Research Article
Technoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of Hybrid Solar-Wind-Hydrodiesel Renewable Energy Systems Using Two Dispatch Strategies
Table 1
Summary of the technoeconomic feasibility analysis of HES in Iran.
| | Ref., year | Area (peak load) | Optimization method | Optimal solution | Outputs |
| | [17], 2020 | Anzali, Genaveh, Jask (8,258.16 kW) | HOMER strategy | For Anzali:
PV: 7,221 kW
WT: 14 units with 660 kW
Battery: 454 units(167 ah) | NPC: $48.8 M
COE: $0.242/kWh
RF: 100% |
| | [18], 2019 | Damghan (1 kW) | HOMER strategy | PV: 1,430 kWh/yr
WT: 8,353 kWh/yr
DG: 3,009 kWh/yr | COE: $0.338/kWh
RF: 76.5% |
| | [19], 2019 | Bandar Abbas, Shiraz, Tabriz, Tehran, Yazd (370.34 kW) | HOMER strategy | In Tehran:
PV: 997 kW
WT: 7 units with 95 kW
DG: 1,000 kW
ELC: 120 kW
HT: 130 kg
Battery: 9 units(130 kWh) | In Tehran: COE: $0.340/kWh
RF: 24.7% |
| | [20], 2019 | Rayen (79.56 kW) | HOMER strategy | PV: 28.7 kW
WT: 14 units with 1.5 kW
DG: 30 kW
Battery: 18 units (7.55 kWh) | NPC: $268.6 k
COE: $0.197/kWh
RF: 67.3% |
| | [21], 2018 | Kerman (3.3 kW) | HCHSA strategy | PV: 7 units with 0.120 kW
WT: 6 units with 1 kW
Battery: 7 units(1.35 kWh) | Life cycle cost: $4 k |
| | [22], 2018 | Fedeshk, South Khorasan (7.5 kW) | Hybrid strategy | PV: 77 m2 (~48 units with 0.26 kW)
Battery: 29 units(2.1 kWh)
Biodiesel: 9.8 kW | Life cycle cost: $20 k |
|
|
