Enhanced Particle Swarm Optimization-Based Feeder Reconfiguration Considering Uncertain Large Photovoltaic Powers and Demands

Table 5

Optimal results after the feeder reconfiguration using the proposed method.

Scenario	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
Voltage magnitude (p.u.)
V1	1.050	1.050	1.050	1.050	1.046	1.050	1.037	1.040
V13	1.013	1.024	1.008	1.009	1.009	1.004	1.004	0.994
V26	1.036	1.032	1.038	1.030	1.050	1.026	1.050	1.050
V44	0.994	1.014	1.012	1.016	0.978	0.998	1.015	1.014
V61	1.050	1.047	1.029	1.023	1.050	1.050	1.030	1.050
V70	1.025	1.050	1.050	1.050	1.016	1.035	1.050	1.046
Reactive power (kVAr)
Q13	109.686	185.963	81.792	82.204	111.298	54.847	145.300	56.510
Q26	358.888	321.407	376.783	302.842	415.400	266.856	419.470	411.446
Q44	130.073	56.783	33.835	87.807	49.378	55.037	76.380	105.918
Q61	541.639	545.250	392.784	345.034	532.708	530.894	404.858	532.886
Real power at swing bus (kW)
P1	1209.57	1149.71	1223.55	1324.58	928.005	1415.21	702.954	885.934
P70	1081.67	1726.06	1974.25	1959.51	1016.86	1356.16	1893.88	1508.39
Loss (kW)	93.979	78.674	92.627	93.126	111.735	101.945	84.322	86.471
Aggregating loss = 92.875 kW