|
| Policies | Tariff | Licensing setting | Financial | Technical | Social |
|
| No energy access plan identifies off-grid areas | Minigrids economic feasibility is under doubt | Licenses are expensive | Minor projects are ignored by financing programs | When dimensioning, there is no consideration for future need | There are no community-based educational initiatives |
| There is no long-term electrification plan in place | Tariffs are too high for rural populations to sustain | Licensing is a time-consuming and complicated process | Programs for short-term funding | Technical standards are inadequate | There are not enough examples of productive use scenarios |
| Regulations that are only in effect for a short period of time and are subject to change | There is no suitable payment method | There is no differentiation made between project sizes | Fiscal incentives are not available | Components that are mismatched with the environment | |
| External stakeholders are not involved in the collaboration because it is done in isolation | Tariff criteria are strict, and there is no distinction between comprehensive financial | | The rate of return on investment is predicted to below | There is no monitoring mechanism in place, and there are no responsible, certified employees | There was no community input throughout the planning stage |
| In minigrid initiatives, there is no clear description of stakeholder duties | | | Initial investment costs are high | There are not enough restrictions in place to assure dependable operation and maintenance | There is not enough technical expertise to hire local workers |
|
