An Improved Maximum Power Point Approach for Temperature Variation in PV System Applications

Table 2

Simulation result performance from the comparison of different MPPT control methods.

Algorithm	P&O	P&O-IMP	INC	INC-IMP	Mod-Locus MPPT	Mod-Locus MPPT-IMP
Tracking speed	Medium	Faster	Medium	Faster	Slow	Faster
Steady-state oscillation	Large	Small	Medium	Small	Medium	Small
Accuracy/efficiency	Low	High	Medium	High	Medium	High
Dynamic efficiency range (%)	97.92–97.99	98.2–98.64	97.94–98	98–98.64	97.93–98	98–98.64
Static efficiency range (%)	99.63–99.87	99.9–99.98	99.45–99.83	99.9–99.7	99.51–99.83	99.89–99.98
Time response (ms)	11.03	8.97	9.77	4.52	19.47	16.9
Power steady-state error (W)	2	Neglected	1	Neglected	0.6	Neglected
Voltage steady-state error (V)	1.5	Neglected	1	Neglected	1	Neglected
Power overshoot	High	Insignificant	High	Insignificant	High	Insignificant