International Journal of Photoenergy

International Journal of Photoenergy / 2011 / Article
Special Issue

Nanotechnology and Solar Energy

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 619069 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/619069

Nanostructured Mesoporous Titanium Dioxide Thin Film Prepared by Sol-Gel Method for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell

Academic Editor: Mohamed Sabry Abdel-Mottaleb
Received17 Feb 2011
Accepted08 Apr 2011
Published04 Jul 2011

Abstract

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) paste was prepared by sol-gel and hydrothermal method with various precursors. Nanostructured mesoporous TiO2 thin-film back electrode was fabricated from the nanoparticle colloidal paste, and its performance was compared with that made of commercial P25 TiO2. The best performance was demonstrated by the DSSC having a 16 μm-thick TTIP-TiO2 back electrode, which gave a solar energy conversion efficiency of 6.03%. The ability of stong adhesion on ITO conducting glass substrate and the high surface area are considered important characteristics of TiO2 thin film. The results show that a thin film with good adhesion can be made from the prepared colloidal paste as a result of alleviating the possibility of electron transfer loss. One can control the colloidal particle size from sol-gel method. Therefore, by optimizing the preparation conditions, TiO2 paste with nanoparticle and narrow diameter distribution was obtained.

1. Introduction

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) has attracted tremendous attention from researchers worldwide due to its potential applications in environmental protection and energy generation [1]. It has demonstrated unique properties such as high adsorption ability and good photocatalytic activity. Recently, TiO2 has been applied largely in dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) due to its nanocrystalline mesopore nature that translates to high surface area for dye adsorption. The adsorbed dye molecules can then be excited by the solar energy to generate electron-hole pairs that are subsequently separated and transported within the lattice of TiO2 [2]. Burnside et al. [3] reported a dye-sensitized solar cell that comprises a black-dye-adsorbed TiO2 working electrode, which achieved a high solar energy conversion efficiency ( ) of 10.4% [4]. The nanoparticle film is 16 μm thick, and the anatase TiO2 was prepared by the hydrolysis of titanium(IV) isopropoxide.

The TiO2 film working electrode is an important part of DSSC. It can be prepared by various methods such as sol-gel [57], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [8, 9], and sputtering [1012]. Sol-gel process is a favorable method for preparing TiO2 nanoparticles since the composition, particle size, film thickness, and porosity of TiO2 can be easily controlled by adjusting parameters such as sol concentration, hydrothermal growth temperature, and sintering condition. Hydrolysis of titanium(IV) isopropoxide in acidic solution was performed by Dolmatov et al. [13] and Jerman et al. [14]. The process produced several types of Ti(OH)x(4-x)+ hydroxocomplexes in equilibrium with x < 4. The value of x changed with reactant concentration, pH, and temperature. When temperature was increased, particle size of TiO2 increased, leading to the formation of precipitate. Yoldas [15] has studied the gelatination process of titanium dioxide. The influence of reactant on hydrolysis and condensation was discussed. They discovered that when an alkyl, as the reactant, was increased, the hydrolytic reaction and the diffusion rate were both slowed down. As a result, the gelatination product formed was smaller, which contained lower concentration of oxide compound.

The addition of some acidic compounds, such as HCl, HNO3, and CH3COOH in Si(OR)4, may be used to control the speed of hydrolysis [16]. Some literature on solar cells [1720] has mentioned the ideal nanocrystal sizes, ranging from 10 to 25 nm, in achieving high cell efficiency. During the preparation of TiO2 powder, primary single-crystal particles may agglomerate to form secondary polycrystalline particles of various sizes, and such process is dependent on the synthesis routes. Shen et al. [21] had conducted a series of studies on the optical absorption and electron transfer of TiO2 with different particle and pore sizes. TiO2 powder with large pores as well as small particle sizes seemed to show high efficiency.

The dye adsorption and charge transport of TiO2 nanoparticle thin film coated with a substrate (e.g., ITO-or FTO-coated glass) have been studied extensively in recent years. The transport of photogenerated electrons or efficiency of device will be dependent on the adhesion of TiO2 thin film. In this study, pencil hardness technique was adopted to test the adhesion of TiO2 film prepared. Furthermore, nanocrystallites will beneficially influence the photocatalytic properties of TiO2 film by increasing the number of active sites, which reduces the risks of charge carrier recombination. In order to efficiently separate and collect photogenerated electrons and holes, TiO2 thin film must offer an environment that has high electron-transferring rate and less carrier traps. According to the results of recent studies on dye-sensitized solar cell, metal oxide is the main constituent for making the thin film. Among the various metal oxides, titanium dioxide is most often selected [22, 23].

Here, three types of precursors were used in the sol-gel method to prepare TiO2 working photoelectrode. The purpose is to control the film thickness and produce a mesoporous TiO2 film. The previously reported mesoporous films were only few micrometers thick. Such thin films provide insufficient surface areas for dye adsorption. On the other hand, a thick film with large BET surface areas will harvest more light, which translates to higher efficiency. The TiO2 film prepared in this study was sensitized by commercial N3 dye and was applied as the photoelectrode in dye-sensitized solar cell.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

P-25 TiO2 (70% anatase, 30% rutile, primary particle size 30 nm, Degussa) powder purchased from Aldrich was used for comparison purpose. Titanium(IV) isopropoxide (TTIP, 97%, Aldrich), titanium(IV) ethoxide (TTIE, ACROS), and titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4, Merck) were precursors for preparing titanium dioxide by sol-gel method. The adjustment of pH was done by adding reagent grade NaOH (Merck). Triton X-100 (Merck) and polyethylene glycol (PEG M.W = 20,000, Fluka) were used as binders, and N3 dye (Ruthenium 533 bis-TBA, Solaronix) was used as the sensitizer. The R150 redox electrolyte was purchased from the Solaronix Commercials. Acetic acid and ethanol were purchased from Merck. All other solvents and reagents were analytical-grade quality, purchased commercially, and used without any further purification.

ITO-conducting glass (20~30 Ω/cm2, Merck, Co., ltd.) was selected as the substrate for TiO2 film. Wolff-wilborn hardness pencil test was adopted for the TiO2 film adhesion test. The crystalline property of TiO2 film was modified using the hydrothermal method with a bomb-type autoclave. In order to avoid the contamination of colloidal paste and protect the autoclave, a teflon beaker was lined in the stainless steel bomb.

2.2. Preparation Methods and Measurement
2.2.1. Sol-Gel and Hydrothermal Preparation Methods

A series of TiO2 nanoparticles were prepared by sol-gel method using acetic acid and nitric acid as the catalytic agent. The sol-gel was prepared from three precursors including titanium(IV) isopropoxide (TTIP), titanium(IV) ethoxide (TTIE), and titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4). The solvent used was ethanol to give a solvent/precursor molar ratio of 1/1. High-purity helium (99.99%) was flowed through the reactor. This solution was added dropwise to the mixture containing 5.2 moles of acetic acid and 50 moles of DI water (deionized water) cooled at 5°C under helium gas purging and vigorous stirring. In order to increase the stability of TTIP and control the particle size [24], the sol-gel was prepared at 5°C under helium gas purge. Fresh sol-gel solution was transparent without any precipitate. After hydrolysis and condensation, the mixture was heated at 80°C in a water bath for 8 h. After that, the temperature was gradually decreased to room temperature. The resulting sol-gel was placed into an autoclave to undergo the hydrothermal process, which heated the mixture at 190°C for 12 h. After hydrothermal process, the mixture became thick and concentrated. TiO2 catalysts prepared were denoted as Y-TiO2, where Y represents the precursor of titanium added. To further study the effect of acid used during hydrolysis, acetic acid was replaced by HNO3, and the catalysts prepared were denoted as X-Y-TiO2. The preparation conditions of TiO2 photocatalysts are listed in Table 1.


SampleHardnessBET surface area (m2/g)Pore diameter (Å)Pore volume (cm3/g)

P25HB~F51.69104.710.1729.1
ETIP-TiO26H60.54129.290.1924.828
H-ETIP-TiO2HB52.7874.320.1328.445
TTIP-TiO2H71.40136.920.2121.030
H-TTIP-TiO2F72.05232.010.1320.830
TiCl4-TiO2HB83.10125.490.26105

2.2.2. Characterization

The mesoporous TiO2 thin film was characterized by nitrogen sorption, Nano-ZS, XRD, SEM, and UV-vis. The efficiencies of photoelectrodes fabricated by these TiO2 thin films were also tested with a solar simulator.

Particle size distribution of the colloidal paste was measured by a nanoparticle analyzer (Malvern zetasizer Nano-ZS).

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were taken using a Bruker-D8-ADVANCE powder diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation (40 kV, 30 mA). The sample was scanned over the 2θ range of 20–60° at a rate of 0.05° min−1 to identify the crystalline structure. Sample for XRD was prepared as a thin layer on a sample holder.

BET surface areas were obtained by physisorption of nitrogen at −197°C using a micromeritics ASAP-2020 instrument. Prior to measurement, the samples were degassed to 0.1 Pa at 100°C. The surface areas were calculated in a relative pressure range assuming a cross-sectional area of 0.162 nm2 for the N2 molecules.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained with a Hitachi 4800 field emission microscope using an acceleration voltage of 20 kV. Samples were placed on a stage especially made for SEM. They were coated with Pt prior to analysis and imaged directly. SEM images were recorded at magnification that ranged from 50000 X to 110000 X. The magnification was calibrated in pixel/nm on the camera. The chemical composition of the sample was determined by scanning electron microscopy-X-ray energy-dispersive spectrum (SEM-EDS) with accelerating voltage of 20 kV.

The diffuse reflectance UV-vis spectra were measured with a UV 3101PC UV-visible spectrophotometer. Powder samples were loaded in a quartz cell with suprasil windows, and spectra were collected in the range from 300 nm to 800 nm against quartz standard.

2.2.3. Preparation and Analysis of Mesoporous Titania Film Working Photoelectrode

Dye-sensitized solar cell prepared was consisted of a TiO2 working electrode coated with ITO conducting glass, a counter electrode, and electrolyte dispersed in between. TiO2 film working electrodes prepared from different titanium precursors (e.g., TTIP-TiO2, TTIE-TiO2, and TiCl4-TiO2) were coated on ITO glass (20 mm × 10 mm) by doctor-blade method [25]. The thickness of TiO2 film after calcination was measured by Tencor α-step profiler, which gave more reliable results than those in previous report [26]. The size and thickness of solar cell were controlled by 3 M tape. The area of photoelectrode was about 0.25 cm2 (0.5 cm × 0.5 cm), and the thickness was about 15 μm before calcination. The N3 dye was adsorbed onto the working electrode by soaking TiO2 film in 0.2 M dye solution using ethanol as the solvent. The amount of N3 dye adsorbed on TiO2 film was determined by UV-vis spectrophotometer, where the chemisorbed dye on TiO2 film was desorbed by adding a mixture of NaOH and ethanol (1 : 1), and the resulting solution was measured.

Counter electrode was made by sputtering a layer of platinum on ITO glass. The photovoltaic property of the cell was measured by solar simulator (i.e., AM 1.5, 100 mW/cm2, YAMASHITA YSS-80A). The light intensity of solar simulator was calibrated by standard silicon solar cell (223 mV).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural and Morphological Characteristics of TiO2 Thin Film

For dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC), the adhesion of titania film on ITO glass is an important criterion that will impact the cell performance. This is because cracking of titania film tends to influence the interfacial transfer of charge carriers [27]. To prevent such phenomenon from happening, a surfactant such as PEG and triton X-100 was added to improve the adhesion of TiO2 thin film. In addition, PEG could also increase the thickness of TiO2 thin film and further enhance its light-absorbing ability [28, 29].

Figure 1 shows the effect of surfactant addition on the hardness of P25 thin film. From the figure, it is noted that TiO2 film with 20 wt% PEG demonstrated the best adhesion property. On the other hand, the addition of triton X-100 showed insignificant effect in improving the adhesion of TiO2 film. The formation of fine bubbles observed while mixing TiO2 paste with triton X-100 might be the reason for the poor adhesion.

Furthermore, adding surfactant has the effect of increasing the thickness of TiO2 film. This will prevent film cracking since thin film tends to crack more easily due to the shrinkage effect, that is, the change of TiO2 volume due to evaporation and decomposition of organic substances, which induces considerable stress on the film [30].

Since the alkoxide titanium will quickly react with water to generate titanium hydroxide, the reaction was kept at 5°C during hydrolysis and followed by the acidification reaction. The acidification reaction can enhance the crystalline property of the nanoparticle. The mixture at the moment was not considered a paste since the particle size and solvent constituent must be further conditioned by the hydrothermal treatment at a temperature of 190°C. Dominant factors that will influence the characteristics of the thin film include particle size, particle morphology, and solvent constituent of the paste [31, 32]. The experimental results show that TTIE-TiO2 colloidal paste with the controllable particle size from 1 to 10 nm can be obtained with good reproducibility. Figure 2 indicates the typical particle size distribution of TTIE-TiO2 sol-gel before hydrothermal treatment, which is similar to that of the original sol-gel colloidal solution. A mixture of alcohol and water is a suitable dispersion solution for measuring nanoparticle size distribution. Originally, the particle size of colloidal solution was below 10 nm. However, both the particle size and the crystallinity of the colloid were increased after carrying out the hydrothermal treatment.

3.2. SEM

The SEM images in Figures 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 show the average diameter of TiO2 particles, which is about 28, 30, 105, 30 and 45 nm for TTIE-TiO2, TTIP-TiO2, TiCl4-TiO2, H-TTIP-TiO2, and H-TTIE-TiO2, respectively. The BET surface area of P25 is 51.69 m2/g. However, from the result of nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm, the prepared TiO2 paste showed higher surface area than that of commercial P25 powder.

The differences in morphology and particle size among the prepared TiO2 paste were observed by SEM. Nanoparticles of both TTIE-TiO2 and TTIP-TiO2 displayed spherical shape with apparent boundary. In contrast, nanoparticles of TiCl4-TiO2 had a rod-like shape. Obviously, differences in morphology or shape of the TiO2 nanoparticles prepared with different precursors and acids were observed. The porous structure of TiO2 film was clearly observed from the SEM images.

As shown in Table 1, the BET surface area of TTIP-TiO2 and TTIE-TiO2 is 71.4 m2/g and 60.54 m2/g, respectively, whereas that of TTIP-TiO2 and TTIE-TiO2 prepared with HNO3 is 72.05 m2/g and 52.78 m2/g, respectively. Assuming the particles are spherical and nonporous, the average particle size can be estimated by the following equation: , where is the surface area and ρ is the density of a particle using the value of 4.0 g/cm3 ( the density of titania). The average particle size calculated from BET surface area is 21 nm, 24.8 nm, 20.8 nm, and 28.4 nm for TTIP-TiO2, TTIE-TiO2, H-TTIP-TiO2, and H-TTIE-TiO2, respectively. The results indicated that all particles are in nanoscale. It should be noted that the average particle size was overestimated because the catalyst under measurement was pretreated at 120°C before nitrogen sorption, which could cause metal sintering to some extent.

3.3. XRD

All TiO2 films prepared in this study have nanosize particles. Figure 8 shows the XRD pattern of the TiO2 film that was coated on ITO glass by doctor blending followed by calcination at 500°C for 1 h.

The XRD patterns of different samples prepared under temperature of 190°C are shown in Figure 8. Only anatase peaks at 2θ of around 25, 38, 48, and 55° were observed. Therefore, the selection of different precursor (TTIE and TTIP) for preparing TiO2 will not affect its crystalline structure.

The XRD results show that TTIP-TiO2 (500) and TTIE-TiO2 (500) were composed of both anatase and rutile phases. The rutile phase was formed during high-temperature calcination at 500°C. The main peaks of TTIP-TiO2 and TTIE-TiO2 became sharper as the calcination temperature was increased, indicating an increase in its crystallinity. The XRD patterns of TiCl4-TiO2 (500) show both rutile and anatase phases; however, no change in peak sharpness has been observed. Nevertheless, the XRD patterns show that these TiO2 have the structure with short-range mesophase order, which is a typical characteristic of TiO2 [24].

3.4. Photoelectrode Characteristics

The photoconversion efficiency of solar cells fabricated from various TiO2 working electrodes were investigated in this study. The thickness of TiO2 film after calcination was estimated to be 8~9 nm. The photocurrent generated by the solar cell is directly proportional to the amount of dye adsorbed on TiO2 film [19] which can be seen in Figure 9. It is noted that the amount of dye adsorbed on TiO2 increases with the film thickness. This is also in agreement with the increase in BET surface area as shown in Table 1.

The amount of dye chemisorbed on H-TTIP-TiO2 film electrode was tested. Despite the fact that H-TTIP-TiO2 exhibited high surface area, its dye adsorption behavior was very poor. This can be explained by the small pore volume of H-TTIP-TiO2 (0.13 cm3/g) as shown in Table 1 which limits its dye adsorption ability.

The H-TTIE-TiO2 film prepared was composed mostly of spherical primary particles and some ellipse-like secondary particles. The use of TTIP precursor to react with different solvent and reactant will change the rate of hydrolysis and primary particle growth [33]. In other words, the primary and secondary particle size, surface morphology, composition, and porosity of TiO2 will be influenced by the concentration and type of precursor used.

Figure 10 shows photocurrent voltage characteristics of the cell made from various TiO2 calcined at 500°C for 0.5 h. It is noted that the resistance of ITO conducting glass after calcination was increased to about 85~110 Ω. This will cause a big impact on the efficiency of the solar cell since ITO functions to transfer electrons that are photogenerated from dye-incorporated TiO2. From Table 2, it is obvious that the solar cell made from TTIP-TiO2 thin film produces the largest short-circuit current (Jsc).


SampleThickness (μm)Jsc (mA/cm2)Voc (V)Fill factor (%)

P2510-11 ± 0.56.250.6452.642.19
TTIE-TiO28-9 ± 0.55.630.7062.182.45
H-TTIE-TiO28-9 ± 0.54.250.6968.451.90
TTIP-TiO28-9 ± 0.513.130.7644.964.45
H-TTIP-TiO28-9 ± 0.55.130.6568.152.25
TiCl4-TiO28-9 ± 0.52.130.6474.090.99
TTIP/TTIP*15-16 ± 0.515.500.67 57.89 6.03 

*Double layer of TTIP-TiO2 for efficiency test.

High photocurrent could be generally related to high surface area, which results in an increase in the amount of dye adsorbed if the film thickness and light irradiation intensity were kept constant. It might also be due to the presence of more anatase TiO2, which facilitates the electron transport [34]. This can be explained by the large pore size and high surface area of TTIP-TiO2 electrode as revealed by SEM and BET analyses. In Tanaka’s study, as the titania particle gets bigger, the chance of electron/hole recombination gets lower [35]. The cell performance depends on the thickness of the TiO2 film. Therefore, we have made a double-layer TTIP-TiO2 thin film electrode that has a thickness of 16 μm [4]. By incorporating this double-layer electrode into a solar cell, a photoconversion efficiency as high as 6.03% can be reached. The sufficient film thickness will create large pore size and enough space which allow more redox electrolyte to diffuse into the film.

TiCl4-TiO2 shows the highest surface area; however, its solar energy conversion efficiency is only 0.99% with low Jsc of 2.13 mA/cm2. It is attributed to the poor adhesion of TiO2 on ITO glass observed. The pH of TiCl4-TiO2 paste is around 1~2, which might cause a corrosion problem on ITO conducting glass. Furthermore, TiCl4-TiO2 film showed poor adhesion when immersed in the iodine electrolyte after calcination. Although TiCl4-TiO2 showed poor performance, it displayed nanotube-like structure. If the adhesion problem can be eliminated, low-cost and high-efficiency solar cell may be fabricated.

4. Conclusion

In this study, various TiO2 pastes were prepared with different precursors and acids. There are many factors that will influence the performance of DSSC, for instance, the nature of dye, semiconductor electrode, and activity of redox electrolyte, and so forth. In DSSC, TiO2 is the key component in determining the device efficiency. TiO2 prepared by sol-gel and hydrothermal method has the advantage of tuning its composition, particle size, and pore size distribution. The criteria of making an effective TiO2 working electrode include high surface area, appropriate band gap, and good adhesion [36]. TiO2 working electrode having high anatase content can facilitate electron transport due to its superior conductivity [34]. It is essential to increase the surface area of TiO2 nanoparticles in order to increase the amount of dye adsorbed. In this study, a double-layer TTIP-TiO2 working electrode with a thickness of 16 μm has been presented. The solar cell incorporating such double-layer working electrode has demonstrated a photoconversion efficiency as high as 6.03%.

References

  1. L. Saadoun, J. A. Ayllon, J. Jimenez-Becerril, J. Peral, X. Domenech, and R. Rodriguez-Clemente, “Synthesis and photocatalytic activity of mesoporous anatase prepared from tetrabutylammonium-titania composites,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 193–202, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. B. O'Regan and M. Gratzel, “A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO films,” Nature, vol. 353, no. 6346, pp. 737–740, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  3. S. D. Burnside, V. Shklover, C. Barbé et al., “Self-organization of TiO nanoparticles in thin films,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 2419–2425, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  4. M. K. Nazeeruddin, P. Péchy, T. Renouard et al., “Engineering of efficient panchromatic sensitizers for nanocrystalline TiO-based solar cells,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 123, no. 8, pp. 1613–1624, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  5. T. Yoko, A. Yuasa, K. Kamiya, and S. Sakka, “Sol-gel-derived TiO film semiconductor electrode for photocleavage of water. Preparation and effects of postheating treatment on the photoelectrochemical behavior,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 138, no. 8, pp. 2279–2285, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  6. K. A. Vorotilov, E. V. Orlova, and V. I. Petrovsky, “Sol-gel TiO films on silicon substrates,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 207, no. 1-2, pp. 180–184, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  7. V. J. Nagpal, R. M. Davis, and S. B. Desu, “Novel thin films of titanium dioxide particles synthesized by a sol-gel process,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 3068–3078, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  8. K. S. Yeung and Y. W. Lam, “A simple chemical vapour deposition method for depositing thin TiO films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 169–178, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  9. J. -P. Lu, J. Wang, and R. Raj, “Solution precursor chemical vapor deposition of titanium oxide thin films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 204, no. 1, pp. L13–L17, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  10. S. Schiller, G. Beister, W. Sieber, G. Schirmer, and E. Hacker, “Influence of deposition parameters on the optical and structural properties of TiO films produced by reactive d.c. plasmatron sputtering,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 239–245, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. H. Suhail, G. M. Rao, and S. Mohan, “Dc reactive magnetron sputtering of titanium-structural and optical characterization of TiO films,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 1421–1427, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. Okimura, N. Maeda, and A. Shibata, “Characteristics of rutile TiO films prepared by r.f. magnetron sputtering at a low temperature,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 281-282, no. 1-2, pp. 427–430, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Yu. D. Dolmatov, Zh. Priklad et al., “Changes of state of titanium (TV) during its hydrolysis in sulfuric acid,” Zhurnal Prikladnoi Khimii, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1725–1732, 1969. View at: Google Scholar
  14. Z. Jerman et al., “Gas/diffusion flow injection determination of ammonium ions in river and waste waters by conductometry,” Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications, vol. 31, no. 12, p. 3280, 1966. View at: Google Scholar
  15. B. E. Yoldas, “Hydrolysis of titanium alkoxide and effects of hydrolytic polycondensation parameters,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1087–1092, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. K. Kamiya and S. Sakka, “Thermal expansion of TiO2SiO2 and TiO2GeO2 glasses,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 52, no. 1–3, pp. 357–363, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  17. Z. Zhang, C. C. Wang, R. Zakaria, and J. Y. Ying, “Role of particle size in nanocrystalline TiOi-based photocatalysts,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 102, no. 52, pp. 10871–10878, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  18. A. J. Maira, K. L. Yeung, C. Y. Lee, P. L. Yue, and C. K. Chan, “Size effects in gas-phase photo-oxidation of trichloroethylene using nanometer-sized TiO catalysts,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 192, no. 1, pp. 185–196, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Ito, S. Inoue, H. Kawada, M. Hara, M. Iwasaki, and H. Tada, “Low-temperature synthesis of nanometer-sized crystalline TiO particles and their photoinduced decomposition of formic acid,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 216, no. 1, pp. 59–64, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. F. Porter, Y. G. Li, and C. K. Chan, “Effect of calcination on the microstructural characteristics and photoreactivity of degussa P-25 TiO,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1523–1531, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Q. Shen, T. Toyoda et al., “Studies of optical absorption and electron transport in nanocrystalline TiO electrodes,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 438-439, pp. 167–170, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. Li, J. Hagen, W. Schaffrath, P. Otschik, and D. Haarer, “Titanium dioxide films for photovoltaic cells derived from a sol gel process,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 167–174, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  23. U. Diebold, “The surface science of titanium dioxide,” Surface Science Reports, vol. 48, no. 5–8, pp. 53–229, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  24. Yu. Jiaguo, Yu. Huogen, B. Cheng, Z. Xiujian, and Z. Qingjie, “Preparation and photocatalytic activity of mesoporous anatase TiO nanofibers by a hydrothermal method,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 182, no. 2, pp. 121–127, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  25. A. A. Belhekar, S. V. Awate, and R. Anand, “Photocatalytic activity of titania modified mesoporous silica for pollution control,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 453–458, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  26. M. Adachi, I. Okada, S. Ngamsinlapasathian, Y. Murata, and S. Yoshikawa, “Dye-sensitized solar cells using semiconductor thin film composed of ceramic nanotubes,” Electrochemistry, vol. 70, pp. 449–452, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  27. S. Ngamsinlapasathian, S. Sakulkhaemaruethai, S. Pavasupree et al., “Highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cell using nanocrystalline titania containing nanotube structure,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 164, no. 1-3, pp. 145–151, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. K. Srikanth, M. M. Rahman, H. Tanaka et al., “Investigation of the effect of sol processing parameters on the photoelectrical properties of dye-sensitized TiO2 solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 171–177, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. E. Stathatos, P. Lianos, and C. Krontiras, “Dye-sensitized photoelectrochemical cell using a nanocomposite SiO2/Poiy(ethylene glycol) thin film as electrolyte support. Characterization by time-resolved luminescence and conductivity measurements,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 105, no. 17, pp. 3486–3492, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  30. K. Kajihara and T. Yao, “Macroporous morphology of the titania films prepared by a sol-gel dip-coating method from the system containing poly(ethylene glycol). IV. general principle of morphology formation and effect of heat treatment,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 173–184, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  31. M. Wu, G. Lin, D. Chen et al., “Sol-hydrothermal synthesis and hydrothermally structural evolution of nanocrystal titanium dioxide,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1974–1980, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Tolvanen, , M.S. thesis, Helesinki University of Technology, Finland, 2003.
  33. C. Longo and M.-A. De Paoli, “Dye-sensitized solar cells: a successful combination of materials,” Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 889–901, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  34. N. G. Park, J. Van De Lagemaat, and A. J. Frank, “Comparison of dye-sensitized rutile-and anatase-based TiO solar cells,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 104, no. 38, pp. 8989–8994, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  35. K. Tanaka, M. F. V. Capule, and T. Hisanaga, “Effect of crystallinity of TiO2 on its photocatalytic action,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 187, no. 1-2, pp. 73–76, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  36. T. Ma, K. Inoue, H. Noma, K. Yao, and E. Abe, “Ionization potential studies of organic dye adsorbed onto TiO2 electrode,” Journal of Materials Science Letters, vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 1013–1014, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Yu-Chang Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

4580 Views | 3848 Downloads | 17 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.