Research Article

Induced Sputum Substance P in Children with Difficult-to-Treat Bronchial Asthma and Gastroesophageal Reflux: Effect of Esomeprazole Therapy

Table 1

Demographic data, associated comorbidities, FEV1, PEF variability, and induced sputum SP in patients and control group.

Asthmatic ( 𝑛 = 5 9 )Control ( 𝑛 = 5 0 )tP

Age 8 . 2 ± 1 . 8 5 8 . 0 ± 1 . 7 0.4>0.05
BMI 1 8 . 4 ± 1 . 4 2 0 . 6 ± 2 . 3 6.9<0.001*
M/F1.1 : 11.2 : 10.2>0.05
Age at diagnosis 4 . 7 ± 1 . 5
Associated nasal allergy35 (59%)4 (8%)
Atopic dermatitis24 (41%)3 (6%)
Immediate family history of asthma40 (68%)2 (4%)
Smoking parents13 (22.03%)12 (24%)
Long-acting β-agonists59 (100%)
High-dose inhaled corticosteroids59 (100%)
leukotriene modifiers41 (69.49%)
Theophylline35 (59.32%)
Blood eosinophils (%) 5 . 9 ± 2 . 1 2 . 0 2 ± 0 . 9 12.5<0.001*
FEV1 (% of predicted) 5 8 . 4 ± 6 . 9 8 9 9 . 4 ± 5 . 8 30.6<0.001*
PEF variability (%) 4 0 . 2 ± 4 . 9 1 3 . 2 ± 2 . 2 34.3<0.001*
Sputum SP (pg/mL) 1 3 2 0 . 9 ± 2 8 8 . 9 5 8 4 . 0 ± 4 3 . 9 17.6<0.001*

BMI: body mass index; EFV1: forced expiratory volume in the 1st second; PEF variability: peak expiratory flow variability; sputum SP: sputum levels of substance P.
* 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 is significant.