Review Article
Research Progress on Durability of Cellulose Fiber-Reinforced Cement-Based Composites
Table 5
Use of supplementary cementitious materials of CFCCs.
| Cementitious materials | Weight of cement (%) | CFs | Extent of improvement | Ref. |
| MK | 50 MK | Sisal | Significant reduction of the calcium hydroxide formation; no signs of fiber degradation | [38, 64, 83] | MK and SF | 15 SF or 15 MK | Sisal | Improved the mechanical properties and the durability | [81] | SL, SF, and MK | 70 SL/10 MK or 70 SL/10 SF | Kraft pulp | Effective in preventing degradation | [82] | RHA, MK, and NC | 30 RHA, MK, and NC | Sisal | The durability of composites was improved owing to the mitigation of fiber degradation | [53] | SF and SL | 10 SF and 40% SL | Cannabinus | Slowing down the strength loss and embrittlement | [84] | SF, SL, FA, MK | 10% SF/70% SL, 10% MK/70% SL, and 10% MK/10% SF/70% FA | Softwood kraft pulp | Prevented composite degradation due to a reduction in the calcium hydroxide content and the stabilization of the alkali content | [85] | SL, GY, LI | 88 SL/10 GY/2 LI (0 cement) | Coir and sisal | Do not appear to have a significant effect on the prevention of ductility dropping | [86] | SF, NRL | 13.55 SF/14.55 CF/1.40 NRL | Cellulose | Improved material durability | [20] |
|
|