Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Polymer Science
Volume 2018, Article ID 1895683, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1895683
Research Article

Evaluation of Antifingerprint Properties of Plastic Surfaces Used in Automotive Components

1Dipartimento di Chimica, Università di Torino, Via P. Giuria 7 10125, Torino, Italy
2GML, C.R.F. S.C.p.A, Corso Settembrini 40, 10135 Torino, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to M. P. Luda; ti.otinu@adul.aloapairam

Received 17 May 2018; Revised 21 September 2018; Accepted 24 October 2018; Published 28 November 2018

Academic Editor: Stefano Turri

Copyright © 2018 M. P. Luda et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Uhlmann, R. Frenzel, B. Voit et al., “Research agenda surface technology: future demands for research in the field of coatings materials,” Progress in Organic Coatings, vol. 58, no. 2-3, pp. 122–126, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. Stoehr, S. McClure, A. Höflich et al., “Unusual nature of fingerprints and the implications for easy-to-clean coatings,” Langmuir, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 619–625, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Girod, R. Ramotowski, and C. Weyermann, “Composition of fingermark residue: a qualitative and quantitative review,” Forensic Science International, vol. 223, no. 1-3, pp. 10–24, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Cadd, M. Islam, P. Manson, and S. Bleay, “Fingerprint composition and aging: a literature review,” Science and Justice, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 219–238, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Jiang, Z. Guo, and W. Liu, “Biomimetic superoleophobic surfaces: focusing on their fabrication and applications,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1811–1827, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. C. Wilson and D. J. Fiore, “Anti-fingerprint coating applications for automotive touchscreen displays,” in SID Symposium Vehicle Displays & Interfaces, p. 204, Dearborn, MI, USA, October 2011.
  7. A. Siriviriyanun and T. Imae, “Anti-fingerprint properties of non-fluorinated organosiloxane self-assembled monolayer-coated glass surfaces,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 246, pp. 254–259, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Y. L. Wu, S. K. Ngian, Z. Chen, and D. T. T. Xuan, “Quantitative test method for evaluation of anti-fingerprint property of coated surfaces,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 257, no. 7, pp. 2965–2969, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. J. Harvey, R. F. LeBouf, and A. B. Stefaniak, “Formulation and stability of a novel artificial human sweat under conditions of storage and use,” Toxicology In Vitro, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1790–1796, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. L. Staymates, M. E. Staymates, and G. Gillen, “Evaluation of a drop-on-demand micro-dispensing system for development of artificial fingerprints,” Analytical Methods, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 180–186, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Belhadjamor, M. el Mansori, S. Belghith, and S. Mezlini, “Antifingerprint properties of engineering surfaces: a review,” Surface Engineering, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 85–120, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. B. Eral, D. J. C. M. ’t Mannetje, and J. M. Oh, “Contact angle hysteresis: a review of fundamentals and applications,” Colloid and Polymer Science, vol. 291, no. 2, pp. 247–260, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus