Simulation and Optimization of Temperature Effect in Solar Cells CdTe with Back Connection Cu<sub>2</sub>O

Khaledi, Parinaz; Behboodnia, Mahdi; Karimi, Mohammad

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1207082

International Journal of Optics

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 1207082 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1207082

Simulation and Optimization of Temperature Effect in Solar Cells CdTe with Back Connection Cu₂O

Parinaz Khaledi,¹Mahdi Behboodnia,¹and Mohammad Karimi²

Academic Editor: Sulaiman W. Harun

Received01 Nov 2021

Revised12 Jan 2022

Accepted21 Jan 2022

Published23 Feb 2022

Abstract

One of the least studied and most important parameters that are ignored in the simulation and construction of solar cells is temperature. The effect of temperature is complex, and the solar cell is a very temperature-sensitive device. Constructing high-efficient solar cells is an essential task. In this paper, we simulated and studied the effect of temperature on the characteristics of FTO/SnO₂/CdS/CdTe/Cu₂O solar cells using MATLAB and Maple software. For this purpose, first, the transport and Poisson equations, the continuity of the current, and the transfer of the carrier were solved by the drift-diffusion method and then they were discretized. We examined the cell temperature in the range of 200 to 400 Kelvin. The results showed that increasing temperature from 200 to 400 Kelvin open-circuit voltage decreases the short-circuit current. Furthermore, the filling factor first increases and then decreases. The efficiency of the solar cell also decreases sharply with increasing temperature. The results showed that, by decreasing the temperature of the solar cell, an efficiency of more than 32% can be achieved in cadmium telluride solar cells with FTO/SnO₂/CdS/CdTe/Cu₂O structure.

1. Introduction

Urbanization and rapid growth in industrialization extensively bring significant increments in environmental pollution and global warming, which are vital issues alongside the energy crisis that oblige scientists to seek a suitable alternative energy source to rescue the Earth and the environment. Thin-film photovoltaic (PV) solar cell technology has grasped global attention among researchers due to its outstanding promises for renewable energy resources and substitution with fossil fuels to meet human energy needs [1]. Solar cells (SCs) as promising renewable energy sources are attracting the attention of researchers. A challenge in modern solar energy is the development of cost-effective devices. Achieving this goal requires a proper understanding of the basic physical processes of device performance. Several attempts have been made to understand the mechanism of the operating of solar cells. The impacts of variables such as morphology, light intensity, and light absorption on device performance and primarily on short-circuit current characteristics have been extensively investigated by previous researchers [2]. The II-VI, I-III-VI, photovoltaic materials, such as CdTe, Cu(In, Ga)Se₂, Cu₂ZnSn(S, Se)₄, and methylammonium lead triiodide (MAPbI₃), respectively, have direct bandgaps that enable light to be absorbed and converted into electricity in semiconductor layers that are just several micrometers thick. So far, more than 20 gigawatts of CdTe-based solar technology has been installed, with module efficiency now averaging 17–18% at cost-competitiveness with Si modules. CdTe can achieve high carrier density and longevity, enabling solar cells with open-circuit voltages of more than one [3]. The high absorption coefficient of cadmium telluride is more than 5 × 10⁵ and the direct band distance is 1.5 volts, which corresponds exactly to the solar spectrum and turns it into a complete solar cell material that can absorb most of the photons in the visible range, which have more energy than the bandgap to convert maximum sunlight into electricity [4]. So far, many studies have been done on the effect of different parameters on the functions of cadmium telluride solar cells, including the study of Jaker Hossain et al. [5] which presents that using the CdSe and Sb₂Se₃ Back Surface Field (BSF) layers significantly increased the efficiency of solar cells [5]. Other researchers have proposed different simulation methods to study the performance of cadmium telluride solar cells using doping concentration, layer thickness, and carrier lifetimes [6]. There is a lot of research on solar cells, especially cadmium telluride solar cells [7–10]. And to date, many studies have been done. Our goal in this article is to study one of the most important parameters in cadmium telluride solar cells, which has been less studied in previous works or not mentioned in most studies. An important parameter that we will examine in this research is temperature. The effect of temperature is complex and solar cells are a very temperature-sensitive device; therefore, the working temperature of solar cells is very important to achieve high performance of solar cells. When a solar cell operates at high temperatures, photovoltaic materials and device properties such as band gaps and absorption coefficients change. However, in most articles, the study of temperature changes is ignored and examines the solar cell only at room temperature [11–15]. Although experimental approaches in which studies are sometimes performed experimentally fail, attempts to analyze device performance through simulation models have shown particular success. The study of solar cell simulations is very useful for predicting the output performance of solar cells before the actual construction of the cell and will significantly reduce production costs and avoid excessive costs. Various tools for simulating solar cells are available, including wxAMPS, a 1D solar cell simulation program, Silvaco ATLAS software, SCAPS-1D software [16], GPVDM software, and more. So far, a lot of research has been done and published by these simulation tools [17–24]. We first did the programming in Maple software, and then we did the same again in MATLAB due to its high speed, and we checked the accuracy of programming as well as comparison of the results.

In this work, we will study the effect of temperature on open-circuit voltage, short-circuit current, charge coefficient, and efficiency in 5-layer solar cells with FTO/SnO₂/CdS/CdTe/Cu₂O structure by numerical simulation.

2. The Governing Physical Equations of the Problem

To begin with, the transport equations, the electron-hole equation, and the Poisson equation must be solved simultaneously. In some previous studies, a quasi-drift-diffusion model has been proposed in which only the electron and hole continuity equations were solved, without considering the Poisson equation. The cavity and Poisson equation as the extended one-dimensional drift-diffusion model can design, optimize, and describe the performance of various cell parameters [25].

The drift-diffusion equations can be obtained by solving the Boltzmann Transport equation (BTE) by solving for the moments of this equation. For steady-state and 1D geometry, the use of relaxation time approximation for the BTE results in

By equating the two relations above (1) and (2) and considering that F = ma, F = Eq, , , the BTE is represented as

The current density is defined as

= n e

In (4), the integral represents the first torque of the distribution function. Multiplying (3) by

And integrating obtains

Since the equilibrium distribution function in terms of is symmetric, the first integral from the left in (6) is zero.

Then,

Calculating the first integral in (9), by applying the fractional method,

The second integral in (9) is equal to where represents the mean square velocity. Equating mobility as in (9), we obtain

Thus the electric drift-diffusion current density for electrons and holes is obtained, respectively, aswhere and are the densities of electrons and holes and is the electric field, while and are the electron and hole mobilities and and are the electron and hole diffusivities.

For programming in MATLAB and Maple software, we have precisely discretized the governing physical equations. Generally, conservative schemes are achieved by subdivision of the computational domain into boxes surrounding the mesh points. Currents are defined on the boundaries of these elements, thus enforcing conservation. Consider the 1D electron current continuity equation under steady-state equations:which, by using half-point difference expansion based on the central difference scheme, giveswhere is the production rate, that is, the amount of charge produced per unit of time under light illumination.

Using the electric current density for the electrons in (12) and dividing both parts by givewhere .

By replacing these in (16), we acquire

Using the compound derivation rule, we have

Substituting the above relation in (17) achieves

Dividing (19) by and according to (20) and (21), we get (22):

We calculate with Laplace transforms and place it in (15).

Our goal is to obtain the discrete form of the continuity equations for electrons and holes. In this work for programming, we consider Laplacian transformation equations (23) to (27):

Using derivatives of (25) and (27), (28)–(31) are obtained:

Then by changing the variable , we obtain

By changing the variable in (22), we acquire

Replacing (30) by (32), we reach

And by placing (31) in (33), we will reach

We replace in (34) by and we come to relation

After simplification relation (35),

By dividing both sides of (36) by and after factoring and simplification,

After simplification and using the definition of Bernoulli function , we reach (38), which is a discrete form of the electric current density equation for electrons.

We obtained the same discrete form of the equations for the holes as

For software programming and simulation, we discretized other governing physical equations, such as the transport equation, the continuity equation, and the Poisson equation, just like the electric current density equations for electrons and holes, which were precisely discretized.

2.1. The Structure of the Studied Solar Cell

A group of researchers [4] studied the structure of this type of solar cell shown in Figure 1 using TCAD Silvaco-Atlas software and reported the optimal thicknesses for this type of structure using simulation. According to the reports provided in the source [4, 26], the optimal thicknesses for the layers FTO/SnO₂/CdS/CdTe/Cu₂O were reported as Cu₂O at 50 nm, CdTe at 2000 nm, CdS at 50 nm, SnO₂ at 100 nm, and FTO at 100 nm, respectively, with the doping concentrations of 5 × in Cu₂O, 2 × in CdTe, 1 × in CdS, 1 × SnO₂, and 3 × in FTO [4]. They did not study the effect of temperature changes and only reported the optimal thickness and impurity at 300 K. In our work, before investigating the effect of temperature changes, first, an FTO/SnO2/CdS/CdTe/Cu2O solar cell was simulated as a reference structure [4] at a constant temperature of 300 K to ensure the accuracy and consistency of the present results with previous data. The obtained photovoltaic parameters were then compared with the simulation results, in other words, short-circuit current density (Jsc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), filling factor (FF), and conversion efficiency (η) with the reference cell. A good match between the simulation results and the reference cell [4] indicates that the parameters and models used in the process simulation are correct.

To study the effect of temperature on various parameters in cadmium telluride solar cells, we considered a 5-layer solar cell containing FTO/SnO₂/CdS/CdTe/Cu₂O layers. The structure of this solar cell is shown in Figure 1.

Then, after simulation, we studied temperature changes from 200 to 400 Kelvin in this structure. We reported the effect of temperature changes on open-circuit voltage, short-circuit current, filling factor, and efficiency.

3. Result and Discussions

The cell efficiency as a function of p-CdTe absorber layer thickness is depicted in Figure 2. By increasing the thickness from 30 to 2000 nm, rapid evolution is observed and then becomes stable from almost 2000–4000 nm. With the increasing thickness, the absorption of the photons increases until the thickness reaches 2000 nm so that it could sufficiently absorb all the photons to get the highest efficiency of 24.40%. This value is in good agreement with the previously reported results [4, 26]. Thus, 2000 nm is used as an optimum thickness of the CdTe absorber layer in the rest of this work.

Figure 3 shows the temperature changes from 200 to 400 K in terms of open-circuit voltage when the thickness of CdTe is 2000 nm. In this temperature interval, the open-circuit voltage varies between 2.45 and 0.64 volts, so that when the temperature is 200 K, the open-circuit voltage has a maximum value of 2.45 volts. At 400 K, the open-circuit voltage drops to a minimum of 0.64 volts. In addition, at room temperature of 300 K, the value of the open-circuit voltage is equal to 1.03 volts, which corresponds exactly to the previous work [4] and confirms our results. In addition, in [27, 28], the open-circuit voltage decreased with increasing temperature, which can be a reason for the accuracy of our results.

Figure 4 reveals the short-circuit surface current density changes in the temperature range 200–400 K at a thickness of 2000 nm CdTe. At temperature of 200 K, the short-circuit surface current density is equal to 27.90 and has the highest value. Even at room temperature, 300 K, this value is equal to 27.59 , which is consistent with the results of previous work and proves the accuracy of the results. Finally, at a temperature of 400 K, the short-circuit surface current density has the lowest value of 27.15 . The results show that, with increasing temperature, the amount of short-circuit surface current density drops to a much lesser extent. In general, as the temperature increases from 200 to 400 K, the short-circuit current decreases imperceptibly. This trend of imperceptible reduction of short-circuit current with increasing temperature is consistent with the results of the previous two works [16, 27–29]. In [28], cadmium telluride solar cells with different dorsal connections have been studied. In their work, with increasing temperature from 300 to 380 K, the short-circuit current has decreased imperceptibly from 24.184575 to 24.169443 . In [27], cadmium telluride solar cells have been studied. In their work, as the temperature increased from 200 to 400 K, the short-circuit current decreased imperceptibly from 23.900 to 23.882 .

Figure 5 shows the filling factor versus the temperature variation from 200 to 400 Kelvin when the thickness of cadmium telluride is 2000 nm. The filling factor is in the range of 0.4707 to 0.8938, so that, at a temperature of about 200 Kelvin, the filling factor is equal to 0.4707, and at room temperature of 300 Kelvin, the filling factor reaches 0.8583, which is consistent with the previous works. Unlike open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current, which decreases with increasing temperature, the results show that the filling factor increases first and then decreases with increasing temperature. So that, from 200 to 330 Kelvin, the amount of filling factor increases and in 330 Kelvin reaches the maximum value and from 340 to 400 Kelvin the number of filling factors slightly decreases. In [28], cadmium telluride solar cells with different dorsal connections have been studied. In their work, with increasing temperature from 300 to 380 K, the filling factor first increases with increasing temperature and at 330 K, it reaches the maximum value and then decreases. In [27], cadmium telluride solar cells have been studied. In their work, with increasing the temperature from 200 to 400 K, the filling factor is first increased and at 350 K, it reaches the maximum value and then decreases. The trend of changes in the filling factor in [27, 28] confirms the correctness of our work.

Figure 6 shows the efficiency versus temperature changes from 200 to 400 K when the thickness of cadmium telluride is 2000 nm. The efficiency of the solar cell is in the range of 32.29% to 15.53% so that at a temperature of about 200 Kelvin, the efficiency is equal to 32.29%, and at room temperature of 300 Kelvin, the efficiency reaches 24.39%, which is consistent with previous work [4]. As with open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current, which decreases with increasing temperature, the results show that the efficiency decreases with increasing temperature. At a temperature of 400 K, the minimum efficiency is 15.53%. As the temperature increases, the efficiency of the cell decreases linearly which indicates the degree of stability of the cell at high temperatures. In all the simulation steps in this work, the mobility and bandgap are independent of temperature [27]. In [27], with increasing temperature from 200 to 400 K, the efficiency decreases linearly from 18.44% to 10.48%. In [16] where CdTe/CdS solar cells have been studied, the efficiency decreases linearly with increasing temperature. In addition, in [28], with increasing temperature from 300 to 380 K, the efficiency decreases linearly from 16.04% to 11.62%. In [16, 27, 28] with increasing temperature, the efficiency decreases linearly which confirms the results of our work.

For better observation and comparison, the variation of filling factor and efficiency in terms of temperature changes are shown simultaneously in Figure 7. Solar cell performance decreases with increasing temperature, indicating an increase in internal carrier recombination rates or dark current, caused by increased carrier concentration [27].

In addition, the efficiency measurement of a solar cell is given aswhere is the solar irradiance on Earth under the AM1.5 Global spectrum [29].

The short-circuit current and the open-circuit voltage are the maximum current and voltage in a solar cell, respectively. However, power output is zero at both of these values. The fill factor, FF, is a parameter that, in conjunction with Voc and Jsc, determines the maximum power from a solar cell. The FF is defined as the ratio of the maximum power from the solar cell to the product of Voc and Jsc.

Figure 8 shows the open-circuit voltage together with the short-circuit current versus temperature range 200–400 K. Both open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current decrease with increasing temperature.

A similar trend has been observed in earlier studies [28] for FTO/SnO₂/CdS/CdTe/Pt which has a similar structure to ours except with platin back contact.

Figure 9 shows the open-circuit voltage and efficiency (vertical axes on the left) and the filling factor and short-circuit current (vertical axes on the right) in terms of temperature as mentioned before, the trend of open-circuit voltage changes, short-circuit current, filling factor and efficiency in our work corresponds to [27, 28] which prove the correctness of our work.

4. Conclusion

Although the parameter temperature has a key role in solar cells, it is not much attended by many researchers. In this paper, we consider a multilayer solar cell consisting of FTO/SnO₂/CdS/CdTe/Cu₂O layers. The structure was optimized in previous studies at room temperature regardless of temperature changes. Till now temperature changes in this structure had not been simulated and studied. The temperature-dependent performance parameters, such as short-circuit current density (Jsc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), filling factor (FF), and conversion efficiency (η) of CdTe-based solar cell have been analyzed with the temperature change ranges from 200 to 400 K indicating the electrical properties such as Jsc and Voc are very important in solar cell performance. It was observed that temperature directly affects the electrical properties of CdTe solar cells. An increase in temperature due to solar illumination directly affects in poor performance of properties such as Jsc and Voc.

The novelty of our work is its ability in attaining confirmed accurate results and little effort in computational simulation executed. In other words, the main novelty of this article is that while it is simple, it has high accuracy. As the cell temperature increased from 200 to 400 K, the efficiency of the solar cells decreased from 32.29% to 15.53%. The filling factor also increased with increasing temperature from 200 to 400 Kelvin and at 330 Kelvin reached its maximum value of 0.9419 and then decreased. Open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current also decreased with increasing temperature from 200 to 400 Kelvin. Performance analysis of the numerical simulation using MATLAB shows that the theoretical efficiency of the CdTe-based solar cell has been improved to 32.29% with a fill factor of 0.4707, a short-circuit current of 27.9 , and an open-circuit voltage of 2.45 volts.

Data Availability

Data are available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

M. Hashemi, M. Minbashi, S. M. B. Ghorashi, and A. Ghobadi, “A modeling study on utilizing low temperature sprayed In2S3 as the buffer layer of CuBaSn (S, Se) solar cells,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. D. Iakobson, O. L. Gribkova, A. R. Tameev, and J. M. Nunzi, “A common optical approach to thickness optimization in polymer and perovskite solar cells,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5005-5006, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. K. Metzger, S. Grover, D. Lu et al., “Exceeding 20% efficiency with in situ group V doping in polycrystalline CdTe solar cells,” Nature Energy, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 837–845, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
I. E. Tinedert, A. Saadoune, I. Bouchama, and M. A. Saeed, “Numerical modelling and optimization of CdS/CdTe solar cell with incorporation of Cu2O HT-EBL layer,” Optical Materials, vol. 106, Article ID 109970, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kuddus, A. B. M. Ismail, and J. Hossain, “Design of a highly efficient CdTe-based dual-heterojunction solar cell with 44% predicted efficiency,” Solar Energy, vol. 221, pp. 488–501, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
D. K. Shah, D. Kc, M. Muddassir, M. S. Akhtar, C. Y. Kim, and O.-B. Yang, “A simulation approach for investigating the performances of cadmium telluride solar cells using doping concentrations, carrier lifetimes, thickness of layers, and band gaps,” Solar Energy, vol. 216, pp. 259–265, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Hatton, M. J. Watts, A. Abbas, J. M. Walls, R. Smith, and P. Goddard, “Chlorine activated stacking fault removal mechanism in thin film CdTe solar cells: the missing piece,” Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 4938-4939, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ablekim, J. N. Duenow, C. L. Perkins et al., “Exceeding 200-ns lifetimes in polycrystalline CdTe solar cells,” Solar RRL, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
G. V. Kaliyannan, R. Gunasekaran, S. Sivaraj, S. Jaganathan, and R. Rathanasamy, “Thin-film solar cells,” Fundamentals of Solar Cell Design, pp. 103–115, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Walker, M. E. Stuckelberger, T. Nietzold et al., “The nanoscale distribution of copper and its influence on charge collection in CdTe solar cells,” Nano Energy, vol. 91, Article ID 106595, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Deng, X. Sun, X. Lv et al., “All room-temperature processing efficient planar carbon-based perovskite solar cells,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 489, Article ID 229345, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Ouyang, J. Zheng, Z. Huang, L. Zhu, and W. C. H. Choy, “An efficacious multifunction codoping strategy on a room-temperature solution-processed hole transport layer for realizing high-performance perovskite solar cells,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 371–379, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Cao, A. Wang, X. Yu et al., “Room-temperature preparation of TiO₂/graphene composite photoanodes for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 586, pp. 326–334, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Huang, R. Zhang, X. Xia et al., “Room temperature processed double electron transport layers for efficient perovskite solar cells,” Nanomaterials, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 329, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-C. Lin, L.-Y. Chen, and T.-H. Lin, “Improving hysteresis of room-temperature air-quenching MAPbI3-xClx solar cells by using mixed-lead halide precursor,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 259, Article ID 124032, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Heriche, Z. Rouabah, and N. Bouarissa, “New ultra thin CIGS structure solar cells using SCAPS simulation program,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 42, no. 15, pp. 9524–9532, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Liu, Y. Sun, and A. Rockett, “A new simulation software of solar cells-wxAMPS,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 98, pp. 124–128, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Michael and A. Bates, “The design and optimization of advanced multijunction solar cells using the Silvaco ATLAS software package,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 87, no. 1-4, pp. 785–794, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Michael, A. D. Bates, and M. S. Green, “Silvaco ATLAS as a solar cell modeling tool,” in Proceedings of the Conference Record of the Thirty-First IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, pp. 719–721, IEEE, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA, January 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Mostefaoui, H. Mazari, S. Khelifi, A. Bouraiou, and R. Dabou, “Simulation of high efficiency CIGS solar cells with SCAPS-1D software,” Energy Procedia, vol. 74, pp. 736–744, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Mishra and R. K. Shukla, “Electrical and optical simulation of typical perovskite solar cell by GPVDM software,” Materials Today Proceedings, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Qu, L. Zhang, H. Wang, X. Song, Y. Zhang, and H. Yan, “Simulation of double buffer layer on CIGS solar cell with SCAPS software,” Optical and Quantum Electronics, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 1–14, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Fell, J. Schön, M. C. Schubert, and S. W. Glunz, “The concept of skins for silicon solar cell modeling,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 173, pp. 128–133, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Elbar and S. Tobbeche, “Numerical simulation of CGS/CIGS single and tandem thin-film solar cells using the Silvaco-Atlas software,” Energy Procedia, vol. 74, pp. 1220–1227, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Khaledi and Y. Abedini, “Simulation And Investigation of the Optical Properties of cds/cdte solar cells,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Optoelectronic, Applied Optics and Microelectronics (OAM-2019), Ardabil, Iran, August 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
I. E. Tinedert, F. Pezzimenti, M. L. Megherbi, and A. Saadoune, “Design and simulation of a high efficiency CdS/CdTe solar cell,” Optik, vol. 208, Article ID 164112, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Isa, I. Mustapha, and A. A. Yahaya, “Numerical modelling of the effect of temperature and thickness on the electrical properties of polycrystalline semi-conductor solar cells [CdTe and Cu (in, Ga) Se2 (CIGS)] using one dimensional device simulation,” IOP Conference Series: Earth And Environmental Science, vol. 730, no. No. 1, Article ID 012027, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Shukla and G. Panda, “The performance study of CdTe/CdS/SnO2 solar cell,” Materials Today Proceedings, vol. 26, pp. 487–491, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Green, Solar Cells: Operating Principles, Technology, and System Applications/Martin A. Green, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, c1982.

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Parinaz Khaledi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

823

Downloads

829

Citations