Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Photoenergy
Volume 2008, Article ID 563949, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/563949
Research Article

Hydrothermal Preparation of Visible-Light-Driven N-Br-Codoped Photocatalysts

1State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion, Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan 030001, China
2Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received 25 July 2007; Revised 14 November 2007; Accepted 20 January 2008

Academic Editor: Leonardo Palmisano

Copyright © 2008 Yonggang Sheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Using a facile hydrothermal method, N-Br-codoped photocatalyst that had intense absorption in visible region was prepared at low temperature ( ), through a direct reaction between nanocrystalline anatase solution and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). The results of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) showed the existence of N-Ti-N, O-Ti-N-R, (attribute to the doped Br atoms by charge compensation), and species, indicating the successful codoping of N and Br atoms, which were substituted for lattice oxygen without any influence on the crystalline phase of . In contrast to the N-doped sample, the N-Br-codoped photocatalyst could more readily photodegrade methylene blue (MB) under visible-light irradiation. The visible-light catalytic activity of thus-prepared photocatalyst resulted from the synergetic effect of the doped nitrogen and bromine, which not only gave high absorbance in the visible-light range, but also reduced electron-hole recombination rate.

1. Introduction

The development of photocatalysis has attracted much attention in the recent 30 years [13]. Of the materials being developed for photocatalytic applications, titanium dioxide (TiO2) remains the most promising due to its high efficiency, low cost, chemical inertness, and photostability [46], and so forth. However, its wide-band gap (3.2 eV ≡ 380 nm for anatase) can only capture UV light, a small fraction (about 3–5%) of the solar irradiance at the earth surface, compared to the 45% of visible light [7]. Thus any red shift in the optical response of TiO2 from the UV band to the visible band will have a profound positive effect on the photocatalytic efficiency of the materials [8, 9].

Doping TiO2 with transition-metal elements was used as the initial approach to shift the optical response of TiO2 from the UV band to the visible band [1015]. However, these metal-doped TiO2 materials suffered from thermal instability and low-quantum efficiency because of increased carrier trapping after doping, or require expensive facilities in the ion implantation case [8, 16, 17]. In contrast, better visible optical response of TiO2 could be achieved by using nonmetal doping [8, 9, 18, 19]. Kinds of nonmetal elements, including nitrogen [2023], phosphor [24], carbon [25], sulfur [26, 27], boron [28], fluorine [18, 29], iodine [30], chlorine, and bromine [31], were found to be capable of making doped TiO2 respond to visible light. In particular, the presence of substitutional N atoms in the TiO2 matrix enhanced the absorption in the visible band and then led to a corresponding photocatalytic activity [32]. Moreover, doped halogen atoms into the oxygen sites should be accompanied by the formation of Ti3+ to maintain the overall electroneutrality of the crystal lattice, and a certain amount of Ti3+ reduced the electron-hole recombination rate and further enhanced the photocatalytic activity [18, 33]. Thus, one may want to know whether halogen atoms codoped in TiO2 together with nitrogen have higher photocatalytic activity than that of N-doped TiO2. To the best of our knowledge, there was no report on the visible-light-driven TiO2 photocatalyst codoped by nitrogen and bromine.

Hereby, a simple process was utilized to prepare the N-Br-codoped TiO2 nanocrystals via the direct reaction between nanocrystalline TiO2 solution and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). Based upon the results of the present work, we found that the N-Br-codoped TiO2 could be considered as an effective visible-light-driven photocatalyst.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials Preparation

All chemicals, including Titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP, Tianchang Chemical Co., Ltd., Tianchang, China), nitric acid (65–68%, Shanghai chemicals, Shanghai, China), CTAB (Tianjin Chemical International Trading Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China), and anhydrous ethanol (Tianjin Chemical International Trading Co., Ltd., China), were of reagent grade and were used without further purification. Water was doubly distilled and deionized.

2.1.1. Preparation of Nanocrystalline TiO2 Solution

The preparation proceeded as follows: 15 mL of TTIP and 3 mL of ethanol were mixed and then added dropwise into 100 mL of water in a 200 mL beaker under continuous stirring. After 15 minutes ultrasonication, 2 mL of nitric acid were added to the mixture, and then the hydrothermal crystallization was carried out at 100°C for 5 hours to obtain a nanocrystalline TiO2 blurry solution (denoted as TOS for conveniency, the original solution for the following preparation).

2.1.2. Preparation of Photocatalysts

For N-Br-codoped TiO2, 18.6 g of CTAB was added into TOS and was refluxed at 80°C for 3 hours under vigorous stirring, leading to a yellow milky solution. The product was then evaporated under low pressure (20-mmHg) to a yellow xerogel. Finally, the unreacted CTAB and other organic by-products were washed out with ethanol in a Soxhlet extractor and then the N-Br-codoped TiO2 photocatalyst was obtained (denoted as TNB).

For comparison, N-doped TiO2 photocatalyst (accordingly designed as TDN) was prepared by a direct reaction between TOS and triethylamine as the above process, and another undoped TiO2 photocatalyst (denoted as TOX derived from TOS by a low-pressure evaporation) was also prepared.

2.2. Photocatalysts Characterization

Several techniques were used to characterize the structure and properties of the above materials TDN and TNB. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained on a D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker AXS, GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) using Cu Ka radiation. Line traces were collected over values ranging from 20° to 70°. The lattice spacing was observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM-2010). Diffuse reflection absorption spectra (DRAS) of the samples were recorded using a UV-Vis-NIR spectrometer (UV-3150 spectrometer Shimadzu, Japan), and BaSO4 was used as the reference sample. The DRAS spectra were used to evaluate the optical absorption properties of the samples [34]. The states of the charges were investigated by XPS (Mg as radiation source, PHI-5300X, Perkin-Elmer physics electronics), and all the bonding energies were calibrated to that of the adventitious C 1second peak fixed at 284.8 eV. In order to investigate the depth profile of N and Br atoms in the lattice of TiO2 particles, XPS analysis of sample TNB using Ar etching was performed.

For the undoped TiO2 sample, TOX, XRD, and DRAS spectra were used to characterize the structure and properties.

2.3. Measurement of Photocatalytic Activity
2.3.1. Photoreactor

For UV-activity determination, the photocatalytic experiments were carried out on a photochemical reactor (SGY-1, Jiangsu Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences) with a 300-W high-pressure mercury lamp as the light source, which provides a main irradiation wavelength about 365 nm.

For vis-activity determination, the light source was a 250 W metal halide lamp (Philips), which was positioned inside a cylindrical Pyrex vessel surrounded by a circulating water jacket to cool the lamp. A cutoff filter was also placed between lamp and the Pyrex jacket to remove the radiation below 420 nm, ensuring the reaction system to be irradiated only by visible light.

2.3.2. MB, Photocatalytic Activity Determination

The photocatalytic experiments were carried out by adding 250 mg of samples into 250 mL of methylene blue (MB) solution (50 ppm). The suspension was stirred in dark for 30 minutes to obtain the saturated adsorption of MB before UV/visible light illumination. The concentration of MB at this point was used as the initial value for the further kinetic treatment of the photodecomposition process. At given irradiation time intervals, the dispersion was sampled (4 mL), centrifuged, and subsequently filtered through a millipore filter (pore size, 0.22  ) to separate the catalyst particles. The concentration of MB was measured at 665 nm wavelength using UV-Visible spectrophotometer. Firstly, a series of standard MB solutions (2.5, 5, 10, 15, and 20 ppm) were prepared and measured using UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Then, a standard curve could be obtained. The concentration of MB during the degradation process could be obtained from the standard curve. Absorption spectra were recorded after 4-fold dilution.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Crystal Phase Identification

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of samples, TOX, TDN, and TNB. The diffraction lines at 2θ = 25.3°, 37.8°, 48.1°, 53.9°, 55.2°, and 62.7° demonstrate that all the three samples are of the anatase phase. The average crystallite size, DA, determined from the diffraction peak of the anatase (101) planes, is about 6.5 nm estimated from the Debye-Scherrer equation [35]. TEM (see Figure 2) of sample TDN and TNB clearly revealed the fringes of (101) planes of anatase with a lattice spacing of about 0.352 nm [36], which corresponds to the XRD patterns. Among the three main polymorphs, anatase TiO2 is believed to exhibit the highest photocatalytic activity [31]. The anatase phase of the photocatalysts will contribute to a good photocatalytic activity.

563949.fig.001
Figure 1: XRD patterns of samples, TOX, TDN, and TNB. Sample TOX was undoped TiO2, sample TDN was N-doped TiO2, and sample TNB was N, Br-codoped TiO2.
fig2
Figure 2: TEM images of samples, TDN (a) and TNB (b).
3.2. Optical Properties and XPS Analysis

The samples, TOX, TDN, and TNB show different color. TOX looks white, TDN yellow while TNB tan. From Figure 3 (DRAS of the samples), TOX have no absorption in the visible band; while the other two samples both have distinctly great absorption in the visible band. Compared to sample TDN, sample TNB showed obvious enhanced absorption in the visible range of 400–600 nm. The broad absorption below 500 nm is because the N 2p orbits are localized above the top of the O 2p valence bands, whereas the absorption above 500 nm is mainly caused by oxygen vacancies [37]. The band gap energy of the synthesized samples was estimated to be about 3.12 eV for TOX, 2.03 eV for TDN, and 1.88 eV for TNB by the absorption edge. The band gap narrowing will result in the obvious red-shift in the optical response, which is helpful for visible photocatalytic activity.

563949.fig.003
Figure 3: UV-Vis diffuse reflection absorption spectra of samples, TOX, TDN, and TNB.

The chemical composition of surface was determined by XPS (see Figure 4). The C 1s, O 1s, Ti 2p, and N 1s peaks components are discernible in the wide scan spectrum of the two samples, but obvious peaks of Br 3d can be found only for TNB. The N 1s core-level spectra of the two samples are showed in Figure 5. For TDN sample (Figure 5(a)), the feature at 396.7 eV is generally known as the “nitride” peak and can be assigned to the N2- anions that replace oxygen atoms in the TiO2 lattice to form N-Ti-N [38, 39]. N 1s peak of 399.3 eV can be attributed to the binding energy of the N atom in special environment of O-Ti-N-R (R: alkyl) [3840]. The weak N 1s peak at 401.7 eV indicates the trace amount of nitrogen in the form of Ti-N-O [39]. For TNB sample, No N 1s peaks from N+ of CTAB (at 402.3 eV) can be found in Figure 5(b) [38, 41], indicating that residual CTAB has been completely removed by the Soxhlet extracting method or at least the residual CTAB was too little to be detected. The two main N 1s peaks at 396.5 eV and 399.3 eV can be attributed to the binding energy of the N atom in special environment of N-Ti-N and O-Ti-N-R (R: alkyl) [3840].

563949.fig.004
Figure 4: XPS wide scan spectra of samples, TDN and TNB.
fig5
Figure 5: (a) N 1s core-level spectrum (deconvolution of N 1s bands) of TDN. (b) N 1s core-level spectrum (deconvolution of N 1s bands) of TNB.

Figure 6 showed Ti 2p core-level spectra of TDN and TNB. For TDN sample (Figure 6(a)), the deconvolution of Ti 2p bands yields two major doublets (2p3/2 and 2p1/2) encompassing the set of two 2p3/2 peaks. The main Ti 2p3/2 peak at 458.6 eV is typical for pure TiO2 [38, 42] and can be attribute to those unreacted TiO2, the other Ti 2p3/2 peak at 457.2 eV for TiOxNy [38, 42]. For TNB sample (Figure 6(b)), the deconvolution of the complex Ti 2p bands yields three major doublets (2p3/2 and 2p1/2) encompassing the set of three Ti 2p3/2 peaks. The strongest Ti 2p3/2 peak at 458.7 eV is typical for pure TiO2 [38] and can be attribute to those unreacted TiO2, other peaks, at 455.7 eV typical for Ti3+ [38], and at 457.2 eV for TiOxNy [38, 42]. Doped nitrogen atoms result in the formation of TiOxNy [42], meanwhile, the formation of Ti3+ might attribute to the substitution of bromine atoms for oxygen just like the case of fluorine doping [33, 43].

fig6
Figure 6: (a) Ti 2p core-level spectrum (deconvolution of Ti 2p bands) of TDN. (b) Ti 2p core-level spectrum (deconvolution of Ti 2p bands) of TNB.

From the results of the depth profile of N and Br atoms of sample TNB (see Table 1), we found that N and Br atoms were mainly at the surface of TiO2 particles. Besides, the results of XPS indicate that N and Br atoms were actually existed in the lattice of the titania crystal.

tab1
Table 1: Results of XPS analysis using Ar etching, sample TNB.
3.3. Photocatalytic Activity
3.3.1. UV-Activity

The photodecomposition of the MB in aqueous solution was carried out under UV light. The time-dependent concentration of MB is shown in Figure 7(a). With high crystallization, P25 can more readily photodegrade MB. The photocatalysts, TOX, TDN, and TNB, exhibit similar and good photocatalytic activity, which due to their similar crystallization and microstructure. Because the doping process was performed under low temperature, then there is little change of crystallization and microstructure.

fig7
Figure 7: (a) Comparison of the UV photocatalytic activities of P25, TOX, TDN, and TNB on MB photodecomposition. Time-dependent concentration of MB in solution under UV light. (b) Comparison of the visible photocatalytic activities of P25, TOX, TDN, and TNB on MB photodecomposition. Time-dependent concentration of MB in solution under visible light.
3.3.2. Vis-Activity

The photodecomposition of the MB in aqueous solution was carried out under visible light. The time-dependent concentration of MB in solution is shown in Figure 7(b). Compared with the visible-inactive P25 and TOX, both of TDN and TNB exhibit excellent photocatalytic activity, and obviously TNB can more readily photodegrade MB than TDN. One may raise the doubt of whether it is the photocatalyst that plays the key role in decomposing MB because MB can absorb visible light itself. This doubt, however, is not necessary considering the case using P25, TOX, TDN, or TNB as photocatalyst. If the decomposition of MB is due to the light absorbance itself, then the efficiency of the decomposition using a different photocatalyst may not vary so much as is shown in Figure 7(b). Also, one may consider such dyes degradation on photocatalysts surface under visible light to be a sensitization mechanism. If the decomposition of MB is due to a sensitization mechanism, then the efficiency of the decomposition using TOX may be similar to that of TDN and TNB due to their similar crystallization and microstructure.

The stability of the catalysts has been tested by using the photocatalysts repeatedly three times. No visible change of the photoactivity has been observed throughout these three runs. To ascertain the role of light radiation in the decomposition process, we have tested the effect of TNB without light radiation and the result is not unexpected (see Figures 7(a) and 7(b)). Without light, the decomposition process could hardly proceed.

Altogether, the excellent visible-light photoactivity of TDN and TNB can be explained by the doped microstructure. Because the N 2p orbits are localized above the top of the O 2p valence bands, the doped N atoms will result in band gap narrowing and improve the visible light absorption of anatase TiO2. The improved visible light absorption can increase the number of photoinduced electron. Undoubtedly, this can enhance the photocatalytic activity. Moreover, the N-doping is considered to have a contribution in the formation of oxygen vacancies [4447]. Incorporation of two N atoms into the oxygen sites should be accompanied by the formation of one oxygen vacancy to maintain the overall electroneutrality of the crystal lattice. Many studies have confirmed that the formation of the superoxide ( ) and hydroxyl radicals ( ), two important active species for initiating a photocatalytic reaction [4852], required oxygen vacancy sites [35, 53, 54]. For sample TNB, The contribution of the doped Br atoms to the visible photocatalytic activity is achieved mainly by the improvement of the quantum efficiency. The doped Br atoms can convert Ti4+ to Ti3+ by charge compensation, and the existence of a certain amount of Ti3+ reduces the electron hole recombination rate and further enhanced the quantum efficiency and photocatalytic activity [43]. Moreover, halogen element, such as Br, Cl, F, doping for oxygen in TiO2 can also cause the absorption edge of TiO2 to shift to the lower energy region [31], though the red-shift is weak, which can enhance the photocatalytic activity too. Thus, the synergetic effect of doped N and Br atoms contributes to a higher visible photocatalytic activity of TNB.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, N-Br-codoped TiO2 photocatalyst was prepared via a facile two-step homogeneous hydrothermal route at low temperature. As expected, the prepared photocatalyst showed a high-photocatalytic activity under visible irradiation, which was attributed to its anatase crystalline framework, low-electron hole recombination rate and high absorbance in the visible light range. A synergetic effect of both doped N atoms and Br atoms should be responsible for the enhanced visible photoactivity.

Acknowledgments

The financial supports from the National Native Science Foundation (no. 20573128) and Shanxi Native Science Foundations (no. 20051025 and no. 2006021031) were acknowledged.

References

  1. A. Fujishima and K. Honda, “Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode,” Nature, vol. 238, no. 5358, pp. 37–38, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. S. U. M. Khan and J. Akikusa, “Photoelectrochemical splitting of water at nanocrystalline n-Fe2O3 thin-film electrodes,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 103, no. 34, pp. 7184–7189, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. S. Licht, B. Wang, S. Mukerji, T. Soga, M. Umeno, and H. Tributsch, “Efficient solar water splitting, exemplified by RuO2-catalyzed AlGaAs/Si photoelectrolysis,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 104, no. 38, pp. 8920–8924, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  4. C. Burda, Y. Lou, X. Chen, A. C. S. Samia, J. Stout, and J. L. Gole, “Enhanced nitrogen doping in TiO2 nanoparticles,” Nano Letters, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1049–1051, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. V. Kozhukharov, P. Vitanov, P. Stefchev et al., “TiO2-photocatalyzed oxidative water pollutants degradation: a review of the state-of-art,” Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 107–111, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. L. Linsebigler, G. Lu, and J. T. Yates Jr., “Photocatalysis on TiO2 surfaces: principles, mechanisms, and selected results,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 735–758, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Mrowetz, W. Balcerski, A. J. Colussi, and M. R. Hoffmann, “Oxidative power of nitrogen-doped TiO2 photocatalysts under visible illumination,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 45, pp. 17269–17273, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. R. Asahi, T. Morikawa, T. Ohwaki, K. Aoki, and Y. Taga, “Visible-light photocatalysis in nitrogen-doped titanium oxides,” Science, vol. 293, no. 5528, pp. 269–271, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. H. Irie, Y. Watanabe, and K. Hashimoto, “Nitrogen-concentration dependence on photocatalytic activity of TiO2-xNx powders,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 107, no. 23, pp. 5483–5486, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  10. S. I. Shah, W. Li, C.-P. Huang, O. Jung, and C. Ni, “Study of Nd3+, Pd2+, Pt4+, and Fe3+ dopant effect on photoreactivity of TiO2 nanoparticles,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, 2, pp. 6482–6486, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. A.-W. Xu, J.-Y. Zhu, Y. Gao, and H.-Q. Liu, “Iron-doped titania nanoparticles for the photocatalytic oxidative degradation of nitrite,” Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 281–286, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  12. C. Wang, D. W. Bahnemann, and J. K. Dohrmann, “A novel preparation of iron-doped TiO2 nanoparticles with enhanced photocatalytic activity,” Chemical Communications, vol. 16, pp. 1539–1540, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  13. Y. Wang, Y. Hao, H. Cheng et al., “Photoelectrochemistry of transition metal-ion-doped TiO2 nanocrystalline electrodes and higher solar cell conversion efficiency based on Zn2+-doped TiO2 electrode,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2773–2779, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. A. A. Altynnikov, G. A. Zenkovets, and V. F. Anufrienko, “ESR study of reduced vanadium-titanium oxide catalysts,” Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 273–279, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. T. Umebayashi, T. Yamaki, H. Itoh, and K. Asai, “Analysis of electronic structures of 3d transition metal-doped TiO2 based on band calculations,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 1909–1920, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. X. Chen, Y. Lou, A. C. S. Samia, C. Burda, and J. L. Gole, “Formation of oxynitride as the photocatalytic enhancing site in nitrogen-doped titania nanocatalysts: comparison to a commercial nanopowder,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 41–49, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. H. Yamashita, M. Honda, M. Harada et al., “Preparation of titanium oxide photocatalysts anchored on porous silica glass by a metal ion-implantation method and their photocatalytic reactivities for the degradation of 2-propanol diluted in water,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 102, no. 52, pp. 10707–10711, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J. C. Yu, J. Yu, W. Ho, Z. Jiang, and L. Zhang, “Effects of F doping on the photocatalytic activity and microstructures of nanocrystalline TiO2 powders,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 3808–3816, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S. U. M. Khan, M. Al-Shahry, and W. B. Ingler Jr., “Efficient photochemical water splitting by a chemically modified n-TiO2,” Science, vol. 297, no. 5590, pp. 2243–2245, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. S. Sakthivel, M. Janczarek, and H. Kisch, “Visible light activity and photoelectrochemical properties of nitrogen-doped TiO2,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 50, pp. 19384–19387, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. K. Kobayakawa, Y. Murakami, and Y. Sato, “Visible-light active N-doped TiO2 prepared by heating of titanium hydroxide and urea,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 177–179, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. T. Ihara, M. Miyoshi, Y. Iriyama, O. Matsumoto, and S. Sugihara, “Visible-light-active titanium oxide photocatalyst realized by an oxygen-deficient structure and by nitrogen doping,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 403–409, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. S. Yin, H. Yamaki, M. Komatsu et al., “Preparation of nitrogen-doped titania with high visible light induced photocatalytic activity by mechanochemical reaction of titania and hexamethylenetetramine,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 2996–3001, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. L. Lin, W. Lin, Y. Zhu, B. Zhao, and Y. Xie, “Phosphor-doped titania - a novel photocatalyst active in visible light,” Chemistry Letters, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 284–285, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. S. Sakthivel and H. Kisch, “Daylight photocatalysis by carbon-modified titanium dioxide,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 42, no. 40, pp. 4908–4911, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. T. Ohno, T. Mitsui, and M. Matsumura, “Photocatalytic activity of S-doped TiO2 photocatalyst under visible light,” Chemistry Letters, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 364–365, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. T. Umebayashi, T. Yamaki, S. Tanaka, and K. Asai, “Visible light-induced degradation of methylene blue on S-doped TiO2,” Chemistry Letters, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 330–331, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. W. Zhao, W. Ma, C. Chen, J. Zhao, and Z. Shuai, “Efficient degradation of toxic organic pollutants with (Ni2O3)/(TiO2xBx) under visible irradiation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 126, no. 15, pp. 4782–4783, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. T. Yamaki, T. Umebayashi, T. Sumita et al., “Fluorine-doping in titanium dioxide by ion implantation technique,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B, vol. 206, pp. 254–258, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. X. Hong, Z. Wang, W. Cai et al., “Visible-light-activated nanoparticle photocatalyst of iodine-doped titanium dioxide,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1548–1552, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. H. Luo, T. Takata, Y. Lee, J. Zhao, K. Domen, and Y. Yan, “Photocatalytic activity enhancing for titanium dioxide by co-doping with bromine and chlorine,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 846–849, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. C. Di Valentin, G. Pacchioni, and A. Selloni, “Origin of the different photoactivity of N-doped anatase and rutile TiO2,” Physical Review B, vol. 70, no. 8, Article ID 085116, p. 4, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. D. Li, H. Haneda, S. Hishita, and N. Ohashi, “Visible-light-driven N-F-codoped TiO2 photocatalysts. 2. Optical characterization, photocatalysis, and potential application to air purification,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 2596–2602, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. H. Sun, Y. Bai, Y. Cheng, W. Jin, and N. Xu, “Preparation and characterization of visible-light-driven carbon-sulfur-codoped TiO2 photocatalysts,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 45, no. 14, pp. 4971–4976, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. J. L. Gole, J. D. Stout, C. Burda, Y. Lou, and X. Chen, “Highly efficient formation of visible light tunable TiO2-xNx photocatalysts and their transformation at the nanoscale,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 1230–1240, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. H. Yu, J. Yu, and B. Cheng, “Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of novel TiO2 nanoparticle-coated titanate nanorods,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 253, no. 1-2, pp. 99–106, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. Z. Lin, A. Orlov, R. M. Lambert, and M. C. Payne, “New insights into the origin of visible light photocatalytic activity of nitrogen-doped and oxygen-deficient anatase TiO2,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 44, pp. 20948–20952, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. J. Wang, W. Wu, and D. Feng, “XPS/AES/UPS,” National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, China, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  39. J. Wang, W. Zhu, Y. Zhang, and S. Liu., “An efficient two-step technique for nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide synthesizing: visible-light-induced photodecomposition of methylene blue,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 1010–1014, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. O. Diwald, T. L. Thompson, T. Zubkov, E. G. Goralski, S. D. Walck, and J. T. Yates Jr., “Photochemical activity of nitrogen-doped rutile TiO2(110) in visible light,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 19, pp. 6004–6008, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. X.-H. Liu, X.-H. Luo, S.-X. Lu, J.-C. Zhang, and W.-L. Cao, “A novel cetyltrimethyl ammonium silver bromide complex and silver bromide nanoparticles obtained by the surfactant counterion,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 307, no. 1, pp. 94–100, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. M. Drygaś, C. Czosnek, R. T. Paine, and J. F. Janik, “Two-stage aerosol synthesis of titanium nitride TiN and titanium oxynitride TiOxNy nanopowders of spherical particle morphology,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 18, no. 13, pp. 3122–3129, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. J. C. Yu, J. Yu, W. Ho, Z. Jiang, and L. Zhang, “Effects of F doping on the photocatalytic activity and microstructures of nanocrystalline TiO2 powders,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 3808–3816, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. I. Nakamura, N. Negishi, S. Kutsuna, T. Ihara, S. Sugihara, and K. Takeuchi, “Role of oxygen vacancy in the plasma-treated TiO2 photocatalyst with visible light activity for NO removal,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 161, no. 1-2, pp. 205–212, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. T. Ihara, M. Miyoshi, M. Ando, S. Sugihara, and Y. Iriyama, “Preparation of a visible-light-active TiO2 photocatalyst by RF plasma treatment,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 36, pp. 4201–4207, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  46. I. Justicia, P. Ordejón, G. Canto et al., “Designed self-doped titanium oxide thin films for efficient visible-light photocatalysis,” Advanced Materials, vol. 14, no. 19, pp. 1399–1402, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. T. Ihara, M. Miyoshi, Y. Iriyama, O. Matsumoto, and S. Sugihara, “Visible-light-active titanium oxide photocatalyst realized by an oxygen-deficient structure and by nitrogen doping,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 403–409, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. K.-L. Zhang, X.-P. Lin, F.-Q. Huang, and W.-D. Wang, “A novel photocatalyst PbSb2O6 for degradation of methylene blue,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 258, no. 1-2, pp. 185–190, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. M. M. Mohamed and M. M. Al-Esaimi, “Characterization, adsorption and photocatalytic activity of vanadium-doped TiO2 and sulfated TiO2 (rutile) catalysts: degradation of methylene blue dye,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 255, no. 1-2, pp. 53–61, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. J. Hong, C. Sun, S.-G. Yang, and Y.-Z. Liu, “Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue in TiO2 aqueous suspensions using microwave powered electrodeless discharge lamps,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 133, no. 1–3, pp. 162–166, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. A. Houas, H. Lachheb, M. Ksibi, E. Elaloui, C. Guillard, and J.-M. Herrmann, “Photocatalytic degradation pathway of methylene blue in water,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 145–157, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. S. Senthilkumaar, K. Porkodi, R. Gomathi, A. Geetha Maheswari, and N. Manonmani, “Sol-gel derived silver doped nanocrystalline titania catalysed photodegradation of methylene blue from aqueous solution,” Dyes and Pigments, vol. 69, no. 1-2, pp. 22–30, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. M. A. Henderson, W. S. Epling, C. L. Perkins, C. H. F. Peden, and U. Diebold, “Interaction of molecular oxygen with the vacuum-annealed TiO2(110) surface: molecular and dissociative channels,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 103, no. 25, pp. 5328–5337, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. R. Schaub, P. Thostrup, N. Lopez et al., “Oxygen vacancies as active sites for water dissociation on rutile TiO2(110),” Physical Review Letters, vol. 87, no. 26, Article ID 266104, p. 4, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar