Research Article  Open Access
E. L. Meyer, "Extraction of Saturation Current and Ideality Factor from Measuring V_{oc} and I_{sc} of Photovoltaic Modules", International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2017, Article ID 8479487, 9 pages, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8479487
Extraction of Saturation Current and Ideality Factor from Measuring V_{oc} and I_{sc} of Photovoltaic Modules
Abstract
Saturation current (I_{0}) and ideality factor (n) of a pn junction solar cell are an indication of the quality of the cell. These two parameters are usually estimated from dark currentvoltage measurements. In this study, a quick and easy method to determine these two parameters by measuring opencircuit, V_{oc}, and shortcircuit current, I_{sc}, is presented. Solar cell designers can use this method as a grading or diagnostic tool to evaluate degradation in photovoltaic (PV) modules. In order to verify the V_{oc}I_{sc} method, a series of experiments have been conducted on a single cell and a 36cell module. Good agreement between our V_{oc}I_{sc} method and dark IV measurements was obtained. An application of the method on the performance degradation of a singlejunction aSi:H module revealed that the module’s I_{0} increased by more than three orders of magnitude and n increased by 65% after an outdoor exposure of 130 kWh/m^{2}. This increase in n indicates that after exposure, the recombination current in the cells’ space charge region increased due to the lightinduced formation of metastable defects. The method is also used to assess the quality of five PV module technologies and proved to be reliable despite defective cells in a module.
1. Introduction
Photovoltaic (PV) cell or module saturation current (I_{0}) and ideality factor (n) are usually determined by fitting the Shockley equation to dark currentvoltage (IV) measurements. This is done by nonlinear parameter estimation software employing iterative methods. These methods require a minimum number of dark IV points (100 in our case) measured very accurately in the microamp range. Photovoltaic research laboratories are more likely to have a solar simulator only and lack a highcost semiconductor characterization system. Therefore, the capability of varying the irradiance in a simulator allows the extraction of ideality factor and recombination current. In this study, the relation between opencircuit voltage (V_{oc}) and shortcircuit current (I_{sc}) of PV cells and modules has been investigated. By measuring V_{oc} and I_{sc} at different irradiance levels, a good linear correlation was found between these two parameters as expected from theoretical predictions. The interpretation of this linear relation is based on the assumption that the PV cells have no significant shunt paths across their junction. In fact, it is shown that if the relation between V_{oc} and I_{sc} is not linear for a cell, the cell is expected to have significant shunt paths or low shunt resistances. Comparing results obtained from V_{oc}I_{sc} measurements to dark IV measurements indicate that the V_{oc}I_{sc} method is a reliable and accurate way to quickly and easily determine the otherwise obscure parameters, I_{0} and n. PV simulations were also used to verify the method, and I_{0} and n obtained from the V_{oc}I_{sc} method are in excellent agreement with the values of I_{0} and n used in the simulations. Due to the simplicity of the method, it is a useful tool for grading cells and modules during manufacturing and also for analyzing any infield degradation. This paper presents, verifies, and applies the V_{oc}I_{sc} method used to determine a cell or module’s saturation current and ideality factor.
2. Solar Cells: Operating Principles
Solar cells are diodes formed by joining ntype and ptype semiconductor materials. When forming this pn junction, electrons diffuse across the junction to the pside where they recombine with holes. Similarly, holes diffuse across the junction to the nside where they recombine with electrons giving rise to the diffusion component of the recombination current. On leaving the nside, electrons leave behind positively ionized donor atoms and the holes leave behind negatively ionized acceptor atoms. These ionized atoms form a space charge region (SCR) giving rise to an electrical field directed from the ntype region towards the ptype region [1, 2]. The buildup of this electric field will, therefore, eventually oppose further diffusion of electrons and holes. At this condition, the Fermi levels in both regions are equal and the junction is said to be at thermal equilibrium. Figure 1 illustrates the energy band diagram of a pn junction at thermal equilibrium. Also illustrated is the builtin potential barrier, V_{bi}, associated with the internal electric field.
2.1. Dark Current
When the pn junction diode in Figure 1 is forward biased, the builtin potential barrier is lowered. Figure 2(a) shows the components of the recombination current when the junction is forward biased and Figure 2(b), the corresponding energy band diagram. The forward bias voltage, V, produces an injection of minority carriers into both sides, that is, electrons (filled circles) from the nside into the pside. The electrons in the pside of the junction move by diffusion until they recombine with holes (empty circles). This recombination may take place either at the surface or in the bulk of the ptype material. This movement by diffusion of electrons in the pside forms one component of the dark diode current (I_{D1}) in the solar cell. Similarly, the current resulting from diffusion of holes in the nside is denoted by I_{D2}.
(a)
(b)
The total diffusion current in the n and pregions (I_{D1} + I_{D2}), which also constitutes ideal recombination, is given by the Shockley equation [2, 3]: where I_{01} = reverse saturation current corresponding to the diffusion and recombination of electron and holes in the p and nregions, respectively; n = ideality factor = 1; k = Boltzmann’s constant; T = absolute temperature.
The last component of the dark current is a result of recombination of electrons and holes in the SCR, I_{D3}. This current constitutes nonideal recombination and is given by where I_{02} = reverse saturation current corresponding to the generation and recombination of electron and holes in the SCR region; n = ideality factor > 1;
The total dark current comprises the components given in (1) and (2):
Equation (3) can be written as a single exponential formula: where I_{0} = reverse saturation current governed by diffusion and recombination of electron and holes; n = 1 if the dark current, I_{D}, is solely determined by diffusion; and n > 1 if recombination in the SCR also contributes to I_{D}.
Apart from the recombination current given in (4), parasitic series and shunt resistances are also present in a practical solar cell. Figure 3 shows the equivalent circuit model of a pn junction solar cell in the dark where the cell is forward biased by a variable power supply, V_{DC}. The shunt resistance, R_{sh}, represents any parallel highconductivity paths across the junction or on the cell edges, and the series resistance, R_{s}, represents the resistance in the bulk of the material and in the Ohmic contacts [4–6].
From the figure, it is evident that the current through the cell is given by where I_{D} is given by (4) and I_{sh} is obtained from Kirchhoff’s voltage rule. Substitution yields the equation governing the dark IV characteristics of a cell or module:
2.2. Photogenerated Current
When the pn junction solar cell is illuminated, the junction is forward biased and the cell produces a photogenerated current, I_{ph}. Figure 4(a) shows the equivalent circuit model of the illuminated solar cell and Figure 4(b) the corresponding energy band diagram when the illuminated cell is connected to a load.
(a)
(b)
The external current through the load, I, is given by [7]
The equation governing the IV characteristics of a PV cell or module is then given by
The shortcircuit current, I_{sc}, of the solar cell is obtained by setting V in (8) equal to zero and assuming that R_{s} is negligibly small; thus,
Similarly, the cell’s opencircuit voltage, V_{oc}, is obtained when no external current flows, that is, in (8). Assuming that and , V_{oc} is then given by
3. Validation of the V_{oc}I_{sc} Method
From (10), it is evident that a plot of V_{oc} versus lnI_{sc} should be linear. The gradient of this linear plot allows the determination of ideality factor, n, and the yintercept yields the reverse saturation current, I_{0}:
To verify the validity of (11), a series of experiments were conducted on a monocrystalline Si cell and a 36cell multicrystalline Si module. A PV simulation program (PVSIM) [8] was also used to verify (11).
Equations (10) and (11) assume that the ideality factor is not influenced by irradiance levels and subsequently by voltage. This is however not the case. The ideality factor has a distinct dependence on voltage. This dependence is governed by unusual or nonideal recombination and parasitic series and shunt resistance. Figure 5(a) shows the theoretical dependence of ideality factor on voltage for an ideal solar cell and for a solar cell with parasitic resistances according to (8) [9]. In this calculation, R_{s} = 0.100 Ω.cm^{2}, R_{sh} = 1.00 M.cm^{2}, I_{01} = 1.00 × 10^{−13} A/cm^{2} and I_{02} = 1.00 × 10^{−10} A/cm^{2}. These are typical values for a Si pn junction solar cell [10].
(a)
(b)
At low voltages (corresponding to very low irradiance levels), the ideality factor is governed by shunt paths across the pn junction. At intermediate voltages, the ideality factor is very “stable”, and at high voltages (irradiance levels), it is governed by series resistances [9].
Figure 5(b) shows the dependence of voltage for our cell on irradiance level as obtained from PVSIM. From this figure, it is clear that the irradiance range that we are working in results in a voltage range corresponding to the “stable” ideality factor region in Figure 5(a), that is between 0.5 V and 0.6 V. If the assumptions resulting in 10 (I_{0} ≪ I_{sc} and R_{sh} ≫ V_{oc}/I_{sc}) do not hold, then of course the ideality factor would not be “stable” in this voltage range. Therefore, this V_{oc}I_{sc} method allows a qualitative measure of whether parasitic resistances are present or not as will be shown in Figure 6 below.
It should be noted that the light IV measurements could only be done between irradiance levels of 169 W/m^{2} and 1000 W/m^{2} since the 4 clear mesh covers reduced the irradiance levels to specific values that could not be further altered. In this irradiance range, the voltage range corresponds to the region where the ideality factor is stable, provided that there are no parasitic resistances or nonideal recombination is taking place.
The advantage of the V_{oc}I_{sc} method is that it will show that the assumptions in (10) are not met when the V_{oc}I_{sc} curve is sublinear. Therefore, when the curve is sublinear, it is expected or suspected that the cell/module have shunting behavior, low series resistance, and/or nonideal recombination taking place.
3.1. Monocrystalline Si Cell
The diode ideality factor and saturation current can be accurately extracted by fitting (6) to a set of measured dark currentvoltage (IV) data using nonlinear parameter estimation software [11, 12]. In this study, we have used FitAll [13] to obtain estimates of n and I_{0} from dark IV measurements. Figure 7 shows the measured dark IV data (symbols) and the nonlinear fit (solid line) of the monocrystalline Si cell. The standard deviation of the fit is indicating that the parameters obtained are very good estimates of the true values. Table 1 lists the two parameters obtained from FitAll and their absolute deviations.

The IV characteristics of the cell were then measured with a SpireSun 240A solar simulator at different irradiance levels (1000 W/m^{2}, 614 W/m^{2}, 375 W/m^{2}, 229 W/m^{2}, and 169 W/m^{2}) while the cell temperature was maintained at 25°C. Figure 8 shows the plot of V_{oc} versus lnI_{sc} measured at different irradiance levels. The correlation of the linear fit with the measured data is 99.84% indicating that the relation between V_{oc} and I_{sc} is in good accordance with the theoretical (10).
Table 2 lists the values obtained for I_{0} and n from the linear fit and compares it to that obtained from the dark IV measurements. Clearly, results obtained from the two methods (V_{oc}I_{sc} method and dark IV) are in good agreement. The relative error of the V_{oc}I_{sc} method from the dark IV results is 0.39 for recombination current I_{0} and 0.05 for ideality factor n.

3.2. 36Cell Multicrystalline Si Module
The method of extracting I_{0} and n from V_{oc}I_{sc} measurements was also used on a 36cell multicrystalline Si module. The shunt resistance of the module was measured using an individual cell shunt measurement system [12]. No cells in the module had significantly low shunt resistances, and the total module shunt resistance was more than 10 MΩ. This value was confirmed by dark IV measurements. Figure 9 shows the measured IV characteristic (symbols) of the module and its performance parameters at standard test conditions (STC: 1000 W/m^{2} irradiance, 25°C cell temperature and AM1.5 global spectrum). PVSIM [8] was then used to simulate (solid line), the module’s characteristic at STC.
Figure 6 illustrates the relation between V_{oc} and I_{sc} of the measured and simulated data. The symbols are the measured data, the solid line the simulation, and the dashed line simulations of the same module but with low cell shunt resistances. The effect of the low cell shunt resistances is particularly evident at low irradiance levels. At these low levels, the assumption that becomes invalid and the relation between V_{oc} and lnI_{sc} is sublinear. Therefore, if the relation between V_{oc} and lnI_{sc} is sublinear for a module or cell, one can conclude that the module or cell exhibits shunting behavior.
Values for I_{0} and n obtained from both measured and simulated data are listed in Table 3. The good correlation between values obtained from measured and simulated data indicates that our method of extracting I_{0} and n from V_{oc}I_{sc} measurements is valid and accurate for both cells and modules. The relative error of the V_{oc}I_{sc} method from the PVSIM results is 0.21 for recombination current I_{0} and 0.02 for ideality factor n.

3.3. Simulation of a 36Cell Si Module
In the previous section, a PV simulation program (PVSIM) has been used to simulate the multicrystalline module. In this section, an arbitrary 36cell module is simulated. The simulations are conducted for different irradiance levels from which V_{oc}I_{sc} data points are obtained. Our method of extracting I_{0} and n was then applied to these data points. The result is then compared to the values for I_{0} and n used by PVSIM. Figure 10 shows the relation between the simulated V_{oc} and I_{sc}. Listed in the accompanying table are the values of R_{s}, R_{sh}, I_{0}, and n used in the simulations. It is evident from this table that the values for I_{0} and n obtained from the V_{oc}I_{sc} method are in excellent agreement with I_{0} and n used by PVSIM.
4. Application of the V_{oc}I_{sc} Method
4.1. Degradation Analysis
Although the primary application of the V_{oc}I_{sc} method is to obtain the obscure parameters of I_{0} and n from IV measurements in a solar simulator, the method can also be employed to establish and or confirm performance degradation when the tests are done periodically on modules deployed outdoors. In a study where a 14 Wp aSi:H module was deployed outdoors [14], the module’s performance degraded by about 60% after being exposed to 130 kWh/m^{2}. Our method was used to analyze this observed degradation. The module had an average individual cell shunt resistance of 100 Ω implying that the assumption holds. Table 4 lists the values for I_{0} and n obtained from V_{oc}I_{sc} measurements before, during, and after a 180 kWh/m^{2} outdoor exposure.

The increase in ideality factor implies that after each exposure, the recombination current in the SCR contributed more towards the dark current. This is also evident from the increase in the saturation current with exposure. When the aSi:H cells are exposed to sunlight, the incoming photons generate electronhole (eh) pairs. When these eh pairs recombine, a photon or phonon may be released. The emitted photons break the weak SiSi bonds in the SCR. These broken bonds form metastable defects in the SCR, which enhances recombination there. The photons emitted from the enhanced recombination cause even more metastable defects to form and, thus, enhance recombination even more [15–18]. This increasing recombination, illustrated by I_{0} in Table 5, deteriorates the performance and quality of the cells’ junction since fewer carriers are now available for current transport in an external circuit.

4.2. Quality Assessment
The V_{oc}I_{sc} method presented in this paper can be used to assess the quality of various modules. Because of its simplicity, module manufacturers, PV system designers, and researchers can use this method to quickly and easily assess module or cell quality. In this study, five modules comprising different module technologies were subjected to the V_{oc}I_{sc} method. The modules are presented in Table 5 where the module technology, rated power, STCmeasured power, and aperture area efficiencies are listed. Figure 11 shows the normalized IV characteristics of the five modules measured at STC. The current values were normalized to I_{sc} and the voltage to V_{oc}. These normalized IV characteristics enable direct comparison of the different module technologies. It is clear from the figure that the fill factor (FF = P_{max}/V_{oc}I_{sc}) of the thinfilm modules and hence their qualities are inferior to that of the crystalline modules.
The V_{oc}I_{sc} method was used to assess module quality in terms of I_{0} and n. Figure 12 shows V_{oc} as a function of I_{sc} for the five module technologies. Different values for V_{oc} and I_{sc} were obtained by measuring IV characteristics at various irradiance levels inside the solar simulator. Module temperatures were maintained at 25°C.
Table 6 lists the parameters (n and I_{0}) obtained from the logarithmic fits to the data in Figure 11. These values were confirmed with dark IV measurements. The closer n is to unity, the better the quality of the module cells. Also, n > 1 implies that apart from ideal recombination in the quasineutral p and nregions, nonideal recombination also takes place in the space charge region (SCR) of the pn junction [2]. From the table, it is evident that the EFGSi module has the best quality cells. This is contrary to the normalized IV characteristics in Figure 10, which suggests that the multicrystalline module has the highest FF and, hence, the best quality. The lower FF of the EFGSi module in Figure 10 is, however, attributed to a crack on one of its cells. Therefore, the V_{oc}I_{sc} method still gives accurate results even when light IV measurements may be misleading.

The relatively higher n for the thinfilm modules reveals that their cell quality is lower than the crystalline cells. It also implies that nonideal recombination takes place especially for the aSi:H module with n close to 2. The high I_{0} of the CuInSe_{2} (CIS) module is due to the fact that the CIS module showed shunting behavior [14, 19–22] implying that the ratio V_{oc}/I_{sc} approaches R_{sh}. In general, the lower quality of the thinfilm modules is mainly due to less stringent manufacturing processes used in an attempt to reduce manufacturing costs.
5. Summary and Conclusions
In this paper, it has been successfully shown that the saturation current, I_{0}, and the ideality factor, n, of cells and modules can be extracted from measuring V_{oc} and I_{sc} at different irradiance levels. In comparison to dark IV measurements and simulations, the underlying physics and implementation of our method are much simpler and in good correlation with results obtained from both dark IV measurements and simulations. The assumption is generally true for cells and modules. If the relation between V_{oc} and lnI_{sc} is sublinear for a cell or module, it can be concluded that the cell or module exhibits shunting behavior.
Due to its simplicity, our method can be used in any PV laboratory with a simulator as well as outdoors. These outdoor measurements would involve the physical measurements of V_{oc} and I_{sc} with an appropriate multimeter and place clear mesh layers over the modules to vary the incident irradiance on the modules. If the module temperature also varies, corrections need to be made for that. It can also be used on measurements taken outdoors with common laboratory equipment [23]. To the cell and module designer, it is a quick and useful diagnostic tool to grade the quality of cells and modules. This V_{oc}I_{sc} method has also been used in this study to analyze the degradation in an aSi:H module deployed outdoors. The saturation current of the module increased by more than three orders of magnitude and the ideality factor increased by 65% from 1.71 initially to 2.83 after the 130 kWh/m^{2} exposure. These results confirmed the StaeblerWronski effect where the formation of recombination centers in the SCR is enhanced by exposure to light photons. Assessment of the quality of various module technologies revealed that the thinfilm module technologies are inferior in quality compared to crystalline Si modules. The V_{oc}I_{sc} method also proved to be reliable even when there are defective cells in a module, which causes results obtained from light IV measurements to be misleading.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express their gratitude to the Govan Mbeki Research and Development Centre at the University of Fort Hare, the National Research Foundation of South Africa, and Eskom for their financial support.
References
 L. Li, P. A. Salvador, and G. S. Rohrer, “Photocatalysts with internal electric fields,” Nanoscale, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24–42, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Lorenzo, Solar Electricity: Engineering of Photovoltaic Systems, P. Davies, Ed., PROGENSA, 1994.
 J. Cubas, S. Pindado, and C. de Manuel, “Explicit expressions for solar panel equivalent circuit parameters based on analytical formulation and the Lambert Wfunction,” Energies, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 4098–4115, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. A. Green, Solar Cells: Operating Principles, Technology and System Application, University of New South Wales, 1992.
 G. Sahin, “Effect of temperature on the series and shunt resistance of a silicon solar cell under frequency modulation,” Journal of Basic and Applied Physics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 21–29, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Kisslinger, W. Hua, and K. Shankar, “Bulk heterojunction solar cells based on blends of conjugated polymers with II–VI and IV–VI inorganic semiconductor quantum dots,” Polymers, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 35, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. A. Mazer, Solar Cells: An Introduction to Crystalline Photovoltaic Technology, Kluwer Academic Publications, 1997.
 D. L. King, J. K. Dudley, and W. E. Boyson, “PVSIM: a simulation program for photovoltaic cells, modules and arrays,” in Proceedings of the 25th IEEE PV Specialists Conference, pp. 1295–1297, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
 S. J. Robinson et al., 12th EU PVSEC, p. 1831, 1994.
 A. Nussbaum, “Generationrecombination characteristic behavior of silicon diodes,” Physica Status Solidi (a), vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 441–450, 1973. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. L. King and J. A. Hansen, “Dark currentvoltage measurements on photovoltaic modules as a diagnostic or manufacturing tool,” in Proceedings of the 26th IEEE PV Specialists Conference, pp. 1125–1128, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 E. L. Meyer and E. E. van Dyk, “Assessing the reliability and degradation of photovoltaic module performance parameters,” IEEE Transaction on Reliability, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 MTR Software, FitAll Nonlinear Regression Analysis: Research Edition, pp. 130–141, 1998, (Function Reference).
 E. L. Meyer and E. E. van Dyk, “Characterization of degradation in thinfilm photovoltaic module performance parameters,” Renewable Energy Journal, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1455–1469, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. L. Staebler and C. R. Wronski, “Reversible conductivity changes in discharge‐produced amorphous Si,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 292–294, 1977. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Kołodziej, “StaeblerWronski effect in amorphous silicon and its alloys,” OptoElectronics Review, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 T. Shimizu, “StaeblerWronski effect in hydrogenated amorphous silicon and related alloy films,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 43, no. 6A, pp. 3257–3268, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Kohler, T. Zimmermann, S. Muthmann, A. Gordijn, and R. Carius, “Structural order and Staebler–Wronski effect in hydrogenated amorphous silicon films and solar cells,” IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 4–9, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. L. Meyer and E. E. van Dyk, “Analysis of degradation in CuInSe_{2} photovoltaic modules,” Physica status solidi (a), vol. 201, no. 10, pp. 2245–2250, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Ahn, K. Kim, A. Cho et al., “CuInSe_{2} (CIS) thin films prepared from amorphous cu–in–se nanoparticle precursors for solar cell application,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1530–1536, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. W. Mitchell, W. Chesarek, D. R. Willett, C. Eberspacher, J. H. Ermer, and R. R. Gay, “CuInSe2 photovoltaic modules,” Solar Cells, vol. 30, no. 1–4, pp. 131–136, 1991. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. L. Meyer and E. E. van Dyk, “Analysis of the effect of parasitic resistances on the performance of photovoltaic modules,” Renewable Energy, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 333–344, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. L. Meyer and E. E. van Dyk, “Monitoring I_{sc}, V_{oc} and performance parameters of photovoltaic modules,” in Proceedings of the 17th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Munich, Germany, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 E. L. Meyer. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.