Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Photoenergy
Volume 2019, Article ID 5737952, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5737952
Research Article

Preparation of Nano-Ag-TiO2 Composites by Co-60 Gamma Irradiation to Enhance the Photocurrent of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

1Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, VNUHCM-University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
2Applied Physical Chemistry Laboratory, VNUHCM-University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
3Faculty of Materials Science and Technology, VNUHCM-University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
4Research and Development Center for Radiation Technology, Vietnam Atomic Energy Institute (VAEI), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Correspondence should be addressed to Thai Hoang Nguyen; nv.ude.sumch@gnaohtn

Received 19 February 2019; Revised 21 April 2019; Accepted 16 May 2019; Published 12 June 2019

Guest Editor: Petru A. Cotfas

Copyright © 2019 Le Thanh Nguyen Huynh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Nano-silver-titanium dioxide (Ag-TiO2) composites were prepared from commercial TiO2 (P25, Degussa) and silver nitrate (AgNO3) by gamma Co-60 irradiation method with various initial concentrations of AgNO3. The nano-AgTiO2 composites are utilized as the photoanode for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs). Under full sunlight illumination (1000 W/m2, AM 1.5), the efficiency of DSCs has improved significantly despite the Ag content of below 1%. The DSC—assembled with 0.75 Ag-TiO2 (0.75% Ag) photoanode—showed that the photocurrent was significantly enhanced from 8.1 mA.cm−2 to 9.5 mA.cm−2 compared to the DSCs using bared TiO2 photoanode. The unchanged open-circuit voltage resulted in the overall energy conversion efficiency to be increased by 25% from 3.75% to 4.86%. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analysis showed that the charge transfer resistance is reduced when increasing Ag content, demonstrating that the charge transfer at TiO2/dye interface was enhanced in the presence of silver nanoparticles.

1. Introduction

Research and application of new energy resources are essential approaches to reduce dependence on fossil fuels, and solar energy is considered one of the feasible solutions to solve the world’s energy crisis. Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) have promised to replace conventional silicon-based solar cells in the context of using clean solar energy due to their low cost, massive production, and facile process. Thus, DSC technology has been an attractive approach for the large-scale solar panel [15]. In DSCs, the cell architecture comprises nanostructured TiO2 photoanode as an electron conductor, a dye Ru-complex as a light absorber, a redox shuttle for dye regeneration, and a counter electrode to collect electrons and reduce positive charges generated through the cell [1]. Commonly, the DSCs showed efficient solar energy-to-electricity conversion of 10% [1, 6].

Many approaches have been studied to alternately improve the conversion efficiency of DSCs, including researching the novel counter electrode, electrolytes, dyes, and semiconductor photoanode materials. Among these, the photoanode plays a decisive part in determining the performance of cells [1, 79]. Many semiconductor materials have been studied to be used as photoanode in DSCs such as TiO2, ZnO, SnO2, Nb2O3, and SrTiO3. In particular, TiO2 has been universally used due to its chemical stability, excellent charge transport capability, low cost, and easy preparation [2, 10, 11]. In DSCs, TiO2 plays three roles: (i) providing a substrate for dye adsorption, (ii) accepting electrons from the dye’s excited state, and (iii) transporting the electrons from conduction band of TiO2 to the conducting substrate then to the external circuit [11, 12]. TiO2 possesses a wide bandgap energy in both common structures: anatase at 3.2 eV and rutile at 3.0 eV. To improve the solar energy-to-electricity conversion efficiency, the surface of TiO2 are modified with metallic ions such as Fe3+ and Zn2+, alternatively, metallic nanoparticles such as Au, Ag, and Pt [3, 9, 10, 13, 14]. Study incorporation of Ag nanoparticles onto TiO2 surface showed that the coupling of semiconductor and metal nanoparticles might yield a photoinduced electron transfer across the interface, which in turn may lead to the increased energy conversion efficiency of DSCs [11, 1517]. Most of the previous reports showed the enhancement of efficiencies (4.86%) due to the plasmonic effect of Ag nanoparticles at high content (>2.5%) [8]. Many methods have been reported to prepare Ag-TiO2 composite such as microwave-assisted sol–gel techniques [18], a microwave-hydrothermal technique [19], and UV irradiation [20]. Gamma irradiation has been well known as an effective method due to its simple preparation, massive produce, high efficiency, and eco-friendliness [14, 16, 21].

In this work, we prepared nano-Ag-TiO2 composites at low Ag content (<1%) via Co-60 gamma irradiation. The nano-Ag-TiO2 composites were used to prepare the photoanodes for DSCs. The role of Ag on the photoperformance of DSCs were investigated by the current-voltage method and the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

TiO2 (P25, Degussa), AgNO3 (99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich), two types of ethyl cellulose (EC) powders (5-15 mPa⋅s and 30-50 mPa⋅s, Sigma-Aldrich), ethanol (95%, Sigma-Aldrich), and terpineol (anhydrous 99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich) were commercially available. Fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO-TEX-8X, ) conductive glass substrates (Dyesol, Australia), electrolyte solution HPE (Dyesol, Australia), ruthenium complex dye N719 (Dyesol, Australia), and platinum paste PT1 (Dyesol, Australia) were used to fabricate the cathode of the DSCs.

2.2. Preparation of Nano-Ag-TiO2 Composites

4.00 g TiO2 was dispersed in 20 mL solution of ethanol and distilled water (1/1, ) by magnetic stirring for 30 minutes; then, the solution was vibrated by ultrasound for 30 minutes. 10 mM AgNO3 solution was added to the colloidal solution with the various weight ratios of Ag : TiO2. The mixtures were irradiated via the gamma-radiation from a Co-60 irradiator in the dose range of 10-30 kGy with a dose rate of 1.3 kGy per hour (VINAGAMMA Center, Ho Chi Minh City). Table 1 details the volume of AgNO3 solution, the weight ratios of Ag : TiO2, and the dose of gamma-radiation. The irradiated colloidal solutions were centrifuged with speed up 10,000 rpm for 30 minutes to collect the powders; then, the final products were dried in air at 60°C overnight.

Table 1: Preparation of Ag-TiO2 samples by gamma irradiation.
2.3. Fabrication of DSCs

DSCs (an active area of 0.2 cm2) were assembled following our process in previous reports with four steps [2224].

2.3.1. Ag-TiO2 Printing Paste Preparation

The Ag-TiO2 printing paste is composed of Ag-TiO2 (20% wt.), ethyl celluloses (10% wt.), and terpinol (70% wt.). 4.50 g EC (5-15 mPa⋅s) and 3.50 g EC (30-50 mPa⋅s) was dissolved in absolute ethanol to form 10% EC solution. 0.40 g nano-Ag-TiO2 composites and 1.40 g terpineol were added to 2.00 g EC solution. The mixture was sonicated in three steps, each for 30 minutes. The final solution was heated in a vacuum oven at 40°C for 10 hours to remove the ethanol and water.

2.3.2. Photoanode Ag-TiO2 Preparation

The FTO glass, as a current collector, was first cleaned in a detergent solution via ultrasonic for 15 minutes, and then rinsed with distilled water and ethanol. The FTO glass was soaked into a 40 mM TiCl4 solution at 70°C for 30 minutes and re-washed with distilled water and ethanol. The Ag-TiO2 paste with a thickness of 12-14 μm was coated on FTO substrate by using screen-printed method. After screen-printing, these coated electrodes were heated at 500°C under airflow for 30 minutes to form the Ag-TiO2 photoanode.

2.3.3. Platinum Cathode Preparation

The FTO glass was treated in 0.1 M HCl in ethanol in an ultrasonic bath for 15 minutes and washed with acetone. The platinum cathode on the FTO substrate (Pt/FTO) was prepared by the screen-printing method using platinum paste PT1. The cathode Pt/FTO was annealed at 450°C for 30 minutes.

2.3.4. DSC Assembly

Both electrodes were arranged into sandwich-type cells by using a ply of melted surlyn at 190°C for 30 seconds. The dye solution (10 mM N719 in DMF) was injected successively into the cells through a hole in the back of platinum cathode, soaking in 4 hours and removing the DMF solvent. The cell was cleaned with acetonitrile for three times before being injected with electrolyte. The hole was then scaled using a quick-drying adhesive. The DSC assembly was performed in a nitrogen-filled glove-box to avoid oxygen and water.

2.4. Structural Characterization

The crystalline structures of nano-Ag-TiO2 composites were characterized by X-ray diffractometer D8 Advanced (Bruker, Germany) with a copper anode (). The XRD patterns were acquired in the 2 range of 20°-80° (0.02° per second). The particle size of nano-Ag-TiO2 was analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images on a TEM 1400 (JEOL, Japan). The UV-vis spectra of nano-Ag-TiO2 composites were recorded on a UV-vis spectrophotometer (Jasco-V630, Japan). The chemical composition of the materials was analyzed by EDS method using HITACHI S-4800 FE-SEM/EDS instrument.

2.5. - Characterizations

The photovoltaic characteristics (-) of the cells were recorded by Keithly 2400 source meter. The light source was a solar simulator from a 450 W halogen lamp with an infrared filter (AM 1.5). The incident light intensity was 1000 W/m2 calibrated with a standard Si solar cell. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of DSCs was carried out by an AUTOLAB 302N apparatus (Ecochemie, Netherlands) in the frequency range of 0.1 Hz-100 kHz and under illuminations of 1000 W/m2.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Characterization of Nano-Ag-TiO2 Composites

Figure 1 illustrates the XRD patterns of commercial TiO2 (Degussa P25) and nano-Ag-TiO2 composites. All diffraction peaks can be indexed in the anatase phase (Tetragonal, space group I41/amd) and rutile phase (Tetragonal, space group P42/mnm). Structural conservation of TiO2 indicates that the -irradiation with Co-60 irradiator does not affect the crystalline structure of TiO2 as well as the ratio of anatase phase and rutile phase. No diffraction peak of Ag was observed in XRD patterns of the Ag-TiO2 samples due to the low content of Ag nanoparticles (below 1%). To determine the existence of Ag naoparticles in composites, other techniques (TEM, EDS, and UV-VIS) were applied.

Figure 1: XRD patterns of nano-Ag-TiO2 composites.

Figure 2 exhibits the TEM images of the nano 0.75 Ag-TiO2 composite. We observed the well-defined TiO2 nanoparticles (bright color) in the range 10-25 nm and the nano-Ag (dark color) on the background of TiO2 particles. The EDS pattern of 0.75 Ag-TiO2 (Figure 3) composite powder confirms the existence of Ag on the composite.

Figure 2: (a) TEM image of 0.75 Ag-TiO2 composite. Digital photo of TiO2 (b) and 0.75 Ag-TiO2 composite (c).
Figure 3: EDS patterns of nano 0.75 Ag-TiO2 composite.

Figure 4(a) shows the UV-vis spectra of the samples in powder. We observed that the band-edge absorption of nano-Ag-TiO2 composites shifted towards the red wavelength (redshift) and the plasmon resonance effect of the silver nanoparticles appeared in the range of wavelength 500-550 nm. The results verified the formation of nano-Ag on TiO2 by the gamma Co-60 irradiation. Based on the Kubelka-Munk plot, the bandgap energy () of nano-Ag-TiO2 composite in powder (Table 2) dropped slightly as compared to TiO2 () following the increase of Ag content.

Figure 4: UV-vis absorption spectra of (a) the as-prepared nano-Ag-TiO2 composites in powder. (b) Ag-TiO2 photoanode films and (c) Kubelka-Munk plot for TiO2 photoanode film.
Table 2: Bandgap energy () of the as-prepared nano-Ag-TiO2 composites in powder and Ag-TiO2 photoanode films, calculated by the Kubelka-Munk plot.

Following the fabricating process of photoanodes, nano-Ag-TiO2 composites were calcinated at 500°C for 30 minutes. We keep track of the photoproperties of photoanodes, with the UV-vis spectra visible in Figure 4(b). The UV-vis spectra of photoanodes in Ag-TiO2 changed significantly. The disappearing of the plasmonic effect in nanosize, as well as the blueshift, was observed due to the agglomeration of Ag nanoparticles after the annealing process. The calculated bandgap of the four photoanodes was approximated in 3.1 eV. Many researches indicated the role of plasmon resonance effect of Ag nanoparticles to increase the performance of DSCs [11, 16, 19, 25]. The lack of plasmonic effect of low Ag content was detailed in DSCs Performance section.

3.2. DSCs Performances

We fabricated the DSCs using nano-Ag-TiO2 composites as well as TiO2-P25 as the photoanode and studied the photoperformance under the 1000 W/m2 intensity light. The DSCs’ performances’ results were gathered in Figure 5 and Table 3. The DSCs assembled from TiO2-P25 photoanode receive a short-circuit current () of 8.12 mA/cm2, open-circuit voltage () of 0.77 V, and fill factor (FF) of 67%; the overall photocurrent conversion efficiency () is calculated to be 3.75%. In the case of Ag-TiO2 photoanodes, the photoperformance of DSCs essentially increased. It is noted that the open-circuit voltages () were nearly unchanged and stabilized around 0.77 V, indicating that the energy structure of photoanodes (Fermi level) is unvaried. The short-circuit current () enhanced gradually with the Ag content; particularly, the 0.75 Ag-TiO2 photoanode exhibited the highest to 9.56 mA/cm2 as compared to 8.12 mA/cm2 with TiO2-P25 photoanode. The photoefficiency () also improved significantly to 4.86%. We believed that the Ag nanoparticles at low content played as the electron-bridge between TiO2 and the current collector FTO which limited the grain boundaries’ effect across the TiO2 matrix. We described the mechanism of photoelectron transfer of Ag-TiO2 photoanodes in DSCs in Figure 6. When the photoanodes Ag-TiO2/N719 were illuminated under sunlight AM 1.5, N719 dye was excited and transformed to N719 following by ultra-fast electron injection from N719 to the conduction band (CB) of TiO2 semiconductor. Due to the lower energy (Fermi level) of Ag-CB than TiO2-CB, the photoelectrons can collect on Ag particles and transfer facilely in TiO2 matrix to the current collector FTO. Moreover, the recombination of and on TiO2 particles can be restricted which also enhances the photocurrent in DSCs.

Figure 5: - curves of DSCs.
Table 3: Performance parameters of DSCs based on photoanodes nano-Ag-TiO2 and TiO2-P25.
Figure 6: Electron transfer pathway in Ag-TiO2 photoanode.

To clarify the role of Ag-TiO2 photoanodes on the photoefficiency of DSCs, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed at the under illuminations of 1000 W/m2 in the frequency range of 0.1 Hz-100 kHz. The Nyquist plots and Bodes plots are presented in Figure 7; the analysis of EIS spectra is detailed in Table 4. The equivalent circuit is given in the inset of Figure 7. The EIS spectra of DSCs in Nyquist plot (Figure 7(a)) show two semicircles, corresponding to two processes: (i) electron transfer in cathode platinum and (ii) electron transfer in TiO2 network and from TiO2-CB to triiodide in electrolyte via reaction (1), called recombination-process.

Figure 7: (a) Nyquist plot and (b) Bode-plot of DSCs based on photoanodes nano-Ag-TiO2 and TiO2-P25.
Table 4: Cathode charge transfer resistances () and recombination resistances () of DSCs measuring at under 1 sun illuminate.

At high frequencies, we observed a negligible variation of electron transfer resistance () in cathode platinum. At intermediate frequencies, the recombination resistances () were decreased drastically (from for photoanode TiO2 and for photoanodes Ag-TiO2) that reveal the role of Ag electron-bridge to facilitate the electron transfer in TiO2 network. According to the research of Wang et al. [4], the reducing recombination resistance reflects the fast electron transfer in the photoanode whereby the photoperformances were beneficial. Moreover, the chemical capacitance of conduction band electron () was also increased that indicated the electron lifetime ()—composed of resistance and capacitance ()—was slightly decreased. Furthermore, the characteristic frequency of was stabilized at 37.3 Hz in Bode plots (Figure 7(b)), indicating stable free electron lifetime.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we demonstrate the direct preparation of nano-Ag-TiO2 composites by the -irradiation method from a Co-60 irradiator and the Ag-TiO2 showed a capability as photoanode in dye-sensitized solar cells. The DSCs—based on nano-0.75 Ag-TiO2 composite photoanode—presented an encouraging performance with of 077 V, of 9.56 mA/cm2, fill factor of 0.64, and photoefficiency of 4.86%. Studying the role of Ag by EIS, we observe only a reduction of recombination resistance in photoanode due to the formation of Ag electron-bridge that improves the electron transfer process but do not reduce electron lifetime.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research work was supported by Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City through grant number HS2015-18-01.

References

  1. B. O’Regan and M. Grätzel, “A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films,” Nature, vol. 353, no. 6346, pp. 737–740, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Ma, M. Akiyama, E. Abe, and I. Imai, “High-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cell based on a nitrogen-doped nanostructured titania electrode,” Nano Letters, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 2543–2547, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. X. Lü, X. Mou, J. Wu et al., “Improved-rerformance dye-sensitized solar cells using Nb-doped TiO2 electrodes: efficient electron injection and transfer,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 509–515, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. F. Wang, J. H. Zeng, and Y. Li, “Silver/titania nanocable as fast electron transport channel for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 87, pp. 256–260, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Mori, T. Ueta, K. Sakai et al., “Organic solvent based TiO2 dispersion paste for dye-sensitized solar cells prepared by industrial production level procedure,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1341–1350, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Grätzel, “Dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 145–153, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Li, M. Ma, W. Chen, L. Li, and M. Zen, “Preparation of Ag-doped TiO2 nanoparticles by a miniemulsion method and their photoactivity in visible light illuminations,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 129, no. 1-2, pp. 501–505, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. P. Lim, A. Pandikumar, N. M. Huang, and H. N. Lim, “Enhanced photovoltaic performance of silver@titania plasmonic photoanode in dye-sensitized solar cells,” RSC Advances, vol. 4, no. 72, pp. 38111–38118, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Ito, T. N. Murakami, P. Comte et al., “Fabrication of thin film dye sensitized solar cells with solar to electric power conversion efficiency over 10%,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 516, no. 14, pp. 4613–4619, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Duan, N. Fu, Q. Liu et al., “Sn-doped TiO2 photoanode for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 116, no. 16, pp. 8888–8893, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. W. Peng, Y. Zeng, H. Gong, Y. Leng, Y. Yan, and W. Hu, “Silver-coated TiO2 electrodes for high performance dye-sensitized solar cells,” Solid-State Electronics, vol. 89, pp. 116–119, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. Schüler, A.-K. Gustavsson, S. Hertenberger, and K. Sattler, “Solar photocatalytic and electrokinetic studies of TiO2/Ag nanoparticle suspensions,” Solar Energy, vol. 96, pp. 220–226, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. Grabowska, A. Zaleska, S. Sorgues et al., “Modification of titanium(IV) dioxide with small silver nanoparticles: application in photocatalysis,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 1955–1962, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. Harifi and M. Montazer, “Fe3+:Ag/TiO2 nanocomposite: synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity under UV and visible light irradiation,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 473, pp. 104–115, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. Yu, S. Zhang, H. Zhao, B. Xue, P. Liu, and G. Will, “High-performance TiO2 photoanode with an efficient electron transport network for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 113, no. 36, pp. 16277–16282, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. Zhang, G. Wang, D. Chen, X. Lv, and J. Li, “Tuning photoelectrochemical performances of Ag-TiO2 nanocomposites via reduction/oxidation of Ag,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 20, no. 20, pp. 6543–6549, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. V. Kamat, “Manipulation of charge transfer across semiconductor interface. A criterion that cannot be ignored in photocatalyst design,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 663–672, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. Tongon, C. Chawengkijwanich, and S. Chiarakorn, “Visible light responsive Ag/TiO2/MCM-41 nanocomposite films synthesized by a microwave assisted sol–gel technique,” Superlattices and Microstructures, vol. 69, pp. 108–121, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Q. Xiang, J. Yu, B. Cheng, and H. C. Ong, “Microwave-hydrothermal preparation and visible-light photoactivity of plasmonic photocatalyst Ag-TiO2 nanocomposite hollow spheres,” Chemistry - An Asian Journal, vol. 5, p. 1466, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. Hossein-Babaei, M. M. Lajvardi, and F. A. Boroumand, “Large area Ag–TiO2 UV radiation sensor fabricated on a thermally oxidized titanium chip,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 116–121, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. O. Tahiri Alaoui, A. Herissan, C. Le Quoc et al., “Elaboration, charge-carrier lifetimes and activity of Pd-TiO2 photocatalysts obtained by gamma radiolysis,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 242, pp. 34–43, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. H. Nguyen, H. M. Tran, and T. P. T. Nguyen, “Application of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in characterization of mass- and charge transfer processes in dye-sensitized solar cells,” ECS Transactions, vol. 50, no. 51, pp. 49–58, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. H. Thanh, Q. V. Lam, T. H. Nguyen, and T. D. Huynh, “Performance of CdS/CdSe/ZnS quantum dot-sensitized TiO2 mesopores for solar cells,” Chinese Optics Letters, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 072501–072504, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. V. Le, H. T. Nguyen, H. V. Le, and T. T. P. Nguyen, “Lead sulfide cathode for quantum dot solar cells: electrosynthesis and characterization,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 274–281, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. P. Lim, Y. S. Lim, A. Pandikumar et al., “Gold–silver@TiO2 nanocomposite-modified plasmonic photoanodes for higher efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1395–1407, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus