, “Phase-space representation of amplitude-squared squeezing,” Physical Review A, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 4944–4950, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Perina, V. Perinova, and J. Kodousek, “On the relations of antibunching, sub-poissonian statistics and squeezing,” Optics Communications, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 210–214, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kim and T. H. Yoon, “Higher order sub-poissonian photon statistics of light,” Optics Communications, vol. 212, no. 1–3, pp. 107–114, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Prakash and D. K. Mishra, “Higher order sub-poissonian photon statistics and their use in detection of Hong and Mandel squeezing and amplitude-squared squeezing,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2291–2297, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. K. Mishra, “Study of higher order non-classical properties of squeezed Kerr state,” Optics Communications, vol. 283, no. 17, pp. 3284–3290, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hillery, “Sum and difference squeezing of the electromagnetic field,” Physical Review A, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 3147–3155, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kumar and P. S. Gupta, “Sum squeezing in four-wave sum frequency generation,” Optics Communications, vol. 136, no. 5-6, pp. 441–446, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kumar and P. S. Gupta, “Difference squeezing in four-wave difference-frequency generation,” Quantum and Semiclassical Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 485–492, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. K. Giri and P. S. Gupta, “Squeezing effects in the sum and difference of the field amplitude in the Raman process,” Modern Physics Letters B, vol. 19, no. 25, pp. 1261–1276, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Olsen and R. J. Horowicz, “Squeezing in the sum and difference fields in second harmonic generation,” Optics Communications, vol. 168, no. 1–4, pp. 135–143, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. B. An and T. Vo, “General multimode sum-squeezing,” Physics Letters A, vol. 261, no. 1-2, pp. 34–39, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. B. An and T. Tinh, “General multimode difference-squeezing,” Physics Letters A, vol. 270, no. 1-2, pp. 27–40, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Prakash and P. Shukla, “Detection of sum and difference squeezing,” IOSR Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 43–47, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Mukherjee, A. Giri, B. Sarkar, and B. Sen, “Sum and difference squeezing in second harmonic generation,” International Research Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 39–42, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Mukherjee and P. C. Jana, “Higher-order squeezing of a generic quadratically-coupled optomechanical system,” IOSR Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 90–95, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Ma, O. Slattery, and X. Tang, “Single photon frequency up-conversion and its applications,” Physics Reports, vol. 521, no. 2, pp. 69–94, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Tanas, “Squeezing from an anharmonic oscillator model: (a^†)²a² versus (a^†a)² interaction Hamiltonian,” Physics Letters A, vol. 141, no. 5-6, pp. 217–220, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. F. Lo, “Time evolution of a charged oscillator with a time-dependent mass and frequency in a time-dependent electromagnetic field,” Physical Review A, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 5262–5265, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. K. Giri, R. P. Singh, and A. Bandyopadhyay, “Displacement gain dependent fidelity in quantum teleportation using entangled two-mode squeezed light,” Optical and Quantum Electronics, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1127–1137, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Dilip Kumar Giri and Binod Kumar Choudhary. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

340

Downloads

773

Citations