Research Article
An Efficient Evolutionary Task Scheduling/Binding Framework for Reconfigurable Systems
Table 2
Schedulers comparison for total execution time (no learning).
| Benchmark | Total execution time | Percentage | | | | | |
| S1 | 520 | 740 | 540 | −30 | −4 | S2 | 1160 | 1750 | 1220 | −34 | −5 | S3 | 300 | 420 | 340 | −29 | −12 | S4 | 775 | 1470 | 820 | −47 | −5 | S6 | 160 | 160 | 160 | 0 | 0 | S7 | 420 | 860 | 500 | −51 | −16 | S8 | 380 | 500 | 460 | −24 | −17 | S9 | 995 | 1990 | 1000 | −50 | −1 | S10 | 1095 | 3000 | 1140 | −64 | −4 | S11 | 920 | 1430 | 1000 | −36 | −8 | DFG2 | 680 | 800 | 584 | −15 | 16 | DFG6 | 325 | 340 | 359 | −4 | −9 | DFG7 | 405 | 600 | 481 | −33 | −16 | DFG12 | 745 | 910 | 761 | −18 | −2 | DFG14 | 140 | 160 | 142 | −13 | −1 | DFG16 | 295 | 403 | 383 | −27 | −23 | DFG19 | 455 | 540 | 460 | −16 | −1 |
| Average | 575 | 945 | 609 | −29 | −6 |
|
|