International Journal of Photoenergy

International Journal of Photoenergy / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Progress and Perspectives in Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalysis

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 620134 |

Rui Xie, Jinzhan Su, Mingtao Li, Liejin Guo, "Structural and Photoelectrochemical Properties of Cu-Doped CdS Thin Films Prepared by Ultrasonic Spray Pyrolysis", International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2013, Article ID 620134, 7 pages, 2013.

Structural and Photoelectrochemical Properties of Cu-Doped CdS Thin Films Prepared by Ultrasonic Spray Pyrolysis

Academic Editor: Shaohua Shen
Received06 Dec 2012
Accepted13 Jan 2013
Published25 Feb 2013


Cu-doped CdS thin films of variable doping levels have been deposited on indium tin oxide-coated glass substrate by simple and cost-effective ultrasonic spray pyrolysis. The influences of doping concentration and annealing treatment on the structure and photoelectrochemical properties of the films were investigated. The deposited films were characterized by XRD, SEM, and UV-Vis spectra. Moreover, the films were investigated by electrochemical and photoelectrochemical measurements with regard to splitting water for solar energy conversion. The results showed that the Cu impurity can cause a structural change and red shift of absorption edge. It was found that the photocurrent can be improved by the Cu-doping process for the unannealed films under the weak illumination. The unannealed 5 at.% Cu-doped sample obtained the maximum IPCE, which achieved about 45% at 0.3 V versus SCE potential under 420 nm wavelength photoirradiation. In addition, the p-type CdS was formed with a doping of 4 at.%~10 at.% Cu after 450°C 2 h annealed in vacuum.

1. Introduction

Hydrogen is widely considered to be the energy carrier of the future. The most promising method, environmentally friendly, of hydrogen generation is based on photoelectrochemical water decomposition using solar energy [1]. The crucial problem of this method is an appropriate choice of the suitable photoanode material. Many oxide photoelectrodes such as TiO2, WO3, ZnO, and SrTiO3 have been extensively studied for hydrogen production during the past decades [26]. However, due to their wide band gaps, these oxides can respond only to ultraviolet (UV) light, the energy of which makes up only a small fraction of the solar spectrum. For enhancing the efficiency of light conversion, it is necessary to develop semiconductor photoelectrodes with suitable band gap to work under visible light irradiation [7]. Many efforts have been made to modify these oxide materials to visible response [810].

In contrast to these metal oxide photoelectrodes, many metal sulfides such as CdS have narrower band gaps that correspond to the visible light. Pristine CdS is known to show n-type characteristics due to the intrinsic defects [11]. It has generally been considered that the formation of p-type CdS is very difficult, because of strong self-compensation effect due to sulphur vacancies [11, 12]. Cu doping was regularly conducted to form p-type CdS. The doping procedure was always by Cu element diffusion from a copper layer over the CdS layer with annealing process [13, 14]. Some other ways such as electrochemical deposition [15], chemical bath deposition [16], vacuum deposition [17], and pulsed laser deposition [18] have been tried to form p-type CdS. Ultrasonic spray pyrolysis as a simple and cost-effective method is widely used for the preparation of sulfide and oxide thin films [19]. Ultrasonic nebulized atomization provides a method to get droplets of precursor with extremely small sizes. As the droplets approach the heated substrate, the reactants diffuse to the substrate, and a heterogeneous reaction occurs, which led to the formation of thin films. In this paper, Cu-doped CdS thin films were prepared by an ultrasonic spray pyrolysis aqueous precursor, and some properties of the deposited films such as structural, morphologic, optical, and photoelectrochemical characteristics were examined to find out the probability of efficiency improving in water splitting application.

2. Experimental

2.1. Preparation of Films

Cu-doped CdS thin films were prepared by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis method with a locally fabricated ultrasonically nebulizing spray pyrolysis apparatus, which was similar to the apparatus used in [20]. ITO-coated glass (15 Ω/sq.) with dimensions of 60 × 20 × 1.1 mm3 heated at 300°C was used as substrate. The substrate temperature was calibrated by fixing a k-type thermocouple temporarily on the surface of the substrate and simultaneously measuring the heat plate temperature. Some additional parameters such as the distance between the hot plate and nozzle, the carrier gas (nitrogen, N2) flow rate, and the velocity of the nozzle motion were optimized previously to get good quality films. In all our experiments the flow rate of carrier gas was fixed at 0.2 m3/h. The intensity of oscillation of the PZT (piezoelectric transducer), the scan length, the velocity of the nozzle, and the times of scanning motion were all kept constant.

A mixed aqueous solution of cadmium chloride, thiourea and copper chloride was used as the precursor solution to deposit Cu-doped CdS thin films. At first, the aqueous solutions of cadmium chloride (0.05 M) and thiourea (0.055 M) were prepared, respectively. A solution of copper chloride (0.005 M) was obtained by adding excess EDTA to copper chloride solution and maintaining in 80°C water bath for 30 min. Then, a fixed volume of mixed aqueous solution was got by taking equal volume (20 mL) of cadmium chloride and thiourea. After that, the variable volume of copper chloride was added into the above-mentioned mixed aqueous solution with constant stirring.

After deposition, samples were subsequently cooled naturally to room temperature in air. Then each sample was cut into four pieces with dimensions of 15 × 20 × 1.1 mm3, two of which would be annealed in vacuum at 450°C for two hours. Ohmic contacts were made on the non-CdS-coated part of ITO using Cu wire with the help of silver glue and sealed with epoxy resin. The assembled working electrodes have surface areas varying from 0.8 to 1.3 cm2.

2.2. Film Characterization

The surface morphology of films was recorded using a model JSM-6700F field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) from JOEL. The structural analysis of as-prepared films was performed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) employing a model X’Pert PRO X-ray diffractometer from PANalytical equipped with Cu Ka irradiation. Optical absorption spectra were recorded in the wavelength range of 300–800 nm using a model UV4100 UV-Vis-NIR Spectrophotometer from Hitachi equipped with an integrating sphere.

Photoelectrochemical measurements were performed in a custom made cell equipped with a quartz window. The cell set up was made up of a working electrode (the deposited sample), a counter electrode (round-shaped platinum wafer with diameter of 1.8 cm and thickness of 0.1 cm), and a reference electrode (SCE, saturated calomel electrode). The measurements were performed at ambient temperature (22°C) employing an EG and G Princeton Applied Research Model 273A potentiostat and a SIGNAL RECOVERY model 5210 lock-in amplifier. The electrolyte for the capacitance measurements which were carried out at dark was 0.5 M KOH (pH = 13.6). While the electrolyte for the action spectra and linear sweep voltammetry measurement was 0.5 M Na2SO3. In the linear sweep voltammetry a 350 W Xe lamp was used as light source whose intensity was determined by a radiometer (FZ-A, Beijing Normal University, China). While in the measurement of photocurrent action spectra, the light source was the same 350 W Xe lamp with its output chopped with a model 197 chopper (SIGNAL RECOVERY) and monochromated with an Computer Controlled monochromator (WGD30-2, BOIF, China), and its intensities were calibrated with an IL1400BL radiometer (International Light, Inc.) equipped with an SEL033 sensor head. The IPCE (the Incident Photon to Electron Conversion Efficiency) was calculated via the formula in [9] without correction for the reflection loss of the quartz window and the absorption loss of the electrolyte.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structure and Morphology

The deposited films appear transparent, smooth, and uniform to the eye, while their colors became darker with higher doping level. Figure 1 shows SEM pictures of six of the samples. It was observed that the diameters of particles in the films decrease and then increase with increasing the amount of Cu doping. The 1 at.% Cu-doped CdS particle has the smallest diameter. This should be a result of the crystalline structure change, as will be demonstrated shortly by XRD analysis, due to Cu doping. The inset of Figure 1(d) shows the cross-sectional view of 2 at.% Cu-doped CdS film. It confirmed the uniformity of the films and exhibited three layers in which the bottom layer was the glass, the interlayer was ITO, and the top layer was the CdS film with a thickness of about 284 nm.

The results of the structural analysis of the undoped and Cu-doped CdS thin films by XRD are shown in Figure 2. All the XRD peaks in all samples corresponded to those of hexagonal CdS (JCPDF 01-080-0006) except two ITO’s peaks (marked by “*, ”JCPDF 01-089-4597) in the 10 at.% Cu-doped sample. No peak corresponds to CuS or Cu2S, indicating that no crystalline CuS or Cu2S phase was formed. In the low doping level a (002) preferred orientation was observed, while in the high doping level this preferred orientation disappeared. As the concentration of Cu increase the peak intensities of (100) (101) (110) (112) direction increase, while that of (002) and (103) direction decrease. So it was thought that the Cu doping provoked a crystalline structure change, which caused a change of morphology that was shown by SEM images. For the annealing samples, the XRD pattern did not change significantly after annealed in vacuum, which means that annealing treatment does not improve the crystalline quality anymore.

3.2. Optical Characteristics

The UV-Vis spectra of unannealed samples are shown in Figure 3. Two absorption edges were observed at 517 nm and 650 nm corresponding to 2.4 eV and 1.9 eV, respectively. The absorption strength in the wavelength range between 517 nm and 650 nm increases with higher dopant concentration, which indicates that the light absorption in this wavelength range is provoked by Cu doping. A close value of 2.0 eV for the absorption edge of Cu-doped CdS was obtained by Sebastian [16]. It was assumed that the dopant of Cu gives a level situated at about 0.5 eV above the top of the valence band of the host CdS. The absorption edge of 650 nm may result from excitation from Cu level to conduction band (CB). Substitutional Cu on a Cd site is expected to be a single acceptor, whose ionization level is located at 0.6 eV above the valance band (VB). But interstitial Cu which is expected to be a single donor has two ionization levels: one is at 0.7 eV below the CB, and the other is just below the CB [21]. Our estimated Cu level is close to ionization level of substitutional Cu, and the XRD characteristic peaks of all samples have no obvious shift, which may be infer that the Cu doping of our CdS films occurs by substitution of Cd ions with Cu ions in the lattice, rather than Cu ions occupying the interlattice sites. In addition, the UV-Vis spectra of annealed samples not shown here have no obvious changes with that of unannealed samples.

3.3. Electrochemical and Photoelectrochemical Characteristics

Figure 4 illustrates Mott-Schottky plots of unannealed Cu-doped CdS with different doping levels. At low dopant concentration (0~2 at.%), the films reveal n-type semiconducting behavior, as positive slopes were obtained whose value increased with higher dopant concentration, indicating that the donor densities are reduced by the compensation of Cu acceptor. At higher dopant concentration (4~10 at.%), the films exhibit a different behavior. The 4 at.% doped and 10 at.% doped samples give both positive and negative slopes in their Mott-Schottky plots which means that they reveal both n-type and p-type characteristics [22]. We ascribe this duplex character behavior to the Cu atoms unevenly distributed in the host CdS film. In contrast with other samples, the 5 at.% doped sample is entirely different whose capacitance value does not change significantly with different electrode potentials. Thus, this film behaves as a capacitor or more probably as a low doped-like semiconductor [22]. That should result from the equality strength of effects from Cu acceptors and defect donors (such as S vacancy).

Mott-Schottky plots for the annealed samples are represented in Figure 5. The low doped (0.5 at.% and 1 at.%) CdS films do not showing n-type characteristic after annealing but behave like unannealed 5 at.% doped CdS as a low doped-like semiconductor [22]. The annealed 2 at.% doped CdS reveals both n-type and p-type characteristics. With the dopant concentration getting higher than 4 at.%, the conversion of conductivity type from n-type to p-type was observed for the annealed Cu-doped CdS. This annealing effect on the conductivity type that should ascribe to the Cu atoms become uniformly distributed in the host CdS film after annealing.

Figure 6 shows wavelength dependence of IPCE (incident photon-to-current conversion efficiencies) for CdS electrodes with different dopant concentrations unannealed or annealed at 450°C in vacuum. These curves clearly show the occurrence of longer wavelength response (red shift) as a result of Cu doping, as is expected from UV-Vis absorption spectra (Figure 3). The threshold wavelength is around 680 nm (corresponding to 1.82 eV), which is 30 nm longer than the absorption spectra result (650 nm). The IPCE in the red shift region increases with higher dopant concentration before the dopant concentration of 5 at.% but gets a little lower for the 10 at.% doped sample. The IPCE in the fundamental absorption region are also improved after Cu-doped. The photocurrent in this region should be derived from the exciting of electron from valence band to conduction band. It was thought that an nonuniform distribution of Cu atoms in the host CdS films was formed due to a asynchronous formation of Cd–S bond and Cu–S bond during the pyrolysis, and this nonuniform distribution of Cu atoms caused formation of disordered tiny local p-n junctions in the films. The Cu acceptors may decrease the photocurrent by acting as a recombination center, but the disordered local p-n junctions separated the generated electrons and holes and improved the photocurrent. The maximum IPCE achieved 45% at 420 nm under 0.3 V versus SCE potential for the 5 at.% doped sample.

As show in Figure 6(b), the IPCE of the annealed films increases by 18% at low dopant level (0.5 at.% and 1 at.% doped) but decreases dramatically when the dopant concentration gets higher than 2 at.%. The reason for this should be the high concentration of Cu acceptors which function as a recombination center. And there were no more local p-n junctions in the films because they were eliminated by uniformly dispersing of Cu atoms which was caused by the annealing treatment.

Figure 7 shows a plot of the photocurrent density versus applied potential obtained by linear sweep voltammetry measurement in which a shutter was used for evaluating the anodic current both in dark and light conditions. The illumination light here was white light from Xe lamp with an intensity of 165 mW/cm2. It was observed that the photocurrents diminished after Cu doping. The undoped film has the highest photocurrent of approximately 5.1 mA/cm2 at 0.3 V versus SCE. For the annealed Cu-doped films, the photocurrents, which were not shown here, dropped even more dramatically after doping.

The decrease of photocurrent after doping under the white light illumination was corresponding to the high carrier recombination rate. This is different from the result of IPCE measurement. The reason for this difference should be the different intensity of the illumination light. The IPCE measurement was taken using the weak monochromatic light (130~750 μW/cm2), while in the linear sweep voltammetry measurement an intense white light was utilized (165 mW/cm2). The large difference of the light intensity causes the variation of the photocurrent response in these two measurements. Under the weak light illumination the electron-hole pairs were spatially separated by the disordered local p-n junctions and then the separated electrons and holes drifted towards the side of substrate and electrolyte, respectively, due to the electric field within the space-charge region, so the efficiency could be relatively high for the weak illumination. It was reported that the electron lifetime decreases with increasing light intensity [23], so the recombination of electrons and holes can be higher under the intense white light illumination, causing the photocurrent drop of the Cu-doped samples. In addition, the electric field in the space-charge region diminished under the intense white light illumination, then the local p-n junctions separated electrons and holes could not be further separated and recombined before they reached the substrate or the electrolyte side.

4. Conclusions

The present work demonstrated Cu-doped CdS films synthesized by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis with Cu2+ containing agent added into precursor directly. The morphology changed with Cu doping. The diameters of particles in the films decrease and then increase with increasing amount of Cu dopant. In this alteration of diameter changing direction, the (002) preferred orientation disappeared. The Cu doping causes a red shift of absorption edge from 517 nm to 650 nm, and the absorption strength increase with higher dopant concentration.

The unannealed films reveal n-type semiconducting behavior at dopant concentration lower than 2 at.% and both n-type and p-type characteristics at dopant concentration higher than 4 at.%. After annealing none of the doped films show n-type anymore. Only the annealing samples with more than 4 at.% Cu-doped films reveal p-type characteristic. Other samples reveal complex conducting characteristics.

The IPCE was improved by Cu doping for the unannealed samples. A maximum IPCE of 45% was got at 420 nm for the 5 at.% doped sample. But for the annealed samples, only that of 0.5 at.% and 1 at.% doped samples were slightly improved. IPCE of 2~10 at.% doped samples decreased dramatically. Under intensity illumination, the photocurrent of all the doped samples decreased. In the linear swept voltammetry measurement, charge separation efficiency in the space charge region was dependent on the illumination intensity. It decreased as the illumination intensity increased.

The p-type CdS can only be formed by high level doping (more than 4 at.%) and then annealing to make Cu element uniformly dispersible. But the doping caused a dramatically decrease of photocurrent. This p-type CdS deposition could not be thought to be advantageous, but as the unannealed Cu-doped samples give an increase in efficiency under weak illumination, which was ascribed to formation of disordered local p-n junction in the film, it can be said that this gives a new way easy to grasp to improve the separation of electron-hole pairs in the photoelectrochemical cells.


The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Contract no. 51121092, no. 51202186) and the National Basic Research Program of China (no. 2009CB220000). One of the authors (J. Su) was supported by the the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.


  1. A. Mills and S. Le Hunte, “An overview of semiconductor photocatalysis,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 1–35, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  2. T. Bak, J. Nowotny, M. Rekas, and C. C. Sorrell, “Photo-electrochemical hydrogen generation from water using solar energy. Materials-related aspects,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 991–1022, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. K. Rajeshwar, “Hydrogen generation at irradiated oxide semiconductor-solution interfaces,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 765–787, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. T. Yoko, A. Yuasa, K. Kamiya, and S. Sakka, “Sol-gel-derived TiO2 film semiconductor electrode for photocleavage of water. Preparation and effects of postheating treatment on the photoelectrochemical behavior,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 138, no. 8, pp. 2279–2285, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  5. N. R. de Tacconi, C. R. Chenthamarakshan, G. Yogeeswaran et al., “Nanoporous TiO2 and WO3 films by anodization of titanium and tungsten substrates: influence of process variables on morphology and photoelectrochemical response,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 50, pp. 25347–25355, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Guo, P. Diao, and S. Cai, “Hydrothermal growth of perpendicularly oriented ZnO nanorod array film and its photoelectrochemical properties,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 249, no. 1–4, pp. 71–75, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Shen, J. Shi, P. Guo, and L. Guo, “Visible-light-driven photocatalytic water splitting on nanostructured semiconducting materials,” International Journal of Nanotechnology, vol. 8, no. 6-7, pp. 523–591, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. Asahi, T. Morikawa, T. Ohwaki, K. Aoki, and Y. Taga, “Visible-light photocatalysis in nitrogen-doped titanium oxides,” Science, vol. 293, no. 5528, pp. 269–271, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. Lindgren, J. M. Mwabora, E. Avandaño et al., “Photoelectrochemical and optical properties of nitrogen doped titanium dioxide films prepared by reactive DC magnetron sputtering,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 107, no. 24, pp. 5709–5716, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  10. A. Hameed, M. A. Gondal, and Z. H. Yamani, “Effect of transition metal doping on photocatalytic activity of WO3 for water splitting under laser illumination: role of 3d-orbitals,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 715–719, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. Mandel, “Self-compensation limited conductivity in binary semiconductors. I. Theory,” Physical Review, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. A1073–A1079, 1964. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. D. A. Cusano, “CdTe solar cells and photovoltaic heterojunctions in II-VI compounds,” Solid State Electronics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 217–218, 1963. View at: Google Scholar
  13. K. P. Varkey, K. P. Vijayakumar, T. Yoshida, and Y. Kashiwaba, “Spray pyrolised thin film CdS homojunction solar cell with improved performance,” Renewable Energy, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 465–472, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  14. S. Mathew, P. S. Mukerjee, and K. P. Vijayakumar, “Characterization of spray pyrolysed CdS thin film doped with Cu,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 34, no. 9A, pp. 4940–4944, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  15. H. Minoura, T. Sugiura, E. Suzuki, Y. Mizuno, Y. Ueno, and D. P. Amalnerkar, “Photoelectrochemical properties of polycrystalline films of CdS doped with Cu,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. 1346–1350, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  16. P. J. Sebastian, “P-type CdS thin films formed by in situ Cu doping in the chemical bath,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 62, no. 23, pp. 2956–2958, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. Xie, C. Tian, W. Li et al., “Preparation of p-type CdS thin films and in situ dark conductivity in vacuum deposited CdS : Cu films,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 257, no. 5, pp. 1623–1627, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. M. Mahdavi, A. Irajizad, A. Azarian, and R. M. Tilaki, “Optical and structural properties of copper doped CdS thin films prepared by pulsed laser deposition,” Scientia Iranica, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 360–365, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  19. P. S. Patil, “Versatility of chemical spray pyrolysis technique,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 185–198, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. T. Li, J. Z. Su, and L. J. Guo, “Preparation and characterization of ZnIn2S4 thin films deposited by spray pyrolysis for hydrogen production,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 2891–2896, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. Nishidate, T. Sato, Y. Matsukura, M. Baba, M. Hasegawa, and T. Sasaki, “Density-functional electronic structure calculations for native defects and Cu impurities in CdS,” Physical Review B, vol. 74, no. 3, Article ID 035210, 8 pages, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. F. Montemor, M. G. S. Ferreira, N. E. Hakiki, and M. da Cunha Belo, “Chemical composition and electronic structure of the oxide films formed on 316 L stainless steel and nickel based alloys in high temperature aqueous environments,” Corrosion Science, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1635–1650, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L. M. Peter and K. G. U. Wijayantha, “Electron transport and back reaction in dye sensitized nanocrystalline photovoltaic cells,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 45, no. 28, pp. 4543–4551, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Rui Xie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.