International Journal of Photoenergy

International Journal of Photoenergy / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

TiO2 Photocatalytic Materials 2014

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 219317 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/219317

Application of Glass Fiber-Based N-Doped Titania under Visible-Light Exposure for Photocatalytic Degradation of Aromatic Pollutants

Academic Editor: Jiaguo Yu
Received05 Feb 2014
Revised13 Mar 2014
Accepted13 Mar 2014
Published31 Mar 2014

Abstract

Flexible glass fiber-supported nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide (GF-N-TiO2) photocatalysts with different N/Ti ratio were prepared using a dip-coating method followed by a low-temperature heat-treatment process. In addition, their photocatalytic activities were evaluated for the degradation of aromatic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) under visible-light irradiation. The prepared GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts were characterized using scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction spectroscopy, and UV-visible spectroscopy. A control photolysis test performed using an uncoated GF displayed no detectable degradation of the target compounds under visible-light irradiation. The outlet-to-inlet concentration ratios of the target pollutants obtained using the GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts were lower than that obtained using the GF-TiO2 photocatalyst. The photocatalytic activity of GF-N-TiO2 photocatalyst increased as the N-to-Ti ratio increased from 0.06 to 0.08 but decreased gradually as the N-to-Ti ratio increased further to 0.12, suggesting the existence of optimal N/Ti ratios. The outlet-to-inlet concentration ratio of all the target compounds displayed an increasing trend as both air flow rate and inlet concentration increased. Overall, the GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts could be applied effectively for the degradation of aromatic VOCs under visible-light irradiation when operation conditions are optimized.

1. Introduction

A significant amount of concern has been directed to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) due to not only their widespread presence in various environments but also their environmental health hazards. Particularly, monocyclic aromatic VOCs, including toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene (TEX), which originate mainly from traffic emissions in urban environments, industrial combustion processes, solvent and petroleum handling, and other industrial processes, are frequently measured at high concentration levels [1]. Ambient-air TEX can infiltrate buildings, exacerbating indoor air pollution [2]. Indoor air quality can be worsened due to TEX emissions from various indoor sources, such as building finishing materials, furniture, and household products [3, 4]. Moreover, TEX even at sub-ppm concentrations are potentially toxic to human beings [5], necessitating the development of control tools to lower health risks to building occupants from indoor air exposure.

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a representative semiconductor photocatalyst that has been extensively used for environmental pollutant purifications. However, it has a major drawback in its practical application in that it is functional under only UV exposure conditions because of its wide band gap [6]. To address this drawback of TiO2, several strategies have been applied by a great deal of research groups; these strategies have included nonmetal deposition [7, 8], metal deposition [9, 10], dye sensitization [11], semiconductor coupling [12], and carbon materials coupling [13, 14]. Among them, nonmetal N-doping has received special attention for environmental applications, mainly because N can be easily incorporated into two different sites of the bulk phase of TiO2 owing to its atomic size comparable with oxygen and small ionization energy [15, 16]. Even though there are certain questions that remain to be answered to understand the photocatalytic mechanism and behavior of N-doped TiO2 (N-TiO2) under visible-light exposure [1720], several research groups found that N-TiO2 photocatalysts had superior photocatalytic activity to unmodified TiO2 under visible-light irradiation for decomposition of a variety of gaseous and aqueous environmental pollutants [8, 15, 21, 22].

Application of nanomaterials for environmental treatments necessitates a supporting substrate to minimize the separation of suspended powders in aqueous media or their uncontrolled dispersion in treated air, problems encountered in water, and air applications, respectively [23, 24]. A range of substrates as a nanomaterial support have been investigated for the photocatalytic degradation of environmental pollutants, including activated carbon powders [25], activated carbon fiber [26, 27], glass beads [28, 29], glass tubes [21], and polymer materials [30, 31]. Among these substrates, glass fiber has received particular attention primarily because of its flexibility, which enables the materials to be fitted in various geometrical-shape photocatalytic reactors [32, 33]. Moreover, Panniello et al. [32] reported that glass fiber-supported Fe-doped TiO2 prepared by a combined hydrolysis and dip-coating method displayed superior photocatalytic performance to a reference P25 TiO2 for degradation of aqueous orange dye. However, the feasibility of other types of photocatalysts, including N-TiO2, which are supported by glass fiber for the treatment of environmental pollutants, is another recent topic of research that requires further examination. Consequently, in this study, the feasibility of applying glass fiber-supported N-TiO2 (GF-N-TiO2) under visible-light exposure to degradation of TEX at sub-ppm concentrations typically associated with indoor air quality issues was investigated.

2. Experimental

2.1. Preparation and Characterization of GF-N-TiO2 and GF-TiO2

GF (11.5 × 22.0 cm, Hyundai Fiber) was thermally pretreated and then cleaned using methanol and distilled water. The GF was heated at 350°C for 4 h in an electric furnace to burn away organic residues on the GF surface. The pretreated GF was washed sequentially with 2-propanol, acetone, and distilled water, after which it was dried at 125°C for 2 h in a dry oven. The dried GF was further treated with NaOH (98%, Sigma-Aldrich) and distilled water and then dried at 125°C for 2 h in the dry oven.

N-TiO2 powder was prepared using commercially available P25 TiO2 powder and urea as a N source. Briefly, 10 g of TiO2 powder was added to specified amounts of urea solution (0.7 M, Sigma-Aldrich) in a Pyrex flask and then rigorously stirred for 2 h under room temperature conditions. Urea solutions of 19, 25, 31, and 37 mL were used to synthesize N-TiO2 powders having N-to-Ti ratios of 0.06, 0.08, 0.10, and 0.12, respectively. The flask was wrapped with aluminum foil to prevent transmission gain of light from laboratory fluorescent lamps and then kept for 24 h. Subsequently, the mixture in the flask was dried for 48 h under reduced pressure conditions to give a white powder. This powder was calcined at 550°C for 5 h in an electric furnace, after which it was washed with diluted H2SO4 (10%, Sigma-Aldrich), and then distilled water until the pH value of washed water reached 7. The washed powder was vacuum-dried for 12 h and then pulverized using an agate mortar to obtain N-TiO2 powder (Figure 1).

The GF-N-TiO2 photocatalyst was prepared using a dip-coating method followed by a low-temperature heat-treatment process. Specifically, 50 mL titanium (IV) isopropoxide (TTIP, 97%, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to 10 mL glacial acetic acid (99%, Sigma-Aldrich) with stirring. This solution was mixed with 1000 mL distilled water followed by addition of 10 mL nitric acid (98%, Sigma-Aldrich) to this solution. Subsequently, the mixture was stirred, until a white precipitate was observed, and then heated at 80°C for 5 h in an oil bath to obtain a transparent sol. The previously prepared N-TiO2 powder (2 g) was added to this sol, after which this mixture was sonicated for 1 h to obtain the final coating solution. The previously cleaned GF was dipped into the coating solution (500 mL) in a home-made glass container (12 cm × 23 cm × 2 cm) for 10 min, taken out slowly, and dried at room temperature for 2 h. These dip-coating and drying processes were conducted in triplicate to give high coating amounts. GF-N-TiO2 powders having N-to-Ti ratios of 0.06, 0.08, 0.10, and 0.12 were named as GF-N-TiO2-0.06, GF-N-TiO2-0.08, GF-N-TiO2-0.10, and GF-N-TiO2-0.12, respectively. In addition, a reference photocatalyst, GF-TiO2, was prepared using P25 TiO2 instead of N-TiO2, following the same coating procedure as used for the preparation of GF-N-TiO2. The characteristics of as-prepared GF-N-TiO2, GF-TiO2, and pretreated GF were determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4300 FE-SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX, Hitachi EDX-350), X-ray diffraction spectroscopy (XRD, Rigaku D/max-2500 diffractometer), and UV-visible spectroscopy (Varian CARY 5G). For the EDX analysis, the sample was pretreated using a Pt-coating system (Hitachi E-1030).

2.2. Determination of Aromatic VOC Degradation Efficiencies

The degradation efficiencies of aromatic VOCs were investigated using GF-N-TiO2, GF-TiO2, and GF, which were placed in a cylindrical photocatalytic reactor. The reactor was prepared using a Pyrex tube (a length of 26.5 cm and an inner diameter of 3.8 cm), where a cylindrical-shaped daylight lamp (F8T5DL, Youngwha Lamp Co.) with a spectral range of 400–720 nm was inserted. The light intensities provided by the daylight lamp were 3.2 mW cm−2 at a distance from the light source to the surface of photocatalysts. The inner surface of the Pyrex tube was covered by a GF-Fe-TiO2, GF-TiO2, or GF sheet. Zero-grade dried air was supplied by an air cylinder and was allowed to flow through a carbon filter for repurification. The dried air stream flowed through two water-containing impingers in tandem, which were partially immersed in a water bath, for air humidification. The relative humidity (RH) levels were adjusted by controlling the mixing ratio of dried with humidified air flows. Standard compounds were prepared by adjusting the mixing ratio of the humidified air with TEX prepared by vaporizing liquid standards, which were injected into a heated glass chamber via a syringe pump (KDS 210, KD Scientific). Lastly, the prepared standard compounds were transferred to the reactor for photocatalytic decomposition efficiency tests. The degradation efficiency tests were conducted under different operational conditions by controlling two important factors: air flow rate (AFR: 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 L min−1) and initial concentration (IC: 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 ppm). When evaluating a specific factor, the other factor was held constant at the following values: IC, 0.1 ppm, and AFR, 1.0 L min−1. In addition, the RH was fixed at 45%, which represents a comfortable value for typical indoor life.

Air measurements were carried out at the inlet and outlet ports of the cylindrical reactor by drawing air through a stainless steel tubing trap containing Tenax GC adsorbent. Gaseous species collected in the adsorbent trap were analyzed using a gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer (Perkin Elmer Clarus SQ 8) (GC/MS) coupled to a thermal desorbing device (Perkin Elmer ATD 350). The gases were qualitatively analyzed based on both their retention times and mass spectra (Wiley 275 software library). Each chemical species was qualitatively analyzed based on calibration curves, which were determined using five concentrations standardized to an internal standard chemical. For the quality control program, a laboratory blank and spiked standard trap samples were analyzed. The entire experimental procedure was repeated three times to give more reliable data and the average values are presented in this paper.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characteristics of As-Prepared Photocatalysts

The surface characteristics of a representative GF-N-TiO2 with a N-to-Ti ratio of 0.08 (GF-N-TiO2-0.08) as well as a reference photocatalyst (GF-TiO2) were examined using SEM, EDX, XRD, and UV-visible absorption analyses. Based on the SEM micrographs (Figure 2), GF-N-TiO2-0.08 showed a better coating of N-TiO2 on GF relative to GF-TiO2. The enhanced coating efficiency for GF-N-TiO2-0.08 was ascribed to the strong agglomerating nature of N-TiO2 [17]. Consistently, previous researchers [22, 34] have found a higher aggregation property of N-TiO2 as compared to pure TiO2 by SEM analysis.

As illustrated in Figure 3, the EDX spectrum of GF-N-TiO2-0.08 showed peaks of Ti, O, and N atoms, whereas the spectrum of GF-TiO2 showed only Ti and O atom bands; those bands assigned to Ti and O atoms were associated with TiO2, while the N atom band was ascribed to N atoms embedded in the TiO2 lattice. Therefore, EDX spectra analysis demonstrated that N atoms could be successfully incorporated into TiO2 to allow the prepared photocatalyst be activated under visible-light irradiation conditions. In agreement with our results, Gurkan et al. [22] found the existence of N atoms for N-TiO2 synthesized using a wet incorporation process through EDX analysis. The undesignated peaks in the EDX spectra were attributed to Pt, which was used for sample coating prior to EDX analysis; no other evident impurities were observed in the samples.

Figure 4 illustrates the XRD spectra of GF-N-TiO2-0.08 and the reference GF-TiO2 photocatalyst. Both photocatalysts displayed an anatase phase with a major band at 25.3° 2θ and a rutile phase with a major band at 27.3° 2θ. These diffractograms were similar to those of Degussa P25 TiO2 reported in other studies [22, 35], indicating that N incorporated into TiO2 for the GF-N-TiO2-0.08 photocatalyst did not alter the crystal structures of TiO2. Gurkan et al. [22] also reported that the XRD patterns of N-TiO2 were similar to those of pure P25 TiO2. However, any N dopant-associated bands were not found in the spectrum of GF-N-TiO2-0.08. These findings suggest that N atoms would not chemically react to produce new crystalline structures, such as TiN, but are rather incorporated interstitially and substitutionally into the TiO2 structure [15]. Otherwise, low amounts of N atoms impregnated into TiO2 in GF-N-TiO2-0.08 could not be detected by XRD possibly due to its limited measurement sensitivity.

The sizes of crystal phases of the GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts and reference GF-TiO2 were estimated based on the Scherrer formula [36]. The anatase crystallite size of GF-N-TiO2-0.08 (36.61 nm) was smaller than that of GF-TiO2 (39.31 nm), while the crystallite sizes of GF-N-TiO2-0.06, GF-N-TiO2-0.10, and GF-N-TiO2-0.12 were 36.49, 36.72, and 37.04 nm, respectively. Gurkan et al. [22] also reported a smaller crystallite size for N-TiO2 powder relative to that of pure TiO2 powder. The reduction in the crystallite size observed for GF-N-TiO2-0.08 was ascribed to the formation of compressive strain in the crystallite structure, which would likely be due to the transformation of electronic structure resulting from N dopant ion incorporation into TiO2 [22].

Figure 5 shows the UV-visible spectra of the GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts and reference GF-TiO2. The reference GF-TiO2 exhibited an absorption edge at a wavelength of around 420 nm, which was in good agreement with that reported in previous studies [22, 34]. In contrast, the UV-visible spectra of GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts were highly shifted toward the visible region, which was consistent with the results reported by Gurkan et al. [22]. These shifts toward the visible region of the spectrum were attributed to the generation of a narrowed band gap level, which is located between the valence and conduction bands of TiO2. Overall, it was suggested that the prepared GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts could be functional under visible-light irradiation as well.

3.2. Photocatalytic Degradation of Aromatic VOCs

The photocatalytic degradation of TEX was conducted using the prepared GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts with different N-to-Ti ratios and GF-TiO2 under visible-light irradiation following three-hour adsorption process. As shown in Figure 6, a control photolysis test performed using an uncoated GF displayed no degradation of TEX at all under visible-light irradiation, which was demonstrated by similar values for inlet and outlet concentrations of TEX. In addition, Figure 5 shows the outlet to inlet concentrations of TEX determined for four GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts (GF-N-TiO2-0.06, GF-N-TiO2-0.08, GF-N-TiO2-0.10, and GF-N-TiO2-0.12) and the reference GF-TiO2 photocatalyst over three-hour photocatalytic process. The outlet-to-inlet concentration ratios of the three target pollutants obtained using the GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts were lower than that of the GF-TiO2 photocatalyst, indicating that GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts had higher photocatalytic activity toward the degradation of TEX. For example, the average outlet-to-inlet concentration ratios of TEX for GF-N-TiO2-0.06 were 0.51, 0.18, and 0.09, respectively, while those of the GF-TiO2 photocatalyst were 0.90, 0.76, and 0.67, respectively. Similarly, Gurkan et al. [22] demonstrated a higher photocatalytic activity for the degradation of cefazolin in the aqueous phase relative to undoped TiO2 under sunlight irradiation. Jo and Kim [21] also reported that daylight lamp-irradiated N-TiO2, which was coated directly onto the inner wall of a Pyrex tubing reactor, showed superior performance for the degradation of aromatic VOCs compared to unmodified TiO2. The superior photocatalytic activity of the GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts under visible-light irradiation was ascribed to their predisposition for visible-light absorbance owing to large specific surface area and the reduced impurity level localized in the top of valence band, as demonstrated from their UV-visible spectra (Figure 5), since the photocatalytic reaction rates are proportional to the amount of photon absorption by the photocatalysts [6, 3740]. The smaller crystallite size of GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts relative to the GF-TiO2 photocatalyst would also enhance their photocatalytic activity. Consequently, it was suggested that GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts with visible-light activation can be applied to effectively degrade aromatic VOCs.

As also demonstrated in Figure 6, the photocatalytic activity of the GF-N-TiO2 photocatalyst increased as the N-to-Ti ratio increased from 0.06 to 0.08, but then decreased gradually as the N-to-Ti ratio increased further to 0.12. These results indicate that there is an optimal N-to-Ti ratio range for the synthesis of GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts. The decreasing pattern for high N-to-Ti ratios was attributed to increased particle aggregation due to high amounts of N dopant, which results in the reduction in photocatalyst surface area [22]. The high amounts of N dopant might also decrease the separation distance of charge carriers, which result in an increase in the recombination of electron-hole pairs.

Figure 7 illustrates the outlet-to-inlet concentration ratios of TEX obtained using GF-N-TiO2-0.08 according to AFRs. The outlet-to-inlet concentration ratio of all the target compounds displayed an increasing trend as AFR increased, indicating that the photocatalytic activity of GF-N-TiO2-0.08 decreased with increasing AFRs. Particularly, the average ratios of TEX increased from 0.47 to 0.82, 0.11 to 0.71, and 0.09 to 0.59, respectively, as the AFR increased from 1 to 4 L min−1. In agreement with our results, Jeong et al. [41] reported that the photocatalytic activity of Degussa P25 TiO2 for the degradation of benzene and toluene under UV irradiation showed a decreasing trend with increasing AFRs. These results might be ascribed to the mass transfer rate of the pollutant molecules from the air stream to the photocatalyst surface as well as photocatalytic reaction kinetics [42]. Unlike batch reactors, the mass transfer rates of gas-phase compounds in continuous-flow photocatalytic reactors are closely associated with the linear face velocities of the air stream [43]. In the present study, the linear face velocities increased as the AFR increased: the linear face velocities for AFRs of 1, 2, 3, and 4 L min−1 were 4.8, 9.6, 14.4, and 19.2 cm s−1, respectively. These results suggested that the photocatalytic activity of the GF-N-TiO2-0.08 would increase as the AFR increased, owing to high mass-transfer rates; rather, the photocatalytic activity of GF-N-TiO2-0.08 decreased with increasing AFR. As such, the low photocatalytic activity of GF-N-TiO2-0.08 at high AFRs was attributed to an insufficient reaction time in the photocatalytic reactor, suggesting that the photocatalytic activity of GF-N-TiO2-0.08 was likely limited by reaction kinetics on the photocatalyst surfaces. The reaction times for AFRs of 1, 2, 3, and 4 L min−1, which were calculated by dividing the empty-space reactor volume by the AFRs, were 6.1, 3.1, 2.0, and 1.5 s, respectively.

Figure 8 shows the outlet-to-inlet concentration ratios of TEX obtained using GF-N-TiO2-0.08 according to ICs. For all target compounds, the outlet-to-inlet concentration ratio increased as IC increased, indicating that the photocatalytic activity of GF-N-TiO2-0.08 decreased with increasing ICs. At the lowest IC (0.1 ppm), the average ratios of TEX were 0.41, 0.10, and 0.07, respectively, whereas those at the highest IC (2.0 ppm) were 0.79, 0.49, and 0.42, respectively. Devahasdin et al. [44] also found that the photocatalytic degradation efficiencies of unmodified TiO2 for degradation of NO under UV irradiation decreased from 70–15% when IC was increased from 5–60 ppm. In addition, Jeong et al. [41] reported that the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of toluene determined using Degussa P25 TiO2 decreased gradually as IC increased from 0.6–10 ppm. The descending trend in photocatalytic activity with increasing IC was ascribed to competitive adsorption among TEX molecules on the catalyst surface; adsorption of chemical molecules onto the catalyst surface is known to be a crucial factor influencing the photocatalytic degradation of organic compounds [6].

4. Conclusions

This study investigated the applicability of glass fiber-based N-doped titania (GF-N-TiO2) under visible-light exposure for the photocatalytic degradation of aromatic VOCs. SEM results indicated the formation of aggregates for the GF-N-TiO2 photocatalyst, while EDX spectral analysis demonstrated that N elements were successfully incorporated into the TiO2 crystal lattice. The UV-visible spectra suggested that GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts could be functional under visible-light exposure. The prepared GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts showed superior photocatalytic performances to the reference GF-TiO2 photocatalyst for degradation of aromatic VOCs under visible-light irradiation. The prepared GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts also showed a different dependence of N-to-Ti ratios on photocatalytic degradation of aromatic VOCs, indicating that there is optimal range of N-to-Ti ratios for the synthesis of GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts. In addition, AFR and IC were both found to be major influential factors on the photocatalytic performance of the GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts. Overall, the GF-N-TiO2 photocatalysts could be applied effectively for the degradation of aromatic VOCs under visible-light irradiation at optimal operation conditions.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (no. 2011-0027916) and through the GCRC-SOP (no. 2011-0030013).

References

  1. M. Leuchner and B. Rappenglück, “VOC source-receptor relationships in Houston during TexAQS-II,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 44, no. 33, pp. 4056–4067, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. O. O. Hänninen, E. Lebret, V. Ilacqua et al., “Infiltration of ambient PM2.5 and levels of indoor generated non-ETS PM2.5 in residences of four European cities,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 38, no. 37, pp. 6411–6423, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. K.-D. Kwon, W.-K. Jo, H.-J. Lim, and W.-S. Jeong, “Characterization of emissions composition for selected household products available in Korea,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 148, no. 1-2, pp. 192–198, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. H. Shin and W. K. Jo, “Longitudinal variations in indoor VOC concentrations after moving into new apartments and indoor source characterization,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 20, pp. 3696–3707, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  5. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer), “List of classifications by alphabetical order,” 2013, http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/index.php. View at: Google Scholar
  6. M. A. Henderson, “A surface science perspective on TiO2 photocatalysis,” Surface Science Reports, vol. 66, no. 6-7, pp. 185–297, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. Ohno, M. Akiyoshi, T. Umebayashi, K. Asai, T. Mitsui, and M. Matsumura, “Preparation of S-doped TiO2 photocatalysts and their photocatalytic activities under visible light,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 265, no. 1, pp. 115–121, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C.-C. Hu, T.-C. Hsu, and S.-Y. Lu, “Effect of nitrogen doping on the microstructure and visible light photocatalysis of titanate nanotubes by a facile cohydrothermal synthesis via urea treatment,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 280, pp. 171–178, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  9. H. Guo, M. Kemell, M. Heikkilä, and M. Leskelä, “Noble metal-modified TiO2 thin film photocatalyst on porous steel fiber support,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 95, no. 3-4, pp. 358–364, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Kment, H. Kmentova, P. Kluson et al., “Notes on the photo-induced characteristics of transition metal-doped and undoped titanium dioxide thin films,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 348, no. 1, pp. 198–205, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. X. Chen, W. Wang, H. Xiao et al., “Accelerated TiO2 photocatalytic degradation of Acid Orange 7 under visible light mediated by Peroxymonosulfate,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 193-194, pp. 290–295, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  12. Y. Wang, J. Zhang, L. Liu, C. Zhu, X. Liu, and Q. Su, “Visible light photocatalysis of V2O5/TiO2 nanoheterostructures prepared via electrospinning,” Materials Letters, vol. 75, pp. 95–98, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. W.-K. Jo, “Coupling of titania with multiwall carbon nanotubes for decomposition of gas-phase pollutants under simulated indoor conditions,” Journal of Air & Waste Management Association, vol. 63, pp. 963–970, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  14. W.-K. Jo and H.-J. Kang, “Titanium dioxide-graphene oxide composites with different ratios supported by Pyrex tube for photocatalysis of toxic aromatic vapors,” Powder Technology, vol. 250, pp. 115–121, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  15. R. Asahi, T. Morikawa, T. Ohwaki, K. Aoki, and Y. Taga, “Visible-light photocatalysis in nitrogen-doped titanium oxides,” Science, vol. 293, no. 5528, pp. 269–271, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Pelaez, N. T. Nolan, S. C. Pillai et al., “A review on the visible light active titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental applications,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 125, pp. 331–349, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  17. C. di Valentin, E. Finazzi, G. Pacchioni et al., “N-doped TiO2: theory and experiment,” Chemical Physics, vol. 339, no. 1–3, pp. 44–56, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. di Valentin, G. Pacchioni, A. Selloni, S. Livraghi, and E. Giamello, “Characterization of paramagnetic species in N-doped TiO2 powders by EPR spectroscopy and DFT calculations,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 23, pp. 11414–11419, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. N. Serpone, “Is the band gap of pristine TiO2 narrowed by anion- and cation-doping of titanium dioxide in second-generation photocatalysts?” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 48, pp. 24287–24293, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. V. Emeline, V. N. Kuznetsow, V. K. Rybchuk, and N. Serpne, “Visible-light-active titania photocatalysts: the case of N-doped TiO2s—properties and some fundamental issues,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2008, Article ID 258394, 19 pages, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. W.-K. Jo and J.-T. Kim, “Application of visible-light photocatalysis with nitrogen-doped or unmodified titanium dioxide for control of indoor-level volatile organic compounds,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 164, no. 1, pp. 360–366, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. Y. Gurkan, N. Turkten, A. Hatipoglu, and Z. Cinar, “Photocatalytic degradation of cefazolin over N-doped TiO2 under UV and sunlight irradiation: prediction of the reaction paths via conceptual DFT,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 184, pp. 113–124, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Y. Shan, T. I. M. Ghazi, and S. A. Rashid, “Immobilisation of titanium dioxide onto supporting materials in heterogeneous photocatalysis: a review,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 389, no. 1-2, pp. 1–8, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. L. Bianchi, C. Pirola, E. Selli, and S. Biella, “Photocatalytic NOx abatement: the role of the material supporting the TiO2 active layer,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 211-212, pp. 203–207, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. Matos, E. García-López, L. Palmisano, A. García, and G. Marcì, “Influence of activated carbon in TiO2 and ZnO mediated photo-assisted degradation of 2-propanol in gas-solid regime,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 99, pp. 170–180, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  26. W. K. Jo, S. H. Shin, and E. S. Hwang, “Removal of dimethyl sulfide utilizing activated carbon fiber-supported photocatalyst in continuous-flow system,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 191, no. 1–3, pp. 234–239, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J.-W. Shi, H.-J. Cui, J.-W. Chen et al., “TiO2/activated carbon fibers photocatalyst: effect of coating procedures on the microstructure, adhesion property, and photocatalytic ability,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 388, pp. 201–208, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  28. T. E. Agustina, H. M. Ang, and V. K. Pareek, “Treatment of winery wastewater using a photocatalytic/photolytic reactor,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 135, no. 1-2, pp. 151–156, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. W. Verbruggen, S. Ribbens, T. Tytgat et al., “The benefit of glass bead supports for efficient gas phase photocatalysis: case study of a commercial and a synthesised photocatalyst,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 318–325, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. K. Alves, F. A. Berutti, F. J. Clemens, T. Graule, and C. P. Bergmann, “Photocatalytic activity of titania fibers obtained by electrospinning,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 312–317, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. C. Prahsarn, W. Klinsukhon, and N. Roungpaisan, “Electrospinning of PAN/DMF/H2O containing TiO2 and photocatalytic activity of their webs,” Materials Letters, vol. 65, no. 15-16, pp. 2498–2501, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Panniello, M. L. Curri, D. Diso et al., “Nanocrystalline TiO2 based films onto fibers for photocatalytic degradation of organic dye in aqueous solution,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 121-122, pp. 190–197, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. Lin, X. Zhang, Q. Sun, T. Zhou, and J. Lu, “Fabrication of solar light induced Fe-TiO2 immobilized on glass-fiber and application for phenol photocatalytic degradation,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 48, pp. 4570–4575, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  34. J. Senthilnathan and L. Philip, “Photocatalytic degradation of lindane under UV and visible light using N-doped TiO2,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 161, no. 1-2, pp. 83–92, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. M. Joshi, N. K. Labhsetwar, D. V. Parwate, and S. S. Rayalu, “Efficient photocatalytic hydrogen generation by silica supported and platinum promoted titanium dioxide,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 48, pp. 3545–3552, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  36. B. D. Cullity and S. R. Stock, Elements of X-Ray Diffraction, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 3rd edition, 2001.
  37. Q. Xiang, J. Yu, and M. Jaroniec, “Nitrogen and sulfur co-doped TiO2 nanosheets with exposed {001} facets: synthesis, characterization and visible-light photocatalytic activity,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 4853–4861, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Q. Xiang, J. Yu, W. Wang, and M. Jaroniec, “Nitrogen self-doped nanosized TiO2 sheets with exposed {001} facets for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity,” Chemical Communications, vol. 47, no. 24, pp. 6906–6908, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Z. Lin, A. Orlov, R. M. Lambert, and M. C. Payne, “New insights into the origin of visible light photocatalytic activity of nitrogen-doped and oxygen-deficient anatase TiO2,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 44, pp. 20948–20952, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. P. Zhou, J. Yu, and Y. Wang, “The new understanding on photocatalytic mechanism of visible-light response N-S codoped anatase TiO2 by first-principles,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 142-143, pp. 45–53, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  41. J. Jeong, K. Sekiguchi, W. Lee, and K. Sakamoto, “Photodegradation of gaseous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using TiO2 photoirradiated by an ozone-producing UV lamp: decomposition characteristics, identification of by-products and water-soluble organic intermediates,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 279–287, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. K. Demeestere, J. Dewulf, and H. van Langenhove, “Heterogeneous photocatalysis as an advanced oxidation process for the abatement of chlorinated, monocyclic aromatic and sulfurous volatile organic compounds in air: state of the art,” Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 489–538, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. L. Yang, Z. Liu, J. Shi, H. Hu, and W. Shangguan, “Design consideration of photocatalytic oxidation reactors using TiO2-coated foam nickels for degrading indoor gaseous formaldehyde,” Catalysis Today, vol. 126, no. 3-4, pp. 359–368, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. Devahasdin, C. Fan Jr., K. Li, and D. H. Chen, “TiO2 photocatalytic oxidation of nitric oxide: transient behavior and reaction kinetics,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 156, no. 1–3, pp. 161–170, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Wan-Kuen Jo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

932 Views | 595 Downloads | 3 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.