International Journal of Plant Genomics

International Journal of Plant Genomics / 2009 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2009 |Article ID 576742 | 8 pages |

A Nest of LTR Retrotransposons Adjacent the Disease Resistance-Priming Gene NPR1 in Beta vulgaris L. U.S. Hybrid H20

Academic Editor: Cheng-Cang Wu
Received26 Sep 2008
Accepted25 Jan 2009
Published15 Apr 2009


A nest of long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons (RTRs), discovered by LTR_STRUC analysis, is near core genes encoding the NPR1 disease resistance-activating factor and a heat-shock-factor-(HSF-) like protein in sugarbeet hybrid US H20. SCHULTE, a 10 833 bp LTR retrotransposon, with 1372 bp LTRs that are 0.7% divergent, has two ORFs with unexpected introns but encoding a reverse transcriptase with rve and Rvt2 domains similar to Ty1/copia-type retrotransposons and a hypothetical protein. SCHULTE produced significant nucleotide BLAST alignments with repeat DNA elements from all four families of plants represented in the TIGR plant repeat database (PRD); the best nucleotide sequence alignment was to ToRTL1 in Lycopersicon esculentum. A second sugarbeet LTR retrotransposon, SCHMIDT, 11 565 bp in length, has 2561 bp LTRs that share 100% identity with each other and share 98-99% nucleotide sequence identity over 10% of their length with DRVs, a family of highly repetitive, relatively small DNA sequences that are widely dispersed over the sugarbeet genome. SCHMIDT encodes a complete gypsy-like polyprotein in a single ORF. Analysis using LTR_STRUC of an in silico deletion of both of the above two LTR retrotransposons found that SCHULTE and SCHMIDT had inserted within an older LTR retrotransposon, resulting in a nest that is only about 10 Kb upstream of NPR1 in sugarbeet hybrid US H20.

1. Introduction

Retrotransposons are now recognized as movers and shapers of plant genome evolution (see reviews [1, 2]). That retrotransposon elements account for much of the sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) genome was shown by the identification [3] of repetitive DNA sequences in Beta vulgaris similar to long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs), a type of retrotransposon without long terminal repeats (LTRs), and other repetitive DNA sequences that resembled LTR retrotransposons of the Ty1-copia class. A repeated DNA sequence in Beta procumbens was described as “Athila-like” [4] since it was deduced to be part of a long terminal repeat with similarity to the Athila retrotransposon from Arabidopsis.

Prior to the present study, pDRV sequences [5] were known simply as a family of short highly amplified DNA repeats shown by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technique to be widely dispersed over all 18 chromosomes of sugarbeet.

Vulmar1, a mariner-class DNA transposon in Beta vulgaris [6], is 3909 bp, has 32 bp terminal inverted repeats, and encodes, in a single ORF, a transposase with a characteristic “DDE” signature motif. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) were used [6] to identify and to establish an abundance of En/Spm-like transposons in sugarbeet.

Coe1, a DNA transposon within apparent LTRs and other retrotransposon-like features, was discovered on a sugarbeet genomic BAC carrying the NPR1 disease resistance-priming gene [79]. This recent discovery in Beta vulgaris of a unique 16.3 Kb CACTA En/Spm-like transposon named Coe1 [7] was followed by the finding of conserved microsynteny of NPR1 with another core plant gene whose predicted product has high similarity to a DNA-binding HSF protein [8]. About 70 Kb of repetitive DNA separates the HSF gene and NPR1 from another small core gene cluster with a CaMP gene specifying a signal peptide calmodulin-binding protein and a gene encoding a CK1-class protein kinase gene [8], greatly extending and disambiguating the results of the initial sequencing and partial in silico analysis of an NPR1 gene-carrying sugarbeet BAC [9]. In summary, our laboratory has identified, sequenced, and annotated a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) carrying the NPR1 disease resistance priming gene of sugarbeet, Beta vulgaris L. [79].

Class I transposable elements which use reverse transcriptase to transpose via an RNA intermediate are termed retrotransposons. In order to identify possible LTR retrotransposons with LTRs, an intergenic region of repetitive DNA was examined by LTR_STRUC analysis, and this report details the discovery of a nest of retrotransposons about 10 Kb upstream from the NPR1 disease resistance gene in sugarbeet H20. This nest appears to have formed when both a copia-type and a gypsy-type elements inserted within an older LTR retrotransposon. Two full-length sugarbeet LTR retrotransposons are described herein for the first time.

2. Materials and Methods

Identification of a sugarbeet BAC carrying the NPR1 disease resistance control gene was described [9]. Genbank accession DQ851167 represents a partial sequence; the 38.6 Kb segment was the largest contig at that time. Subsequently the entire 130 Kb contiguous fragment was sequenced and annotated (Genbank accession EF101866). Basic methods used for DNA sequence analysis were described [9], and construction of the BAC library was detailed [10]. In the present study, LTR analyses of the NPR1 BAC were performed using LTR_STRUC [11], and LTR Finder [12]. Programs, einverted [13] (, and EMBOSS ( [13] were used to identify inverted repeats, and repeats were also found using NCBI BLAST ( An EST database for sugarbeet ( was employed for both nucleotide and protein BLAST to explore possible functional gene expression [14]. Subsequent analysis of DNA sequence data was performed using Lasergene version 6 (DNASTAR, Madison, Wis, USA). BLAST was used to identify the most similar protein products of LTR retrotransposons in other plant species. Multiple alignments were performed using MegAlign from the DNASTAR suite. Neighbor joining tree, or cluster analysis, was performed using MEGA 4 software (

3. Results and Discussion

A genomic NPR1 disease resistance priming gene-carrying BAC [79] was subjected to LTR_STRUC and LTR FINDER analyses, and two distinct full-length LTR retrotransposons were identified (Figure 1). Depicted are RTR1 and RTR2, two LTR retrotransposons that we also term SCHULTE and SCHMIDT, respectively, as well as a previously described element, Coe1, a DNA transposase gene within apparent LTRs and other retrotransposon-like features [7]. These repetitive DNA elements are intergenic, between two small clusters of core genes: HSF and NPR1 genes separated from CaMP and CK1PK genes encoding a signal peptide calmodulin-binding protein and a “casein kinase 1-class protein kinase,” respectively.

SCHULTE, a 10 833 bp long LTR retrotransposon, has 1372 bp LTRs sharing only 99.3% nucleotide sequence identity. The 0.7% divergence in the LTRs of SCHULTE indicates about ten base substitutions occurred since insertion/transposition. This old, somewhat degraded retrotransposon has two ORFs encoding a Ty1/copia-like integrase/reverse transcriptase and a hypothetical protein (Figure 2). Unexpected introns, uncharacteristic of retrotransposon genes, may be the result of frameshifts and point mutations. SCHULTE has 98% nucleotide sequence identity over ≥9 Kb with a 9.7 Kb DNA fragment (DQ374026) and 1.3 Kb of a 5.3 Kb DNA fragment (DQ374025), each fragment of BAC62 [14]. BAC62 carries a Beta vulgaris L. genomic region adjacent a Beta procumbens translocation carrying a nematode resistance gene [15], thus BAC62 has a SCHULTE-like retrotransposon.

Named to honor an author of the first-described physical map of the afore-mentioned region, SCHULTE is the first full-length retrotransposon sequence from Beta vulgaris to be reported. Since two out of the three B. vulgaris BACs sequenced to date, BAC62 and the NPR1-carrying BAC, carry a SCHULTE-like element, there are likely a very large number of SCHULTE-like LTR retrotransposons in the sugarbeet genome. However, FLC, or the flowering control gene-carrying BAC [16], did not carry a SCHULTE-like element.

SMART analysis showed that the predicted product of the SCHULTE reverse transcriptase gene has rve and Rvt2 protein domains. An alignment by MegAlign of the conserved rve and Rvt2 (Figure 3) domains of similar Ty1-copia-like plant retrotransposon-encoded proteins, identified by BLAST, were analyzed by neighbor joining in MEGA 4 to assess structural relatedness (Figure 4). As shown in Figure 3, the predicted product of the Beta vulgarisSCHULTE reverse transcriptase gene has conserved rve and Rvt2 domains shared among highly similar domains of products of LTR retrotransposons from Medicago truncatula, Vitis vinifera,Oryza sativa japonica, Zea mays, and Glycine max. Except for the Solanum demissum and Vitis vinifera accessions, the Rvt2 domain evidently has a conserved YVDDIIF active site (Figure 3).

Similar LTR retrotransposon gene products in Arabidopsis thaliana, Solanum demissum, and particularly in Phaseolus vulgaris are structurally divergent (Figures 3 and 4). A search of the TIGR plant repeat database revealed that SCHULTE produced nucleotide sequence matches with many different copia-like retrotransposons in all four families: Brassicaceae, Fabaceae, Gramineae, and Solanaceae. The best PRD nucleotide sequence alignment match () was to ToRTL1 in Lycopersicon esculentum.

Probable expression of integrase/reverse transcriptase gene(s) in active SCHULTE-like retrotransposon was shown by BLAST alignment () of the ORF with BI643218, an EST, or expressed sequence tag. Expression of both LTRs was clearly evidenced by alignments, , with ESTs BI698297 and BI698341. Four other ESTs showing some alignment ( to ) also suggest other likely active SCHULTE-like elements.

Another LTR retrotransposon discovered using LTR_STRUC and LTR FINDER, SCHMIDT was so named to honor a pioneering researcher of repeat DNA elements in Beta. SCHMIDT, 11 565 bp retroelement, encodes a complete Ty3-gypsy-class polyprotein in a single ORF without introns. The SCHMIDT reverse transcriptase gene has all of the domains expected of an intact retroelement polyprotein, and the domain order is indicative of Ty3-gypsy-class. SCHMIDT has 2561 bp LTR sequences with 100% identity, consistent with this transposable element still being active.

EMBOSS analysis of the 130 Kb NPR1-carrying sugarbeet BAC revealed the presence of at least 24 inverted repeat (IR) sequences but, for the purposes of this report, let us describe only those inverted sequences associated with LTR retrotransposons SCHULTE and SCHMIDT. The following two pairs of IR 8/21 inverted repeat sequences are associated with SCHULTE (Figure 2). The IR 8/21 inverted repeat sequences share 94% identity (18/19). The following pair of IR 22 inverted sequences, associated with SCHULTE (Figure 2), are 9.5 Kb apart and share 80% identity (shown below), but this pair of IR 22 are also direct repeats with 96% identity. SCHMIDT has a pair of inverted repeat IR 9 sequences upstream of the single reverse transcriptase polyprotein gene and just downstream of polymerase binding site (Figure 2). These IR 9 inverted repeat sequences share 100% identity (23/23) and contain only nucleotides A and T.

Over about one-tenth of their length, each LTR sequence of SCHMIDT shares 97% nucleic acid sequence identity with pDRV, a family of Beta vulgaris short repeated DNA sequences known as rich in DraI (TTTAAA) restriction enzyme recognition sites [5]. For example, eight DraI sites are carried by pDRV1, a 434 bp repeated sequence [5]. Each LTR of SCHMIDT has 10 DraI sites, and the full-length SCHMIDT retrotransposon has twenty-four DraI (TTTAAA) sites. Perhaps pDVR conserved sequences were originally a preferred recognition site for insertion; they seem to have evolved into an integral part of the LTRs of SCHMIDT-like retrotransposons. In any case, the observed high degree of nucleotide sequence identity that the LTRs of SCHMIDT have with pDRVs, highly reiterated sequences rich in nucleotides A and T [5], is very interesting since pDRV repeat sequences, originally visualized by FISH, are dispersed over all 18 sugarbeet chromosomes [5].

Figure 5 shows results of alignment by MegAlign of conserved rve and Rvt1 domains of the protein products from SCHMIDT-like plant retrotransposons identified by BLASTp from various plant species, and Figure 6 shows a neighbor joining analysis tree by MEGA 4 showing structural relatedness. A highly conserved FIDDILI active site in the Rvt1 domain is noted in particular (Figure 5). The predicted SCHMIDT reverse transcriptase polyprotein gene product shows high structural similarity with a conserved region of proteins encoded by similar LTR retrotransposons from Cicer arietinum, Medicago truncatula, Oryza sativa japonica, Sorghum bicolor, and Zea mays AAL59229. Somewhat similar LTR retrotransposons from Glycine max, Primula vulgaris, Vitis vinifera, Solanum demissum, Hordeum vulgare, and Zea mays AAM94350 produce structurally divergent products (Figure 6). Against the TIGR plant repeat database, SCHMIDT produced good, , BLAST nucleotide sequence identity which matches primarily with Prem1- and Xilon1-like gypsy-like RTRs in Zea, Oryza, Sorghum, and Triticum. This finding suggests divergent evolution, where a SCHMIDT-like ancestor originated in monocots, then, upon lateral transfer to sugarbeet, natural selection for structural similarity or convergence in a new genetic background resulted in a high degree of amino acid similarity of the protein product with other gypsy-like retrotransposons in eudicots. The predictions of convergent evolution are structurally similar proteins encoded by phylogenetically distinct retrotransposons. Whether similar sequences arose through convergent or divergent evolution, it is interesting to simply note that SCHMIDT has a significant degree of nucleotide sequence identity primarily with certain gypsy-like retrotransposons found in monocots.

Expression of retroelements similar to SCHMIDT in sugarbeets is suggested by the finding that SCHMIDT gave BLAST alignments with the following ESTs: BI643170, BI643158, BI698360, and BI643246 (, , , and , resp.). These four BLAST hits represent only about 0.02% of the ESTs in the collection.

An older LTR retrotransposon, which had been interrupted by subsequent insertions of SCHULTE and SCHMIDT, became evident (Table 1) when LTR_STRUC analysis was performed on a sequence having an in silico deletion of the LTR retrotransposons SCHULTE and SCHMIDT. Although very degraded and unclassifiable, the older LTR retrotransposon was deduced to be 5395 bp with 780 bp LTRs sharing 99% identity.


Length of RTR10 833 bp11 565 bp5395 bp (before two TE insertions)14 531 bp
Length of LTR1372 bp2561 bp780 bp169 bp
5 LTR-3 LTR Identity (%)99.3%100.0%99.0%96.4%
Number of open reading frames (ORFs)2123
5 beginning and 3 end of flanking region (duplication)ATTTTCGCTCGCTTGCTACT
Class & domains presentCopia-like Integrase and RTase domainsAll domains expected of a complete Gypsy-like retrotransposonPutative RT domainsCoe1 [7], class II within a class I, DNA transposase/Copia-like RTase pseudogene

In conclusion, the relatively small repetitive DNA sequences previously described as “pDRVs” can now be seen as a part of the LTRs of SCHMIDT-like retrotransposons.

Planned research will address possible effects of retrotransposons on the expression of core plant genes including the NPR1 disease resistance-priming gene immediately downstream of the LTR retrotransposon nest.

4. Conclusions

An LTR retrotransposon nest consisting of an older retroelement into which both a gypsy-like SCHMIDT and a copia-like SCHULTE inserted was identified, and properties of the retrotransposons were described. Since LTR retrotransposons are driving forces in plant genome evolution (see reviews [1, 2]), they may have tremendous potential usefulness in genetic manipulation and genome modification to enhance agricultural profitability and sustainability.


  1. J. L. Bennetzen, “Transposable elements, gene creation and genome rearrangement in flowering plants,” Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 621–627, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. M. Casacuberta and N. Santiago, “Plant LTR-retrotransposons and MITEs: control of transposition and impact on the evolution of plant genes and genomes,” Gene, vol. 311, no. 1-2, pp. 1–11, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. T. Schmidt, S. Kubis, and J. S. Heslop-Harrison, “Analysis and chromosomal localization of retrotransposons in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.): LINEs and Ty1-copia-like elements as major components of the genome,” Chromosome Research, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 335–345, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. Dechyeva, F. Gindullis, and T. Schmidt, “Divergence of satellite DNA and interspersion of dispersed repeats in the genome of the wild beet Beta procumbens,” Chromosome Research, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 3–21, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. T. Schmidt, S. Kubis, A. Katsiotis, C. Jung, and J. S. Heslop-Harrison, “Molecular and chromosomal organization of two repetitive DNA sequences with intercalary locations in sugar beet and other Beta species,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 97, no. 5-6, pp. 696–704, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. G. Jacobs, D. Dechyeva, G. Menzel, C. Dombrowski, and T. Schmidt, “Molecular characterization of Vulmar1, a complete mariner transposon of sugar beet and diversity of mariner- and En/Spm-like sequences in the genus Beta,” Genome, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1192–1201, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. D. Kuykendall, J. Shao, and K. Trimmer, “Coe1 in Beta vulgaris L. has a Tnp2-domain DNA transposase gene within putative LTRs and other retroelement-like features,” International Journal of Plant Genomics, vol. 2008, Article ID 360874, 7 pages, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. Kuykendall, J. Shao, and T. Murphy, “Conserved micro-synteny of NPR1 with genes encoding a signal calmodulin-binding protein and a CK1-class protein kinase in Beta vulgaris and two other eudicots,” International Journal of Plant Genomics, vol. 2008, Article ID 391259, 8 pages, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. Kuykendall, T. S. Murphy, J. Shao, and J. M. McGrath, “Nucleotide sequence analyses of a sugarbeet genomic NPR1-class disease resistance gene,” Journal of Sugar Beet Research, vol. 44, pp. 35–49, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. M. McGrath, R. S. Shaw, B. G. de los Reyes, and J. J. Weiland, “Con-struction of a sugarbeet BAC library from a hybrid that combines diverse traits,” Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. E. M. McCarthy and J. F. McDonald, “LTR_STRUC: a novel search and identification program for LTR retrotransposons,” Bioinformatics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 362–367, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  12. Z. Xu and H. Wang, “LTR_FINDER: an efficient tool for the prediction of full-length LTR retrotransposons,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 35, web server issue, pp. 265–268, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. P. Rice, L. Longden, and A. Bleasby, “EMBOSS: the european molecular biology open software suite,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 276–277, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. R. Herwig, B. Schulz, B. Weisshaar et al., “Construction of a ‘unigene’ cDNA clone set by oligonucleotide fingerprinting allows access to 25 000 potential sugar beet genes,” The Plant Journal, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 845–857, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. Schulte, D. Cai, M. Kleine, L. Fan, S. Wang, and C. Jung, “A complete physical map of a wild beet (Beta procumbens) translocation in sugar beet,” Molecular Genetics and Genomics, vol. 275, no. 5, pp. 504–511, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. A. Reeves, Y. He, R. J. Schmitz, R. M. Amasino, L. W. Panella, and C. M. Richards, “Evolutionary conservation of the FLOWERING LOCUS C-mediated vernalization response: evidence from the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris),” Genetics, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 295–307, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2009 David Kuykendall et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

1265 Views | 569 Downloads | 11 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.