Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Photoenergy
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 4894127, 4 pages
Research Article

Modulation above Pump Beam Energy in Photoreflectance

Insituto de Energía Solar, ETSIT, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avda. Complutense 30, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Correspondence should be addressed to D. Fuertes Marrón

Received 19 May 2017; Accepted 27 June 2017; Published 9 July 2017

Academic Editor: Christin David

Copyright © 2017 D. Fuertes Marrón. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Photoreflectance is used for the characterisation of semiconductor samples, usually by sweeping the monochromatized probe beam within the energy range comprised between the highest value set up by the pump beam and the lowest absorption threshold of the sample. There is, however, no fundamental upper limit for the probe beam other than the limited spectral content of the source and the responsivity of the detector. As long as the modulation mechanism behind photoreflectance does affect the complete electronic structure of the material under study, sweeping the probe beam towards higher energies from that of the pump source is equally effective in order to probe high-energy critical points. This fact, up to now largely overseen, is shown experimentally in this work. E1 and E0+ Δ0 critical points of bulk GaAs are unambiguously resolved using pump light of lower energy. This type of upstream modulation may widen further applications of the technique.

1. Introduction

Photoreflectance (PR) is a pump and probe spectroscopy well known in the characterisation of semiconductor materials and devices [1, 2]. It relies on the diffusion of charge carriers photogenerated with the pump beam and the subsequent screening of electric fields already present in the sample at space-charge regions, typically located at interfaces and free surfaces. The dielectric constant of the specimen and thus its reflectance R are slightly perturbed upon the field modulation. Such small changes in reflectance, ΔR, are detected using phase-sensitive techniques with a probe light beam swept in wavelength and typically expressed as relative ΔR/R ratios. The technique contributed significantly to the present understanding of the electronic structure of most typical semiconductors [3] and has found continuity as a valuable characterisation tool of novel materials, like dilute nitrides [4], low-dimensional structures [5, 6], and their potential applications [7]. The detection stage in PR largely relies on the rejection of any pump light scattered upon interaction with the sample that may eventually end up at the detector. Scattered pump light is typically the main source of background noise, together with sample luminescence, in the resulting spectra [8], as it enters right at the chopping frequency tracked by phase-sensitive detection. The use of long-pass filters (LPF) right in front of the detector is commonplace in order to avoid such spurious scattering. PR proceeds thereof by sweeping the monochromatized probe beam toward lower energies from the uppermost value set by the filter edge, recording changes in reflectance of the probe upon the action of the pump beam. Implicitly, the highest energy accessible to the experiment is therefore set by the optical edge of the LPF, normally chosen a few hundreds of meV below the nominal photon energy of the pump source. This small offset accounts for both the line broadening of the source (particularly if LEDs are used) as well as the finite width of the filter optical edge.

In contrast to this sort of standard PR, the so called “first derivative” modulation spectroscopies [9], like piezoreflectance (PzR) or thermoreflectance (TR), do not appear bounded at high energies as a result of the perturbing action. In the case of piezoreflectance [10], stress-strain cycles are imposed on the sample, usually by means of a piezoelectric actuator attached to the sample, whereas in thermoreflectance [11], the sample is subjected to thermal cycles induced, for example, by a Peltier element. The same applies to electroreflectance (ER), making use of an externally applied modulated electric field on the sample [12]. Even when each modulation mechanism is executed at a reference frequency thereby used for detection, the detection itself is in principle not constrained to a certain photon energy range of the probe beam. The only practical limitations are imposed by the spectral content of the source and the responsivity of the detector employed. The reason is that the perturbation used as modulation agent, independently of its origin, does affect the entire electronic structure of the sample under test. PR is not different from PzR, TR, or ER in that respect. The generation of photovoltage upon pump illumination of a semiconductor, on which PR is based, is better illustrated as a change in band bending at those regions in the sample sustaining space charge (SCR), typically free surfaces or interfaces, as schematically shown in Figure 1. Even when photogeneration of free carriers upon appropriate illumination may just involve the first interband transitions allowed between occupied and empty states, the entire electronic structure of the material is thereby affected, as long as the modulation of the electric field associated to the SCR is active. It is thus expected that electronic transitions at energies higher than those directly accessible with the pump beam be equally subject to the modulating action and consequently not PR-silent, as schematically shown in Figure 1. In other words, upstream modulation using probe photon energies higher than that of the pump beam should be equally accessible as in downstream PR using LPF, should the photon energy of the pump beam be sufficient in order to develop a measurable photovoltage. The latter can actually happen at the fundamental absorption edge of the sample or via defect states at subbandgap energies. In what follows, we show evidence of the modulation of high-energy critical points showing up in PR spectra of GaAs when using pump light of lower energy.

Figure 1: Schematic representation of critical points (CPs) E0, E0+ Δ0 (indicated as ESO), and E1 of GaAs represented in ascending energy on the same energy axis of a typical experimental PR spectrum (left). The band diagram picture (right) illustrates the modulation mechanism at CPs, namely, periodic SPV generation, upon illumination with a chopped pump beam of energy slightly above E, inducing transitions at the fundamental gap. Notice that, although the E0+ Δ0 transition involves a valence state below the valence band edge (reference at zero energy), the corresponding energy is greater than the fundamental gap E.

2. Methods

For this purpose, we have used a Si-doped GaAs wafer (AXT, ). The reason is that n-type-doped GaAs exhibits intense and broad signatures in PR at room temperature, particularly in the range of E1 transitions, that are typically better resolved than in intrinsic material. PR was measured using the light beam of a quartz-tungsten-halogen lamp (operated at 150 W) as probe of intensity I0(λ). The light is passed through a monochromator (1/8 m Cornerstone-Newport) and focused with optical lenses on the sample. Light directly reflected with intensity I0(λ)R(λ) is focused on a solid-state Si-detector. The current signal is transformed into a dc-voltage and preamplified (Keithley). The pump beam from a laser source is mechanically chopped at 777 Hz and superimposed onto the light spot of the probe on the sample, providing the periodic modulation. Three laser sources have been used as pump in the experiments, the 325 nm line of a 15 mW He-Cd laser, the line at 632.8 nm of a 30 mW He-Ne laser, and a solid-state laser diode operating at 814 nm. The signal recorded at the detector contains therefore two components: the dc average signal I0(λ)R(λ) and the ac modulated contribution I0(λ)ΔR(λ), where ΔR(λ) is the modified reflectance resulting from the modulated perturbation. The complete signal feeds a lock-in amplifier (Stanford Instruments), which tracks the ac signal at the chopping frequency. The relative change in reflectance is obtained thereof by normalizing the ac signal with respect to the dc component, with typical values in the range of 10−3 to 10−6.

3. Results

Figure 2 shows recorded spectra as a function of wavelength between 400 and 1100 nm under different pump beams and pass filters. Long-pass filters (LPF) and short-pass filters (SPF) are indicated in the figure together with the nominal edge. The upper panel shows three measurements performed under 325 nm pump and different filter combinations: (i) LPF 395 nm, (ii) LPF 395 nm and LPF 665 nm, and (iii) LPF 395 nm and SPF 600 nm. LPF 395 nm prevents scattered laser light entering in the detector. Additional LPF 665 nm and SPF 600 nm further restrict the accessible wavelength range towards higher or lower wavelengths from their nominal edge, respectively. Three PR signatures are readily observed in the figure, corresponding to E0, E0+ Δ0, and E1 transitions, as shown previously in Figure 1. Such interband transitions are well documented: E0 corresponds to the lowest direct gap at the Γ point of the Brillouin zone between Γ8 valence- and Γ6-conduction-band states; E0+ Δ0 corresponds to the split-off valence band Γ7 due to spin-orbit coupling, connecting to the same Γ6-conduction-band state; finally, E1 is the next critical point in order of ascending energy and takes place along the Λ direction from the center of the Brillouin zone [13]. The filter edges can be identified in the spectra with the declining signals deviating from the LPF 395 nm spectrum. Perfect overlapping over the respective wavelength ranges with the measurement using just LPF 395 is observed, confirming the absence of eventual second-order harmonics in the spectra.

Figure 2: PR spectra of n-GaAs wafer obtained under different pump beam energies and pass filters. Dotted lines indicate the nominal wavelength of the pump beams. Critical points E0, E0+ Δ0 (labeled as ESO), and E1 are also indicated. (Upper panel) using 325 nm pump with LPF 395 nm and additional LPF 665 nm or SPF 600 nm. (Middle panel) using 632.8 nm pump with LPF 665 nm or SPF 600 nm. (Lower panel) using 814 nm pump and SPF 800 nm.

The medium panel shows spectra obtained under 632.8 nm pump illumination. The short wavelength spectrum was obtained with SPF 600 nm, whereas the long wavelength one was obtained with LPF 665 nm. The nominal wavelength of the laser is indicated by the dotted line. As it can be observed, the spectra collected under 632.8 nm pump keep track of E0 and E1 signatures (E0+ Δ0 is affected by the filter edges), very much like the 325 nm pump does, even when E1 is not directly accessible now under 632.8 nm illumination. Instead, upstream modulation of high-energy critical points results from absorption involving lower energy transitions E0 and E0+ Δ0. The modified built-in potential and the associated field, due to photogenerated carrier screening at SCR, is the modulating mechanism affecting the entire electronic structure, including all high-energy critical points. They can be probed thereof in a similar fashion as low-energy critical points in downstream modulation. Finally, the lower panel of Figure 2 shows a PR spectrum obtained under 814 nm pump illumination using SPF 800 nm. The dotted line indicates the wavelength of the pump beam. Again, high-energy critical points E1 and ESO are readily probed when pumped with light of lower energy.

4. Discussion

Upstream photoreflectance is better understood when considering the character of modulation spectroscopies as absorption-based techniques. As such, and contrarily to the case of luminescence, PR also probes unoccupied states which are accessible to the energy range of the photons in the probe beam. However, it is not necessary that the pump generating the periodic perturbation be absorbed in a process involving that particular transition to be probed in the experiment. This result has been recently reported in GaSb [14] and previously in subbandgap PR on GaAs [15]. The latter case illustrates the fact that upstream modulation can also be activated via optically active defect states in the bandgap. As a matter of fact, the upstream energy range in PR has largely been overseen in the past, as evidenced by the absence of related literature, with just a few exceptions mentioned. Even in such cases, results have oftentimes been presented in relation to certain specificities of the samples, rather than as an expected output.

5. Conclusion

In summary, it has been shown that the information range accessible to PR can be extended to energies above that of the pump beam. Its practical implementation is simple, either replacing LPF with SPF or alternatively using notch or narrow-band filters around the wavelength of the pump beam. Probing upstream is a direct consequence of the absorption-based nature of the technique and the intrinsic modulation mechanism involved, based on photovoltage generation upon the action of the pump beam affecting the entire electronic structure of the material under test. Accounting for this fact, apparently not much explored yet, may widen the current applicability of the technique.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


This work has been carried out within the COST-action MP1406-Multiscale in Modelling and Validation for Solar Photovoltaics, supported by the European Commission. Financial support from the Ministry of Economy and Competitivity (TEC2015-64189-C3-1-R) and from the Comunidad de Madrid (S2013/MAE-2780) is acknowledged.


  1. M. Cardona, Modulation Spectroscopy, Academic Press, New York and London, 1969.
  2. F. H. Pollak, “Study of semiconductor surfaces and interfaces using electromodulation,” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 31, p. 938, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  3. D. E. Aspnes, Handbook on Semiconductors Vol. 2, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1980.
  4. W. Walukiewicz, W. Shan, K. M. Yu et al., “Interaction of localized electronic states with the conduction band: band anticrossing in II-VI semiconductor ternaries,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, p. 1552, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  5. O. J. Glembocki, B. V. Shanabrook, N. Bottka, W. T. Beard, and J. Comas, “Photoreflectance characterization of interband transitions in GaAs/AlGaAs multiple quantum wells and modulation-doped heterojunctions,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 46, p. 970, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  6. J. Misiewicz, P. Sitarek, G. Sek, and R. Kudrawiec, “Semiconductor heterostructures and device structures investigated by photoreflectance spectroscopy,” Materials Science, vol. 21, p. 263, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  7. D. Fuertes Marrón, E. Cánovas, I. Artacho et al., “Application of photoreflectance to advanced multilayer structures for photovoltaics,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 178, p. 599, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  8. F. H. Pollak, Handbook on Semiconductors Vol. 2, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2nd edition, 1994.
  9. D. E. Aspnes, “Third-derivative modulation spectroscopy with low-field electroreflectance,” Surface Science, vol. 37, p. 418, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  10. W. E. Engeler, H. Fritzsche, M. Garfinkel, and J. J. Tiemann, “High-sensitivity piezoreflectivity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 14, p. 1069, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  11. B. Batz, “Reflectance modulation at a Germanium surface,” Solid State Communications, vol. 4, p. 241, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  12. B. O. Seraphin and R. B. Hess, “Franz-Keldysh effect above the fundamental edge in Germanium,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 14, p. 138, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  13. P. Lautenschlager, M. Garriga, S. Logothetidis, and M. Cardona, “Interband critical points of GaAs and their temperature dependence,” Physical Review B, vol. 35, p. 9174, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  14. H. J. Jo, M. G. So, J. S. Kim, and S. J. Lee, “Optical properties of GaSb measured using photoluminescence and photoreflectance spectroscopy,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 69, p. 826, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  15. H. Bhimnathwala and J. M. Borrego, “Surface characterization of LEC SI-GaAs using photoreflectance with sub-bandgap excitation,” Solid-State Electronics, vol. 35, p. 1503, 1992. View at Google Scholar