Research Article  Open Access
Hongcai Ma, Guang Jin, Xing Zhong, Kai Xu, Yanjie Li, "Optical Design of a Solar Dish Concentrator Based on Triangular Membrane Facets", International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2012, Article ID 391921, 5 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/391921
Optical Design of a Solar Dish Concentrator Based on Triangular Membrane Facets
Abstract
The design of a solar dish concentrator is proposed based on triangular membrane facets for space power applications. The facet concentrator approximates a parabolic surface supported by a deployable perimeter truss structure, which originates from a large aperture space antenna. For optimizing the number of facets rows and focaldiameter ratio of the concentrator, Monte Carlo raytracing method is utilized to determine optical performance of the concentrator, and the system rootmeansquare (RMS) deviation is considered in this design procedure. A 600facet concentrator with focaldiameter ratio of 1.1 will achieve 83.63% of radiative collection efficiency over a 15 cm radius disk located in the focal plane, with a mean solar concentration ratio exceeding 300. The study in this paper is helpful for the development of the membrane facet concentrator.
1. Introduction
Spacebased solar energy is an attractive energy source with a huge potential application for the space solar power and support of various spacecrafts. Researchers have focused on researching the large aperture concentrator as the key component for spacebased concentrator photovoltaic (CPV) system collecting spacebased solar radiation onto a highefficiency photovoltaic cells [1, 2]. To reduce volume and mass of spacebased CPV systems while maximizing efficiency of the photovoltaic cells, there has been long interest in the development of membrane dish concentrators for space power applications. As lightweight, inexpensive, highperformance structures, they are excellent candidates for spacedeployable collectors as well as costeffective terrestrial energy sources. For the terrestrial use, the proposed design of ellipsoidal polyester membrane facets has much better performances than a multifacet dish concentrator consisting of identical circular, and the simulated membrane shape was experimentally verified [3]. A largespan solar parabolic trough concentrator is designed based on a multilayer polymer mirror membrane mounted on a rotatable concrete structure [4]. For the use in space, an inflatable prototype for the Deployable Solar Concentrator has been developed [5]. Especially, L’Garde has developed power antenna concept, and this new technology utilizes an inflatable membrane reflector to concurrently concentrate solar energy for space electrical power generation, while acting as an antenna with large aperture and high gain [6]. Similarly, many reflector antennas with a mesh membrane surface and a deployable perimeter truss, such as AstroMesh antenna [7, 8] and deployable modular mesh antenna [9], divide the reflector surface into triangular flat facets. While the above antenna configurations are also adaptive to be used as concentrators, they had not been explored for solar power generation applications.
This paper deals with the optical design of a lightweight solar concentrator with triangular membrane flat facets as potential lowcost alternate for space solar power generation applications. The focal radiation flux distributions are calculated by the Monte Carlo raytracing method. To obtain the desired radiative collection efficiency and mean solar concentration ratio, we investigate on the minimal number of facets of the concentrator when varying focaldiameter ratio () of the concentrator under consideration of both the system RMS deviation and the random surface error.
2. Concentrator Geometry
Generally, the deployable membrane antennas consist of cable network supplemented with a membrane, tension ties, perimeter truss, and rear net. For simplicity, we only consider the forming process for a membrane surface. The number and size of triangle facets of the membrane surface are determined by layout of nodes. To minimize the number of nodes, a net with coinciding threeband nodes is adopted in this paper [10]. The layout of nodes is shown as Figure 1(a). For the circular aperture, the membrane is divided into equal sectors and equally spaced concentric circles, and there are nodes in the th concentric circles lying on equally spaced radian length of . Then the horizontal nodes are mapped onto the desired parabolic surface giving the shape of membrane after deformation. In reality, the horizontal nodes of membrane are pulled down by cable to the mapped positions of nodes, and then the nearby three nodes comprise a triangle membrane facet. The mapping procedure used for generating the triangularfacet membrane surface is shown in Figure 1(b). The ideal deformed membrane is approximately parabolic in shape and consists of many triangular flat planes, but in reality each plane becomes deformed due to cable tension, membrane tension, membrane size, and surface curvature which is related to focal length. The ideal forming process for a membrane surface has only been considered in this paper. In the final surface, the number of triangular facets and nodes are and numerical description of the deformed membrane given by the positions of nodes on the parabolic surface is derived as where is the number of concentric circles where the nodes are located, represents the th node in the anticlockwise direction in the th concentric circle, is the aperture diameter, and is the nominal focal length of the concentrator.
(a)
(b)
For the solar concentrator based on a triangular membrane facets, in this paper we assume the requirements for the radiation flux on a circular target are that radiative collection efficiency , at a high mean concentration ratio of at least ; meanwhile, the concentrator geometry is refined by selecting the minimum number of facets rows , and the ratio is varied to get the desired radiation flux as high as possible.
3. Monte Carlo RayTracing Method
In Monte Carlo raytracing method, the average radiation flux on the target and the areaweighted mean solar concentration on a circular disk target are defined as where is the radiation flux received by the th discrete annular element, is the radius of the th discrete annular element, is the number of discrete annular elements on the circular target, m is the radius of the circular target disk, and is the incident direct solar flux in space.
Incident rays are distributed over the triangular elements in proportion to the projected element areas. The angular distribution of the launched rays is modeled by the “pillboxsunshape”, which represents the ideal solar disk with uniform brightness in halfcone angle . In order to take into account the random surface error combining with membrane wrinkling at the facets, a Gaussian distribution (expressed in milliradians) is assumed for the angular deviation of the reflected rays with respect to the nominal direction of reflection [11]. The latter is given by the specular law of reflection in which triangularfacets normal vectors are derived from the node triples positions. The receiver is considered without shadowing the incident solar energy. Table 1 summarizes the parameters of the membrane facet concentrator.

4. Optical Design of TriangularFacets Concentrator for the System
The accuracy requirements of deployable antenna with a perimeter truss structure are often specified by the system RMS deviation of the actual triangular flat facets surface from the desired parabolic surface. While we could vary the ratio of the concentrator originated from the deployable antenna to get the focal radiation flux as high as possible, the allowable RMS deviation limits the satisfying range of ratios. Thus, the RMS deviation is considered for this analysis. For a given value of , the maximal triangular facet length and the facet rows are given by [12]
According to the practical limitation of the allowable RMS deviation mm [13], the relationships between the facet rows and the minimum ratio are shown by the curve in Figure 2. In Figure 2, the ratios satisfying the requirement of the RMS deviation are on the upper right zone of the curve, and there are satisfying ratios for , 10, 11, and 12, respectively. The satisfying range of ratios enlarges when the facet rows increases. With the concentrator divided into an enough large number of small facets, all range of ratios is satisfying. This relationship offers restricted limits for the ratio selected for different facet rows in the following optimization procedure of the flatfacet concentrator.
Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show that the variation of radiative collection efficiency with ratio when the random surface error is 0 and 10 mrad, respectively, for the facet rows of 9, 10, 11, and 12. Both figures illustrate that the larger the number of facets, the higher the collection efficiency. By comparing (a) and (b), it is shown that the collection efficiency is slightly lower in the presence of random surface error for the same facet rows value. For instance, by comparison of the case with and without the surface error, the average decreasing amount is only 0.1% from 0.4 to 1.6 of ratio. In addition, an optimal ratio which corresponds to the highest collection efficiency exists for each facet rows as the horizontal line shows; however, the optimal ratio decreases with the increase of facet rows . For instance, for a concentrator with , the collection efficiency increases from 67.7% to 85.27% for the ratio increasing from 0.4 to 1.1 and with increasing from 9 to 12, the optimal ratio decreases from 1.3 to 1.1. Furthermore with the increasing beyond the optimal ratio, the collection efficiency decreases more obviously with random surface error than without random surface error, for example the average decrease is 0.3% with surface error of 10 mrad and 0.15% without random surface error when ratio increases from 1.1 to 1.6 for .
(a)
(b)
Similarly, Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show the variation of the mean concentration ratio with the ratio for several facet rows values when the random surface error is 0 and 10 mrad, respectively. The mean concentration ratio exhibits similar dependence on ratio as the collection efficiency does (Figure 3). The mean concentration ratio also increases with the increasing number of facet rows . With the surface error increasing from 0 to 10 mrad, the mean concentration ratio appreciably decreases. When , , the mean concentration ratios are 340.9, 333.5, respectively, both exceeding 300.
(a)
(b)
In the case keeping concentrator aperture constant, the existence of the optimal ratio for each facet rows is discussed in more detail. When the ratio increases, the concentrator implies a reflected solar cone with more angular divergence. Therefore, the image on the receiver increases. But, on the other hand, a smaller ratio also implies larger RMS deviation, which increases the image size. Therefore, the observed optimal ratio is the result of a tradeoff between these two effects.
Based on the above analysis, the selection of the optimal facet rows and ratio is determined by both the desired flux and allowable RMS deviation . The procedure of optimization design can be described in the following steps: firstly, the minimum number of facet rows is obtained according to the requirements of radiation flux; secondly, the appropriate range of ratio is derived from the allowable RMS deviation ; finally, the ratio is scanned over the range satisfying the requirement of the RMS deviation to achieve the highest radiation flux under the consideration of the random surface error. Based on this design procedure, the obtained optimal facet rows and ratio = 1.1 result in radiative collection efficiency of 83.63% at a mean concentration ratio of 333.5 for a 15 cm radius target with the surface error of 10 mrad, which fulfills well the design requirements.
5. Conclusions
We have identified the optical performance of a solar concentrator based on triangular membrane facets for energy collection. The concentrator approximates an ideal parabolic with triangular flat facets supported by a deployable perimeter truss structure, which originates from a large aperture space antenna. An optical design procedure to the membrane facet concentrator has been developed. The number of facet rows and focaldiameter ratio () was optimized by Monte Carlo raytracing method, in which the radiative collection efficiency and areaweighted mean concentration ratio were calculated. Under consideration of the allowable RMS deviation mm and a random surface error combing with membrane wrinkling of 10 mrad, a 600facet concentrator will achieve 83.63% of radiative collection efficiency over a 15 cm radius disk located in the focal plane, with an areaweighted mean concentration ratio of 333.5. The solar concentrator based on triangular membrane facets is a promising option for the development of a costeffective space photovoltaic solar energy generation.
Acknowledgment
The financial support provided by National Basic Research Program of China with Grant no. 2010CB227101 is greatly appreciated.
References
 M. J. O'Neill, M. F. Piszczor, M. I. Eskenazi et al., “Ultralight stretched Fresnel lens solar concentrator for space power applications,” in Proceedings of the SPIE's 48th Annual Meeting, pp. 5179–5117, San Diego, Calif, USA, August 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 L. S. Mason, “A solar dynamic power option for space solar power,” NASA/TM 1999209380, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Zanganeh, R. Bader, A. Pedretti et al., “A solar dish concentrator based on ellipsoidal polyester membrane facets,” Solar Energy, vol. 86, pp. 40–47, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 R. Bader, A. Pedretti, and A. Steinfeld, “A 9maperture solar parabolic trough concentrator based on a multilayer polymer mirror membrane mounted on a concrete structure,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, vol. 133, no. 3, Article ID 031016, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Grossman and G. Williams, “Inflatable concentrators for solar propulsion and Dynamic Space Power,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 229–236, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
 D. Lichodziejewski and C. Cassapakis, “Inflatable power antenna technology,” in Proceedings of the AIAA 991074 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (AIAA '99), January 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 K. Ando, J. Mitsugi, and Y. Senbokuya, “Analyses of cablemembrane structure combined with deployable truss,” Computers and Structures, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 21–39, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. M. Awlad Hossain, C. H. Jenkins, and L. Hill, “Analysis of a membrane modified perimetertruss mesh antenna,” in Proceedings of the UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes: Innovative Technologies and Concepts, pp. 259–270, SPIE, Bellingham, Wash, USA, August 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 S. P. Chodimella, J. Moore, J. Otto, and H. Fang, “Design evaluation of a large aperture deployable antenna,” in Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, vol. 6624, Newport, RI, USA, May 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Tibert, Deployable tensegrity structures for space applications [Ph.D. thesis], Stockholm, 2002.
 A. Rabl, Active Solar Collectors and Their Applications, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1985.
 P. K. Agrawal, M. S. Anderson, and M. F. card, “Preliminary design of large reflectors with flat facets,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. AP29, no. 4, pp. 688–694, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
 M. W. Thomson, “AstroMesh deployable reflectors for ku and ka band commercial satellites,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Communication Satellite Systems Conference and Exhibit (AIAA '02), Montreal, Canada, May 2002. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Hongcai Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.