International Journal of Polymer Science

International Journal of Polymer Science / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 5258621 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5258621

Thermal Properties of Woven Kenaf/Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Epoxy Hybrid Composite Panels

Academic Editor: Victor H. Perez
Received04 Jul 2019
Revised04 Sep 2019
Accepted28 Sep 2019
Published11 Dec 2019

Abstract

The effects of carbon fibre hybridisation on the thermal properties of woven kenaf-reinforced epoxy composites were studied. Woven kenaf hybrid composites of different weave designs of plain and satin and fabric counts of and were manually prepared by a vacuum infusion technique. A composite made from 100% carbon fibre was served for a comparison purpose. Thermal properties of pure carbon fibre and hybrid composites were determined by using a thermogravimetric analyser (TGA) and differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). It was found that a hybrid composite with higher kenaf fibre content (fabric count ) showed better thermal stability while the highest thermal stability was found in the pure carbon fibre composite. The TG and DTG results showed that the amount of residue decreased in the plain-designed hybrid composite compared to the satin-designed hybrid composite. The DSC data revealed that the presence of woven kenaf increased the decomposition temperature.

1. Introduction

Over the last decade, natural fibre is known as a reinforcement material in a polymer composite. Natural fibre acts as a substitution to synthetic or man-made fibres due to the environmental concerns raised by the latter. A natural fibre-reinforced polymer composite (NFRPC) is a composite material made up of a polymer matrix mixed with natural fibres, such as oil palm [1], jute [2, 3], flax [4], banana fibre [5], kenaf [6, 7], and ramie [8]. These fibres are widely used as reinforcements in the NFRPC due to the fact that they are low in density, good in mechanical properties, and recyclable and have excellent strength per weight materials [9, 10]. Furthermore, natural fibres are favoured over synthetic fibres because they are abundant, renewable, and biodegradable.

Among these fibres, kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) is one of the remarkable natural fibres that can be potentially used in the biobased composite production because of its lower price, good properties, and fast-growing characteristic [1113]. Kenaf bast has good prospective as a reinforcement agent for the natural fibre composite because it has long fibre with good mechanical properties and high strength that can be converted to a high performance composite [14, 15]. Compared to softwood fibres, bast fibre is slightly shorter, ranging from 2.48 to 3.6 mm, and thinner, which makes it has higher ability of bonding and strength development [16, 17]. In addition, the slenderness ratio (fibre length/fibre diameter) of kenaf bast fibres is comparable to those of softwood fibres [18]. Apart from that, bast fibre has low lignin content (14.7%) which is favourable to its quality [16]. For the past several years, kenaf fibres have been proven suitable for fibre-reinforced composite applications such as particleboard, medium density fibreboard (MDF), polymer matrix composite (PMC), pultruded products, nonwoven materials, and woven materials.

However, the performance of the NFRPC is still not comparable with the synthetic polymeric composite. Therefore, hybridisation of natural fibres with synthetic fibre is recommended in order to decrease the moisture absorption and increase the mechanical properties of the composites. Hybridisation is able to overcome the disadvantages of NFRRC such as poor fibre-matrix bonding adhesion [19, 20], higher water absorption and hydrophilic nature [21, 22], inferior wettability [23, 24], and low thermal properties [25]. Thus, hybridisation with synthetic fibre such as carbon fibre, glass fibre, aramic fibre, and Kevlar is believed to be able to improve the mechanical and thermal properties of the composites. Various past investigations using hybridisation of natural and synthetic fibres have been carried out such as kenaf/Kevlar [26], flax/glass fibre [27], jute/carbon fibre [28], sisal/carbon fibre [29], ramie/glass fibre [30], and flax/carbon fibre [31] composites.

Several studies have proved that the thermal properties of NFRPC have been improved by hybridisation with synthetic fibre. A comprehensive review conducted by Ibrahim et al. [32], Madhusudhan and Keerthi Swaroop [33], and Jawaid and Khalil [34] on the hybrid composite has confirmed that thermal properties of natural and synthetic fibre hybrid composites are better than those of the nonhybrid composite due to the higher thermal stability of synthetic fibres. Atiqah et al. [35] also found that the addition of glass fibre in sugar palm fibre-reinforced polyurethane had better thermal properties as revealed by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). Thermal properties of glass/sisal fibre-reinforced polypropylene composites showed improvement with addition of glass fibre [36]. Better thermal stability has been observed in the hybrid composite of sisal/glass polypropylene [37]. In addition, Nayak et al. [38] also noticed that better thermal stability was attained with the addition of bamboo and glass fibres into the polymeric composite.

In this study, investigation was carried out to study the thermal properties of woven kenaf and carbon fibre-reinforced epoxy composite. The effect of carbon fibre addition on the thermal properties of woven kenaf-reinforced epoxy composite was also observed. TGA and DSC were used to evaluate the thermal properties of the hybrid composite. Thermogravimetry was used to observe the thermal stability and degradation, while DSC was used to analyse the transition’s temperature.

2. Materials and Methods

The woven kenaf fabric was prepared manually using a hand loom. Two weaving designs, namely, plain and satin, and two different fabric counts, namely, and (), were used in this study. Carbon fibre in a balanced woven fabric form (SPN.B 200.P-3K) was supplied by Spinteks Tekstil Ins. Specific properties of the carbon fibre are tabulated in Table 1. Epoxy EPIKOTE 240 resin (5300 mmol/kg epoxy group content, density of 1.12 g/cm3) and hardener EPIKURE Curing Agent 309 were purchased from Chemrex Corporation Sdn. Bhd.


PropertiesCarbon fibre

Weave patternPlain
Warp tow size3K
Weft tow size3K
Density1.78 g/m3
Thickness0.20 mm
Tensile strength3800 MPa
Tensile modulus240 GPa
Strain1.6%

The manufacturing of the woven kenaf/carbon fibre hybrid composite was conducted in accordance with the procedures specified in the previous work [39]. The composite samples were prepared in a dimension of by a hand lay-up method followed by the vacuum infusion process (VIP). The composite was prepared through VIP to efficiently pull the epoxy resin into the layer of woven kenaf and carbon fibre by removing the air from the system. In the preparation of composites, the layer of woven kenaf and carbon fibres was placed one by one by the hand lay-up method. Each composite consists of a single ply woven kenaf as the reinforcement at the centre and carbon fibres at the upper and lower layers as shown in Table 2. The epoxy resin is applied after placing each layer of fabrics. In this process, a pressure is applied to the laminated plies through a vacuum bagging film. The resin was then allowed to flow for a few minutes to ensure that the resin penetrated all the layers. Finally, the infused fabric composite was left to cure for 24 h at room temperature. In this study, five types of composites, namely, 100% carbon fibre, and woven kenaf/carbon fibre hybrid composite were tested for their thermal properties within the scope of this work. TGA and DSC analyses were carried out to further investigate the thermal properties of hybrid woven composites after the incorporation with carbon fibre.


Composite codeLaminate sequenceWoven kenaf
Weave designFabric countVolume fraction (%)

CP5CF+PKF+CFPlain17.45
CP6CF+PKF+CFPlain16.33
CS5CF+SKF+CFSatin20.14
CS6CF+SKF+CFSatin18.89

Note: CF: carbon fibre; PKF: Plain kenaf fabric; SKF: Satin kenaf fabric.

TGA was measured using a thermogravimetric analyser (TGA Q500 from TA Instruments) to observe changes in temperature and time in the controlled environment. The samples were heated from 25 to 800°C at a heating rate of 10°C/min in the nitrogen gas flow rate of 50 mL/min. A sample of 8–10 mg of the materials was heated in the sample pan, and the recorded data were displayed as TG (weight loss as a function of temperature) and as DTG (derivative thermogravimetric, weight loss rate as a function of temperature). DSC analysis was carried out to measure changes in heat flows associated with material transitions of the composites using a DSC Q20 from TA Instruments. A sample weight of 3–4 mg in an aluminium crucible with a pin hole was heated at a rate of 10°C/min from 25–350°C under nitrogen air. Three samples from each composition were analysed. Each fibre sample was analysed separately and overlapped for comparison.

3. Results and Discussion

In order to study the effect of hybridisation of carbon fibre on the thermal stability of woven kenaf composites, TGA was conducted. The TG and DTG curves were used to obtain the onset of decomposition temperature (), temperature at the decomposition peak (), weight loss, and the fraction of material that is not volatile at 800°C, denoted as residual. Meanwhile, DSC was used to characterise transitions, for instance, crystallisation and melting, with the function of fabric design and fabric density of woven kenaf in the woven kenaf/carbon fibre hybrid composite.

4. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

The TG and DTG curves of the composite are presented in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. The , , weight loss, and residual at 800°C are tabulated in Table 3. The weight loss percentage are is in Figure 1; there was a reduction in the weight loss as a function of temperature in the hybridisation of carbon fibre with woven kenaf.


Sample type (°C) (°C)Weight loss (wt.%)Residue at 800°C (wt.%)

100% CF341.41381.3444.2554.14
CP5331.27363.5881.9013.09
CP6336.11368.9182.0414.44
CS5331.62364.1371.9720.92
CS6334.88368.0275.8920.79

Notes: CF = carbon fibre composite; CP5 = hybrid plain kenaf composite ( fabric count) with CF; CP6 = hybrid plain kenaf composite ( fabric count) with CF; CS5 = hybrid satin kenaf composite ( fabric count) with CF; CS5 = hybrid satin kenaf composite ( fabric count) with CF.

The TG result of 100% carbon fibre in Figure 1 revealed a single decomposition step with the highest of 341°C, compared to the woven kenaf/carbon fibre hybrid composite. From the starting temperature of 25°C to the temperature of 100°C, the composite lost only 0.53% of the initial weight that resembles the evaporation of solvent materials. Mass loss of 37.38% over the temperature range of 250-500°C could be observed in 100% CF composite. The mass loss at this temperature range could be attributed to the decomposition of an organic-based sizing compound on the carbon fibre [40, 41]. Then, the composite continued with a linear weight loss up to 800°C, where the final residue was 54.14%, which indicated the total weight loss of only 44.25% from the initial weight. Also, only one main peak on the DTG curve as illustrated (Figure 2) was observed corresponding to an apparent step of decomposition. The thermal properties of the carbon fibre composite and their hybrid were studied by Dhakal et al. [42]. The authors found that the carbon fibre composite has higher of 365°C compared to those of the composites hybridise with flax fibre.

It was observed that the thermal degradation for all hybrid composites shows three-step degradation processes, with a small noticeable step observed at the temperature below 100°C. From the TG and DTG curves, one can see that the small step of weight loss at the temperature range of 30–100°C was only found in the hybrid composites, which is attributed to the release of moisture content, due to the water evaporation of water present in kenaf fibres [42, 43]. On the contrary, the pure carbon fibre composites did not show weight loss at 100°C temperature, due to the absence of water molecule.

The second step corresponded to the weight loss of kenaf fibre, where a major decomposition occurred at a temperature range of 270–380°C. This was due to the decomposition of hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin of natural fibres [44] and depolymerisation of the matrix [45]. The decomposition of natural fibres starts with hemicellulose, followed by cellulose, lignin, and ash. The hemicellulose starts to decompose early, normally at temperature of 220°C due to its chemical structure that consists of a random amorphous structure with little strength, thus easily hydrolysed. In contrast, the decomposition of cellulose takes place at a higher temperature (315–390°C) than those of the hemicellulose because of its long polymer of glucose units and high crystalline nature, making cellulose relatively thermally stable [46]. The third degradation step is around 370–420°C, which related to the degradation of carbon fibre chain rupture, where styrene was the primary product [47].

From Table 3, the of 100% carbon fibre was 341.41°C, and the of hybrid composites were around 331.27–336.11°C. The addition of woven kenaf into carbon fibre composites decreased the of neat carbon fibre because some portion of the synthetic fibre is replaced with less thermally stable material, i.e., kenaf fibres. Based on the TG curves, the composite with woven kenaf with plain fabrics including CP5 and CP6 shows a move in the decomposition process towards a higher temperature level at 364–368°C. The substantial increase in thermal stability upon the weave design in the composite structure also can be related to the fibre and fibre interaction. It appears that another factor which contributes to the higher thermal stability of polymeric composites is enhanced interaction between fibre and the matrix, resulting in additional intermolecular bonding between them [48]. This can be supported by the high tensile and impact properties of the plain composite in the previous study [39].

It is clear that, the of the hybrid composite increased from 363.58 to 368.91°C and 364.13 to 368.02°C by increasing the fabric density of woven kenaf from to for both plain and satin fabrics. The increase in could be associated with the amount of cellulosic content in kenaf fibre with higher fabric density. This is in agreement with a study conducted by Atiqah et al. [35], who found that higher sugar palm fibre loading resulted in more thermally stable sugar palm/glass fibre polyurethane composite. As depicted in Figure 2, the DTG curve for fabric density (CP6 and CS6) shifted to higher temperatures. This phenomenon might be due to the higher amount of hydrogen bonds between cellulose chains in the composites that can lead to more ordered and packed cellulose regions. This may further increase the thermal decomposition temperature of cellulose [49]. In addition, Nair et al. [48] mentioned that a highly ordered region could reduce the mobility of cellulose chains and eventually strain and weaken the existing hydrogen bonding thus increasing the thermal stability of the composite.

Based on the results shown in Table 3, the highest final residue at 800°C was observed in the 100% carbon fibre composite, which was 54.14%. Meanwhile, the lowest residue was found in woven kenaf with plain fabric (CP5 and CP6). This could be attributed to the resistance of carbon fibre to high temperature and better fibre-matrix compatibility. The satin fabric hybrid composites (CS5 and CS6) showed residual of nearly 21%. Conversely, the residual left at 800°C for both plain fabric hybrid composites decreased significantly to approximately 13% and 14%. This was probably due to the resin-rich area found in the satin composite [39]. At the first stage, the hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin in kenaf fibres were decomposed and formed charred layers that could prevent further degradation on the polymer matrix. According to Asim et al. [45], at a higher temperature (300°C and above), epoxy starts to decompose. As the satin fabric contains more epoxy that is not infused into the interyarn due to the fabric structure [39], it resulted in more residual and forms a thicker layer between the heat source and polymeric material. This thicker layer residual results in the higher temperatures required for the composite decomposition and caused higher residual content [50].

5. Differential Scanning Calorimetric (DSC)

The DSC analysis was carried out to further investigate the thermal behaviour of the pure carbon fibre and hybrid composites. Figure 3 shows the DSC curves of hybrid composites CP5 (composite with plain fabric and fabric count), CP6 (composite with plain fabric and fabric count), CS5 (composite with satin fabric and fabric count), CS6 (composite with satin fabric and fabric count), and 100% CF (composite with pure carbon fibre). The curves for all the composites show an exothermic and endothermic behaviour, indicating the melting and crystallisation of the composite samples. The thermal parameters of melting and crystallisation of the samples are summarised in Table 4.


Sample type (°C) (°C)

100% CF178.2294.4
CP5145.0257.4
CP6140.6211.4
CS5145.9231.3
CS6144.7230.7

From Figure 3, the addition of woven kenaf into carbon fibre hybrid composites affected the thermal behaviour significantly. It is clearly shown that the heat released from the 100% CF composite was higher than that of the hybrid composite. From the curves, the curing temperature () and melting temperature () values of the composites were strongly influenced by the incorporation of woven kenaf in the matrix polymer. The of plain-designed hybrid composites and satin-designed hybrid composites decreased compared to the of the pure carbon fibre composite. This could be probably due to the incorporation of woven kenaf that reduces the total energy needed to be absorbed to break up the polymer chains of composites.

The first drop of curvature was at around 58°C (point A), displaying the glass transition temperature (), indicated as the starting point for the energy required to change the molecular structure inside the composites from a low energy state, i.e., solid or glassy state, to a higher energy state, i.e., rubbery state. The thermal decomposition continued until a temperature of 122°C (point B), and it is observed that there were multiple peaks for hybrid composite samples, but in the carbon fibre composite, only two small peaks appeared. At this point, chains in the polymer might start to change the molecular structure to decompose from amorphous solid to crystalline solid by partially arranging their structures. As can be observed, the peak shifts to higher temperatures with the increase in the woven kenaf content (fabric count of ). This finding was in line with a study conducted by Mofokeng et al. [51], who determined that, as the fibre content of sisal fibre in poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and polypropylene (PP) composites increased, the crystallisation peak intensity decreased and it shifted to higher temperatures. They concluded that the sisal fibres act as the nucleation sites for the crystallisation of polymer; thus, it restricts the mobility of the polymer chains. These sites may be particulates or fibres dispersed in the matrix; thus, small crystals were formed around them [52]. In addition, kenaf fibres mainly consist of cellulose that represents the crystalline part of the materials, which could also result in increased crystallinity of the composites.

Subsequently, there were very strong endothermic peaks for all the hybrid composite known as . At the temperature range of 211–261°C (point C), there were endothermic peaks for hybrid composite samples, identified as thermal degradation due to the hemicellulose and cellulose degraded in kenaf fibres. It was reported that chemical constituents in natural fibres start degrading at a temperature around 200°C [53, 54]. This peak is attributed to the dehydration, by splitting of hydroxyl groups of the cellulose molecule, resulting in the formation of water molecules and depolymerisation of cellulose, leading to the formation of flammable volatile products. The peak intensity of increased in the presence of higher kenaf fibre content (woven fabric of ) probably due to the fact that more heat is required to be absorbed to break up the polymer chains in composites. Additionally, the hybrid composite with woven fabric of showed better bonding properties between woven kenaf and carbon fibre with the matrix, thus crystallising at higher temperatures. For 100% carbon fibre, it can also be observed that the heat required to generate these peaks was higher than the hybrid samples (293°C) indicating that this melting temperature of carbon fibre contributed to the crystalline structure in carbon fibre through evaporation of the solvent during heating [55]. It is notable that the hybrid samples showed a higher exothermic peak (point D) than the pure carbon fibre composite samples, indicating that the degradation of lignin and cellulosic matters from the kenaf fibres as lignin starts to decompose at the temperature of 340°C and above [54, 56]. Thus, it can be stated that the hybridisation of woven kenaf with carbon fibre in the composite structure becomes more thermally stable. The decomposition in 100% CF is probably due to the decomposition mechanism of epoxy resins through cyclisation of aliphatic chain ends [57].

6. Conclusions

The effects of hybridisation of carbon and kenaf fibre on the thermal stability of woven kenaf/carbon fibre-reinforced epoxy hybrid composite were examined. Although TG and DTG curves revealed that the thermal stability of the pure carbon fibre composite was higher than that of the hybrid composite, the thermal stability of the hybrid composites improved as higher content of kenaf fibre was used, i.e., fabric density of . It was found that using the plain weave design of woven kenaf has improved the overall thermal stability of the samples compared to that of the satin design. The addition of carbon fibre in woven kenaf hybrid composites has improved the TGA properties of hybrid composites. The DSC results show that the plain weave design and fabric count of owned better interfacial adhesion between fibre and matrix. Thus, the hybrid composites are suitable for various applications that might be subjected to elevated temperatures. The DSC results discovered that the hybrid composite is more stable as shown by the high decomposition temperature.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude and sincere appreciation to the Laboratory of Biocomposite Technology, INTROP, Universiti Putra Malaysia. The authors’ appreciation and gratitude also extend to the Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi and to the Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) for their assistance. This research was funded by the Aerospace Malaysia Innovation Centre (AMIC) and the Higher Education Center of Excellence (HICoE), Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (Grant numbers 9300426 and 6369109, respectively).

References

  1. Z. Ibrahim, M. Ahmad, A. A. Aziz et al., “Dimensional stability properties of medium density fibreboard (MDF) from treated oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) empty fruit bunches (EFB) fibres,” Open Journal of Composite Materials, vol. 06, no. 4, pp. 91–99, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Fatima and A. R. Mohanty, “Acoustical and fire-retardant properties of jute composite materials,” Applied Acoustics, vol. 72, no. 2-3, pp. 108–114, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. L. Liu, J. Yu, L. Cheng, and X. Yang, “Biodegradability of poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) composite reinforced with jute fibre,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 90–94, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Goutianos, T. Peijs, B. Nystrom, and M. Skrifvars, “Development of flax fibre based textile reinforcements for composite applications,” Applied Composite Materials, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 199–215, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. H. Zin, K. Abdan, and M. N. Norizan, “The effect of different fiber loading on flexural and thermal properties of banana/pineapple leaf (PALF)/glass hybrid composite,” in Structural Health Monitoring of Biocomposites, Fibre-Reinforced Composites and Hybrid Composites, M. Jawaid, M. Thariq, and S. Naheed, Eds., pp. 1–17, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, England, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  6. H. Anuar and A. Zuraida, “Improvement in mechanical properties of reinforced thermoplastic elastomer composite with kenaf bast fibre,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 462–465, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. H. A. Aisyah, M. T. Paridah, M. H. Sahri, U. M. K. Anwar, and A. A. Astimar, “Properties of medium density fibreboard (MDF) from kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) core as function of refining conditions,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 592–596, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. Lodha and A. N. Netravali, “Characterization of interfacial and mechanical properties of “green” composites with soy protein isolate and ramie fiber,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 37, no. 17, pp. 3657–3665, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. M. Haque, M. Hasan, M. S. Islam, and M. E. Ali, “Physico-mechanical properties of chemically treated palm and coir fiber reinforced polypropylene composites,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 100, no. 20, pp. 4903–4906, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. Ashori, “Wood-plastic composites as promising green-composites for automotive industries!,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 4661–4667, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. T. Paridah, A. B. Basher, S. SaifulAzry, and Z. Ahmed, “Retting process of some bast plant fibres and its effect on fibre quality: a review,” BioResources, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 5260–5281, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  12. A. A. Mossello, J. Harun, P. M. Tahir et al., “A review of literatures related of using kenaf for pulp production (beating, fractionation, and recycled fiber),” Modern Applied Science, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 21–29, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  13. I. S. Aji, S. M. Sapuan, E. S. Zainudin, and K. Abdan, “Kenaf fibres as reinforcement for polymeric composites: a review,” International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 239–248, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  14. A. H. Juliana, H. A. Aisyah, M. T. Paridah, C. C. Y. Adrian, and S. H. Lee, “Kenaf fiber: structure and properties,” in Kenaf Fibers and Composites, S. M. Sapuan, J. R. Ishak, J. Sahari, and M. L. Sanyang, Eds., CRC Press, Boca Rotan, USA, 1st edition, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  15. T. Nishino, K. Hirao, M. Kotera, K. Nakamae, and H. Inagaki, “Kenaf reinforced biodegradable composite,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 1281–1286, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H. P. S. A. Khalil, A. F. I. Yusra, A. H. Bhat, and M. Jawaid, “Cell wall ultrastructure, anatomy, lignin distribution, and chemical composition of Malaysian cultivated kenaf fiber,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 113–121, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Ashori, J. Harun, W. D. Raverty, and M. N. M. Yusoff, “Chemical and morphological characteristics of Malaysian cultivated kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) fiber,” Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 131–134, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. Ververis, K. Georghiou, N. Christodoulakis, P. Santas, and R. Santas, “Fiber dimensions, lignin and cellulose content of various plant materials and their suitability for paper production,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 245–254, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Y. A. El-Shekeil, S. M. Sapuan, M. Jawaid, and O. M. Al-Shuja’a, “Influence of fiber content on mechanical, morphological and thermal properties of kenaf fibers reinforced poly(vinyl chloride)/thermoplastic polyurethane poly-blend composites,” Materials & Design, vol. 58, pp. 130–135, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. B. Bax and J. Müssig, “Impact and tensile properties of PLA/Cordenka and PLA/flax composites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 68, no. 7-8, pp. 1601–1607, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. D. Petroudy, “Physical and mechanical properties of natural fibers,” in Advanced High Strength Natural Fibre Composites in Construction, F. Mizi and F. Feng, Eds., pp. 59–83, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, England, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  22. L. Y. Mwaikambo and M. P. Ansell, “Chemical modification of hemp, sisal, jute, and kapok fibers by alkalization,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 84, no. 12, pp. 2222–2234, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. T. Paridah and A. H. Juliana, “Adhesion characteristics of kenaf fibers,” in Kenaf Fibers and Composites, S. M. Sapuan, J. R. Ishak, J. Sahari, and M. L. Sanyang, Eds., pp. 37–60, CRC Press, Boca Rotan, USA, 1st edition, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  24. H. A. Aisyah, M. T. Paridah, M. H. Sahri, A. A. Astimar, and U. M. K. Anwar, “Influence of thermo mechanical pulping production parameters on properties of medium density fibreboard made from kenaf bast,” Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 575–580, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. R. Araujo, W. R. Waldman, and M. A. De Paoli, “Thermal properties of high density polyethylene composites with natural fibres: coupling agent effect,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 93, no. 10, pp. 1770–1775, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. R. Yahaya, S. M. Sapuan, M. Jawaid, Z. Leman, and E. S. Zainudin, “Mechanical performance of woven kenaf-Kevlar hybrid composites,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, vol. 33, no. 24, pp. 2242–2254, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y. Zhang, Y. Li, H. Ma, and T. Yu, “Tensile and interfacial properties of unidirectional flax/glass fiber reinforced hybrid composites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 88, pp. 172–177, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. P. Niedermann, G. Szebényi, and A. Toldy, “Characterization of high glass transition temperature sugar-based epoxy resin composites with jute and carbon fibre reinforcement,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 117, pp. 62–68, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. P. N. Khanam, H. P. S. A. Khalil, M. Jawaid, G. R. Reddy, C. S. Narayana, and S. V. Naidu, “Sisal/carbon fibre reinforced hybrid composites: tensile, flexural and chemical resistance properties,” Journal of Polymers and the Environment, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 727–733, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. D. Romanzini, A. Lavoratti, H. L. Ornaghi Jr., S. C. Amico, and A. J. Zattera, “Influence of fiber content on the mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of glass/ramie polymer composites,” Materials & Design, vol. 47, pp. 9–15, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. Assarar, W. Zouari, H. Sabhi, R. Ayad, and J. M. Berthelot, “Evaluation of the damping of hybrid carbon-flax reinforced composites,” Composite Structures, vol. 132, pp. 148–154, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. I. D. Ibrahim, E. R. Sadiku, T. Jamiru et al., “Hybrid natural/synthetic fibre,” in Biocomposites: Properties, Performance and Applications, A. Shahzad, Ed., p. 27, Nova Science Publishers, USA, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  33. T. Madhusudhan and G. Keerthi Swaroop, “A review on mechanical properties of natural fiber reinforced hybrid composites,” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 2247–2251, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  34. M. Jawaid and H. P. S. A. Khalil, “Cellulosic/synthetic fibre reinforced polymer hybrid composites: a review,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. Atiqah, M. Jawaid, S. M. Sapuan, M. R. Ishak, and O. Y. Alothman, “Thermal properties of sugar palm/glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane hybrid composites,” Composite Structures, vol. 202, pp. 954–958, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. Jarukumjorn and N. Suppakarn, “Effect of glass fiber hybridization on properties of sisal fiber-polypropylene composites,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 623–627, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. K. Nayak and S. Mohanty, “Sisal glass fiber reinforced PP hybrid composites: effect of MAPP on the dynamic mechanical and thermal properties,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1551–1568, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. K. Nayak, S. Mohanty, and S. K. Samal, “Influence of short bamboo/glass fiber on the thermal, dynamic mechanical and rheological properties of polypropylene hybrid composites,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 523, no. 1-2, pp. 32–38, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. H. A. Aisyah, M. T. Paridah, A. Khalina et al., “Effects of fabric counts and weave designs on the properties of laminated woven kenaf/carbon fibre reinforced epoxy hybrid composites,” Polymers, vol. 10, no. 12, article 1320, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. P. Tranchard, S. Duquesne, F. Samyn, B. Estebe, and S. Bourbigot, “Kinetic analysis of the thermal decomposition of a carbon fibre-reinforced epoxy resin laminate,” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, vol. 126, pp. 14–21, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. S. Feih and A. P. Mouritz, “Tensile properties of carbon fibres and carbon fibre-polymer composites in fire,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 765–772, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. H. N. Dhakal, Z. Y. Zhang, R. Guthrie, J. MacMullen, and N. Bennett, “Development of flax/carbon fibre hybrid composites for enhanced properties,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Sanyang, S. Sapuan, M. Jawaid, M. Ishak, and J. Sahari, “Effect of plasticizer type and concentration on tensile, thermal and barrier properties of biodegradable films based on sugar palm (Arenga pinnata) starch,” Polymers, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1106–1124, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. M. S. Kumar, D. Duraibabu, and K. Subramanian, “Studies on mechanical, thermal and dynamic mechanical properties of untreated (raw) and treated coconut sheath fiber reinforced epoxy composites,” Materials & Design, vol. 59, pp. 63–69, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. Asim, M. Jawaid, M. Nasir, and N. Saba, “Effect of fiber loadings and treatment on dynamic mechanical, thermal and flammability properties of pineapple leaf fiber and kenaf phenolic composites,” Journal of Renewable Materials, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 383–393, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. H. Yang, R. Yan, H. Chen, C. Zheng, D. H. Lee, and D. T. Liang, “In-depth investigation of biomass pyrolysis based on three major components: hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 388–393, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. L. B. Manfredi, E. S. Rodríguez, M. Wladyka-Przybylak, and A. Vázquez, “Thermal degradation and fire resistance of unsaturated polyester, modified acrylic resins and their composites with natural fibres,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 255–261, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. K. C. M. Nair, S. Thomas, and G. Groeninckx, “Thermal and dynamic mechanical analysis of polystyrene composites reinforced with short sisal fibres,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 61, no. 16, pp. 2519–2529, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. M. Poletto, V. Pistor, and A. J. Zattera, “Structural characteristics and thermal properties of native cellulose,” in Cellulose-Fundamental Aspects, T. G. M. Ven, Ed., pp. 45–68, InTech Open, UK, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. N. Norizan, K. Abdan, M. S. Salit et al., “Physical, mechanical and thermal properties of sugar palm yarn fibre loading on reinforced unsaturated polyester Composite,” Journal of Physical Science, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 115–136, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. P. Mofokeng, A. S. Luyt, T. Tábi, and J. Kovács, “Comparison of injection moulded, natural fibre-reinforced composites with PP and PLA as matrices,” Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 927–948, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. T. S. Gomes, L. L. Visconte, and E. B. Pacheco, “Mechanical and thermal behavior of composites based on high density polyethylene and banana tree fiber,” Polímeros, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 206–211, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  53. E. Sinha and S. K. Rout, “Influence of fibre-surface treatment on structural, thermal and mechanical properties of jute fibre and its composite,” Bulletin of Materials Science, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 65–76, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. M. Kabir, M. Islam, and H. Wang, “Mechanical and thermal properties of jute fibre reinforced composites,” Journal of Multifunctional Composites, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 71–76, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. G. Hong, Y. C. Lin, and C. H. Lin, “Crystallization and degradation behaviors of treated polyhydroxybutyrates,” Reactive and Functional Polymers, vol. 68, no. 11, pp. 1516–1523, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. R. K. Sharma, J. B. Wooten, V. L. Baliga, X. Lin, W. Geoffrey Chan, and M. R. Hajaligol, “Characterization of chars from pyrolysis of lignin,” Fuel, vol. 83, no. 11-12, pp. 1469–1482, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. S. V. Levchik and E. D. Weil, “Thermal decomposition, combustion and flame‐retardancy of epoxy resins—a review of the recent literature,” Polymer International, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 1901–1929, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 H. A. Aisyah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

297 Views | 296 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.