International Journal of Polymer Science

International Journal of Polymer Science / 2011 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 109693 | 11 pages |

RAFT Synthesis and Self-Assembly of Free-Base Porphyrin Cored Star Polymers

Academic Editor: Peng He
Received25 Mar 2011
Accepted11 May 2011
Published04 Aug 2011


Reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) synthesis and self-assembly of free-base porphyrin cored star polymers are reported. The polymerization, in the presence of a free-base porphyrin cored chain transfer agent (CTA-FBP), produced porphyrin star polymers with controlled molecular weights and narrow polydispersities for a number of monomers including N, N-dimethylacrylamide (DMA) and styrene (St). Well-defined amphiphilic star block copolymers, P-(PS-PDMA)4 and P-(PDMA-PS)4 (P: porphyrin), were also prepared and used for self-assembly studies. In methanol, a selective solvent for PDMA, spherical micelles were observed for both block copolymers as characterized by TEM. UV-vis studies suggested star-like micelles were formed from P-(PS-PDMA)4, while P-(PDMA-PS)4 aggregated into flower-like micelles. Spectrophotometric titrations indicated that the optical response of these two micelles to external ions was a function of micellar structures. These structure-related properties will be used for micelle studies and functional material development in the future.

1. Introduction

The controlled organization of functional dyes, such as porphyrins, into polymer supramolecular systems has numerous potentially interesting material applications [1]. Porphyrin containing biological systems, where the dye usually works in aggregated structures, offer insights to these possibilities. Both the chemical structure of the dye and its cooperative interaction with other molecules accomplishes various complex functions such as photosynthesis and electron transfer [2].

Several porphyrin polymers have been synthesized [317]. Micellization of these polymers offers the opportunity to organize the nanostructure of dyes in solution. For example, through the self-assembly of a porphyrin-centered amphiphilic star poly(oxazoline) in water/DMF, Jin observed vesicular aggregates [12]. Similar morphology aggregated from monofunctionalized metalloporphyrin polystyrene was also reported by de Loss et al. [14]. Despite these interesting discoveries, the self-assembly behaviour of porphyrin polymers is far from being understood and further research is required. We, therefore, are interested in the synthesis of well-defined free-base porphyrin polymers for self-assembly studies in an attempt at exploring porphyrin chemistry in polymer supramolecular assemblies.

Among various options, living radical polymerization, which can be carried out under mild conditions and is compatible with a wide range of monomers, represents the best choice for this study [1417]. As a matter of fact, several groups have explored similar syntheses using nitroxide mediated polymerization (NMP) [15] and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) [1417]. Zimmerman reported that NMP could be used to prepare porphyrin cored star copolymers. However, the resulting polymers usually had broad polydispersities and multimodal molecular weight distributions [15]. ATRP catalyzed by transition metals has proven to be successful in the synthesis of well-defined porphyrin polymers. However, its use has been limited to metal ion (Zn(II) [16], Pd(II) [17]) coordinated porphyrin initiators and thus the production of metal complexed polymers. Attempts to synthesize polymers containing free-base porphyrin using ATRP was unsuccessful, because Cu(II) (formed by the Cu(I) catalyst) will preferentially insert into the porphyrin core [14, 16]. Although metalloporphyrin polymers possess many interesting properties for applications, such as catalysis, light harvesting, oxygen transportation [317], and so on, other increasingly studied applications, such as sensors [18], prefer free-base porphyrin polymers. In our self-assembly research, free-base porphyrin polymers with optical sensitivity to external ions will be useful in probing aggregate structures.

Reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) [19] provides a distinct advantage in the synthesis of free-base porphyrin polymers. Not only is RAFT a metal-free living radical system, it also has proven over years of intensive research to be compatible with a wide range of monomers, thus offering flexibility in molecular design [2024]. Despite these advantages, the preparation of porphyrin polymers via RAFT has not yet been reported [2533].

Herein, we report the synthesis of free-base porphyrin cored star (co) polymers using RAFT polymerization. The polymerization was initiated by AIBN and mediated by a free-base porphyrin cored RAFT agent (CTA-FBP). Well-defined free-base porphyrin cored star homopolymers and amphiphilic block copolymers were successfully produced. Following the synthetic work, the self-assembly behaviours of the porphyrin cored amphiphilic star block copolymers were explored and the optical properties of the porphyrin stimulated by external ions were used to probe the structures of the aggregates.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

5, 10, 15, 20-tetrakis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-21H, 23H-porphine (THPP), 4-dimethylaminopyridine, and N, N′-Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) were purchased from Aldrich and used as received. S-1-Dodecyl-S′-(α, α′-dimethyl-α′′-acetic acid)trithiocarbonate (CTA1) was synthesized according to a reported procedure [2024]. 2, 2′-Azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN, 99%, Aldrich) was purified by recrystallization from methanol. All monomers were obtained from Aldrich and passed through a short basic alumina column to remove radical inhibitors before use. All solvents and other chemicals were purchased from Aldrich or Alfa Aesar and used as received unless otherwise stated. Spectrophotometric grade methanol was used for micelle preparation and optical behavior studies.

2.2. Characterization

Both 1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 400 UltraShield spectrometer at room temperature (~20°C) with CDCl3 used as solvent, unless otherwise stated. Molecular weight distributions of the polymer products were recorded using gel permeation chromatography (GPC) at ambient temperature using a system equipped with a Polymer Laboratories 5.0 μm-bead-size guard column (50 × 7.5 mm) and two Polymer Laboratories PLgel 5 μm MIXED-C columns (Molecular weight range of 2,000,000–500 g/mol) with a differential refractive index detector (Shodex, RI-101). Unless otherwise stated, tetrahydrofuran containing triethylamine (5%, v/v) and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (0.08 g/L) was used as an eluent at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Toluene was used as a flow rate marker. Poly(styrene) in the range of 7,500,000–580 g/mol was used as the standard for calibration. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was performed at room temperature on a Brookhaven light scattering system (BI-200SM Laser Light Scattering Goniometer) with a BI-APD detector using a He-Ne laser at 633 nm. The detector angle was set at 90°. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained on a JEOL 1200EX Transmission Electron Microscope with an acceleration voltage of 80 kV. For TEM sample preparation, a drop of micellar solution was deposited onto a carbon coated copper grid. The solution was then drained off using a piece of filter paper. All the micelles were negatively stained using uranyl acetate (2%) except Zn2+ coordinated samples. UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded at room temperature on a Jasco V-530 spectrophotometer using a quartz cell of 1 cm path length. The samples were scanned in the range of 800–250 nm, and the scanning speed was set at 4000 nm/min. Spectrophotometric grade methanol was used as background. Fluorescence measurements were recorded at room temperature on a Jobin Yvon-SPEX FluoroMax-3 fluorometer with excitation wavelength set at 410 nm and with 1 nm of increment and 0.1 s of integration time. The slits for both excitation and emission were set at 2 nm.

2.3. Synthesis of CTA-FBP

A mixture of S-1-dodecyl-S′-(α,α′-dimethyl-α′′-aceticacid)trithiocarbonate (CTA1, 605 mg, 1.66 mmol), 5, 10, 15, 20-tetrakis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-21H, 23H-porphine (270 mg, 0.4 mmol) and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP, 21 mg, 0.17 mmol) in dichloromethane (25 mL), and DMF (0.8 mL) was stirred at 10°C under nitrogen atmosphere. N, -dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC, 350 mg, 1.69 mmol) was added in portions. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 hours and then poured into water (20 mL). The product was then extracted into dichloromethane (30 mL × 3). The combined organic phase was dried over Na2SO4 and filtered, with the solvent subsequently removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (eluted with dichloromethane) to afford 335 mg CTA-FBP as a purple solid in 41% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): σ 8.86 (s, 8H, pyrrole H), 8.21 (d, J = 8.33 Hz, 8H, ArH), 7.51 (d, J = 8.58 Hz, 8H, ArH), 3.40 (t, J = 7.35 Hz, 8H, 4CH2S), 2.00 (s, 24H, 8CH3), 1.75 (m, 8H, 4CH2), 1.44 (m, 8H, 4CH2), 1.20–1.34 (m, 64H), 0.81 (t, J = 7.11 Hz, 12H, 4CH3), −2.86 (br s, 2H, 2NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): σ 172.11, 150.95, 139.71, 135.22, 119.87, 119.19, 55.95, 37.24, 31.85, 29.61, 29.58, 29.53, 29.45, 29.29, 29.12, 28.98, 27.89, 25.46, 22.63, 14.09.

2.4. Typical RAFT Polymerization Procedure

All polymerizations using CTA-FBP as chain transfer agent were carried out with AIBN as an initiator in a degassed and sealed tube. A representative example for the polymerization of DMA is described as follows. A stock solution of 10 mM AIBN in toluene was first prepared. An aliquot (100 μL) of the AIBN solution was taken and transferred into a tube containing CTA-FBP (10.3 mg, 0.005 mmol) and monomer (2 mmol). The solution was then sealed with a suba-seal and degassed with three freeze-thaw cycles, before back filling with nitrogen. The reaction mixture was immersed into a preheated oil bath at 65°C for a specified time. The polymer products were precipitated by dropwise addition of the reaction mixture to diethyl ether. The precipitates were filtered off, washed with diethyl ether, and dried in a vacuum. Final products were characterized by 1H NMR and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The procedure for the synthesis of amphiphilic block copolymer was the same except using the presynthesized star homopolymer as macro-CTA.

2.5. Micellization of Porphyrin Star Block Copolymers

Micelles were prepared by the following method: to porphyrin cored star block copolymers of P-(PDMA96-PS33)4 or P-(PS34-PDMA239)4 (1 mg), 10 mL methanol was added. The resulting mixture was gently heated to a clear solution before cooling down to room temperature.

2.6. UV-Vis Spectrophotometric Titration

Before titration, stock solutions of 0.025 M, 0.25 M, and 2.5 M aqueous HCl and 0.25 M Zn(OAc)2 in methanol were prepared. In the titration experiments, 2.5 mL of the porphyrin cored star block copolymer micelle solution in methanol (0.1 mg/mL) was added to a quartz cuvette. The porphyrin concentration was ca. 2 × 10−6 M in the P-(PDMA96-PS33)4 micelle solution and ca. 9 × 10−7 M in the P-(PS34-PDMA239)4 micelle solution. For titration of H+,  μL quantities of aqueous HCl were added to the polymer micelles, and the UV-vis absorbance was recorded until no changes persisted in the spectrum. Titration of Zn2+ was performed by the addition of μL quantities of Zn(OAc)2 solution in methanol to the polymer micelles until the final concentration of Zn2+ was 5 × 10−4 M in the cuvette.

2.7. Fluorescence Titration

2.5 mL of the micelle solution (0.1 mg/mL) was added to a quartz cuvette. The emission spectrum of the micelle solution was then recorded with excitation at 410 nm. Solid NaI was subsequently added to the solution ([NaI] in the solution ranged from 0.2 M to 1.6 M). The emission spectrum of the micelle solution was recorded after each addition of NaI.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of CTA-FBP

Depending on the chain transfer agent (CTA) structure, two approaches can be used for the synthesis of star polymers via RAFT polymerization: (1) propagation attached to the core and (2) propagation away from the core. These approaches are usually called Z-group and R-group approaches, respectively [34, 35]. In general, side reactions such as star-star coupling and star-chain coupling can occur in the synthesis of stars using the R-group approach, while, in theory, the Z-group approach should avoid this problem. A recent study, however, has shown the R-group approach to be the more efficient and controlled of the two [36], whilst star coupling side reactions put down due to chain transfer to polymer have also recently been observed in the Z-group approach [37]. Taking the above into account, we chose the R-group approach for the synthesis of our porphyrin cored star polymer. Therefore, the CTA-FBP as shown in Scheme 1 was synthesized by coupling 5, 10, 15, 20-tetrakis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-21H, 23H-porphine (THPP) with S-1-dodecyl-S′-(α, α′-dimethyl-α′′-acetic acid)trithiocarbonate (CTA1) in the presence of DCC/DMAP.


THPP is a commercially available porphyrin derivative with four symmetrical hydroxyl groups, thus making it a very good candidate for the preparation of the four-arm CTA-FBP. CTA1 is a trithiocarbonate containing a C12 chain and a carboxylic acid group, and is suitable for the RAFT polymerization of a number of monomers [38]. Due to its easy preparation up to large scale and high efficiency in RAFT polymerizations [3944], we used it to couple with THPP. The reaction was conducted in mixed solvents of dichloromethane and DMF. A small amount of DMF was added to aid the dissolution of THPP. The pure CTA-FBP was isolated by column chromatography as a purple solid in moderate yield. The 1H NMR of CTA-FBP is shown in Figure 1 and the integral of all the peaks is in good agreement with the designed molecule.

3.2. RAFT Polymerization

The RAFT polymerization of N,N-dimethylacrylamide (DMA) was performed in bulk using CTA-FBP as chain transfer agent. The polymerization was initiated by AIBN at 65°C using a molar ratio of [CTA-FBP]0/[AIBN]0 = 1 : 0.2. Three experiments, with the ratios of monomer to CTA-FBP varied from 400 : 1 to 800 : 1, were carried out. In each case, high yields (>90%) were achieved within 5 hours. The polymers were characterized by GPC, and the traces are illustrated in Figure 2. Monomodal molecular weight distributions were obtained, suggesting star-star coupling did not have deteriorating effect on the star polymer synthesis. Moreover, the GPC traces shifted to higher molecular weight proportional to the amount of monomer added, thus supporting a living/controlled polymerization process. The molecular weights and molecular weight distributions of the resultant polymers are summarized in Table 1. Although the target molecular weights are higher than those obtained, it is clear from the low polydispersities, as well as the fact that GPC often underestimates the molecular weights of star polymers due to architecture effects (see later), that the system is well controlled.

Polymer productsM : CTA-FBPTime (h)Conv. (%) (Calc.) (GPC)PDI

P-(PDMA)4400 : 159640100231001.10
P-(PDMA)4600 : 159457900425001.13
P-(PDMA)4800 : 159074900526001.13

To test the livingness of the polymerization, a kinetic experiment was carried out at the ratio of [DMA]0/[CTA-FBP]0/[AIBN]0 = 400 : 1 : 0.2. The resultant data is illustrated in Figure 3. As shown, the polymerization followed first order kinetics suggesting a constant concentration of active species throughout the polymerization. Molecular weights and molecular weight distributions of the polymers produced at each time interval were characterized by GPC. These traces clearly show an increment in the molecular weight proportional to the polymerization time and the polydispersity remained below 1.20 throughout the polymerization (Figure 4). As mentioned briefly previously, the comparison between the apparent molecular weight of the polymers and theoretical values in Figure 4 indicates GPC analysis provided underestimated molecular weights, especially at higher monomer conversion. Several possible reasons may account for this phenomenon: (1) polystyrene standards were used for molecular weight calculation, (2) star polymers usually have smaller hydrodynamic volumes than linear polymers of the same molecular weight [36], and (3) it is also possible that some side reactions such as termination occurred at high monomer conversions. Overall, the first order kinetics together with the controlled molecular weight and narrow polydispersity of the resultant polymers suggests the RAFT polymerization of DMA using CTA-FBP to be a controlled route towards the synthesis of these star polymers.

3.3. Synthesis of Porphyrin Cored Block Copolymers

The living characteristics of the polymerization provided an opportunity to synthesize star block copolymers. As shown in Scheme 2, P-(PDMA)4 (or P-(PS)4) can be used as macro-CTA to initiate the RAFT polymerisation of St (or DMA) for the preparation of amphiphilic porphyrin cored star block copolymers. Successful chain extension upon the addition of the second monomers was confirmed by GPC characterization. Two typical GPC traces for P-(PDMA)4 and P-(PDMA-PS)4 are compared in Figure 5. It is clearly demonstrated that the overall molecular weight shifts to a higher value suggesting an efficient chain extension of the macro-CTA. 1H-NMR characterization indicated that the polymers consist of both PS and PDMA segments (see Figure 6). The block ratio can be estimated from the integration of the appropriate peaks due to PS and PDMA. Using a similar approach, P-(PS-PDMA)4 was also prepared. The detailed characterization of these two block copolymers is summarized in Table 2.

Targeted block copolymersMacro-CTA (PDI)MTime (h)Conv. (%)Overall (GPC)PDIBlock ratio

P-(PDMA-PS)4P-(PDMA96)4 (1.10)St68.5412001.1396 : 33 (PDMA : PS)
P-(PS-PDMA)4P-(PS34)4 (1.11)DMA2.599376001.2934 : 239 (PS : PDMA)

a[monomer]0 : [Macro-CTA]0 : [AIBN]0 = 800 : 1 : 0.2; temperature was set at 65°C.
3.4. Self-Assembly of Porphyrin Cored Star Block Copolymers

As the optical properties of free-base porphyrin are very sensitive to its aggregation structure and external proton and metal ions, self-assembly of porphyrin star polymers may lead to micelles with different optical properties. Further, porphyrin can be used as a probe to investigate the supramolecular structures of the micelles. We prepared micelles in methanol using both P-(PDMA96-PS33)4 and P-(PS34-PDMA239)4. Methanol is a selective solvent for PDMA, in which PS aggregates into the cores and PDMA forms the coronas. The resulting micelles were characterized using TEM, with all samples negatively stained. As shown in the images (Figure 7), both polymers aggregated into spheres with diameters in the range of 20 nm to 60 nm. P-(PDMA96-PS33)4 micelles (see Figure 7(a)) are smaller relative to those of P-(PS34-PDMA239)4 (see Figure 7(b)), probably because the molecular weight of the first polymer is lower. The micelle solutions were also characterized using DLS. This characterization indicated that P-(PS34-PDMA239)4 micelles have a diameter of 56 nm in solution, which is consistent with the TEM data (see Figure 7(b)). However, for P-(PDMA96-PS33)4 micelles, DLS revealed an average diameter of 100 nm, which is much larger than that found in the TEM analysis (Figure 7(a)). This conflicting result between DLS and TEM suggests a small number of larger aggregates were formed in solution, as DLS normally emphasizes larger particles. The different self-assembly behavior as detected by DLS may also relate to the structure of the polymers. Based on the architectures of the polymers, we can assume that, as shown in Scheme 3, flower and star-like micelles were formed from P-(PDMA96-PS33)4 and P-(PS34-PDMA239)4, respectively. In the formation of flower-like micelles, it often happens that one molecule may bridge two micelles inducing micelle-micelle aggregates, which may be a reason for the formation of a small amount of large aggregates in the P-(PDMA96-PS33)4 system.


Following TEM and DLS characterization, we investigated the structure-related optical properties of the micelles and confirmed the formation of the two types of micelles depicted in Scheme 3. UV-vis spectroscopy was used for the primary investigation. Unimers of both polymers in THF exhibited a strong absorption at 416 nm which is a characteristic of the Soret band for porphyrin units. Upon micellization in methanol, the Soret band shifted to 420 nm for P-(PS34-PDMA239)4 micelles, suggesting that porphyrins were indeed embedded in the cores of the micelles [45]. In contrast, the Soret band for P-(PDMA96-PS33)4 micelles in methanol remained at 416 nm, suggesting that the micellization of this polymer did not perturb the porphyrin electronic transition. The segregation of porphyrins as a result of flower-like structures is a likely factor in this phenomenon.

The structure-related optical properties of the micelles were further studied using spectrophotometric titration. Depending on the position of porphyrin in the micelles, a structure-related optical response upon adding acid would be expected. As such, star-like and flower-like micelles should be distinguishable. We first performed UV-vis spectrophotometric titrations of P-(PDMA96-PS33)4 and P-(PS34-PDMA239)4 micelles, respectively, against HCl with the spectra illustrated in Figure 8. As we can see from the Figures 8(a) and 8(b), the Soret band and Q-band for the porphyrin in both micelles changed remarkably with the amount of added HCl. For example, the absorption of the Soret band of free-base porphyrin decreased with a concurrent absorbance enhancement at 442 nm due to protonated porphyrin. This result suggests that porphyrin either in the core or the periphery of the aggregates can be accessed by protons. In a quantitative sense, however, differences in the optical response behaviour are observed. These difference can be appreciated by comparing the absorbance changes at 442 nm as a function of the amount of proton added during the titration (see Figure 9). As shown in the figure, a relatively large amount of H+ was required to protonate the porphyrin in P-(PS34-PDMA239)4 micelles, although the porphyrin concentrations in P-(PS34-PDMA239)4 micelles (ca. 9 × 10−7 M) is lower than that in the P-(PDMA96-PS33)4 equivalents (ca. 2 × 10−6 M). This comparison suggests H+ had more difficulty accessing the porphyrin functionality in the P-(PS34-PDMA239)4 star-like micelles relative to the same functionality in the P-(PDMA96-PS33)4 flower-like aggregates. It was possible to entirely prevent protonation of the core porphyrin by transferring the micelles from the original methanol solution to water through a dialysis process (see Figure 10). This observation was probably due to tighter packing of PS chains in water compared to in methanol. Overall, these experiments demonstrated that porphyrin can be use to probe subtle change in micellar structure.

These micelle structure-related optical properties were more obvious when fluorescence titrations of the micelles in methanol using NaI as quencher were performed. As shown in Figure 11(a), the fluorescence intensity of P-(PDMA96-PS33)4 flower-like micelles at 651 nm dropped rapidly with increasing amount of NaI. On the contrary, however, for P-(PS34-PDMA239)4 star-like micelles, under the same conditions, there is very little change in the intensity of the fluorescent signal (see Figure 11(b)), indicating NaI did not effectively quench the photoluminescence of porphyrins embedded inside the cores of the micelles in methanol.

3.5. Metallization of Porphyrin Micelles

It is well-known that porphyrins are capable of binding metal ions and that the properties of metalloporphyrins are strongly related to the type of metal coordinated. We explored this possibility of functionalizing our porphyrin containing polymers using Zn2+ metal ions. Zinc acetate (5 × 10−4 M of Zn2+ in the quartz cell) was introduced into the P-(PDMA96-PS33)4 and P-(PS34-PDMA239)4 micelles (0.1 mg/mL) at room temperature. Distinguishable UV-vis spectral changes were observed within 17 hours for P-(PDMA96-PS33)4 flower-like micelles due to the formation of a zinc porphyrin complex (see Figure 12(a)). As a result of the metal coordination, the micelles could be observed in TEM directly without negative staining (see Figure 13). On the contrary, the UV-vis absorption of P-(PS34-PDMA239)4 star micelles remained the same after three days, suggesting it is difficult to coordinate Zn2+ with porphyrin trapped in the micelle core. Overall, the metal coordination chemistry observed here as a function of micellar structure offers many possibilities worthy of further exploration, such as in sensors and heavy metal assays.

4. Conclusions

We have demonstrated that RAFT, as a metal-free living system compatible with a wide range of monomers, is a powerful and efficient tool for the design and synthesis of free-base porphyrin polymers. The self-assembly of synthesized star block copolymers of P-(PDMA96-PS33)4 and P-(PS34-PDMA239)4 in methanol, a selective solvent for PDMA, led to spherical micelles with the porphyrin positioned either in the core or periphery of the micelles depending on the polymer architecture. The structures were characterized using TEM and DLS. UV-vis and fluorescence studies indicated the micelles possess a structure-related optical behaviour and coordination chemistry, which should prove useful for micelle studies and material exploration in the future.


This work was financially supported by The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK (EPSRC). X. S. Wang thanks the EPSRC for the award of a Roberts Fellowship. GQF and R. McHale thank the EPSRC for PDRA fellowships. F. Guodong Liang and Tanapak Metanawin are acknowledged for TEM experiments.


  1. J. A. A. W. Elemans, R. van Hameren, R. J. M. Nolte, and A. E. Rowan, “Molecular materials by self-assembly of porphyrins, phthalocyanines, and perylenes,” Advanced Materials, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1251–1266, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. T. S. Balaban, “Tailoring porphyrins and chlorins for self-assembly in biomimetic artificial antenna systems,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 612–623, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Y. Kim, M. F. Mayer, and S. C. Zimmerman, “A new route to organic nanotubes from porphyrin dendrimers,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1121–1126, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. J. Twyman and Y. Ge, “Porphyrin cored hyperbranched polymers as heme protein models,” Chemical Communications, no. 15, pp. 1658–1660, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. B. Li, X. Xu, M. Sun et al., “Porphyrin-cored star polymers as efficient nondoped red light-emitting materials,” Macromolecules, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 456–461, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. T. Imaoka, R. Tanaka, S. Arimoto, M. Sakai, M. Fujii, and K. Yamamoto, “Probing stepwise complexation in phenylazomethine dendrimers by a metallo-porphyrin core,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 40, pp. 13896–13905, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. F. Loiseau, S. Campagna, A. Hameurlaine, and W. Dehaen, “Dendrimers made of porphyrin cores and carbazole chromophores as peripheral units. Absorption spectra, luminescence properties, and oxidation behavior,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 32, pp. 11352–11363, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. X. Zheng, I. R. Oviedo, and L. J. Twyman, “Pseudo-generational effects observed for a series of hyperbranched polymers when applied as epoxidation catalysts,” Macromolecules, vol. 41, no. 21, pp. 7776–7779, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Hecht, H. Ihre, and J. M. J. Fréchet, “Porphyrin core star polymers: synthesis, modification, and implication for site isolation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 121, no. 39, pp. 9239–9240, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Hecht, N. Vladimirov, and J. M. J. Fréchet, “Encapsulation of functional moieties within branched star polymers: effect of chain length and solvent on site isolation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 18–25, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. H. Jin, “Controlled location of porphyrin in aqueous micelles self-assembled from porphyrin centered amphiphilic star poly(oxazolines),” Advanced Materials, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 889–892, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. H. Jin, “Self-assembly of porphyrin-centered amphiphilic star block copolymer into polymeric vesicular aggregates,” Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 403–409, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. H. Jin, “Water soluble star block poly(oxazoline) with porphyrin label: a unique emulsion and its shape direction,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 320–327, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  14. F. de Loos, I. C. Reynhout, J. J. L. M. Cornelissen, A. E. Rowan, and R. J. M. Nolte, “Construction of functional porphyrin polystyrene nano-architectures by ATRP,” Chemical Communications, no. 1, pp. 60–62, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. B. Beil and S. C. Zimmerman, “Synthesis of nanosized “cored” star polymers,” Macromolecules, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 778–787, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  16. L. R. H. High, S. J. Holder, and H. V. Penfold, “Synthesis of star polymers of styrene and alkyl (meth)acrylates from a porphyrin initiator core via ATRP,” Macromolecules, vol. 40, no. 20, pp. 7157–7165, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. W. R. Dichtel, K. Y. Baek, J. M. J. Fréchet, I. B. Rietveld, and S. A. Vinogradov, “Amphiphilic diblock star polymer catalysts via atom transfer radical polymerization,” Journal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 17, pp. 4939–4951, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. Vlascici, E. F. Cosma, E. M. Pica et al., “Free base porphyrins as ionophores for heavy metal sensors,” Sensors, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 4995–5004, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. Chiefari, Y. K. Chong, F. Ercole et al., “Living free-radical polymerization by reversible addition—fragmentation chain transfer: the RAFT process,” Macromolecules, vol. 31, no. 16, pp. 5559–5562, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  20. C. Barner-Kowollik, T. P. Davis, J. P. A. Heuts, M. H. Stenzel, P. Vana, and M. Whittaker, “RAFTing down under: tales of missing radicals, fancy architectures, and mysterious holes,” Journal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 365–375, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. G. Moad, E. Rizzardo, and S. H. Thang, “Living radical polymerization by the RAFT process,” Australian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 379–410, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. G. Moad, E. Rizzardo, and S. H. Thang, “Living radical polymerization by the RAFT process—a first update,” Australian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 669–692, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. B. Lowe and C. L. McCormick, “Reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) radical polymerization and the synthesis of water-soluble (co)polymers under homogeneous conditions in organic and aqueous media,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 283–351, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. Boyer, M. H. Stenzel, and T. P. Davis, “Building nanostructures using RAFT polymerization,” Journal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 551–595, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. H. Stenzel, T. P. Davis, and C. Barner-Kowollik, “Poly(vinyl alcohol) star polymers prepared via MADIX/RAFT polymerisation,” Chemical Communications, vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 1546–1547, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  26. V. Darcos, A. Duréault, D. Taton et al., “Synthesis of hybrid dendrimer-star polymers by the RAFT process,” Chemical Communications, vol. 10, no. 18, pp. 2110–2111, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Bernard, A. Favier, L. Zhang et al., “Poly(vinyl ester) star polymers via xanthate-mediated living radical polymerization: from poly(vinyl alcohol) to glycopolymer stars,” Macromolecules, vol. 38, no. 13, pp. 5475–5484, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Bernard, X. Hao, T. P. Davis, C. Barner-Kowollik, and M. H. Stenzel, “Synthesis of various glycopolymer architectures via RAFT polymerization: from block copolymers to stars,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 232–238, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. J. Inglis, S. Sinnwell, T. P. Davis, C. Barner-Kowollik, and M. H. Stenzel, “Reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) and hetero-diels-alder chemistry as a convenient conjugation tool for access to complex macromolecular designs,” Macromolecules, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 4120–4126, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. G. Hart-Smith, H. Chaffey-Millar, and C. Barner-Kowollik, “Living star polymer formation: detailed assessment of poly(acrylate) radical reaction pathways via ESI-MS,” Macromolecules, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 3023–3041, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. G. Johnston-Hall and M. J. Monteiro, “Diffusion controlled termination of linear polystyrene radicals in linear, 4-Arm, and 6-Arm star polymer matrices in dilute, semidilute, and concentrated solution conditions,” Macromolecules, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 727–736, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. R. T. A. Mayadunne, J. Jeffery, G. Moad, and E. Rizzardo, “Living free radical polymerization with reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT polymerization): approaches to star polymers,” Macromolecules, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1505–1513, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Stenzel-Rosenbaum, T. P. Davis, V. Chen, and A. G. Fane, “Star-polymer synthesis via radical reversible addition-fragmentation chain-transfer polymerization,” Journal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 39, no. 16, pp. 2777–2783, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. H. Chaffey-Millar, M. H. Stenzel, T. P. Davis, M. L. Coote, and C. Barner-Kowollik, “Synthesis and degradation behaviour of cyclic poly(ε—caprolactone),” Macromolecules, vol. 39, pp. 6406–6419, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  35. C. Barner-Kowollik, T. P. Davis, and M. H. Stenzel, “Synthesis of star polymers using RAFT polymerization: what is possible?” Australian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 719–727, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. H. Mori, H. Ookuma, and T. Endo, “Poly(N-vinylcarbazole) star polymers and amphiphilic star block copolymers by xanthate-mediated controlled radical polymerization,” Macromolecules, vol. 41, no. 19, pp. 6925–6934, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. D. Boschmann and P. Vana, “Z-RAFT star polymerizations of acrylates: star coupling via intermolecular chain transfer to polymer,” Macromolecules, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 2683–2693, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. T. Lai, D. Filla, and R. Shea, “Functional polymers from novel carboxyl-terminated trithiocarbonates as highly efficient RAFT agents,” Macromolecules, vol. 35, no. 18, pp. 6754–6756, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. Hentschel, K. Bleek, O. Ernsty, J. F. Lutz, and H. G. Börner, “Easy access to bioactive peptide-polymer conjugates via RAFT,” Macromolecules, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1073–1075, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. Z. An, Q. Shi, W. Tang, C. K. Tsung, C. J. Hawker, and G. D. Stucky, “Facile RAFT precipitation polymerization for the microwave-assisted synthesis of well-defined, double hydrophilic block copolymers and nanostructured hydrogels,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 129, no. 46, pp. 14493–14499, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. N. Cambre, D. Roy, S. R. Gondi, and B. S. Sumerlin, “Facile strategy to well-defined water-soluble boronic acid (co)polymers,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 129, no. 34, pp. 10348–10349, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. C. Cheng, G. Sun, E. Khoshdel, and K. L. Wooley, “Well-defined vinyl ketone-based polymers by reversible addition—fragmentation chain transfer polymerization,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 129, no. 33, pp. 10086–10087, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. H. Skaff and T. Emrick, “Reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization from unprotected cadmium selenide nanoparticles,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 43, no. 40, pp. 5383–5386, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. D. Rowe-Konopacki and S. G. Boyes, “Synthesis of surface initiated diblock copolymer brushes from flat silicon substrates utilizing the RAFT polymerization technique,” Macromolecules, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 879–888, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. Z. El-Hachemi, G. Mancini, J. M. Ribó, and A. Sorrenti, “Role of the hydrophobic effect in the transfer of chirality from molecules to complex systems: from chiral surfactants to porphyrin/surfactant aggregates,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 130, no. 45, pp. 15176–15184, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Lin Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

2302 Views | 1081 Downloads | 6 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.