Review Article

Rubella and Congenital Rubella Syndrome in the Philippines: A Systematic Review

Table 1

Published studies of serologic surveys and clinical manifestations of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) in the Philippines.
(a) Serologic surveys ().

AuthorDateSettingMethodsInclusion criteriaConfirmatory testResults

Espiritu-Campos et al. 1973 [12]1973Community setting (urban)ProspectiveMale and female volunteers (0–40 years old)Hemagglutination-Inhibition test32.2% rubella susceptible

Del Mundo 1973 [10]1973Community setting (urban and rural)ProspectiveMale and female volunteers (0–40 years old)Hemagglutination-Inhibition test26% rubella susceptible

Chan et al. 1979 [13]1978Community setting (urban)ProspectiveNonpregnant women (6–45 years old)Hemagglutination-Inhibition test29.6% were rubella susceptible (38.1% for women ≤ 30 years old, 12.5% for >30 years old)

Alday et al. 1982 [14]1982Tertiary hospitals (urban Manila City and rural Las Pinas)ProspectiveNonpregnant women aged (16–45 years old)Hemagglutination-Inhibition test37.3% were rubella susceptible (urban women ≤ 30 years old, 80%; urban women > 30 years old, 20%; and rural women ≤ 30 years old, 64%, rural women > 30 years old, 36%)

Yu et al. 1997 [15]1997Tertiary hospital (Cebu City)ProspectivePregnant women (17–45 years old)Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay (IgG)10.9% were rubella susceptible

(b) Congenital rubella syndrome ().

AuthorMonth/year study was conductedCRS manifestation(s) primarily used to identify casesMethodsIncluded subjectsDiagnostic criteria for CRSResults

Nueva-Espana et al. 1988 [16]January 1981 to June 1986Hearing lossRetrospective review of audiology clinic records and audiologic testChildren 0–16 years old presenting in a tertiary hospital with hearing loss (mean 4.7 years old)Hearing loss plus maternal history of febrile rash and other signs associated with CRS17 cases (out of 496) had maternal history of rubella, and only 3 cases of the 17 were diagnosed with CRS

Santos-Cabaero et al. 1998 [17]January 1990 to December 1994Cardiac, hearing loss, and cataractRetrospective review of patient recordsChildren diagnosed with CRS by physiciansRubella IgM confirmed CRS casesDeafness and cataract were the most predominant symptoms with 26 (62%) and 28 (67%) cases, respectively. Other clinical findings included were psychomotor delay (50%), congenital heart disease (45%), neonatal cholestasis (31%), and glaucoma (4 cases or 10%)

Yu and Rameriz 2003 [18]September to October 2002Hearing lossProspective, cross-sectional study using questionnaireStudents enrolled in a School for the Deaf (mean 14.2 years old)Hearing loss plus maternal history of rubella136 (23.5%) deaf students had maternal history of rubella, among which 15 (2.6%) had visual problems and 8 (1.4%) had congenital heart disease

Tecson and Santiago 2004 [19]January 2000 to August 2003CataractRetrospective review of patient recordsInfants 0–12 mos with atraumatic cataract in a tertiary hospitalCongenital cataract with history of maternal measles and heart disease45 cases (out of 218 cases, or 20.5%) had CRS. 18 cases (out of 218 cases or 8.2%) had suspected CRS
CRS was the most common cause of secondary cataract

Agnas 2005 [20]January 1995 to December 2002Cardiac, cataract, and hearing lossRetrospective review of patient recordsChildren diagnosed with CRS by physiciansRubella IgM confirmed CRS casesCataract was the most common clinical manifestation, followed by patent ductus arteriosus at 24 (49%) and 15 cases (31%), respectively. The other clinical manifestations were hepatomegaly (10%), jaundice (10%), pulmonary artery stenosis (6%), extrauterine growth retardation (4%), glaucoma (2%), and hemolytic anemia (2%)

Tipayno 2008 [21]January 1996 to December 2005Hearing lossRetrospective review of audiologic recordsPatients tested in audiologic clinic of a pediatric specialty tertiary hospital (mean 3.9 years old)Clinically diagnosed CRS (criteria used for diagnosis not mentioned)48 patients out of 2,783 (1.7%) physician-diagnosed CRS
44 patients with CRS (91%) with hearing loss, 80% of which were severe to profound hearing loss