Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Photoenergy
Volume 2014, Article ID 607954, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/607954
Review Article

Recent Progress in TiO2-Mediated Solar Photocatalysis for Industrial Wastewater Treatment

1National Institute of Clean-and-Low-Carbon Energy, Shenhua NICE, P.O. Box 001, Future Science & Technology Park, Changping District, Beijing 102209, China
2Department of Chemical Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia

Received 5 May 2014; Accepted 27 May 2014; Published 8 July 2014

Academic Editor: Qing Wang

Copyright © 2014 Tong Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The current paper reviews the application of TiO2-mediated solar photocatalysis for industrial wastewater treatment, starting with a brief introduction on the background of industrial wastewater and the development of wastewater treatment processes, especially advanced oxidation processes (AOPs). We, then, discuss the application of solar TiO2 photocatalysis in treating different kinds of industrial wastewater, such as paper mill wastewater, textile wastewater, and olive mill wastewater. In the end, we compare solar TiO2 photocatalysis with other AOPs in terms of effectiveness, energy, and chemical consumption. Personal perspectives are also given, which may provide new insights to the future development of TiO2 photocatalysis for industrial wastewater.

1. Introduction

Industrial wastewater is of global concern due to its severe effects on the environment. Compared with municipal wastewater, industrial wastewater generally contains high concentration of toxic or nonbiodegradable pollutants, such as fats, oil, grease, heavy metals, phenols, and ammonia [1]. The water quality of wastewater can be indicated by some parameters such as suspended solids (SS), biological oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and total organic carbon (TOC) [2]. These parameters are typically very high in industrial wastewater, which significantly reduce the performance of conventional wastewater treatment processes. Industrial wastewater also has much more complex composition than other wastewaters. Moreover, the water quality of industrial wastewater varies from one industry to another. Huge difference in water quality of wastewater between different factories may also happen in some cases. For example, the wastewater produced from iron and steel industry contains a large amount of ammonia, cyanide benzene, naphthalene, phenols, and cresols due to the reduction reactions in blast furnace and the production of coke [3]. In contrast, dispersed dyes are considered as dominant pollutants in textile wastewater and effluent from paper industry generally contains high concentration of SS and BOD [4]. Unlike other wastewaters, high concentration of radioactive materials is present in nuclear industry wastewater. Owing to the high concentration of toxic pollutants and diversity of water quality, the treatment of industry wastewater is always a big challenge. In recent years, various novel technologies such as membrane technology, electrochemical method, and membrane bioreactor (MBR) have been proposed for the treatment of industrial wastewater. Unfortunately, these treatment processes still face several problems, for example, complicated technical requirements, high operational cost, and long reaction time, which severely restrict their applications.

Electrochemical method is to apply a voltage between an anode and cathode to remove pollutants via direct oxidation or reduction on electrodes or indirect oxidation or reduction by the reactive oxygen species generated by electrochemical reactions [5, 6]. Electrochemical method can be categorized to electrodeposition, electrodisinfection, electrocoagulation, electroflotation, electroadsorption, electrooxidation, and electroreduction. Suspended pollutants, colloids, and many charged pollutants can be effectively removed from wastewater by this method [7]. For instance, electroflotation is successfully used for the treatment of oil mill effluent [8], oily wastewater [9], coking wastewater, and mining wastewater. In addition, electrooxidation process has been extensively investigated since the late 1970s [7]. Although many research works have already been done on optimization of the operation parameters, improvement of the electrocatalytic activity, the degradation mechanisms, and kinetics of pollutants, it is clear that electrode materials have big impact on the degradation of pollutants, which has to be improved in term of stability and durability [10].

With the increasing requirement of water supply and the more stringent environmental regulations, great progresses have been seen globally in membrane technology in past two decades. Compared with other processes, membrane technologies have many advantages such as high removal rate on pollutants, well arranged process conductions, and no addition of chemicals [10]. These superiorities make it suitable for wastewater treatment. However, membrane fouling caused by pollutants in wastewater is a major obstacle, which restricts the large-scale application of membranes in industry. Thus, how to achieve an effective and low cost way to treat wastewater is a crucial point.

Biological wastewater treatment is widely used in municipal wastewater treatment due to its low operation cost compared to other treatment processes such as thermal oxidation and chemical oxidation [11]. MBR is an improved activated sludge system, which is a combination of suspended biomass with a membrane process that replaces gravity sedimentation to clarify the wastewater effluent [12]. MBR process has small footprint, flexible design, and automated operation properties. However, like other membrane technologies, membrane fouling by mixed liquor remains and activated sludge is considered as a major obstacle for its applications. In addition, membranes with high chemical resistance are required due to the chemical cleaning process. Currently, MBR technology is mostly applied in small or moderate scale. Moreover, only biodegradable pollutants can be removed by biological treatment processes. There are still large amounts of toxic nonbiodegradable materials present in industrial wastewater.

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), which rely on the generation of highly reactive and oxidizing hydroxyl radicals (•OH), are considered as highly competitive water treatment technologies. As an important technology of AOPs, photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) has attracted increasing attention in recent years because of its excellent performance on pollutants removal, low cost, and photochemical stability and without addition of toxic chemicals [13, 14]. TiO2 is the most widely used catalyst in heterogeneous photocatalysis, because of its photostability, nontoxicity, low cost, and stability in water under most environmental conditions [15]. Large amount of reactive oxygen species such as hydroxyl radicals (•OH) and superoxide radical anion (•O2) are produced on the surface of TiO2 under light irradiation, and these reactive radicals are regarded as the major responsible species for the degradation of organic pollutants in wastewater [1619]. Preis and coworkers [13] studied the degradation of phenolic compounds in wastewater from oil shale under UV-light irradiation. The results revealed that the wastewater quality characteristics have obvious influence on the photodegradation rate of the pollutants. PCO can also serve as a pretreatment, which can significantly enhance the biodegradability of industrial wastewater to meet requirements of the subsequent biotreatment process. Sioi et al. [19] investigated the decolorization of a typical pharmaceutical wastewater using TiO2 P25 as a heterogeneous photocatalyst, revealing that photocatalytic oxidation is a powerful alternative technology for the degradation of hematoxylin. Their results also showed that the performance of P25 nanoparticles didn’t decrease after reuse and, thus, was suitable for practical wastewater treatment. To further improve the efficiency of wastewater treatment, some other techniques can be combined with PCO process. For example, Kim and Park [20] developed a novel hybrid process combining PCO with biofilm. Their results revealed that the pretreatment using biofilm could largely enhance the efficiency of PCO. Moreover, the integrated technology showed better performance as compared to Fenton oxidation in terms of color and COD removal. PCO process has many advantages, but it also faces some drawbacks. One is the relatively high operating cost because of the use of UV lights. Nevertheless, the UV lights in such systems could be replaced by natural solar radiation, which is free in most areas and feasible especially for industrial wastewater treatment [21]. The PCO process can also be combined with constructed wetlands [22]. The combined system was tested under natural irradiation, showing that organic pollutants, nutrients, and pathogenic bacteria can be effectively removed. More importantly, TiO2-mediated solar photocatalytic oxidation is low cost and environmental friendly and thus may be a promising solution for wastewater treatment.

2. Process and Mechanism of Solar Photocatalysis

In last decades, many efforts have been devoted to the degradation of organic pollutants in wastewater using solar photocatalysis [27, 32]. Compared to the counterparts using UV light, solar driven PCO of organic pollutants using solar irradiation can be much more economical [33]. As a typical semiconductor-based heterogeneous photocatalyst, TiO2 was successfully employed for the degradation of various families of organic pollutants in wastewater under solar light irradiation. Stylidi and coworkers [34] successfully used TiO2 suspension to degrade azo dyes under solar light; while Herrmann and coworkers applied this technology for the detoxification of wastewater which contains multiple pollutants [32].

In a typical solar photocatalysis process (Figure 1), the electrons (e) on the photocatalyst surface can be excited from valence band to conduction band by photons with energy larger than its band gap under solar light irradiation, which forms e- and holes (h+) on conduction and valence bands, respectively. The photogenerated electrons and holes then migrate to the surface of the photocatalyst, where they participate in redox reactions with adsorbed species and, thus, form superoxide radical anion () and hydroxyl radical (•OH), respectively, as follows [13, 1618, 48, 49]:

607954.fig.001
Figure 1: General mechanism of TiO2 in solar photocatalysis process.

The photogenerated reactive oxygen species are very strong oxidizers and play the dominant roles in the degradation of organic pollutants in wastewater. The organics in wastewater can be completely degraded to CO2 and H2O and, thus, there is no secondary pollution. However, many e and h+ recombine releasing energy as heat before they participate in the redox reactions, which dramatically inhibit the practical photocatalytic activity of photocatalysts [50]. Moreover, owing to the larger band gap, TiO2 can be excited only by UV lights, which account for less than 5% energy of the solar spectrum [15, 48, 51]. Thus, it is necessary to develop TiO2 based materials which can utilize more solar energy. To solve this problem, some noble metals and their derivatives such as Ag, [52], Pt [53], AgBr [54], and CdS [55], have been tried to incorporate with TiO2 forming hybrid photocatalysts [54], which would extend the photocatalytic activity of the photocatalysts into visible light range. The mechanism can be explained by two aspects. (1) The recombination rate of e and h+ is inhibited because of the presence of incorporated materials, which promotes interfacial electron transfer and consequently facilitates the separation of e and h+ [51]. (2) TiO2 band gap is narrowed, which makes the excitation of TiO2 easier. It will facilitate the electrons transfer from valence band to conduction band, and, thus, more oxidative species might be produced [56]. Özkan et al. reported that 1 wt.% Ag could effectively enhance the PCO efficiency [57]. Zang and Farnood found that AgBr can promote the PCO process for the degradation of methyl orange under solar light irradiation [54]. In addition, some researchers have already proven that the band gap of modified TiO2 is lower than pure TiO2 [58, 59]. Grzechulska and Morawski [58] investigated the modified commercial TiO2 with metal hydroxides, and their study revealed that the band gap of modified material is 1.6 eV, which is lower than pure TiO2. Moreover, TiO2 can also be integrated with some other semiconductors with a narrow band gap, for example, CdS, to form composite photocatalysts [60].

3. Application in Industrial Wastewater

3.1. Application in Paper Mill Wastewater

The paper mill is the fifth largest industry in North American economy [61]. Over 50% wastes in Canada’s water can be attributed to the pulp and paper industry [62]. Large amounts of water are required by paper industry, which also produced equally large amounts of wastewater [63, 64]. Previous study indicated that 2000–6000 gallons water were consumed to produce one ton of paper [61]. The wastewater produced by this industry is commonly treated by biological process [65]. However, the effluent from paper industry contains highly toxic and refractory compounds, which restricts the application of biological method. In pulp and paper industry, water is required in each stage, and wastewater is also generated in each stage. The produced pollutants at different steps of a paper mill plant are shown in Figure 2 [23, 66]. Among these processes, the cellulose pulp bleaching stage produced the largest amount of high-strength wastewater, which contains several chlorinated compounds and some toxic organics [63]. Previous reports [67] showed that wastewater with BOD/COD ratio smaller than 0.3 is not suitable for biological treatment. Thompson and coworkers [68] reported that the biodegradability index of wastewater from pulp bleaching process is around 0.02–0.07, which indicated a further treatment process should be taken after biological process for the complete removal of pollutants. For example, Bajpai et al. [69] studied the degradation of pollutants from pulp and paper mill by anaerobic technology, and they found that the treated wastewater still contains high residual COD due to the incomplete degradation. In addition, the typical characteristics of paper mill wastewater at different processes are shown in Table 1 [23]. It shows that the pollutants vary dramatically from one plant to another plant.

tab1
Table 1: Typical characteristics of wastewater at different pulp and paper processes. (Table 1 is reproduced from [23]. Copyright 2004, with permission from Elsevier).
607954.fig.002
Figure 2: Pollutants produced in different stages of paper industry. (Figure 2 is reproduced from reference [23]. Copyright 2004, with permission from Elsevier).

Another important work was conducted by Ghaly and coworkers [24]. The paper mill wastewater was treated by a synthesized nanosized TiO2 under solar light, and they found that the biodegradability index of the paper mill wastewater increased from 0.16 to 0.35. It indicates that solar photocatalytic oxidation of the paper mill wastewater can be used as an efficient pretreatment method before biological treatment process.

Many factors can influence the performance of solar TiO2 photocatalysis on the treatment of paper mill wastewater [24]. The first one is the size of TiO2. New physical and chemical properties will emerge when the size of TiO2 is reduced down to nanoscale. Due to this, the nanosized material may possess with better performance as compared to a conventional bulk material [70]. Chen and Mao [48] reported that morphology of nanomaterials can also affect their properties and performance in specific applications. Nowadays, researchers have put many efforts to develop new functional nanomaterials for the removal of pollutants [7173]. Ghaly et al. [24] synthesized nanosized TiO2 via a conventional sol-gel process using TiCl4 as the precursor. The synthesized material exhibited good photocatalytic activity under sunlight irradiation because of its mixture phase of anatase and rutile [18]. As shown in Figure 3 [24], the PCO process was carried out in aqueous suspensions where TiO2 was irradiated by concentrated sunlight. In a typical operation process, the wastewater from paper mill was fed into the solar reactor, where it was stirred with the synthesized TiO2 in dark for 10 min. After the adsorption equilibrium between wastewater and TiO2 was achieved, solar energy was applied for the photodegradation of the pollutants in wastewater. Subsequently, the wastewater and TiO2 would circulate in the system and, thus, the treatment efficiency can be enhanced by this continuous process. The COD removal rates under different conditions were evaluated by the authors and shown in Figure 3 [24]. Over 70% COD was removed after the PCO process, indicating that solar photocatalysis is effective for the treatment of paper mill wastewater. It is worth noting that some intermediate compounds may be produced in the process which would retard the degradation of pollutants [24]. In addition, COD concentration decreased in the absence of solar light, which can be attributed to the adsorption effect of TiO2 on the pollutants in wastewater.

607954.fig.003
Figure 3: %COD removal during the treatment of the wastewater by different oxidation processes against reaction time, with solar light only, with TiO2 only, and with solar/TiO2 [TiO2 = 0.75 g/L, pH = 6.5]. (Figure 3 is reproduced from reference [24]. Copyright 2011, with permission from Elsevier).

Recent studies indicated that the dosage of photocatalysts is another important influencing factor [63]. It should be noticed that the increase of photocatalyst would increase the reaction sites on the material and, thus, enhance the PCO efficiency. However, some experiments [63] revealed that high TiO2 concentration does not imply a high reaction performance. According to the previous reports [74], the optimal photocatalyst concentration for industrial wastewater treatment is several hundred mg/L in solar photoreactors. This phenomenon can be explained by the turbidity effect of TiO2. Excess TiO2 would affect the penetration of sunlight through the suspensions due to the light scattering effects [63, 75, 76]. Hence, the dosage of TiO2 in the photoreactor should be optimized, which can also lower the cost on photocatalyst. As shown in Figure 4(a), the optimum TiO2 concentration is 0.75 g/L in the system [24]. Liu and coworkers reported that the optimum dosage of catalyst was determined not only by the type and concentration of pollutants but also by the design of photoreactors [77]. Thus, the dosage of catalyst should be investigated for each individual system.

fig4
Figure 4: (a) %COD removal during the treatment of the wastewater by solar photocatalytic oxidation against solar irradiation time at different loading of TiO2 [pH = 6.5], (b) %COD removal during the treatment of the wastewater by solar photocatalytic oxidation against solar irradiation time at different pH values [TiO2 = 0.75 g/L]. (Figure 4 is reproduced from reference [24]. Copyright 2011, with permission from Elsevier).

In addition, pH values of wastewater can also affect the PCO efficiency because the generation of hydroxyl radicals is related with pH conditions [76]. Several studies showed that the COD removal rates increased with the increase of pH values, as shown in Figure 4(b) [24, 78]. It can be attributed to the following reasons. Firstly, H+ can interact with aromatic organic pollutants in paper mill wastewater and lower the electron densities at the polycyclic groups, leading to the decrease of hydroxyl radicals [78]. Secondly, the TiO2 particles tend to agglomerate under acidic condition and, thus, lead to the decrease of reaction sites for the degradation of pollutants in paper mill wastewater [79]. Finally, the surface of TiO2 would be negatively charged under high pH conditions due to the presence of OH, which acted as an efficient trap for the generation of h+ and hydroxyl radicals. These oxidative species are responsible for the degradation of organic pollutants [79]. Thus, pH condition can be considered as a key factor for the production of hydroxyl radicals, which finally affect the efficiency of solar photocatalysis.

3.2. Application in Textile Wastewater

Owing to the large amount of discharge and the degradation-resistant composition, textile wastewater is considered as a major resource of pollutants from industry [80]. There are several processes for textile industry, such as sizing of fibers, scouring, desizing, bleaching, rinsing, mercerizing, dyeing, and finishing [81]. A brief textile process was shown in Figure 5, revealing that large quantities of organics are involved in this technology. Although various textile products can be obtained nowadays, many contaminants are released into environment through indiscriminate discharge of wastewater, which causes severe pollution. Previous reports indicated that textile wastewater contains dyes, detergents, grease, oil, heavy metal, inorganic salts, and fibers [2]. Among them, dye residue is considered as a dominant pollutant which is mainly produced in the step of finishing [25]. An obvious characteristic of textile wastewater is the strong color due to the presence of various dyes. According to the Easton’s reports [82], over 30% of the used dyestuffs remain in the reactor after the dyeing process, which results in that a huge amount of azo dyes enter into wastewater. Azo dyes have been considered as a mutagen and carcinogen by the US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health [83, 84]. It is important to notice that this kind of dyes is difficult to be decolorized [47, 85].

607954.fig.005
Figure 5: A typical textile process [25].

Although most of the textile wastewater is treated before discharge, the conventional treatment process such as aerobic biological process and physical-chemical treatment cannot meet the requirement of elevated discharge standards [2]. A typical characteristic of wastewater from a textile dyeing process is summarized in Table 2 [86]. We can find that the wastewater contains high strength COD, which may destroy the microorganisms in a biological wastewater treatment system.

tab2
Table 2: Typical characteristics of wastewater from a textile dyeing process. (Table 2 is reproduced from [47]. Copyright 1986, with permission from Elsevier).

Vilar and coworkers studied the treatment of textile wastewater by solar-driven advanced oxidation processes [26]. In this research, commercial TiO2 P25 was used as the photocatlayst. Figure 6 shows the decolorization and mineralization of the textile wastewater by TiO2 solar photocatalysis [26]. We can find that almost 70% of colour in the wastewater was removed when the catalyst concentration was 200 mg/L. The dosage of catalyst was considered as an optimum concentration for the photoreactor used in the study [87]. However, the mineralization of organics in this treatment process is relatively low, which can be attributed to the high concentration of chloride. Owing to the presence of chloride, the produced hydroxyl radicals would be scavenged and some less reactive inorganic radicals such as Cl•, and would also be generated [26, 88]. In addition, previous reports indicated that some organic dyes are capable of photosensitizing TiO2 due to the absorption of visible light [51]. The major initial steps of the photosensitization reactions are shown in the following equations [89]:

607954.fig.006
Figure 6: Decolourisation and mineralization of the textile wastewater by TiO2 solar photocatalysis: DOC degradation curve, Abs/Abs0 AT 516 nm and pH evolution. (Figure 6 is reproduced from reference [26]. Copyright 2011, with permission from Elsevier).

It is clearly shown that the photosensitized degradation of dyes under visible light irradiation is another pathway beside the PCO process. Moreover, some transition or posttransition metal ions such as Cu2+, Zn2+, and Fe3+ also have significant effect on the degradation of dyes in textile wastewater via a similar photosensitization [89]. Thus, the decolorization of textile wastewater is relatively easier as compared to the mineralization process.

Some other reports [27, 28, 81, 90] also proved that TiO2 is a powerful photocatalyst for the degradation of pollutants in textile wastewater. Neppolian et al. [27] found that dye molecules could be completely degraded to CO2, , , , and H2O by solar photocatalysis, and addition of other auxiliary chemicals such as H2O2 and Na2CO3 could greatly promote and inhibit the photodegradation efficiency, respectively. pH also plays an important role in the treatment of textile wastewater because it affects both the generation of hydroxyl radicals in PCO process and the structure of dye pollutants. Figure 7 reveals that a neutral pH condition would facilitate the degradation of dyes in solar photocatalysis process. High concentration of proton would retard the photodegradation of dyes under acidic conditions; while basic conditions also have suppressive effect on the solar photocatalysis process because the dyes become chemically stable at high pH ranges [27].

607954.fig.007
Figure 7: Influence of pH on the degradation of the dye. (Figure 7 is reproduced from reference [27]. Copyright 2002, with permission from Elsevier).

Although TiO2 based materials have many advantages for environmental application, the separation of them from the suspension of textile wastewater is still a big issue which restricts the reuse of photocatalyst. Alinsafi et al. [91] reported that TiO2 can be immobilised on various substrates such as glass slides and glass fibers. Although the performance of the supported photocatalysts was strongly dependent on the chemical structure of dyes and other additives, the immobilized photocatalysts presented excellent decolourization ability for the treatment of textile industry wastewater. Furthermore, Rao et al. [28] developed a novel pebble bed photocatalytic reactor for textile wastewater treatment under solar irradiation. TiO2 was successfully coated onto the silica rich white pebbles, and a pebble bed photoreactor was further constructed, as shown in Figure 8. In this research, catalyst loading, pH, and initial concentrations of dyes were found as important influencing factors. In addition, the recirculation flow rate in the system was also investigated, presenting that the conversion of pollutants decreased with the increment of flow rate. This phenomenon can be explained by the nonideal flow behaviour of the photoreactor. The flow diversion should be controlled, which enhances the contact area between the textile wastewater and the coated photocatalysts [28].

fig8
Figure 8: (a) Pebbles before and after TiO2 coating, (b) solar photocatalytic pebble bed reactor, and the close-up of pebbles. (Figure 8 is reproduced from reference [28]. Copyright 2012, with permission from Elsevier).
3.3. Application in Olive Mill Wastewater (OMW)

OMW is considered as one of the most important agricultural pollutants, which was largely produced by some countries such as Spain, Italy, and Greece [92]. The annual production of olive oil was estimated in  t, resulting in huge amount of OMW [93]. Production of 1000 kg of olives may generate 0.5–1.5 m3 of OMW which is dependent on the oil extraction methods [94, 95]. OMW contains high strength of suspended solids and organic pollutants, such as polysaccharides, sugars, phenols, polyalcohols, proteins, organic acids, and oil [96, 97]. Due to the high concentration of organic pollutants, COD and COD values of OMW are high up to 220 g/L and 100 g/L, respectively [94]. In addition, the characteristics of OMW are variable with the change of climatic conditions, different type of olives, methods of extraction, and regions [94]. The extraction process of olive oil is shown in Figure 9.

fig9
Figure 9: Olive oil extraction processes. (Figure 9 is reproduced from reference [29]. Copyright 2012, with permission from Elsevier).

Currently, the main olive process method used in many countries is the 3-phase system, which possesses some advantages such as high working capacity and automation of the industrial plants [29]. Although the olive oil, solids, and wastewater can be separated in this system, it requires a considerable volume of warm water for the dilution of olive paste. Thus, the production of OMW is still a big problem. It is estimated that 30 million m3 OMW is discharged per year [29, 98]. OMW is characterized by a dark-colour due to the polymerization of phenolic compounds and lignin. Moreover, inorganic metals, high conductivity, and acidic condition of the wastewater can also affect the choice of the treatment methods [29].

Gernjak et al. compared two solar photocatalytic pilot-plant reactors (Figures 10(a) and 10(b)) for the degradation of OMW with different concentrations and from different sources [99]. For the compound parabolic collector (CPC), a complete module is formed by a series of collectors connected in a row. Wastewater flows simultaneously through all parallel tubes, and the number of collector components modules has no limit [30]. For the falling film reactor (FFR), the components contain flat plate, top distributor, bottom receiver, batch tank, and a centrifugal pump. Wastewater in a batch bank flows through the flat plate to bottom receiver, and this is a circulatory system [31]. As a cheaper alternative of CPC, the designed FFR shows comparable results to the CPC in terms of COD degradation rate based on the previous report [31]. Due to the open nonconcentrating geometry of the FFR, there is no reflectivity or transmissivity loss in the reactor. In addition, the shortage of the FFR is the short pathlength of the reactor, but it can be neglected because of the extremely high light absorption of the OMW [31]. Moreover, the temperature in the FFR is lower than that in the CPC due to the heat losses suffered from evaporation of water. This may retard the removal of volatile organic compounds. However, the low temperature would cause less foaming, and the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide can also be reduced [31].

fig10
Figure 10: (a) Two compound parabolic collectors (CPCs) of one prototype module, (b) falling film reactor (FFR). (Figure 10(a) is reproduced from reference [30]. Copyright 1999, with permission from Elsevier; Figure 10(b) is reproduced from reference [31]. Copyright 2004, with permission from Elsevier).

In addition, some other researchers also studied the treatment of OMW using a TiO2/UV system [100, 101]. Although the UV light source is not economical as compared to the solar source, these studies can also provide some important references for the future work [102]. El Hajjouji et al. [100] investigated the removal rate of COD, colour scale, and phenols in OMW using a TiO2/UV system. They found that colour and phenols were more difficult to be removed compared to COD, which can be attributed to the degradation of some nonconservative water pollutants in OMW. Chatzisymeon et al. [101] investigated the effect of operating conditions in a photocatalytic treatment process of OMW. Their results indicated that the removal of COD was determined by contact time. Thus, the hydraulic retention time of OMW in a photoreactor is a key factor. Moreover, the detoxification of OMW is strongly dependent on the residual organic matters, indicating that a complete degradation of COD is still required in future application.

4. Conclusions

Solar photocatalysis has been investigated as an effective wastewater treatment process during the past decades. Although fundamental and engineering researches have established the solar photocatalysis technology in wastewater treatment, the industrial application is still in an infantile stage and some challenges are still needed to be smoothed out, such as the solar utilization efficiency, the construction and operation of photoreactor, and the separation of photocatalysts. Photocatalytic membranes or microspheres might be able to solve the separation problem of photocatalysts [102104]. Their photocatalytic activities for real wastewater need to be tested under solar irradiation in the future studies. Modification of the current photocatalysts such as doping is a good pathway to enhance the PCO efficiency under solar irradiation considering the low fabrication cost. More attention is also needed to be paid to the design of photoreactors to optimize the operational factors for the system’s activity, and recycling should also be comprehensively considered for large-scale applications. We believe that solar TiO2 photocatalysis method can provide a promising pathway for the deep degradation of the pollutants in industrial wastewaters.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the financial support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51134017).

References

  1. N. S. A. Mutamim, Z. Z. Noor, M. A. A. Hassan, and G. Olsson, “Application of membrane bioreactor technology in treating high strength industrial wastewater: a performance review,” Desalination, vol. 305, pp. 1–11, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. W. Lau and A. F. Ismail, “Polymeric nanofiltration membranes for textile dye wastewater treatment: preparation, performance evaluation, transport modelling, and fouling control: a review,” Desalination, vol. 245, no. 1–3, pp. 321–348, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. J. Langenfeld, S. B. Hawthorne, and D. J. Miller, “Quantitative analysis of fuel-related hydrocarbons in surface water and wastewater samples by solid-phase microextraction,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 144–155, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. P. Wu, T. Wu, W. W. He, L. L. Sun, Y. J. Li, and D. Sun, “Adsorption properties of dodecylsulfate-intercalated layered double hydroxide for various dyes in water,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 436, pp. 726–731, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Alsheyab, J. Q. Jiang, and C. Stanford, “On-line production of ferrate with an electrochemical method and its potential application for wastewater treatment—A review,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 1350–1356, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Zhang, Y. Jiang, Y. Li, Z. Hu, L. Zhou, and M. Zhou, “Three-dimensional electrochemical process for wastewater treatment: a general review,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 228, pp. 455–467, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. H. Chen, “Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 11–41, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. C. C. Ho and C. Y. Chan, “The application of lead dioxide-coated titanium anode in the electroflotation of palm oil mill effluent,” Water Research, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1523–1527, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Y. Hosny, “Separating oil from oil-water emulsions by electroflotation technique,” Separations Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Ng, and D. D. Sun, “A free-standing, hybrid TiO2/K-OMS-2 hierarchical nanofibrous membrane with high photocatalytic activity for concurrent membrane filtration applications,” RSC Advances, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 3638–3641, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Joss, E. Keller, A. C. Alder et al., “Removal of pharmaceuticals and fragrances in biological wastewater treatment,” Water Research, vol. 39, no. 14, pp. 3139–3152, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. A. Shannon, P. W. Bohn, M. Elimelech, J. G. Georgiadis, B. J. Marĩas, and A. M. Mayes, “Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades,” Nature, vol. 452, no. 7185, pp. 301–310, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Choi, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 69–96, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. N. Chong, B. Jin, C. W. K. Chow, and C. Saint, “Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: a review,” Water Research, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 2997–3027, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. Zhang, X. Yan, and D. D. Sun, “Hierarchically multifunctional K-OMS-2/TiO2/Fe3O4 heterojunctions for the photocatalytic oxidation of humic acid under solar light irradiation,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 243, pp. 302–310, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. Kuwahara, T. Kamegawa, K. Mori, and H. Yamashita, “Design of new functional Titanium oxide-based photocatalysts for degradation of organics diluted in water and air,” Current Organic Chemistry, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 616–629, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Fujishima, T. N. Rao, D. A. Tryk, and J. Photoch, “Titanium dioxide photocatalysis,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  18. A. L. Linsebigler, G. Q. Lu, and J. T. Yates Jr., “Photocatalysis on TiO2 surfaces: principles, mechanisms, and selected results,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 735–758, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Sioi, A. Bolosis, E. Kostopoulou, and I. Poulios, “Photocatalytic treatment of colored wastewater from medical laboratories: photocatalytic oxidation of hematoxylin,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 184, no. 1-2, pp. 18–25, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. S. Kim and Y. S. Park, “Comparison study of dyestuff wastewater treatment by the coupled photocatalytic oxidation and biofilm process,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 256–263, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. S. Malato, J. Blanco, J. Cáceres, A. R. Fernández-Alba, A. Agüera, and A. Rodŕiguez, “Photocatalytic treatment of water-soluble pesticides by photo-Fenton and TiO2 using solar energy,” Catalysis Today, vol. 76, pp. 209–220, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  22. A. Antoniadis, V. Takavakoglou, G. Zalidis, E. Darakas, and I. Poulios, “Municipal wastewater treatment by sequential combination of photocatalytic oxidation with constructed wetlands,” Catalysis Today, vol. 151, no. 1-2, pp. 114–118, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. Pokhrel and T. Viraraghavan, “Treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater—a review,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 333, no. 1–3, pp. 37–58, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Y. Ghaly, T. S. Jamil, I. E. El-Seesy, E. R. Souaya, and R. A. Nasr, “Treatment of highly polluted paper mill wastewater by solar photocatalytic oxidation with synthesized nano TiO2,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 168, no. 1, pp. 446–454, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Sala and M. C. Gutiérrez-Bouzán, “Electrochemical techniques in textile processes and wastewater treatment,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2012, Article ID 629103, 12 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. V. J. P. Vilar, L. X. Pinho, A. M. A. Pintor, and R. A. R. Boaventura, “Treatment of textile wastewaters by solar-driven advanced oxidation processes,” Solar Energy, vol. 85, no. 9, pp. 1927–1934, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. B. Neppolian, H. C. Choi, S. Sakthivel, B. Arabindoo, and V. Murugesan, “Solar light induced and TiO2 assisted degradation of textile dye reactive blue 4,” Chemosphere, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1173–1181, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. N. N. Rao, V. Chaturvedi, and G. Li Puma, “Novel pebble bed photocatalytic reactor for solar treatment of textile wastewater,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 184, pp. 90–97, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Zbakh and A. El Abbassi, “Potential use of olive mill wastewater in the preparation of functional beverages: a review,” Journal of Functional Foods, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 53–65, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. Blanco, S. Malato, P. Fernández et al., “Compound parabolic concentrator technology development to commercial solar detoxification applications,” Solar Energy, vol. 67, no. 4–6, pp. 317–330, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. W. Gernjak, M. I. Maldonado, S. Malato et al., “Pilot-plant treatment of olive mill wastewater (OMW) by solar TiO2 photocatalysis and solar photo-Fenton,” Solar Energy, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 567–572, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. Herrmann, C. Guillard, J. Disdier, C. Lehaut, S. Malato, and J. Blanco, “New industrial titania photocatalysts for the solar detoxification of water containing various pollutants,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 281–294, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. S. Bhatkhande, V. G. Pangarkar, and A. A. C. M. Beenackers, “Photocatalytic degradation of nitrobenzene using titanium dioxide and concentrated solar radiation: chemical effects and scaleup,” Water Research, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1223–1230, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Stylidi, D. I. Kondarides, and X. E. Verykios, “Pathways of solar light-induced photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes in aqueous TiO2 suspensions,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 271–286, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. K. Srivastava, R. Bembi, A. K. Singh, and A. Sharma, “Physicochemical studies on the characteristics and disposal problems of small and large pulp and paper mill effluents,” Indian Journal of Environmental Protection, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 438–442, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  36. R. S. Singh, S. S. Marwaha, and P. K. Khanna, “Characteristics of pulp and paper mill effluents,” Journal of Industrial Pollution Control, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 163–172, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. J. Jahren and H. Oedegaard, “The use of Computational Fluid Dynamics for improving the design and operation of water and wastewater treatment plants,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 40, no. 4-5, pp. 81–90, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. S. J. Jahren, J. A. Rintala, and H. Ødegaard, “Aerobic moving bed biofilm reactor treating thermomechanical pulping whitewater under thermophilic conditions,” Water Research, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1067–1075, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. S. Rohella, S. Choudhury, M. Manthan, and J. S. Murty, “Removal of colour and turbidity in pulp and paper mill effluents using polyelectrolytes,” Indian Journal of Environmental Health, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 159–163, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. F. B. Dilek and C. F. Gokcay, “Treatment of effluents from hemp-based pulp and paper industry: I - Waste characterization and physico-chemical treatability,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 161–163, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. N. L. Nemerow and A. Dasgupta, Industrial and Hazardous Waste Management, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
  42. N. T. Yen, N. T. K. Oanh, L. B. Reutergard, D. L. Wise, and N. T. T. Lan, “An integrated waste survey and environmental effects of COGIDO, a bleached pulp and paper mill in Vietnam, on the receiving waterbody,” Studies in Environmental Science, vol. 66, pp. 349–361, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  43. T. N. Mandal and T. N. Bandana, “Studies on physicochemical and biological characteristics of pulp and paper mill effluents and its impact on human beings,” Journal of the Freshwater Biology, vol. 8, pp. 191–196, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  44. A. G. Vlyssides and D. G. Economides, “Characterization of wastes from a newspaper wash deinking process,” Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, vol. 6, no. 11-12, pp. 734–739, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Gupta, “Pollution load of paper mill effluent and its impact on biological environment,” Journal of Ecotoxicology and Environmental Monitoring, vol. 7, pp. 101–112, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  46. S. K. Dutta, “Study of the physicochemical properties of effluent of the paper mill that affected the paddy plants,” Journal of Environmental Pollution, vol. 6, no. 2-3, pp. 181–188, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  47. U. Pagga and D. Brown, “The degradation of dyestuffs. Part II: behaviour of dyestuffs in aerobic biodegradation tests,” Chemosphere, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 479–491, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. X. Chen and S. S. Mao, “Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications and applications,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 2891–2959, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. X. Zhang, T. Zhang, J. H. Pan, J. Ng, and D. D. Sun, “Transformation of bromine species in TiO2 photocatalytic system,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 439–444, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  50. H. Honda, A. Ishizaki, R. Soma, K. Hashimoto, and A. Fujishima, “Application of photocatalytic reactions caused by TiO2 film to improve the maintenance factor of lighting systems,” Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 42–47, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. F. Han, V. S. R. Kambala, M. Srinivasan, D. Rajarathnam, and R. Naidu, “Tailored titanium dioxide photocatalysts for the degradation of organic dyes in wastewater treatment: a review,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 359, no. 1-2, pp. 25–40, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. V. S. R. Kambala, B. Lavédrine, and P. Boule, “Influence of metallic species on TiO2 for the photocatalytic degradation of dyes and dye intermediates,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 154, no. 2-3, pp. 189–193, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. A. Wold, “Photocatalytic properties of TiO2,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 280–283, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. Y. Zang and R. Farnood, “Photocatalytic activity of AgBr/TiO2 in water under simulated sunlight irradiation,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 334–340, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. Y. Bessekhouad, D. Robert, J. V. Weber, and J. Photochem, “Bi2S3/TiO2 and CdS/TiO2 heterojunctions as an available configuration for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 163, no. 3, pp. 569–580, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. M. Sökmen, D. W. Allen, F. Akkas, N. Kartal, and F. Acar, “Photo-degradation of some dyes using Ag-loaded titanium dioxide,” Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, vol. 132, pp. 153–163, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  57. A. Özkan, M. H. Özkan, R. Gürkan, M. Akçay, and M. Sökmen, “Photocatalytic degradation of a textile azo dye, Sirius Gelb GC on TiO2 or Ag-TiO2 particles in the absence and presence of UV irradiation: the effects of some inorganic anions on the photocatalysis,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 163, pp. 29–35, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. J. Grzechulska and A. W. Morawski, “Photocatalytic decomposition of azo-dye acid black 1 in water over modified titanium dioxide,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. L. C. Chen, C. M. Huang, and F. R. Tsai, “Characterization and photocatalytic activity of K+-doped TiO2 photocatalysts,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 265, no. 1-2, pp. 133–140, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. C. Barglik-Chory, C. Remenyi, H. Strohm, and G. Müller, “Adjustment of the band gap energies of biostabilized CdS nanoparticles by application of statistical design of experiments,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 23, pp. 7637–7640, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. N. L. Nemerow and A. Dasgupta, Industrial and hazardous waste management, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
  62. Ottawa, Canadian Government Publishing Centre, 1990.
  63. A. C. Rodrigues, M. Boroski, N. S. Shimada, J. C. Garcia, J. Nozaki, and N. Hioka, “Treatment of paper pulp and paper mill wastewater by coagulation-flocculation followed by heterogeneous photocatalysis,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 194, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. S. Lacorte, A. Latorre, D. Barceló, A. Rigol, A. Malmqvist, and T. Welander, “Organic compounds in paper-mill process waters and effluents,” TrAC—Trends in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 725–737, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. L. T. Angenenta, K. Karim, M. H. Al-Dahhan, B. A. Wrenn, and R. Domíguez-Espinosa, “Production of bioenergy and biochemicals from industrial and agricultural wastewater,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 477–486, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. US EPA, “Permit guidance document: pulp, paper and paperboard manufacturing point source category,” EPA-821B00003, 2000.
  67. J. L. de Morais, C. Sirtori, and P. G. Peralta-Zamora, “Treatment of landfill leachates by heterogeneous photocatalysis integrated to a conventional biological process,” Quimica Nova, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 20–23, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. G. Thompson, J. Swain, M. Kay, and C. F. Forster, “The treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent: a review,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 275–286, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. P. Bajpai, Treatment of Pulp and Paper Mill Effluents with Anaerobic Technology, Pira International, Leatherhead, UK.
  70. C. G. Granqvist, A. Azens, P. Heszler, L. B. Kish, and L. Österlund, “Nanomaterials for benign indoor environments: electrochromics for “smart windows”, sensors for air quality, and photo-catalysts for air cleaning,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 91, pp. 355–365, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. J. Yuan, K. Laubernds, J. Villegas, S. Gomez, and S. L. Suib, “Spontaneous formation of inorganic paper-like materials,” Advanced Materials, vol. 16, no. 19, pp. 1729–1732, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. J. Yuan, X. Liu, O. Akbulut et al., “Superwetting nanowire membranes for selective absorption,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 332–336, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. X. Zhang, J. H. Pan, A. J. Du, W. Fu, D. D. Sun, and J. O. Leckie, “Combination of one-dimensional TiO2 nanowire photocatalytic oxidation with microfiltration for water treatment,” Water Research, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1179–1186, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. S. Malato, P. Fernández-Ibáñez, M. I. Maldonado, J. Blanco, and W. Gernjak, “Decontamination and disinfection of water by solar photocatalysis: recent overview and trends,” Catalysis Today, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 1–59, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. M. Pera-Titus, V. García-Molina, M. A. Bãnos, J. Giméneza, and S. Esplugas, “Degradation of chlorophenols by means of advanced oxidation processes: a general review,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 219–256, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  76. P. R. Gogate and A. B. Pandit, “A review of imperative technologies for wastewater treatment I: oxidation technologies at ambient conditions,” Advances in Environmental Research, vol. 8, no. 3-4, pp. 501–551, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. S. Liu, J. Yang, and J. Choy, “Microporous SiO2-TiO2 nanosols pillared montmorillonite for photocatalytic decomposition of methyl orange,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 179, no. 1-2, pp. 75–80, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. I. Konstantinou and T. Albanis, “TiO2-assisted photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes in aqueous solution: kinetic and mechanistic investigations: a review,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. M. A. Fox and M. T. Dulay, “Heterogeneous photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 341–357, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. V. Correia, T. Stephenson, and S. J. Judd, “Characterisation of textile wastewaters—a review,” Environmental Technology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 917–929, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. P. A. Pekakis, N. P. Xekoukoulotakis, and D. Mantzavinos, “Treatment of textile dyehouse wastewater by TiO2 photocatalysis,” Water Research, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1276–1286, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. J. Easton, Colour in Dyehouse Effluent, Alden Press, Oxford, UK, 1995.
  83. B. W. Manning, C. E. Cerniglia, and T. W. Federle, “Metabolism of the benzidine-based azo dye direct black 38 by human intestinal microbiota,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. E. R. Bandala, M. A. Peláez, A. J. García-López, M. J. Salgado, and G. Moeller, “Photocatalytic decolourisation of synthetic and real textile wastewater containing benzidine-based azo dyes,” Chemical Engineering and Processing, vol. 47, pp. 169–176, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. C. M. Carliell, S. J. Barclay, N. Naidoo, C. A. Buckley, D. A. Mulholland, and E. Senior, “Microbial decolourisation of a reactive azo dye under anaerobic conditions,” Water SA, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 61–69, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. M. Marcucci, I. Ciabatti, A. Matteucci, and G. Vernaglione, “Membrane technologies applied to textile wastewater treatment,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 984, pp. 53–64, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. R. S. Malato, G. J. Blanco, R. M. I. Maldonado et al., “Engineering of solar photocatalytic collectors,” Solar Energy, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 513–524, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. C. Guillard, H. Lachheb, A. Houas, M. Ksibi, E. Elaloui, and J. Herrmann, “Influence of chemical structure of dyes, of pH and of inorganic salts on their photocatalytic degradation by TiO2 comparison of the efficiency of powder and supported TiO2,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. C. Chen, X. Li, W. Ma, J. Zhao, H. Hidaka, and N. Serpone, “Effect of transition metal ions on the TiO2-assisted photodegradation of dyes under visible irradiation: a probe for the interfacial electron transfer process and reaction mechanism,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 318–324, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  90. I. Arslan, I. A. Balcioglu, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Heterogeneous photocatalytic treatment of simulated dyehouse effluents using novel TiO2-photocatalysts,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 193–206, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. A. Alinsafi, F. Evenou, E. M. Abdulkarim et al., “Treatment of textile industry wastewater by supported photocatalysis,” Dyes and Pigments, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 439–445, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. L. Rizzo, G. Lofrano, M. Grassi, and V. Belgiorno, “Pre-treatment of olive mill wastewater by chitosan coagulation and advanced oxidation processes,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 648–653, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. M. Brenes, A. García, P. García, J. J. Rios, and A. Garrido, “Phenolic compounds in Spanish olive oils,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 3535–3540, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. P. Paraskeva and E. Diamadopoulos, “Technologies for olive mill wastewater (OMW) treatment: a review,” Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 1475–1485, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. A. C. Barbera, C. Maucieri, V. Cavallaro, A. Ioppolo, and G. Spagna, “Effects of spreading olive mill wastewater on soil properties and crops, a review,” Agricultural Water Management, vol. 119, pp. 43–53, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. M. Beccari, G. Carucci, A. M. Lanz, M. Majone, and M. P. Papini, “Removal of molecular weight fractions of COD and phenolic compounds in an integrated treatment of olive oil mill effluents,” Biodegradation, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 401–410, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. F. Cabrera, R. López, A. Martinez-Bordiú, E. de Dupuy Lome, and J. M. Murillo, “Land Treatment of Olive Oil Mill Wastewater,” International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, vol. 38, no. 3-4, pp. 215–225, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. I. Sabbah, T. Marsook, and S. Basheer, “The effect of pretreatment on anaerobic activity of olive mill wastewater using batch and continuous systems,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1947–1951, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. W. Gernjak, M. L. Maldonado, S. Malato et al., “Pilot-plant treatment of olive mill wastewater (OMW) by solar TiO2 photocatalysis and solar photo-Fenton,” Solar Energy, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 567–572, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. H. El Hajjouji, F. Barje, E. Pinelli et al., “Photochemical UV/TiO2 treatment of olive mill wastewater (OMW),” Bioresource Technology, vol. 99, no. 15, pp. 7264–7269, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. E. Chatzisymeon, N. P. Xekoukoulotakis, and D. Mantzavinos, “Determination of key operating conditions for the photocatalytic treatment of olive mill wastewaters,” Catalysis Today, vol. 144, no. 1-2, pp. 143–148, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. X. Zhang, D. Wang, and J. C. Diniz da Costa, “Recent progress on fabrication of photocatalytic membranes for water treatment,” Catalysis Today, vol. 230, pp. 47–54, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  103. X. Zhang, T. Zhang, J. Ng, and D. D. Sun, “High-Performance Multifunctional TiO2 Nanowire Ultrafiltration Membrane with a Hierarchical Layer Structure for Water Treatment,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 19, no. 23, pp. 3731–3736, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  104. X. Zhang, J. H. Pan, A. J. Du, J. Ng, D. D. Sun, and J. O. Leckie, “Fabrication and photocatalytic activity of porous TiO2 nanowire microspheres by surfactant-mediated spray drying process,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1070–1076, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar