International Journal of Photoenergy

International Journal of Photoenergy / 2012 / Article
Special Issue

Development of Visible Light-Responsive Photocatalysts

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 598713 | 4 pages |

Synthesis, Characterization, and Evaluation of Boron-Doped Iron Oxides for the Photocatalytic Degradation of Atrazine under Visible Light

Academic Editor: Shifu Chen
Received23 Jul 2011
Accepted15 Sep 2011
Published15 Dec 2011


Photocatalytic degradation of atrazine by boron-doped iron oxides under visible light irradiation was investigated. In this work, boron-doped goethite and hematite were successfully prepared by sol-gel method with trimethylborate as boron precursor. The powders were characterized by XRD, UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra, and porosimetry analysis. The results showed that boron doping could influence the crystal structure, enlarge the BET surface area, improve light absorption ability, and narrow their band-gap energy. The photocatalytic activity of B-doped iron oxides was evaluated in the degradation of atrazine under the visible light irradiation, and B-doped iron oxides showed higher atrazine degradation rate than that of pristine iron oxides. Particularly, B-doped goethite exhibited better photocatalytic activity than B-doped hematite.

1. Introduction

Atrazine, 2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-1,3,5-triazine, has been widely used in the fields of corn, sorghum, orchard, and forest, controlling broad-leaf and grassy weeds [1]. However, due to the toxicity to aquatic organisms and mammals, high mobility, low-sorption affinity, and slow biodegradability [2, 3], atrazine has been banned by many European countries. It is frequently detected in ground water and surface water [4] and seriously influenced water quality. Therefore, many ways have been found to resolve atrazine contamination, such as advanced oxidation processes [5], microorganism removal [6], and microwave irradiation [7].

It has been reported that photocatalysis is effective way in the degradation of organic pollutants. TiO2 is considered to be the most promising photocatalyst due to its nontoxicity, chemical inertness, and high reactivity. Parra found that both suspended and supported TiO2 could destroy atrazine although atrazine could not be completely mineralized [8]. However, the widespread technological use of TiO2 is impaired by its wide-band gap (3.2 eV), which can only be activated under UV light. Iron oxides especially goethite and hematite have been studied as photocatalysts in recent years because their lower band gap (2.2 eV), and nonmental doping could improve reactivity of photocatalysts [9, 10]. It is reported that PE films with boron-doped goethite has higher photo-induced degradation than pure PE films under the UV irradiation [11]. In this paper, B-doped goethite and hematite were prepared as photocatalysts, and enhancement of photocatalytic activity of atrazine degradation was observed under visible light irradiation.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Fe(NO3 )3, (CH3 O)3 B, KOH, methanol were supplied from Guoyao Chemical Co. (Shanghai, China) and atrazine was supplied from the Laboratories of Dr. Ehrenstorfer (Germany). All chemicals were used without further purification, and deionized water was used in all the experiments.

2.2. Preparation of Photocatalysts and Characterization

The original goethite (G-S-B0%) was prepared according to the method of Atkinson et al. [12], and the preparation of B-doped goethite photocatalysts was the same as the method of Liao et al. [13], while the atomic weight ratio of B to Fe was 2% (G-S-B2%). Goethite and B-doped goethite were calcined at 400°C for 2 h to obtain the original hematite (H-S-B0%) and B-doped hematite (H-S-B2%), respectively.

The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface areas of the powder samples were determined by nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm measurements on a ST-08 nitrogen adsorption apparatus. The X-ray powder diffraction pattern was obtained with a Brook D8 diffractometer using Fe K radiation with an accelerating voltage of 40 kV and current of 20 mA. The UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of different iron oxides in the 190–900 nm were recorded using an American Lambda35 UV-vis spectrophotometer.

2.3. Photocatalytic Evaluation with Atrazine under Visible Light

The photocatalytic activities of pure and B-doped iron oxides nanoparticles were evaluated by the degradation of atrazine under visible light irradiation at a constant temperature (25°C). 25 mL 10 mg·L−1 atrazine solution was put in 50 mL of centrifugal test tube with 100 mg different photocatalysts, and then all tubes were placed in a constant temperature shaking incubator at a speed of 190 r·min−1. A 250 W metal halide lamp (  nm, JLZ250KN, Shanghai Yaming Co.) was put above all tubes as the visible light irradiation with a distance of 80 cm. At different time intervals during the irradiation, samples were collected, filtered, and finally analyzed by HPLC (Agilent1100). Atrazine was detected at 222 nm and the mobile phase was methanol/water mixture (80 : 20, v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL·min−1 using C18 column (4.6 mm × 150 mm).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Crystal Structure

XRD was carried out to investigate the changes of goethite and hematite phase structure after boron doping and heat treatment. Figure 1 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of goethite and B-doped goethite. Compared with G-S-B0%, there is no significant new peak appearing in G-S-B2%, but the intensity of some peaks become weaker or stronger. Maybe the content of boron is too small to make perceptible crystal change of goethite’s structure by X-ray diffraction. But boron does make an influence in the crystal structure of goethite. Figure 2 shows the crystal form change of common hematite and hematite with 2% boron doping. It seems that H-S-B0% and H-S-B2% have the same peaks. Perhaps the high calcination temperature destroyed the changes of doping.

3.2. UV-vis Diffuse Reflectance Spectra

Figure 3 illustrates the UV-vis light reflection spectrum of goethite and boron-doped goethite. In the UV part, G-S-B0% and G-S-B2% show the same reflection rate, while in the visible part, G-S-B2% shows stronger light absorption than G-S-B0%. The UV-vis light reflection spectra of undoped and 2% boron-doped hematite were shown in Figure 4. H-S-B2% shows stronger absorption than H-S-B0% during the whole wavelength range. The band-gap energy of these four iron oxides were estimated by [14] and presented in Table 1. It is inferred that boron doping may narrow the band-gap energy of iron oxides and improve their light absorption ability.

SamplesBET(m2/g)Band-gap energy (eV)


3.3. BET Surface Area

Table 1 lists the BET surface areas of four iron oxides. G-S-B2% exhibits higher BET surface area than that of G-S-B0% (34.13%), and the BET surface area of H-S-B2% is also larger than that of H-S-B0%(21.29%). These results confirm that boron doping can efficiently inhibit the crystal size growth and increase the surface area of goethite and hematite.

3.4. Visible Light Photocatalysis of Atrazine

To examine the photocatalytic activity of B-doped iron oxides, atrazine was chosen as target contaminant. And the degradation rate of atrazine through the reaction time in present of these four iron oxides under visible light was displayed in Figures 5 and 6. The photocatalytic degradation of atrazine followed the first-order reaction kinetics under visible light according to , where stands for the initial concentration of atrazine and is the concentration of atrazine at time. All the numbers were collected in Table 2. The results clearly indicated that G-S-B2% and H-S-B2% revealed a substantially enhanced activity for degradation of atrazine, as compared to undoped G-S-B0% and H-S-B0% under visible light irradiation. The first-order kinetics constants for atrazine degradation by G-S-B0%, G-S-B2%, H-S-B0%, and H-S-B2% were 0.0295 h−1 , 0.0301 h−1 ), 0.0199 h−1 , and 0.0202 h−1 , respectively, and the half lives ( ) of atrazine degraded by them were 23.49 h, 23.02 h, 34.82 h, and 34.31 h, respectively. It was confirmed that boron doping could show good optical activity and goethite had better catalytic activity than hematite under visible light irradiation.

Experiments conditions (h−1) (h)

G-S-B0% 0.97740.029523.49
G-S-B2% 0.98570.030123.02
H-S-B0% 0.97570.019934.82
H-S-B2% 0.99320.020234.31

4. Conclusion

The degradation of atrazine by using visible light-activated B-doped iron oxide as photocatalyst is demonstrated in this paper. Goethite, hematite, and B-doped goethite and hematite were successfully synthesized by a novel modified sol-gel method. Although there is no significant different in XRD results between pure iron oxide and B-doped iron oxide, however, the BET surface area and UV-vis spectra indicate that boron doping greatly influenced the properties of iron oxide. G-S-B2% and H-S-B2% exhibited enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity in degradation of atrazine compared with G-S-B0% and H-S-B0%, which maybe due to the stronger light adsorption and boron-doped goethite exhibited better photocatalytic activity than boron-doped hematite.


This work was supported jointly by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (40973056; 40371064) and Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (SRFDP) of the Ministry of Education of PRC (20100146110020).


  1. X. Z. Fan, B Lu, and A. J. Gong, “Dynamics of solar light photodegradation behavior of atrazine on soil surface,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 75–79, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. B. Zhang, L. Wang, G. Pan et al., “Degradation of atrazine photoinduced by Fe(III)-pyruvate complexes in the aqueous solution,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 169, no. 1–3, pp. 772–779, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. C. Barreiro, M. D. Capelato, L. Martin-Neto, and H. C. B. Hansen, “Oxidative decomposition of atrazine by a Fenton-like reaction in a H2O2/ferrihydrite system,” Water Research, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. Ta, J. Hong, T. F. Liu, and C. Sun, “Degradation of atrazine by microwave-assisted electrodeless discharge mercury lamp in aqueous solution,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 187–194, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. T. A. McMurray, P. S. M. Dunlop, and J. A. Byrne, “The photocatalytic degradation of atrazine on nanoparticulate TiO2 films,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 182, no. 1, pp. 43–51, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. P. Wackett, M. J. Sadowsky, B. Martinez, and N. Shapir, “Biodegradation of atrazine and related s-triazine compounds: from enzymes to field studies,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 39–45, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. H. L. Chen, E. Bramanti, I. Longo, M. Onor, and C. Ferrari, “Oxidative decomposition of atrazine in water in the presence of hydrogen peroxide using an innovative microwave photochemical reactor,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 186, no. 2-3, pp. 1808–1815, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Parra, S. E. Stanca, I. Guasaquillo, and K. R. Thampi, “Photocatalytic degradation of atrazine using suspended and supported TiO2,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 107–116, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. K. Y. Jung, S. B. Park, and S. K. Ihm, “Local structure and photocatalytic activity of B2O3-SiO2/TiO2 ternary mixed oxides prepared by sol-gel method,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 239–245, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. J. Xu, Y. H. Ao, M. D. Chen, and D. G. Fu, “Low-temperature preparation of boron-doped titania by hydrothermal method and its photocatalytic activity,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 484, no. 1-2, pp. 73–79, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. L. Liu, D. W. Zhu, W. B. Zhou et al., “Solid-phase photocatalytic degradation of polystyrene plastic with goethite modified by boron under UV-vis light irradiation,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 256, no. 8, pp. 2546–2551, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. J. Atkinson, A. M. Posner, and J. P. Quirk, “Adsorption of potential-determining ions at the ferric oxide-aqueous electrolyte interface,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 550–558, 1967. View at: Google Scholar
  13. S. J. Liao, J. Wang, D. W. Zhu et al., “Structure and Mn2+ adsorption properties of boron-doped goethite,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 38, no. 1-2, pp. 43–50, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. R. L. Qiu, L. Song, D. D. Zhang, Y. Q. Mo, E. Brewer, and X. F. Huang, “Characterization of conjugated polymer poly(fluorene-co-thiophene) and its application as photosensitizer of TiO2,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2008, Article ID 164702, 5 pages, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Shan Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

1484 Views | 863 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.