Diethyl phthalate (DEP) in ultrapure water, surface water, and wastewater
The O3/AC process was the most efficient for the removal of DEP in all three types of water. The O3/H2O2 and O3/AC processes are more efficient than ozonation alone.
The UV/H2O2/O3 process at pH 7 with H2O2 = 10 mM was most ecoeffective with 100% of phenol removal within 30 min and 58.0% TOC removal after 1 h. UV/H2O2/O3 was the most effective process for phenol wastewater mineralization.
Twenty-four micropollutants including endocrine disrupting compounds, pharmaceuticals, and personal care products
The general trend of ozone and hydroxyl radical reactivity with the selected micropollutants was explained. Suitable technology for the removal of these micropollutants was suggested based on the micropollutant reactivity with ozone and hydroxyl radical.
The UV/H2O2 process with or without perovskite catalysts facilitates pyruvic acid removal fastest. The O3/UV/perovskite process was efficient for mineralization.
Operating conditions such as initial pH, concentration of H2O2, and ferrous salt were optimized for each process. The UV/Fenton and UV/H2O2/O3 processes were found to be the most effective for the degradation and mineralization of p-CP.
Nitroaromatics such as nitrotoluene, dinitrotoluene, and trinitrotoluene
Ozonation and/or Fenton’s reagent were found to be efficient for TNT degradation. The O3/H2O2 process at pH > 7 was most efficient for 2-MNT and 2.4-DNT removal.
Haloacetic acids (HAAs), dichloroacetic acid (DCAA), and trichloroacetic acid (TCAA)
The O3/UV process was the most efficient of the six degradation methods for DCAA and TCAA in water. Decomposition by AOPs was easier for DCAA than for TCAA.
The optimum H2O2 dosage and solution pH were studied. Adding H2O2 to the ozonation process accelerated the oxidation of O-nitrotoluene by a factor of 8. The O3/UV and UV/H2O2 processes are 20 and 10 times more efficient than the ozonation process, respectively.
AOP efficiencies are in the following order: adsorption < TiO2 + UV-vis < UV-vis < O3 + TiO2 O3 < O3 + UV-vis O3 + UV-vis + TiO2. The O3 + UV-vis and O3 + UV-vis + TiO2 methods are the most economically attractive.
Ozone treatment was a very effective method for complete removal of colour but in COD removal it was not efficient. The removal of COD in ozonation, O3/H2O2, and O3/AC processes, 30%, 80% and 100%, respectively.
The efficiency of the various AOPs at two different pH was in the following order. At pH 2, US/UV/O3O3/UV > US/O3 > US/UV > O3 > US > UV. At pH 10.0, US/UV/O3 > O3/UV > O3 > US/O3 > US/UV > UV > US. The maximum rate of phenol degradation was observed in the combined application of O3/UV/US at basic pH.
The UV/O3 process was more effective at all times than the US and/or O3 process. The O3/US/UV process was the most efficient for colour and aromatic removal and AO7 dye mineralization.