International Journal of Polymer Science

International Journal of Polymer Science / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 543930 |

Othman Al Othman, Shan Faiz, Muhammad Abduh Tuasikal, "Study of Natural and Accelerated Weathering on Mechanical Properties of Antioxidants Modified Low Density Polyethylene Films for Greenhouse", International Journal of Polymer Science, vol. 2014, Article ID 543930, 5 pages, 2014.

Study of Natural and Accelerated Weathering on Mechanical Properties of Antioxidants Modified Low Density Polyethylene Films for Greenhouse

Academic Editor: Geoffrey R. Mitchell
Received16 Mar 2014
Revised15 Jul 2014
Accepted29 Jul 2014
Published20 Aug 2014


Natural and accelerated weatherings were studied to inspect the effect of antioxidants to protect low-density polyethylene (LDPE) films for commercial application as greenhouse covering materials in Saudi Arabia. In this investigation, six different formulations of LDPE film with incorporation of antioxidants were prepared and compared with neat LDPE. The samples were extruded and blown into a film using twin-screw extruder and film blowing machine. The LDPE films were exposed for outdoor weathering in Riyadh during the period of 90 days (mid of June to mid of September) while the accelerated tests were performed by Weather-Ometer. The film having 0.2 wt% Alkanox-240 (AN-0.2) stabilizers showed the highest tensile strength among all samples during natural and 100-hour accelerated weathering (10.9 MPa and 21.8 MPa, resp.). The best elongation at break was witnessed in 0.2% Good-rite antioxidants which were 64% in natural weathering; however, 0.5% Good-rite antioxidants showed 232% in accelerated weathering. The film having 0.5 wt% Good-rite 3114 (GR-0.5) antioxidant could withstand 70 days during natural exposure before the tensile strength values were reduced to 2/3rd of the initial. The present study suggested that the addition of antioxidants Good-rite, Anox, and Alkanox can improve the mechanical strength, film’s life, effectiveness, and stability and they are suitable to be incorporated in LDPE for commercial greenhouse films.

1. Introduction

Greenhouses are known to provide most suitable conditions for production as the crops are being controlled and looked after under suitably controlled environment, that is, by maintaining basic requirements for agriculture, for example, water, fertilizers, seeds, and plant protection chemicals. It is known that greenhouses are covered with transparent material that transmits visible light (400–700 nm), which is the major source of energy for photosynthesis [1]. In the last decades, the increased research towards greenhouses has significantly increased the involvement of plastics for use as a cover material [2].

Low-density poly ethylene (LDPE), being of light weight, transparent, economical, and of robust mechanical strength, has dominated the use of plastic films as greenhouse covering materials. However the greenhouse materials are subjected to numerous environmental factors that lead to chemical and/or physical degradation. It is well depicted in literature that degradation of LDPE is enhanced by UV radiation which transfers its energy to polymer molecules causing them to be energized and subject to oxidation [3].

Researchers have aimed to enhance the stability of LDPE films to make it more effective for greenhouse cover and a number of antioxidants and UV stabilizers have been reported in the literature [46]. Mashael [7] studied the effect of talc (10%) with PP and reported enhanced stress at break, elongation at break, and Young’s modulus. Xue et al. [8] developed aspen fiber-polypropylene composites and studied mechanical properties at 4°C and 40°C. They reported increase in tensile moduli, flexural moduli, and flexural strength as the wood fiber content increased in the composites. The tensile strength decreased as the fiber content increased.

The effects of natural and accelerated weathering on polyethylene-based films containing commercially available pink, yellow, and white organic pigments and a UV absorber of the benzophenone type were investigated by Michálková et al. [9] They concluded that all films experienced increase in viscosity and decrease in tensile strength and elongation at break in natural weathering. Ojeda et al. [10] compared HDPE, LLDPE (linear low-density polyethylene), and isotactic polypropylene (PP) containing antioxidant. They left the samples in natural weathering for a year to observe the structural changes and its impact on the thermal and mechanical properties. They found that HDPE/LLDPE blend and PP degraded faster than HDPE and LLDPE individually and concluded that presence of tertiary carbon atoms was the main cause for this result.

In the present study we used Good-rite 3114 antioxidant, Anox 20, and Alkanox 240 at various concentrations and blends to investigate their behavior on the mechanical properties of LDPE films under natural and accelerated weathering.

2. Materials

Low-density polyethylene (LDPE HP0322N) film blowing grade was supplied by SABIC, Saudi Arabia, with density 0.922 g/cm3 and melt flow index 0.31 g/10 min. It contains no slip and antiblock additives. HP0322N offers outstanding toughness and good optical properties and is suitable to be processed via extrusion and conventional blown film technique.

In this investigation, LDPE films with six different antioxidants were prepared using film blowing and their behavior was compared with neat LDPE. The formulations are given in Table 1.

Type of additivesCodewt%

Good-rite 3114 antioxidantGR-0.20.2
Anox 20AN-0.20.2
Alkanox 240AL-0.20.2

2.1. Preparation of LDPE Films

The LDPE pellets were extruded using twin-screw extruder and then blown into a film using film blowing machine. LDPE pellets with additive blends were first melt-mixed in a twin-screw corotating extruder (Farrel Limited FTX 20, US). The conditions were as follows. Barrel zone temperatures were 180°C, 190°C, 200°C, 210°C, 220°C, and 230°C, extruder speed was set at 14 rpm, and melt pressure was 22 bar.

The materials were fed into the extruder from hopper which runs into the barrel containing the rotating screw. This screw mixes, compresses, and moves the polymer as it changes from solid granules to a viscous melt. The screw diameter is 26 mm with L/D ratio of 35. The extrudate was cooled in a water bath at about 20°C, pelletized, and was left air-dried over 24 hours. In the next step, the material was fed in the film blowing machine.

The film blowing extrusion process began with plastics in pellet form being dropped into the extruder from the hopper. The extruder conveys the plastics forward using a rotating screw. The screw melts the plastic pellets by both friction heating and outside heaters around the barrel. Once the material is molten, it is fed upwards through a circular die to form a hollow plastic tube filled with a desired amount of air.

The plastic tube was continuously brought upward from the tensile force (pull) of nip rollers above the die. The nip rollers are two wheels like steam rollers, which are several feet above the die. The nip rollers are pressured together to form a pinch-off on the bubble, keeping a constant air volume below and flattening the plastic out. In film blowing machine barrel temperatures were 200°C, 180°C, and 150°C, winder speed was 270 rpm, and extruder speed was set at 450 rpm.

2.2. Weathering of LDPE Films
2.2.1. Natural Weathering Test

The LDPE films were exposed to outdoor weathering on the roof of the college of engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, (46° 47′ E, longitude, and 24° 39′ N, latitude). The LDPE films were exposed to natural weathering. The sample sizes were 6 cm × 11 cm and were assembled on a steel cage at a 35° angle facing the south (Figure 1).

This natural weathering was carried out during the period of summer season for 90 days from mid of June to mid of September 2012. The temperature during the day and night ranged between 30 and 45°C and between 25 and 31°C, respectively. The wind speed was around 20 to 30 km/hour and humidity was around 10 to 15% [11].

2.2.2. Accelerated Weathering Test

With outdoor weathering test, accelerated weathering test for 0, 75, and 100 hours was carried out using accelerated weathering apparatus (Atlas Ci5000 Xenon Weather-Ometer, USA). LDPE films with good mechanical behavior (size 7 cm × 15 cm) were clamped in aluminum rack. The conditions in the chamber are tabulated in Table 2.


Black panel temperature75°C
Chamber temperature58°C
Relative humidity5%
Irradiance @ 340 nm0.6 W/m2

3. Characterizations

3.1. Mechanical Properties

The tensile properties were measured through the conventional uniaxial tension test on a Hounsfield H100 KS series tensile testing machine. The dumbbell-shaped specimens, ASTM D638, of all materials were tested at room temperature at crosshead speed of 50 mm/min. The samples were held between two clamps. The upper clamp was connected to a cross-head which moves upwards at a preprogrammed rate to apply tension to the sample. The values were taken from the mean of 3 runs for all cases.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Preweathering Characterization of LDPE Films

Neat LDPE (40 μm) showed the highest elongation at break at 246% as shown in Figure 2(a). The elongations at break of other two films AN-0.2 and AL-0.2 (with same thickness of 40 μm) containing different additives are lower than neat LDPE. For additive filled LDPE, elongation at break was about 215% for the blends AN/AL-0.1/0.1 (film thickness 70 μm). The comparison between neat LDPE and antioxidants incorporated films is represented in Figure 2(b). Neat LDPE film supersedes the rest with a value of 38 MPa. Among the rest AN-0.2 showed tensile strength of 33 MPa and GR-0.2 of 30 MPa which suggests that they are good covering materials. The elastic moduli for various antioxidants are shown in Figure 2(c). AN-0.2 showed the best modulus (426 MPa) followed by GR-0.2 with a value of 301 MPa. All other samples had considerably high values with the exception of GR-0.5.

4.2. Postweathering Characterization of LDPE Films

Table 3 tabulated the tensile strength change during accelerated and natural weathering, respectively. The increase in weathering time in both cases showed reduction in the tensile strength. The least decrease in tensile strength was obtained in AN-0.2 in 90 days natural weathering whose strength was reduced from 33.7 to 10.9 MPa. Similar sample showed the best result for the 100 h accelerated weathering.

SampleTensile strength (MPa)
Accelerated weatheringNatural weathering
0 h75 h100 h0 day90 days

Neat LDPE38.319.615.338.310.3

The elongation at break of postweathered samples is mentioned in Table 4. GR-0.2 showed the maximum elongation and its value was raised to 232% from the original 89.8%. Except for GR-0.2, no other formulation showed considerable rise in this regard.

SampleElongation at break (%)
Accelerated weatheringNatural weathering
0 h75 h100 h0 day90 days

Neat LDPE246.0181.291.6305.76.3

Table 5 illustrates elastic modulus of plastic films under natural and accelerated weathering. This table exhibits fine results with reduction in elastic modulus. GR-0.5 showed the best trend and even after weathering, it shows a rise in the elastic modulus, thus providing better stability to the matrix under harsh conditions. The elastic modulus was increased from 91.8 MPa to 96.3 MPa (natural weathering) and to 138.9 Mpa (accelerated weathering). This intensified the fact that incorporation of 0.5% Good-rite antioxidant provides better stability than other formulations. This result is supported with discussed in the next section.

SampleElastic modulus (MPa)
Accelerated weatheringNatural weathering
0 h75 h100 h0 day90 days

Neat LDPE305.7286.0279.8305.767.9

It can be seen from Figure 3 that the weathering period for the reduction to 2/3rd of the initial value of tensile strength, , of tested films under accelerated condition is approximately 2 days, whereas for natural weathering it took around 17 days. This result means that the accelerated test method is about 9 times faster than natural exposure in Riyadh (June–September).

LDPE films with 0.2% Anox antioxidant take about 20 days to reach 2/3rd of the initial value of tensile strength under natural weathering, while this film without antioxidant requires about 17 days. For LDPE film containing 0.5% Good-rite antioxidant, of the weathered film exposed to natural weather is approximately 70 days. So, the usage life of AN-0.2 and GR-0.5 films is approximately 1.2 and 4.1 times greater than the life of neat LDPE film, respectively.

Good-rite antioxidants were used at different concentrations. At 2.0 wt%, its under natural weathering is 18 days, while this film without antioxidant takes about 17 days. It means that 2.0 wt% of Good-rite antioxidant is about 1.1 times faster than films without antioxidant. The results also show that GR-0.5 is more effective in durability than 0.2 wt% and 2.0 wt%. This weight, that is, 0.5%, enhances stability (4.1 times faster), whereas the other two weights do not. The threshold of Good-rite antioxidant that provides good effectiveness is probably 0.5 wt%.

5. Conclusion

The weathering behavior of films of low-density polyethylene blends, containing three different antioxidants and their blends, was analyzed by subjecting the films to both natural and artificial weathering exposure. The film with Anox (0.2%) showed the maximum tensile strength and elastic modulus among all formulations in preweathering conditions. In postweathering results, AN-0.2 showed better stability than all other films for both natural and outdoor exposure. The reduction of tensile strength to 2/3rd of the initial value was best obtained for GR-0.5 which was 70 days for natural exposure. The elastic modulus after natural and accelerated weathering showed that GR-0.5 provided great stability to the polymer matrix. The results showed that incorporation of Goodrite antioxidant with 0.5% content and Anox with 0.2% enhanced the mechanical properties of LDPE and they are best suited to be used as greenhouse covering.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors acknowledge the College of Engineering Research Center and Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University in Riyadh for the financial support to carry out the research work reported in this paper.


  1. D. Briassoulis, D. Waaijenberg, J. Gratraud, and B. von Eslner, “Mechanical properties of covering materials for greenhouses: part 1, general overview,” Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 81–96, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. N. T. Dintcheva, F. P. La Mantia, D. Acierno et al., “Characterization and reprocessing of greenhouse films,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 141–146, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. D. Briassoulis and E. Schettini, “Analysis and design of low-density polyethylene greenhouse films,” Biosystems Engineering, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 303–314, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. P. A. Dilara and D. Briassoulis, “Degradation and stabilization of low-density polyethylene films used as greenhouse covering materials,” Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 309–321, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Bualek, K. Suchiva, S. Boonariya, and B. Ratana-Arakul, “Aging of low density polyethylene films for agricultural use in Thailand,” Journal of the Science Society of Thailand, vol. 17, pp. 103–122, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  6. A. A. Basfar, K. M. Idriss Ali, and S. M. Mofti, “UV stability and radiation-crosslinking of linear low density polyethylene and low density polyethylene for greenhouse applications,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 229–234, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. AS. Mashael, “Study of the effect of weathering in natural environment on polypropylene and its composites: morphological and mechanical properties,” International Journal of Chemistry, vol. 3, pp. 129–141, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  8. Y. Xue, D. R. Veazie, C. Glinsey, M. F. Horstemeyer, and R. M. Rowell, “Environmental effects on the mechanical and thermomechanical properties of aspen fiber-polypropylene composites,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 152–158, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. Michálková, J. Pospíšil, I. Fortelný et al., “Restabilization of the aging resistance of compatibilized blends of pre-aged low density polyethylene and high-impact polystyrene (LDPE/HIPS),” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 1486–1493, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. T. Ojeda, A. Freitas, K. Birck et al., “Degradability of linear polyolefins under natural weathering,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 703–707, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Othman Al Othman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.